REVIEW: (the) Woman


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

An unflinching depiction of the seemingly impossible expectations of womanhood, (the) Woman exceeds anticipation in the very best way

M is many things. A writer, a mother, a woman. She’s tired and angry and uncertain. In a world that tells women that they can do anything, that they can well and truly ‘have it all,’ M is bursting with an overwhelming question: HOW? 

We follow M as she progresses through two means of creation; her children and her writing. M is birthing a play while also birthing children and is compounded by the impossible expectations of balancing both lives simultaneously. Society tells her that she can do both, that women are no longer sequestered to the home with no means of upward mobility. What society doesn’t explain is how the hell that is meant to work? 

Upton’s exacting writing serves as a response to the commonplace and derivative one-woman show that fits femininity into the framework of a man’s breadth of understanding, a position in which women are only allowed to be strong and independent with no room for messiness and the inherent complications of being a literal human being. (the) Woman is honest, sometimes brutally so, expertly bringing to life the complex impossibility of living up to the expectations mothers are embroiled in. 

We follow M as she tries to write her newest play. It’s a big move in her career, and while her domestic responsibilities don’t seem to be getting any lighter, neither do the requests of her career. She’s pushed to write a play that doesn’t fit, and as we see her struggle against the expectations of her producers, so we see her pushing to write the play she wants to write. Slowly we recognize that the play we are watching is, in fact, the play M is writing. The curvature of M’s creative zeal undulates, posited in snappy scenes that cut to the core of M’s personal experience.

The piercing writing Upton offers is elevated by the incredible performances by the cast. Lizzy Watts creates an electric M who embodies rage and discomfort with spectacular fire. She carries the play with a keen ability to lay everything out on the table, drawing the audience into a position in which we somehow can accept the many things that are messy about M while still rooting for her all the way through, teaching us to perhaps practice this degree of empathy to the mothers within our own lives. Jamie Rose Monk, André Squire, and Josh Goulding take on a large variety of other characters within the piece, creating a colourful universe of people within this production. Special mention is owed to Monk, who catches many laughs and certainly brought many (me) to tears.  


(the) Woman is an exquisite, sharp and holistic look at how enraging being a woman can be. While we might be miles ahead of where we used to be, (the) Woman reminds us that we have much unlearning still to do. This piece will leave you spilling over with the joy and angst of womanhood. You might want to give your mom a hug afterwards.

REVIEW: Royal Albert Hall Classical Coffee Mornings – Chantefable Duo “From Hillside Gardens”


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“A wonderful performance, easing us gently into the new season and reminding us to live in the present a little more.”


Presenting their gentle ode to the seasons to the audience of the Royal Albert Hall’s Classical Coffee Mornings, the Chantefable Duo are soprano vocalist Mariana Rodrigues and keyboardist Andrew Cowie. ‘Chantefable’ is a French literary tradition in which a story is told through a blend of sung verse and recited prose. Rodrigues and Cowie give us their interpretation of this through a thoughtful selection of poetry and classical song, each piece conveying a sense of the seasons passing. Performed in the lovely Elgar Room of the Royal Albert Hall (with a coffee and pastry included in the ticket!), this Classical Coffee Morning is a delightful way to spend a Sunday. 

Both students of the Royal College of Music, the two musicians are bursting with talent and passion for their art, an energy that comes through as they perform. Rodrigues’ voice is beautiful, swelling with emotion when the song calls for it, and drawing out the humour in the poetry she performs with ease. The most distinctive aspect of this performance is that the spoken word is accompanied by Cowie’s entirely improvised music, making the concert completely unique and never to be seen again. This gave an immediacy to the performance that brought me into the present moment; this to me felt symbolic of the changing seasons and the feeling of time passing. 

Cowie’s performance is wonderful, but his skill really does shine when he improvises. He manages to perfectly match the tone of each spoken word, slow and thoughtful in the more pensive, jaunty and comical in those more humorous. However, it wasn’t always possible to understand the words Rodrigues was singing; I realise this is to an extent because of the vowel modification necessary to sound as beautiful as she did (and she really did!), but it did sometimes hinder any comprehension of a narrative being told with the music, which is somewhat the point of a chantefable. 

