REVIEW: The Moonwalkers: A Journey with Tom Hanks


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“Travel through the past, present, and future in an incredible celebration of space history.”


If you have ever been gripped by the fascination of space and what lies beyond our planet, you have likely been enamoured by the story of humans reaching the Moon. Arguably one of the greatest achievements of humankind is having gone beyond our atmosphere and successfully landed and explored the Moon. The Moonwalkers: A Journey with Tom Hanks gives space enthusiasts and the generally curious the opportunity to reflect on the mission people have gone on to achieve this incredible goal. 

Created by Tom Hanks and Christopher Riley, The Moonwalkers takes audiences on a voyage through the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s. The mediums blend through Hanks recounting stories from his life and love for space, factual information on the colossal events that led to the Moon landing and interviews with future Artemis crew members, all of which come together to deliver a well curated and compelling tale about the hope to reach beyond. 

Hanks is the perfect narrator for this story. He has truly swapped the cowboy boots for those of a space enthusiast and hearing his perception of the Moon landing through the eyes of his teenage self was a joy to hear.

What accompanies the beautiful narration are the equally impressive 360-degree projections and surround audio technology. Through NASA photography, the audience is completely immersed in space. The Moon images are crystal clear, it almost feels like you’re there yourself. The humanity communicated through the pictures is an element of this experience that leaves you feeling alive, knowing the once impossible was indeed possible. Particular highlights include the showcase of some of the 10,000 images taken during the Apollo missions. The ode to the fallen astronauts is a harrowing moment, delivered such a thoughtful and intentional way. By honouring the bravery of those who made the Moon landing possible while looking toward the Artemis generation, The Moonwalkers reminds us that progress is not finite – it is ongoing.

The piece is held up by the spectacular, contemplative original score by Anne Niktin. Far more than a supporting element, the music acts as an emotional guide throughout the experience, shaping the rhythm and tone of each chapter. Captivating through clever transitions between different genres, from jazz to contemporary melodies, it stands out in its own right.

It is impossible to leave without a renewed sense of faith in human curiosity and collaboration. The Moonwalkers: A Journey with Tom Hanks is a delight to witness. There are few ways better to spend 50 minutes immersed in adventure, awe and optimism. Visit Aviva Studios in Manchester to experience this masterpiece until 11th January 2026 or Lightroom in London until 8th March 2026. Tickets are available here.

REVIEW: A Queermas Carol


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

“This piece was a beautiful combination of adult humour and poignant themes wrapped up with ghosts and christmas songs. “



A Queermas Carol was a beautifully well – rounded demonstration of how theatre should be a safe space, both shown through the actors’ vulnerability and also the clear demographic of the audience. The duo, accompanied by the disembodied voice of Charles Dickens (Micky Cochrane) and their wonderful special guest, Carmen Silk, brought some societally heavy topics to life in an engaging and playful way that had the whole audience on the edge of their seats with both laughter and anticipation. 

The opening rap of the show was an immediate hook into the piece and also set the expectations of the audience – establishing that the audience was expected and encouraged to interact. As someone who loves immersive theatre, being given permission to interact and feel at the same level as the performers was a really nice addition. It also goes without saying that the opening rap set up the piece as being unapologetically camp – arguably to be expected from the title but was really lovely to be reflected by the performers and the way that they presented themselves in the space. 

As in the original story, we were introduced to the ghosts – not just Marley and Marley, but also of Past, Present and Future, which is where we really saw the actors’ vulnerability. Rhi started this off by delving into the past, bringing themes of discovery of self and the feeling of isolation to the forefront. This was brilliantly done, as it allowed the performers to reflect feelings that I would guess a lot of the audience would have felt at some points in their life. Following this, in the Present, we saw a version of Bob Cratchitt and Tiny Tim that followed the realities of being transgender in the current society. This was particularly poignant due to the current potentialities of imposing governmental laws. My friend who attended with me spoke to Mack at the end, expressing her appreciation for that story being told as she has a trans partner – further proving how important it is for these stories to be told. 

Of course, these themes weren’t just brought up in a straight forward way, no not at all. Rhi’s delving into the past was accompanied by the brilliant character that was the furbigotchi – no context needed, you’ll have to see the show – and Mack’s Bob Cratchitt moment was set up with him being portrayed as a ‘DILF’, both of which juxtaposed the seriousness of the stories being told beautifully, allowing us to laugh at the funny moments and listen when we needed to. 

