REVIEW: How to be a Dancer in Seventy-two Thousand Easy Lessons


Rating: 5 out of 5.

Michael Keegan-Dolan distils a lifetime of struggle and creativity into a meditation on how dance transcends constraint, expectation, and history


There’s a sly misdirection in the title: you expect a didactical session, a how-to lesson. What Michael Keegan-Dolan offers instead is a memoir in motion, a life distilled into rhythm, anecdote and image. Over eighty minutes the show moves like story: intimate, rough-edged, and stitched together with unexpected tenderness.

The evening opens with a startling image. His partner, Rachel Poirier, arrives on stage smoking, wielding an angle grinder against a massive wooden box. Sparks fly, the noise is harsh, industrial, elemental. Out of this act of force comes a treasure chest of props that will serve as touchstones for the autobiographical journey ahead. It feels like an origin myth: birth emerging from roughness, the creative process wrestled into existence.

Michael is an open book. He narrates rather than explains, in short, rhythmic sentences that read like poetry and land with the force of gesture. He doesn’t perform his memories as dance, but gives them a pulse. The delivery has a metric quality like a kind of spoken Latin scansion where the voice itself becomes a limb. In that way his storytelling is kinetic. He conjures on stage people from his life:  his mother who dreamt of the stage, an erudite father, a haunting grandfather, a bruising encounter with a priest, schoolboys and first love  and sets them in motion with both humour and the blunt honesty of confession.

Movement threads through everything: his awkward pigeon feet, the desire to move like screen idols, a first school disco, the imobility of his first sexual experience. These moments are tied together by migration as well as he moves across Europe ( the necessary itineraries of an artist finding himself) . And in all this time, one thing stays steady: his Irishness. Michael treats that identity as a fixed axis around which everything else rotates, sometimes with warmth, sometimes with the sharpness of being singled out and made to feel like an “other”. 

Poirier, by contrast, is perpetual motion. She is sidekick, alter ego, and prop all at once, the medium through which Keegan-Dolan’s storytelling finds its body. The connection between them is strikingly alive. Their interplay culminates in her solo to Ravel’s Bolero, where, in a suit and channelling a striking masculinity, she seems to merge with Michael, carrying his story and embodying his essence.

The final image was stark: Michael and Rachel standing still, eyes closed, unmovable. And yet I am certain I wasn’t alone in seeing them dance, not on the stage, but in the collective imagination of the audience. In my mind they were moving freely to the triumphant The Firebird Suite finale, unbound by the weight of expectation: not the father who wanted a barrister, not the critics, not the clichés of Irishness, not the fatigue, the doubts, the financial precarity, or the bruises of rejection. Just two artists breaking through all that, reclaiming joy, and reminding us that to dance is, ultimately, to refuse constraint.

What are your thoughts?