REVIEW: Rose of Nevada


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Jenkin delivers a tour-de-force time-slip fantasy, rugged and unkempt as the seas on which it’s set, but with a twinkling heart which floats well above the waterline. 


Seven years after his seminal BAFTA winning debut Bait, Mark Jenkin returns to the Cornish coast with The Rose of Nevada, another analogue-driven tale of family, love and grief, but this time with a hauntingly sci-fi perspective. 

Nick (George Mackay) is a struggling father, desperate to provide for his family in a once thriving fishing village. We see lingering shots of worn rope, moss and deep, vibrant rust, the treasures of a bygone age. Nick finds work on a fishing trawler which has mysteriously re-appeared in the harbour, thought to have been lost long ago. On it he meets Liam (Callum Turner), a rough sleeping out-of-towner eager to escape his old life, and the two become tangled in a twisting, time-jumping reality where nothing is as it once was, and yet everything is. 

The cast provide rather nuanced and unassuming performances. Everyone apart from Mackay’s Nick is played with a strange apathy, even before the supernatural elements of the film take hold. Mackay is at first stiff-jawed and reserved, but we see him slip into an emotional journey, from a quiet desperation to a trance-like resolve. Turner on the hand feels brash and tempered, but again, he seems held back by something, restrained. Rosalind Eleazar gives a subtly playful performance as Liam’s ‘wife’, and she hold a real power in her expressions, so much learned in the raise of her eyebrows or the way she tilts her head. Francis Magee as Captain Murgey is suitably sea-drenched, and he does well as the crusty salty-dog figure, hungry for the profits of the catch. 

The film is beautifully imagined by Jenkin. Shot in his usual way with a 16mm Bolex clockwork camera, the images carry a sandpaper graininess, with a colour saturation that shifts drastically through dreamlike stages, sometimes murky and dull, but sometimes pure technicolour, roses framed against the turquoise sea, or the crest of a hill, pure green and dazzled in sunlight. However, what ‘landscapes’ exist here are purely at the edges of our focus, as Jenkin drives a close fixed perspective with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Everything feels sucked in, claustrophobic, and even when we are out on the open sea, we feel trapped. 

Then there is the sound design and score, also by Jenkin, which is brutal and thumping. The camera he uses cannot pick up sound, and this is added later, an obstacle which Jenkin uses to his advantage. This is a film that you hear as much as you see. Every crank of machinery, the slicing of fish guts, the change of a gear or the wind whistling through the trees is elevated, and the sequences aboard the fishing boat are terrifically intense, playing out more like scenes from a war film than anything else, with the score’s sharp creaks and drones often matching the hardware to heartbeat-quickening crescendos.

There are obvious allusions here to other films, not least The Lighthouse which set a modern benchmark for sailor-horror. There’s a bit of Jaws here too, three men going after a big catch etc. However, the film’s time jumping elements were mostly reminiscent of Andrew Haigh’s All of Us Strangers, a film which too seamlessly moved amongst chronology, and with the same wispiness that Rose of Nevada has. 

Jenkin’s work is instantly identifiable through its technical elements, and yet with this work he seems to be branching out in terms of both scale and genre, an exciting prospect for any film fan, for as it has been demonstrated, and Rose Of Nevada is no exception, Jenkin knows how to build tension with the simplest of assets, how to find beauty in the smallest details, and how to find heart in barren worlds. 

Rose of Nevada will be released in the UK/Ireland in selected cinemas 24th April, with the US release on 19thJune. 

REVIEW: Noughts and Crosses


Rating: 3 out of 5.

‘A nostalgic callback that feels eerily relevant today’


Noughts and Crosses is a story that feel just as important today, if not more, than when the book was published in 2001. Adapted for the stage by Sabrina Mahfouzand directed by Ester Richardson, this production arrives at The Lowry to bring readers back to the world of Sephy and Callum. Urgent, reflective and moving, its transition to the stage reawakens those initial emotions, casting them in a new and powerful light.

Set in a world divided by race and privilege, the story follows Sephy (Brianna Douglas) and Callum (Lewis Tidy), whose relationship unfolds against a backdrop of systemic oppression and deep-rooted division. With Sephy part of a politically influential family as a Nought, her friendship with Callum as a Cross presents a whole host of challenges. The story explores the innocence of children and how there is a conscious shift in recognising difference as they age. Around them, a strong cast – including Melody Adeniran, Daniel Copeland, Chris Jack, Emma Keel and Elexie Walker – work together to bring this fractured society to life.