Carmen Silk brought a few minutes of cabaret style singing – obviously different depending on the guest you see, this will be different, but she had a lovely voice and connected incredibly well to the audience in the short time she was on stage. 

Using Charles Dickens as a (mostly) just voice over character was a very well thought out choice, as it emphasised the way that the queerness of the characters was being policed, which I thought landed subtly but very well. I may be a bit biased, but I particularly enjoyed the ending of the piece after being entrusted to look after the Tiny Tim puppet (thanks Mack!). I won’t go into too much detail so as to not spoil this piece, but it was wrapped up in a lovely way that both kept the audience laughing but also left them satisfied.

Overall, I would highly recommend this piece to anyone looking for both a laugh and also to see themselves reflected in the stories told.  


REVIEW: Pippin


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“Whimsical, immersive, bohemian. This highly talented cast, team of creatives and crew excellently capture the mystical world of Hirson and Schwartz’s Pippin. “


Hirson and Schwartz’s Pippin follows a young prince in search of passion and adventure in his life. To prove that he is a valuable player in his father’s jumbled chess set (King Charles), he goes to war. However, when the Leading Player convinces him to strike back against tyranny, Pippin kills his father and takes over the throne. He soon realises being a great ruler is not as easy as he had thought, so continues his quest where he meets widow Catherine and her son Theo along the way. Pippin must make a difficult choice of whether to settle down or to keep making magic with the symphony of players who promised him success in finding a purpose. 

Amanda Nor’s revival magically captured the world of the players through a mystical lens, immediately immersing audience members with the selection of Pippin from amongst the spectator seating, alluding to the message that he is one of us from the start and allowing further empathy towards his character. The entire piece was well directed from the get-go, with not a creative choice out of place, allowing each member of the cast to shine with their individual talents.

We are left in the capable hands of Emily Friberg (Leading Player), who effortlessly shone with her powerhouse voice and captivating storytelling and expression. Emily demonstrated the puppeteer role of the Leading Player, manipulating Pippin throughout the piece and showing an impressive range of emotion and musicality, a triple threat indeed. Our protagonist, Lewis Edgar as Pippin, demonstrated his incredible tenor voice and huge range of acting skills as he unpicks Pippin’s character as if living the role. Lewis continued to portray a truth and humbleness to the character, married with a powerful belt in songs reflecting Pippin’s struggle and triumph. Mia Quimpo as the wonderful Catherine also elegantly showed her talents in her beautiful, powerful voice and inviting narration, with great comedic timing as she breaks the narrative and releases new life into the performance much to the Leading Player’s chagrin. 

Clare Brice (Berthe) had a warm, wonderful stage presence with brilliant comedic elements, fluid and flexible dancing with noticeable musicality and offered a safe space for audience interaction during her big number. Oliver Wood (Charles) gave an impressive offering of skill during a patter song with his great diction and comedy skills whilst also showing vulnerability in his final moments after his tyrannical reign. Helena Caldas (Fastrada) had such wonderful technique in her dancing and beautiful singing voice as she exudes a charming yet commanding role using the band to her advantage to have Charles (and the audience) in the palm of her hand. 

Daniel North (Louis) gave a wonderful range of character and fluidity in movements. I wish I had more opportunities to hear him sing since I heard some powerful notes towards the finale, such a strong voice. Similarly with Imogen Amos and George Kipa, however the two showcase their individualism with Imogen’s excellent Dance Captain abilities with Fosse influences and George’s great strength and dance technique with captivating facial expressions. 

Musical choices were excellently carried out by Harry Style and Manuel Gageiro alongside Martin T. Hart as Magic Consultant to really sell the travelling magic show. Set and costume by Hannah Danson also added to the whimsical aesthetic with contemporary influences and astrological ones – so much detail! Simon Jackson’s lighting design further personified the Leading Player’s actions in particular.

Overall this revival demonstrated how our great purpose in life is just to love and allow yourself to be loved through a wonderfully talented team of cast, creatives and crew.


REVIEW: Jack and the Beanstalk


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

A sparkly spectacular splendour to behold from start to finish!


A sparkly sensation with a phenomenal cast and ensemble to boot – if you weren’t feeling Christmassy before you absolutely will be after Crossroads Pantomime production of Jack and the Beanstalk. 

This show has something for everyone. Allan Stewart, Grant Stott and Jordan Young take to the stage again as the dynamic trio strongly and effortlessly supported by Clare Gray as Pat the cow, with her quick-witted charm and well-timed comical moments. Gail Watson makes for a fun-loving Spirit of the beans adding feistiness and a sprinkle of magic with every entrance. Amber Sylvia Edwards delivers real power and passion as princess Jill with great show stopping vocals.