The music includes classical repertoire mostly taken from the 19th and early 20th century, with composers from Britten and Elgar to Quilter and Lehmann. The songs complement the poems which include Dickinson, Hardy and Betjeman to name just a few. You can feel that every piece has been chosen with a great deal of thought and consideration, each in keeping with the running theme of nature and seasonal change. A stand-out song was ‘There are fairies at the bottom of our garden’, composed by Lehmann. Rodrigues performed this spectacularly; the whole room listened with rapture as she proclaimed herself the fairy queen (and I can say I honestly believed her!). I also loved how McCaig’s poems on frogs framed the chantefable: both Cowie and Rodrigues conveyed the humour and joy in these poems perfectly. However, I would have liked a greater variation in the music played as the songs at moments felt a bit monotonous, possibly a result of much of the music being taken from the same time period. 

The Chantefable Duo gave a wonderful performance, easing us gently into the new season and reminding us to live in the present a little more. I would certainly see them again given the chance, and would recommend it to anyone else with a love of words and music, and a couple of hours to spare on a Sunday morning.

FEATURE: Into the Shadows: ‘Dark Secrets – The Esoteric Exhibition’ Unearths the Occult Beneath London

Beneath the train tracks of Waterloo Station, something strange is stirring. From 11 October 2025 to 31 May 2026, The Vaults—London’s subterranean haven for all things immersive and unconventional—becomes home to Dark Secrets: The Esoteric Exhibition, a vast and spine-tingling deep dive into the world of the occult, folklore, secret societies and all things unexplained


This isn’t just your typical spooky season pop-up. With over 1,000 authentic objects spread across 27 themed rooms and 1,200 square metres of moody underground space, Dark Secrets is being billed as one of the most ambitious exhibitions of its kind. Think less “haunted house” and more “esoteric anthropology meets aesthetic creep-fest.”

Curated by Italmostre—the cultural outfit behind the blockbuster serial killer exhibition that drew over 120,000 visitors—the show offers a rare glimpse into rituals, relics, and revelations that have long lingered in the shadows of history. But don’t expect cheap thrills. This is an exhibition that balances spectacle with scholarship. It explores everything from fraudulent spiritualism to ancient magical practices with a critical eye and a dash of theatrical flair.

Highlights That Haunt

Among the most buzzworthy objects are Aleister Crowley’s personal ceremonial staff, a calcified Siamese foetus preserved in accordance with Southeast Asian ritual tradition, and a 1620 edition of Malleus Maleficarum—the witch-hunting manual that fanned the flames of hysteria across Europe. If your interests lean more “haunted artefacts” than historical grimoires, you’ll find the largest-ever display of cursed dolls in Europe, including the infamous Weeping Doll, whose reputation for moving its eyes and whispering at night is enough to keep even the sceptics uneasy.

Other must-sees include a Dybbuk box said to imprison a malicious spirit, ritual skull cups from Tibetan tantric practices, and even Jimi Hendrix’s jacket—an eerie nod to the myths surrounding the “27 Club” and the esoteric edge of rock ‘n’ roll. For true believers (or at least committed curiosity-seekers), there’s a vampire-hunting kit complete with stakes, crosses and holy water vials, alongside archaeological evidence of vampire burials—because why not leave with a healthy fear of the undead?

And yes, even football fans get their moment with a display of cursed sports memorabilia, including a jersey linked to England’s supposed “cursed” 1966 World Cup victory. Because apparently, superstition doesn’t stop at the stadium gates.

A Cultural Event With Substance (and Style)

What makes Dark Secrets more than just a cabinet of curiosities is its critical lens. The exhibition not only showcases the bizarre and the beautiful but also questions how myths, pseudoscience and superstition have shaped societies—and continue to do so. It’s a look at the human desire to explain the unexplainable, to find patterns in chaos, and to hold on to rituals in an increasingly rational world.

The Vaults, with its moody brickwork and dim corridors, sets the perfect tone. This is immersive storytelling at its most ambitious—part museum, part mystery, part urban exploration. If the paranormal ever had a pop-up temple, this might be it.

Know Before You Go

The exhibition runs from Wednesdays to Sundays, with extended hours on Fridays and Saturdays. It’s roughly a 90-minute journey into the uncanny, and advance tickets are available at darksecretsexhibition.com/london. Be warned: this isn’t a kids’ Halloween haunt. It’s thoughtful, eerie, and sometimes unsettling. But if you’ve ever been curious about the fine line between history and the arcane, Dark Secrets might just be your next intellectual obsession.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Nick Sidi


OLIVIER AND TONY AWARD-WINNING PRODUCER NICK SIDI ANNOUNCES CURVEBALL, A NEW COMMERCIAL THEATRE PRODUCTION COMPANY WITH ARTIST-LED CREATIVE COLLABORATIONS AT ITS CORE.