Brianna Douglas brings a warmth to Sephy that makes her internal conflict feel honest and genuine, while Lewis Tidy grounds Callum with a volatile calm that draws the audience in. Together, they create a connection that is easy to captured by. Across the ensemble, the actors stepped into multiple roles and delivered them with ease. Tom Coleman brilliantly stepped into the role Jude, allowing the performance to continue. 

At times, the pacing can feel uneven, with some scenes being slightly drawn out and others not allowing the weight of what is unfolding to be reflected upon. This occasionally disrupts the flow of the production, making it harder to remain fully immersed in the world being built. The simplicity of the set allows the story to remain front and centre, while the lighting design does much of the work in shaping atmosphere and tone.

Ultimately, this is a production carried by the enduring relevance of its story. While elements of the staging and delivery feel less assured, the heart of Noughts & Crosses and the commitment of its performers comes through – asking important questions and is a story that doesn’t quite let you go once you have left the theatre.

Noughts and Crosses plays at The Lowry until 25th April. Tickets are available here.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Alastair Clark

A high-fidelity stand-up show performed in real record shops, drawing on Alastair Clark’s decade behind the counter. We sat down with Alastair to discuss their upcoming performances.

Alastair Clark: On the Record tours across the UK this year. Tickets are available here.


What does a real record shop give this show that a comedy club never could?
The stories in this show happened in a record shop, by staging the show in this way there is a connection between the space and the material you wouldn’t get anywhere else. Also, record shops are community hubs, so by coming to people’s local record shop I am engaging directly with folks who will get a lot out of the show, but might not consider going to the comedy club.

How has leaving the shop changed the way you listen to—and think about—music?

When I worked at the shop a lot of my role focused on new music. I was emailed by every label and distributor about every album that was coming out. We are talking hundreds of emails a day. It was like being plugged into The Matrix! So I really had my finger on the pulse. Now, there are a few new bands I am excited about, but I’m definitely not aware of stuff in the way that I was. I listen to less, but enjoy it more I think. I don’t mind being the guy who hasn’t heard of something. 

How do you balance nostalgia with the messier truth of moving on?

I mean that is a great question. I have always brought a brutal honesty to my shows. I am really trying to communicate in a genuine way. But obviously the truth is complicated by nature. You have to simplify it enough to give an audience a satisfying show. I think the way I’ve always managed to do this is by exploring one aspect of these moments in our lives. Talking about a breakup, complicated. Talking about being in denial about how much you’re struggling, well that’s one element of it… and you can focus on that. In this show it made sense to focus on one aspect of moving on. It’s sincere, but it isn’t the whole truth. That’s the balance.

Do different record shops change the rhythm or feel of the show?

I think every show has a slightly different rhythm and feel. My delivery is quite conversational, so it is easy for me to match an audience’s energy and make sure we have a good time. Each place in the country has its own vibes. That’s part of the fun of doing it live. So I’m sure we will find each shop has its own quirks and I’m looking forward to getting stuck in.

Did stepping away from the shop feel like losing part of your identity?

Hugely, and I was really scared of that. I think it’s why I stayed so long. When you work in a record shop, it’s a bit like being a bit of a local celebrity. I got recognised so much more for working in a record shop than I ever do for being a comic! But the reality is, do you want to sacrifice these other bits of yourself to keep that bit? I can’t do things in half measures, I commit. I wanted to see if I could make comedy work. To give the Alastair Clark the comedian the best chance possible, I had to say goodbye to Al, the bloke behind the counter of your local record shop. 

What have these spaces taught you about community and connection on tour?

I remember the partner of one of my customers in the shop saying to me: “You know, he didn’t really have friends until he started coming to this place.”

Record collecting can be a very solitary hobby. You go to shops alone, you catalogue records alone, you listen to stuff alone. But there are people who shop in the same shops as you, they go to the same gigs as you, you have so much in common with them. I loved that about the job, I introduced people to each other and I knew they would get on, because I knew what music they liked. The record shop has been forced to evolve into a community hub, you could buy every record you ever wanted online… but where’s the fun in that? I’m so looking forward to going into these shops and meeting the communities built around them. After all, without customers there is no shop.

REVIEW: Between The River and The Sea


Rating: 3 out of 5.

“A one-man show full of heart, but lacking in structure and depth”


Part of the Royal Court’s 70th anniversary season, Between The River and The Sea continues the trend of bold programming from artistic director David Byrne. The controversial title provokes a reaction before the piece even begins, although creator/performer Yousef Sweid insists the play isn’t political. 