Ed Curtis, the director, delivers an extravaganza of colour and pomp including many laugh-out -loud moments with Young, Stott and Stewart showcasing their professionalism and skill.  Including aptly chosen and relevant for all jokes written by Stewart and Harry Michaels with additional material by Stott and Young, these moments land well with an Edinburgh audience. There are also hilariously planted mishaps written in to deliberately “rile” up an enthusiastically engaged crowd of all ages. 

At times it feels a little more royal variety show than panto, however it never deters too far from the classic tale of Jack who sells his cow Pat for a bag of magic beans where he then finds, with the help of the Spirit of the beans, they have transformed into a large beanstalk leading to the evil Giant in the sky. 

Accompanied by the well-orchestrated band conducted by MD Andy Pickering, cleverly crafted familiar songs range from all eras and are delivered excellently by all the cast. Most memorably Grant Stott opens the second half with a fantastic parody villain song “Fee Fi Fo Fum” to the music from Rocky Horror picture show’s “Sweet Transvite”. Stott just gets on with making a brilliant pantomime villain using his height to tower over and create the right level of menace. He has successfully encompassed the role of the silly baddie side kick named Fleshcreep, the Giant in the sky’s evil henchman.

All the production splendour couldn’t be better driven by anyone other than pantomime dame, Allan Stewart, playing Aunty May, Jack’s loving albeit larger than life mother. Stewart well versed in panto traditions gives us a nostalgic trip down memory lane in his song “Tea and medals” where we see how he progressed from the hero to the dame. 

Stewart creates high energy fun with well executed gags and physical comedy from start to finish. He and Jordan Young playing Jack are highly experienced and hugely entertaining as a son and mother duo. Young enhances the well-timed comedic moments with Stewart, and they bounce of each other seamlessly even when things go wrong.

The set designed by Mark Walters is a sight to behold with everything expected for a traditional pantomime of this magnitude including incredible backdrops, props and puppetry. Nothing is simply left to imagination and the level of mastery and breathtaking craftmanship is truly impressive. 

Rory Beaton lighting designer executes all the lighting and sparkle one could hope for as it encapsulates the vibes for a Christmas pantomime. Richard Brookers sound design is slick and well timed for the slapstick moments adding a great level of energy to the performance. Not forgetting Karen Martins tight and incredibly executed choreography by the ensemble. Martin gives us many impressive moments of acrobats and stylistic movement delivering the “wow!” factor one hopes to see from a skilled ensemble. 

Costume designer Teresa Nalton creates beautifully crafted costumes with lights threaded throughout for the most immersive sparkle during those key big moments and turning points within the show. 

“Jack and Beanstalk” delivers on every level of magic, laughter and fun. If you manage to see one thing before the end of 2025 or you are needing a good idea for treating someone in the new year, then make it this, “Jack and the Beanstalk, The Giant PANTOMIME spectacular” at the Festival theatre. Running from 13th December 2025 to 11th January 2026- it’s one not to be missed!


REVIEW:Prashasti Singh: Divine Femine


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A confident, cleverly-crafted evening. Prashasti knows how to work a crowd. 


Soho Theatre downstairs was graced with the returning presence of Prashasti Singh,a 30-something (she won’t tell you how old she is) Indian comedian for her performance of Divine Feminine. The stand-up routine sought to explore themes of therapy, the psyche, gendered stereotypes and contemporary Indian society. Singh greets a bubbly, packed room and is keen to engage the audience in her opening moments. The audience soon learn Singh is far from shy, and cleverly engages with the key themes from the off, satirically remarking upon male privilege. 

Singh navigates her set through her discussions of aging and her journey of self-discovery. Intertwined with gags of Indian celebrity references, Singh takes the audience on a very relatable and honest journey. Working chronologically with age, where we learn Singh wanted to be her dad as a child, and channelling through to her later 30s, the set appears very neatly choreographed. 

Having discovered the demographic of the room, being majority over 30 and of Indian decent, Singh attempts to include the audience in the story to the best of her ability and at times her storytelling is spot on. In some moments however, the jokes felt limited to specific experiences and knowledge. In particular, the presentation of an Indian celebrity on an easel, witnessed a divide in the audiences understanding. This moment later led to more confusion as the set referenced back to the celebrity. 