How has your extensive experience as both an actor and a producer influenced the way you approach developing new theatrical projects at Curveball?

I think the main thing is that I really have experienced what it feels like to be on both sides of the table – or if you have ever been in a technical rehearsal – both sides of the MacBooks! I do remember my first time in tech as a producer and saying “oh this is what it feels like NOT to be staring out from the stage towards a load of desks with glowing apples looking back at you”. As an actor you work closely with your creative teams so you really see what everyone brings to the work and respect what everyone needs. You see how the work is built day by day from during rehearsals. And over the years that insight has been helpful in allowing me – as a producer – to be welcomed into the creative process.

What excites you most about integrating recording artists into the process of creating musicals, and how does it change the traditional theatre dynamic?

They bring a freshness / something new to the table?. They aren’t necessarily adhering to any preconceived “rules” of musical theatre and so there is a different energy. Having said that – there are also challenges in them understanding the differences in what needs to work dramaturgically as a piece of storytelling as opposed to, say, a great album track. It is the meeting of these two worlds that really excites me – it has to be a collaboration. You must bring them into the theatrical world but also really listen to what they have to offer. 

In what ways do you see Curveball Productions challenging conventional theatre norms while maintaining commercial viability?

Curveball is not so much about setting out to break conventional norms – as believing – as i really do – that you make the work first and the commercial viability follows. It is about setting out what the artistic vision is for a show – that is the driving force – rather than a starting point of “well this is a great commercial idea”. All sorts of shows can be “commercial” – you just need to make things that people really want to see. We don’t always know what that is. We can be surprised. 

How do you balance nurturing emerging voices with collaborating with established artists to create ambitious and innovative productions?

That is a good question and a challenge but i would hope that with any show that Curveball produces we can be an open door to new voices whether in the cast or creative team. I am a campaigner and fundraiser for Frantic Assembly’s IGNITION program – a free nationwide talent development program for young people with little or no experience of theatre, who face barriers accessing the Arts, and may never even have considered a pathway in our industry as possible. They bring a fresh voice to the stories we tell. I am all for that. 

Can you describe a moment in your career when dramaturgy fundamentally transformed a project you were producing?

I wouldn’t say it transformed the project but I do remember a moment where i was so certain of something as a dramaturg that it forced me out of my comfort zone. I was working on a cross genre theatre show called FATHERLAND for Manchester International Festival in 2017 with the playwright Simon Stephens, the musician Karl Hyde (Underworld) and Director / Choreographer Scott Graham. I just had a gut feeling that we should cut one particular song – and this was going to be really difficult for the actor who was performing it. I knew from my own experience as an actor that was going to be very hard conversation to have but I just knew that the piece as a whole would benefit. I remember thinking – this is my job now. 

Looking ahead, what kind of cross-genre or experimental collaborations do you hope to bring to the West End and beyond?

Shows like Fatherland where you get a mix of 3 different artists leading a process excite interests me – as do more collaborations with recording artists and theatre makers.  It’s not about being experimental as about getting creative forces in a room together from the start so they can spark off each other. 

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Hersh Dagmarr


We sat down with Hersh Dagmarr, the legendary French queer singer/songwriter and visual artist to chat about his show Minogueus Sanctus.

Centering around iconic pop princess Kylie Minogue’s repertoire rearranged in the piano-vocal cabaret style, the show explores the very concept of pop royalty and fandom itself – asking the essential question of what makes and who is (or more precisely who isn’t) a ‘gay icon’.

Get your tickets here.


Minogueus Sanctus reimagines Kylie’s pop hits through a piano-vocal cabaret lens—what inspired you to turn the dancefloor diva into a liturgical muse?

First of all, because I love Kylie and always did – and I love the idea of paying tribute to her music. Her catalogue is so extensive that it feels like it covers our entire lives. I can’t remember a time where she wasn’t here. Her resilience, staying power and consistency is quite extraordinary.

Through her, I wanted to explore the theme of the extreme power of nostalgia. Especially pop songs, how they accompany our entire life and become our own personal landmarks. They touch us in such a personal and deep way. No other form of art seems to have this kind of power. Most of all when it’s from one artist like Kylie with such a dedicated fan base, who literally gets to evolve and grow up with their audience. This almost gives them a status of untouchability.

We talk about pop stars using words such as “icons” and “idols”.  The semantics belong to religious and liturgical lingo for a reason. 

You’ve said your music comes from both a ‘faraway past and a distant future’—how does that temporal tension manifest in your interpretations of Kylie?

My own original material and music I have been releasing as a singer and music producer has been quite experimental electronic pop music, compared to songs I interpret in my shows which are, for the most part, very classic tunes.

I have these two parallel areas of interest in my artistry, the deep past and the distant future, and they both feed off each other equally. I always draw and paint characters with finger wave hair, pencil eyebrows and polka dot ties! The stylistic codes of cabaret are ingrained in my brain and I always want to go back to them somehow.

In my cabaret shows I like to unearth tunes from that deep past, way back to the early 20th century – whether it’s French chanson, American classic songbook or German sprechgesang – or turn more modern pop songs into that expressionist style of cabaret. 

The common thread in my shows is an alter ego which could be a ghost, a vampire or just the walking memory of an artist from the grand Weimar Berlin era. I guess the tension manifests though this alter ego’s past experiences and stories told in the context of now.

What does it mean to you to ‘deconstruct’ a gay icon—and how do you distinguish homage from hagiography?

My aim is less to deconstruct a gay icon than to re-interpret a familiar song; give it a new habit, a new meaning. Focus the light on a different angle and give it another dimension – another story. You should hear what we did with “I Should be So Lucky” or “I Believe in You”!

I guess an homage has more to do with the music and work itself, whereas hagiography would concern the artist and the actual cult of their personality. There’s quite a distinct line to me. This is one of the themes explored in Minogueus Sanctus.

Cabaret has long been a space for subversion and reinvention—what role does camp or theatricality play in the way you reinterpret pop?

Camp, if it means a humorous exaggeration, is a vital ingredient in cabaret – an ingredient which has to be used sparingly, however, and shouldn’t overshadow the overall performance. Cabaret is no panto.

Theatricality is another thing, I suppose. I do love to give my shows a theatrical arch. I like a narrative, I like a story and I like dramatic entrances. I actually think it applies to every kind of show – rock, pop, opera, piano-vocal cabaret etc – that an entrance has to be polished. I can’t stand an artist just walking onstage, for example. There’s never a good reason for that. It seems lazy to me. Staging is essential if you are going to get up onstage. At least that’s how I see things.

But if we are going to specifically talk about reinterpreting pop, theatricality and perhaps camp are particularly essential because it’s about stripping the song of all its sophisticated and very produced arrangements and just keeping the very core of it; the melody and the lyrics. And then, in order to make the song live, you have to amp up the drama and expressionism. You have to reenact the emotions and amplify the themes evoked. It’s quite a lot of weight on the performer’s shoulders in such a minimal context but I live for it!

In a world that increasingly favors polish and perfection, what draws you to the raw, moody, and intimate language of Weimar-inspired cabaret?

Precisely the fact that the world seems to increasingly favour polish and perfection makes me long for dissonance and a bit of a dent and a slap…! But what also draws me to this particular brand of cabaret is that under all the subversion, outrageousness and histrionics, it has an elegance to it, and it comes from a context of pure artistry and creativity through harsh times. Face up with glitter, (middle) finger wave hair and the right song!

Ultimately, the elegance of it comes from its profound humanity and compassion, in spite of all the bravado and harshness on the surface. 

FEATURE: Fume Festival – Autumn BBQ Edition


A carne-val of fiery flavours – FUME’s autumnal meat feast delivers a sizzling array of offerings


I arrived as early as I could for the midday opening and found the staff to be incredibly welcoming- even giving me free sauces and a goodie bag.  Now in its fifth year, FUME promised to bring even more vendors and international flair- this time with two Texans (Dayne’s and KG BBQ- more on those later).

Starting with the Kingston-based Poor Boys, I had a sensational brisket donut and chicken crackling. I wolfed these down, having arrived deliberately famished, whilst watching a live demonstration onstage of sweetbread being baked with bone marrow. An absolute belter of a start. And the feeling I’d peaked too soon. 