Yet as Singh exclaims, some sentences simply cannot be translated, and a few members of the audience would have to miss out. Nevertheless, her conversations on mental health felt very important, giving insightful takes on being single, losing a sense of self and family pressures. Where a sense of collective understanding was created, is where this performance felt the must successful. Singh’s explorations of relationships with men felt very apt, pinpointing the harsh realities of their behaviour. She calls on the men in the audience at times, and they are seen to joyfully laugh along at themselves. The end of the set reveals where the Divine Feminine title comes into the piece. The potential for this ending moment felt big,as Singh builds much anticipation towards this moment, expanding on the specific details of her story. However, I couldn’t help but feel a little disappointed in its finale, where the end product didn’t land as well as the build-up. Regardless, the crowd-control Singh had was undeniable and this elegantly crafted performance left the audience feeling warm, listened to and with a smile on every face.


REVIEW: Shaun the Sheep’s Circus Show


Rating: 4 out of 5.

playful, impressive, and very enjoyable, but some unnecessary or overused aspects 


The first half of Yaron Lifschitz’s Shaun the Sheep’s Circus Show is structured episodically, with short and fast-paced sketches about each of the characters. Up to the interval, there’s a distinct focus on physical comedy and prop-based gags. I particularly enjoyed the slapstick violence, like the farmer falling over and slipping off the stage, a sheep being run over by a tyre, people turning round and accidentally hitting each other with things like seesaws or pig’s troughs- a slapstick classic!

The performers were all great, especially their ability to portray emotions through, essentially, nothing but animal noises and gibberish. The synchronisation was always really impressive, and some moments made me wonder how they were even doing them.

   The scene with Timmy and his mum was a tender moment of emotional contrast, and used audience interaction neatly; I also enjoyed the opening routine with the Farmer building up to the flock appearing.

The puns on the billboard screen were all funny, and I thought the paper plane prop becoming part of the animations and then going back to being a prop was great, but for the rest of the first half it felt like the screen wasn’t really used in any meaningful way.

I loved Jethro Woodward’s music, which switched between energetic, bouncier pieces (calling to mind a mix of mid-period Stereolab and club music) as well as more beautiful and tenser, more dramatic ones. I really liked some of the other audio motifs, in particular the use of the theme tune, although the lightbulb idea sound effect felt overused by the end of the show.

The lighting- designed by Jason Organ- often functions as a subtle contrast with the heightened performances and music. The cuts to black in the sequence with the dog and the postman are very effective at breaking up and subverting the episodic structure, previously reinforced by the lighting. 

Similarly, the Bull felt especially powerful and intimidating when it first appeared, as the only part of the first half that interrupted the character-based structure of the different sketches. Unfortunately, this is lost in its reappearance after the interval, when it’s lost in all the other elements onstage.

In a lot of ways, the second half of the show is completely different. More focused on the overall story about the Farmer’s TV than on character-based sketches, it feels like much more of a full circus show than a piece of physical theatre, with almost all of the classic circus acts coming after the interval. This meant that the show felt unbalanced. For me, the pig trapeze and the first half of the juggling routine could easily have been moved to the first half. Because of this imbalance, I kept feeling in the first half like I was waiting for a spectacle that just didn’t come.

In the second half, the billboard, used to show the live facial expressions of all the performers, felt overused. The performers were constantly performing to the screen instead of the audience, making it distracting and unnecessary. The video game sketch with the billboard was also essentially repeated immediately afterwards by the performers.

The circus costumes at the start of the second half were gorgeous, but the brown tracksuits at the end felt a little out of place, as if they’d come from nowhere. I loved the hats and wigs representing the different characters. 

I wish the performers had interacted with the stage more, especially with all the different levels, or maybe used elements of the set such as the billboard in physical ways, not just for the videos and animations. 

Instead there was a focus on prop-based comedy, which was always entertaining, but the best moments were consistently when the performers used the stage to their advantage: rolling down the hill, the house being used as a hat, and the sequence with the dog chasing the postman.

The glow-in-the-dark juggling and hula hooping- another example of routines which used the stage to their advantage being the best ones- looked brilliant, but admittedly did peter out. This was also my feeling about the show overall: very visually impressive, but with an ending that felt a bit weak. Saying it was anti-climactic is maybe too harsh, but I thought the end of the first half was more impressive than the grand finale. 


REVIEW: Vogue: Inventing the Runway


Rating: 3 out of 5.