Right. Back to the meats. Following a free shot of Kraken cherry cola rum I went to the first Texan vendor- Dayne’s from Aledo, TX- for a pricey but tender slab of brisket that was delicious, however it was let down by being paired with the limpest slice of white bread I’ve ever eaten. I thought they’d run out of literally any other bread but this does appear to be deliberate, according to their website menu.

Next up was the chili cheese sausage with chimichurri, and pork belly burnt ends from St Albans’ Craft and Cleaver. The burnt ends were so sweet with sticky sauce- fantastically melting in my mouth. The sausage was packed with flavor and spice I don’t think it needed any accompaniments. Then onto Devon’s Smoke on the Waters- chicken skewers (the owner’s fave to make – I asked), and a slightly deconstructed Philly brisket cheesesteak. The chicken genuinely stood out with a gooey glaze that elevated the perfectly grilled chicken. The sour dash of lime really cut through the sweetness perfectly.

Now, Canterbury’s Korean Cowgirl are known for being multi award-winning – they even put their trophies at the booth! I opted for their famous cherry char sui back ribs and to say it was a religious experience was an understatement. The mix of texture, glaze, fruitiness and smokiness were superb. The meat just fell of the bone it was so tender. Again, I asked and this too was the owner’s favourite to make – it’s easy to see why this is a champion dish. 

It was at this point, after my Efes pint, that my metabolic rate was fighting me and I had to slow down. I finished off the carnal proceedings having checked the pitmaster leaderboard for who currently had the most votes. KG BBQ – a Texan-Egyptian vendor (yes, really). It also had one of the longest queues, though audiences were entertained by a metal cooking contraption that was both fascinatingly kinetic and flame-grilled. It was mesmerizing to watch the meats get flipped continuously in some sort of fairground cage dreamt up by an Iron Maiden production designer. I opted for the lamb chop and although the meat was prepared excellently, it didn’t have the wow factor the hype seemed to imply. I finished off the day with a massive brookie (brownie-cookie) from Proper Brownies in the indoor section. An amazing live band playing country versions of modern hits and classics created a great vibe. 

There were many other vendors, some selling food, drinks, snacks, homewares and even a mechanical bull to ride. I would have appreciated a more diverse drinks offering other than Efes and limited cocktails. I would have also liked to see more traditional BBQ food- I couldn’t find anyone selling cornbread, for example, which is such a BBQ staple and a veggie alterative, or beans, slaw and other staples such as mac n cheese. There’s lot of potential and it’s great that international vendors are starting to attend, though. FUME are definitely one to watch as they increase their offerings nationwide.

Woolwich Works- 26-28th September 2025

REVIEW: Classical Coffee Mornings: Chantefable Duo 


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“A wonderful medley of poetry, spoken word and classical song”


On a drizzly, autumnal Sunday lunchtime at the iconic Royal Albert Hall, the duo  comprising of Mariana Rodrigues and Andrew Cowie performed a collection of poetry, song and improv. A cuppa in hand and a few pastries really did epitomise the Classical Coffee Relaxed. This informal event was part of the “relaxed performance” whereby people can move around, chat as loudly as they like, leave if they wish etc, which is a good idea and made this performance assessable to everyone.  

A selection of poetry was on offer; most I had never heard of before and had an air of light heartedness to it. I spoke to Mariane briefly after who said that the morning performance was more serious, so they went for something to balance it out. The theme they had chosen was animals and we were treated to either poetry or spoken word on this topic Frog, Whale, Butterfly and Ant were the animals of choice.  

Mariana’s singing was mesmerizing and along with the piano music, really brought to life he pieces of poetry that they were performing. The mixing of poetry/spoken word with classical song kept the performance engaging. The songs were possibly more unknown classical (my knowledge of the subject is limited) but it is easy to appreciate the beauty in  classical and on a drizzly day in London, it was just a cozy thing to do.  

Both Mariana and Andrew are not only talented but have clearly put a lot of time into  creating this concept, with the improv music being something that we only heard in that  moment and would never be repeated, which adds something special. There were a couple of recognisable pieces of music, the theme music for Pirates of the Caribbean for one, but  this didn’t detract from engaging with the performance. A nice touch, even though I am not a huge fan of audience participation, was Mariana coming round with an annotated poem suggesting tone/atmosphere to explain how they approach the performance, which just made it feel even more unique.  Classical Coffee Mornings is a wonderful concept and perfect if you want to go on a solo  date, or if you are catching up with friends. It was heartwarming to see a small group of retired women out together having a catch up over a coffee. It’s a good concept for anyone  who finds a packed venue overwhelming as it gives people a chance to enjoy classical music almost on an individual’s own terms. It was a lovely, welcoming atmosphere, if a little quiet but sometimes peace and some classical music is all you need.