An interesting exploration of fashion runways, but not a very immersive experience


The show started in an odd way, with the audience entering the space via a series of corridors backstage. I thought at first that this might be a reference models entering the stage, but then I was told that other shows take place in this space. So I can only assume that this was just a matter of poor architectural planning.

The show was in a nutshell a documentary about fashion runways, that was then projected across the four walls that we sat in. The documentary itself I found very interesting. It explored the of history of fashion runways and modern day specifical that it has become. The moments that I enjoyed the most was when they explored fashion shows that rebel against their elitist counterparts taking place in back alleys and making political statements. I also enjoyed the exploration of the theatrical runways that were just as much performance art as they were fashion shows. The show did a good job at charting the ever-changing world of the fashion runway and acted as a beautifully stunning archive of some of the industries most iconic moments. It was a great introduction to the world of the runway, accessible to the newbie but also still providing interest to someone who is more well versed in the fashion world.

But despite enjoying the documentary itself. I don’t feel like I gained much from experiencing as it was presented. I was left feeling like I could have just watched it on TV at home. I guess it was a way to be present with what I was watching, similar to that of a cinema experience. But it didn’t feel like it expanded that far outside of that. The different images being projected across the screens just gave me a sore neck from trying not to miss anything. Occasionally an image would spread out upon the floor, but they were only a fleeting beautiful moment. What I have enjoyed from other light shows, was very much lacking here: the interaction between the architecture of the space and the images being projected. With the venue being four white walls, there was no opportunity for this kind of relationship.

Therefore, despite the material of the show being interesting, I am left disappointed that promised to be an ‘immersive experience’, did very little to actually immerse its audience.

REVIEW: Austentatious


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Austentatious remains one of the sharpest improv shows on the British circuit, consistently funny, impressively slick and a reliably excellent night out.


Austentatious, the much-loved British institution of improvised comedy and theatrical silliness, is now in its 14th year and marking the 250th anniversary of Jane Austen’s birth.

We attended on a night featuring Stephen Mangan as the guest star and honestly could not have picked a better date. Mangan slipped seamlessly into the experienced cast and delivered some of the most memorable moments of the evening, including the immortal naming of Felicity Cockblock, a steady stream of ball-based jokes and an enthusiastic jig. He was an absolute highlight and if this is anything to go by, other special guests Mel Giedroyc and Paterson Joseph were surely just as strong.

Austentatious is exactly what it promises. An extravagant, knowingly ostentatious performance blending Austen-esque storytelling, classic British humour and genuinely top tier improvisation. Improv shows can often sag under the weight of indulgent sketches that add little and test an audience’s patience, but this cast are masters of keeping things tight. Scenes are neatly wrapped up before they overstay their welcome and the pace rarely falters.

Much of what makes Austentatious sing is the chemistry between the performers and the visible joy they take in building a full narrative from a single audience suggested title. The ending can feel slightly rushed, but given there is no opportunity to plan or debate the story arc, the fact they manage to land it at all is impressive. On our night, the absence of the central female lead for the second half could have derailed things entirely, yet a fellow cast member stepped in and integrated into the plot effortlessly despite missing the entire first act set up.

As my guest neatly put it, this is a perfect show to gift friends or family. The showmanship is exceptional, with improvised lighting, live music and a violinist on stage supporting the action beautifully. The humour is clever, accessible and just the right side of lewd, which reliably wins over the whole room.

Austentatious returns to the Vaudeville Theatre for several dates across the first half of 2026 and it remains an easy recommendation for anyone in need of a guaranteed good night out.

REIVEW: Most Favoured at Soho Theatre


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

A perfectly-cast character comedy which goes in an unexpected direction


Eight months of one-night-stands might be seen as a worrying symptom of the decaying social contract, a courageous reclamation of female sexuality, or even the start of a celebrity career. For thirty-something Mary (Lauren Lyle), it’s her new year’s resolution, designed to inject some spice into her life. And perhaps also just a bit of a cry for help. David Ireland’s very funny two-hander takes place after one of Mary’s conquests, as each lover shares a secret with their recent bedfellow. It’s a snappy script rich with observational humour and character comedy, keeping the audience laughing throughout.

Most Favoured isn’t about rapid-fire gags; instead, it feels like a comforting sitcom, where the better you know its characters, the funnier each scene becomes. Mary’s neurotic need for things to make sense combines well with the puppy dog energy of American tourist Mike (Alexander Arnold). Alongside excellent character comedy, there are some laugh-aloud observations, taking in topics ranging from KFC fries and wake-up sex to the UK-US language barrier. Both roles have been perfectly cast, with each character forming a ready connection with the audience; Lyle in particular pulls some cracking facial expressions.

In the show’s early scenes, Mike seems just a little too stereotyped as the goofy small-town American: he claims not to have heard of KFC, is easily distracted, and brushes off Mary’s dramatic revelation as if he hasn’t grasped it fully. But when his own secret comes to light, these earlier scenes make sense through a new lens. Whilst another script would milk dramatic tension from Mary’s revelation, Most Favoured isn’t like other shows, and its pace and humour are all the better for Mike’s flippant response. By the time the curtain goes down, the audience feel tenderness and warmth towards both characters.

From the outset, there’s a lot of flesh on display: Mary begins wrapped in a towel, and Mike wears a small pair of white underpants. But as Mary’s revelation approaches, and the audience gain a sense of her context, layers of clothing are added, telling their own story. When Mike dresses towards the show’s conclusion, his outfit is similarly well-chosen, augmenting the plot unfolding onstage. Similar attention to detail extends to the set, with an excellent visual gag hidden in plain sight. From casting to costume to set, everything comes together and amplifies the laughs.

It’s a real steal for Soho Theatre to host David Ireland’s World Premiere – his last show opened at the glitzier, considerably larger Soho Place with Martin Freeman ably supported by rising star Joe Locke. Most Favoured is certainly a sillier show, with funnier one-liners, but it retains the sharp, intimate chemistry that makes Ireland a writer to watch. The smaller space fits this one-act, 45-minute show well, and the pint-sized performance does nothing to diminish Ireland’s sharp writing and intimate character work.

At its heart, Most Favoured is a very funny, superbly acted, and precisely designed character comedy, which keeps the audience guessing. An earlier start time suggests audiences could catch another show afterwards, but this press night overruns by ten minutes, making it a stretch. Nevertheless, Most Favoured is an excellent appetiser ahead of a West End main course, and also stands on its own as a bite-sized piece of compelling comedy.

Most Favoured plays at Soho Theatre until 24th January. Tickets can be purchased here.

REVIEW: The Ugliest F***** Tree in Vanity Lane


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Heartfelt and festive new writing from Glasgow’s newest theatre company


In the season where panto feels inescapable, it’s a treat to see something that can keep the festive humour, while still telling an emotional story. Inksplat Theatre Company’s first show, The Ugliest F***** Tree in Vanity Lane, is a fun two-hander that while rough around the edges, has a lot of heart.

Ugliest F**** Tree centres on George (Holly Ferguson) and Avery (Elena Gower), a couple who delight in their annual tradition of spying on their neighbours’ Christmas decorations and awarding one truly heinous foliage the Ugliest Tree award. However throughout the following year, while George stays fixated on the one tree that hasn’t been taken down (rather than writing that book she is supposed to be working on), Avery’s career starts taking off, her social life is thriving, and they begin to realise that perhaps their relationship isn’t as perfectly matched as they once thought.

The story is simple but well plotted by co-writers Kathleen Tierney and Noah McGarrity, filled with fun gags and zany one liners – particularly from Holly Ferguson’s George, who perfectly epitomises the weird tangents your mind takes you down when you have nothing to keep you busy (I’m totally convinced by the Jeff Bezos/evil mushroom argument she launches into around the mid-point of the show). Her peppy optimism always keeps the play in motion, and got a lot of love from the audience in a packed Old Hairdressers. Gower’s Avery is a subtler character that balances her clear love for George with her refusal to let herself be slowed down when seeking things she wants. Gower made this dichotomy delicate and meaningful, adding the heart underneath the jokes.

The show was smooth and pacy thanks to the slick work of the stage and tech team, taking us through a whole year in 45 minutes. It felt like every prop and transition had been minutely calculated, never distracting from the story being told but adding fun little moments. The flip chart was a particular masterstroke, creating a visual window into George’s mind. It was a pleasure to watch something where everyone clearly cared so much about creating the best show they could.

Ultimately I feel like the one let down was simply a lack of ambition in the story – it was a well-crafted story of falling out of love with your first big relationship, but it never really dug deep into the issues each character was facing, or the universal appeal of those challenges for an audience. George and Avery simply say goodbye and walk away from each other, but what has this year meant to them, and to us? Inksplat brands itself as a company with a focus on political theatre – so it seems odd that their first show sets itself so firmly in the domestic sphere. I’d love to see how they can apply their narrative and production polish to something with a larger premise.

Author:
Innes Goodall