REVIEW:Clarkston


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Clarkston sets out to chart emotional wilderness, but often loses its way among clunky metaphors and rushed storytelling”.


“Maybe we’re like the last American pioneers” muses Jake, a drifting young man stacking shelves at a Costco in the titular small town of Clarkston. The line encapsulates the play’s core ambition; to draw a thread between the rootlessness of modern American youth and the idealism of the Manifest Destiny era of westward expansion. But while Samuel D. Hunter’s Clarkston aims for thematic depth and scope, it too often opts for telling over showing – subtlety is not on the shelves here.

Jake arrives in Clarkston while tracing the historic route of Lewis and Clark, hoping to find purpose along the way. He meets Chris, a night-shift worker at the local Costco, and the two quickly form a bond over their shared sense of purposelessness and emotional trauma. Their evolving relationship is the emotional core of the play, which also weaves in Chris’s difficult relationship with his meth-addicted mother. This is a new work by Hunter, known for his explorations of isolation and working-class American life, though here the execution feels more heavy-handed. 

Directed by Jack Serio, the production is mostly well executed, but not without its odd choices. A portion of the audience is seated on adjacent sides of the stage – perhaps in an attempt at intimacy – but the effect never really takes hold. Instead, it occasionally feels gimmicky rather than immersive, and is distracting in scenes that demand emotional intensity.

The pacing also feels uneven. In the first few scenes, Jake and Chris go from barely knowing each other to sharing deeply personal traumas, to a riverside sexual encounter, to an abrupt crisis point – all seemingly within a matter of hours – or at least, it feels that way, as the timeframe is never made clear. These transitions feel rushed and confusing, undermining what could have been a more organic development of connection and tension.

Ruaridh Mollica delivers a quietly powerful performance as Chris, thoughtfully capturing the character’s fragility and desperation with convincing nuance. Sophie Melville is excellent as Chris’s mother, teetering between manipulative volatility and raw, almost animal desperation – her presence is often genuinely unsettling.

Joe Locke (best known for Heartstopper and Agatha All Along) brings a quiet sincerity to the role, and his onstage presence has a natural warmth, but the emotional range required for Jake’s internal turmoil often feels muted. His frequent quoting of Lewis and Clark’s journals comes off more as a clunky narrative device than a believable character trait. 

Set design and lighting work reasonably well, evoking the sterile, fluorescent world of the warehouse and suggesting something of the wider emotional wilderness these characters inhabit. That said, with part of the stage occupied by audience seating, the set never feels fully realised.

Hunter is wrestling with ambitious themes: disillusionment, illness, poverty, legacy, and the mythology of the American Dream. The writing, however, does not always trust the audience. Lines like Jake’s repeated “I’m f****d up” feel over-insistent, and much of the dialogue leans towards exposition over genuine discovery. There are flashes of real emotional depth – especially in the explosive scenes between Chris and his mother – but they’re often undercut by forced imagery and on-the-nose dialogue. The link between modern disaffection and the journey of Lewis and Clark never quite lands. It’s a metaphor stretched thin, and while it provides a narrative frame, it rarely deepens it.
Clarkston is an ambitious play that poses some worthwhile questions but fumbles in its delivery. There are glimmers of emotional truth and strong performances, but the writing too often gets in its own way. Some audience members may find themselves – like Jake and Chris – lost in the aisles of Costco, searching for a story that never quite finds its frontier.

REVIEW: Cinderella (La Cenerentola) at London Coliseum 


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Cinderella is back but not as we know it


One of Gioachino Rossini’s most popular operas, La Cenerentola has been making a comeback in recent years. Director Julia Burbach has chosen to present an English version of the Italian opera, a translation presented by the English National Opera so genius it’s hard to believe it’s not the original language. 

Rossini altered many key details from what is considered the original version written in 1697 by Charles Perrault, changing the iconic glass slipper into a bracelet, the evil stepmother into a stepfather and fairy godmother to the male Alidoro, a tutor of the prince. Burbach adds a silent female counterpart, the spirit of Cinderella’s mother, who dances alongside Alidoro, peeking around doorways and over balconies at her much-maligned daughter. She also adds a group of children dressed as adorable mice to assist Alidoro in his dealings, some of whom randomly transform into miniature versions of the family members for no discernible reason other than for the great amusement of the audience. 

Recontextualising the 1810 story into present day London, the large ensemble are dressed in a curious array of modern-ish costumes, designed by Sussie Juhlin-Wallén. However, she triumphs in her creation of the chorus costumes, dressing them as Ramiro’s ancestors in a stunning array of crimson, adding extra humour with many chorus members dressed in voluptuous skirts and towering wigs. 

Deepa Johnny is an exquisite Cinderella, with Isabelle Peters and Grace Durham bursting with talent as they play the hilariously vain and conceited step-sisters Tisbe and Clorinda. Aaron Godfrey-Mayes is a stunning Prince Don Ramiro and Simon Bailey an amusing and quick-tongued Don Magnifico. 

Yi-Chen-Lin expertly conducts the Orchestra of English National Opera with vigour and elegance, although at times the performers struggle to keep up with the escalating music. Set by Herbert Murauer is both functional and unique, with two sets of elevator doors set within a grand mansion allowing for many exciting moments to keep the audience entertained during what is a very lengthy opera. 

A thoroughly enjoyable presentation of a beloved romantic opera, English National Opera have created a production that is both accessible and visually exciting. A cohesive and talented ensemble made up of singers, dancers and children ensure this presentation is truly worthy of the esteemed Rossini name and a production not to be missed by any opera-lover.

REVIEW: Choke Me


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A brilliantly acted one-hander that explores the psychology of a woman trapped in a loveless marriage and a violent affair with her stepson.


choke me., written and performed by Alexandra Montalbano and directed by her and Brock Looser, is a modern reimagining of Lope de Vega’ Punishment Without Revenge. Casandra guides us through how she found herself in a loveless marriage with a controlling and cheating husband and an affair with her violent stepson.

Montalbano expertly flits between multiple characters in an astoundingly dynamic performance. Each one feels fully drawn and alive – there’s a string of awful first dates, Casandra’s well-meaning but useless parents, her friend who knows her better than she knows herself. Then there’s her husband, an oppressive control freak who can’t be bothered to hide his affair; and her stepson, who twitches terrifyingly from apathy to violence learnt from watching too much pornography. Montalbano finds impressive psychological depth in all these figures, but we never lose sight of it being Casandra’s story. It’s an elegantly judged balancing act that many one-handers get wrong.

The story is staged between two cameras that feed to two TVs upstage. Sometimes we see Montalbano from three angles at once, cleverly simulating the feeling of a crowd. At other moments we ‘cut’ back and forth between one angle and another as if watching a film conversation. This technique is most effective when Casandra talks about her, or her husband’s, affairs. It gives Montalbano and Looser the uncanny ability to conjure three presences in the space that can never meet each other’s gazes.

At times, this live-cinema element feels underused. There are stretches when nothing is on either screen and they, along with the cameras, break the immersion of the world being built. By the end, though, there is a theatrically exciting use of the set-up that develops the idea beyond a simple live feed. I wished that moment had arrived earlier and stayed longer once it did.

choke me. expertly builds a sense of dread in its audience. It reveals Casandra’s affair with her stepson early on (enough that I’m not spoiling the play by mentioning it). This allows the piece to explore the devastating psychological effects of this incestuous relationship rather than saving it as a late shock. Casandra’s entrapment is clearly conveyed, as is her use of humour to mask trauma.

It is a play that grapples with serious, complicated issues: the morality of infidelity, coercive partners, incest, and how pornography has normalised men desiring hyper-aggressive sexual acts. It trusts its audience to think seriously about these questions and manages to fit a huge amount into a tight runtime. There are moments of humour and lightness, but it’s also bold enough to believe that theatre can be the catalyst for conversations about what society finds acceptable and unacceptable.

choke me. is a brave play – all one-handers are, but this one especially. It’s brave in its choice of subject and brave in its staging. Montalbano’s acting is so vivid and her presence so captivating that in less skilled hands the play might have managed only to shock. With her, it shimmers with life