A Christian-Arab-Palestinian-Israeli, Sweid has often felt like he’s living a double life. Now raising children in Germany from two different Jewish-Israeli ex-wives, Sweid is facing a custody battle that he is determined to keep civil. This one-man show is laced with gentle humour and empathy, the subject matter is handled delicately and with grace that the provocative title doesn’t suggest. 

Loosely structured around his life story, the show ambles from one moment to the next, lacking in structure that would drive the plot forward. The overall message is one of peace and unity, Sweid acknowledges the pain and suffering caused on all sides and dares to dream of a utopia without borders.

Sweid plays beautifully to a familiar audience, exclaiming ‘I see so many of my friends!’ as he walks out onto stage. His performance is met with constant whoops, laughs and cheers which at times he can’t help but reference, further diluting the wandering narrative. This is a true community performance, with director Isabella Sedlak joining him to take a bow at the end.

The show played at Edinburgh Fringe in 2025 and feels suited to the festival format, as it is presented on a bare stage bar a few protest flags, a chair and a microphone. Despite having previous runs, the show itself feels unfinished, with rambling stories that go nowhere and some half-hearted audience interaction that is quickly abandoned. It’s a 60-minute part standup, part theatre piece that doesn’t feel particularly suited to this more traditional venue. 

Nonetheless this is a performance full of heart and Sweid seems like the perfect person to deliver his message of radical empathy, acceptance and peace. He is charming and easy to watch, offering an optimistic view of the future through the eyes of his Jewish children, living such protected lives in Berlin they can’t remember the word for antisemitism. 

Between The River and The Sea runs at Jerwood Theatre Upstairs at Royal Court Theatre until May 9, 2026. Tickets are available here.

REVIEW: The Woman in Black


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“No matter how much you may brace yourself, this show is ready to startle you.”


The Woman In Black, will never grow old, terrorising those who watch it. Directed by Robin Herford, a champion of this account and adapted by Stephen Mallatratt, based in the novel by Susan Hill, get ready for an unforgettable and stormy reenactment of a paranormal encounter.

The play covers the story of Arthur Kipps, a man with a tale desperate to be told about his days working as a solicitor, travelling to a coastal town North of London, Crythin Gifford, to find and retrieve the financial papers of a client who passed away. Upon his arrival, Arthur Kipps begins to feel an air of unwelcomeness, secrets and paranormal activity. Years after his traumatising tale, Arthur Kipps desperately asks an actor to help him retell the story, to inform his friends and family after keeping this secret with him, eating him alive. Arthur Kipps and the actor begin to explore the story, reliving it to a grave extent.

Regardless of whether you have read the book, seen the play or watched the film, admittedly, there are large expectations from the stage play, it must be terrifying. The large task of creating theatre which scares unexpectedly was there, without being obvious as to when something was happening. The audience jumped and yelped at each scare, it seemed we fell into the trap every single time.

Directed by Robin Herford, the choices made seemed to be the right ones. Although this performance translated to the audience perfectly, it is understandably a story which can be easily muddled. The performance seemed honest and had great simplicity to it, nothing was too much, Herford’s direction made complete and total sense bringing two dimensions together, the theatre, where Arthur Kipps and The Actor work on bringing Arthur’s story to life and inside the story, the bleak and strange Eel Marsh House, the causeway and the unfriendly coastal town of Crythin Gifford. Herford himself has played Arthur Kipps in several different theatres across the world, conceivably, Herford’s knowledge not only as a director but as an actor, has clearly had an impact on this production.

Both actors had a heavy assignment to complete, having the complexity of being The Actor and Arthur, but also as several different characters in Arthur Kipps story, succeeding entirely in this process. Daniel Burke’s performance as The Actor and as young Arthur Kipps was honourable and had a great lightness to it, showing determination from both The Actor, perfecting the performance and the young Arthur Kipps, eager to do what is right. It was easy to differentiate between the two, which is essential for keeping the story easy to follow.

John Mackay’s Arthur Kipp was one to never forget, as well as his additional roles as Sam Daily and Keckwick. Mackay’s performance appeared to be slick, clever and precise, it was thoroughly enjoyable watching both actors tell this story.

The element usage on stage paired perfectly with everything else, lighting and sound were used effectively, yet not overdone. This play was on two different levels of excellence to watch; one, being the fact that The Actor mentions the importance of lighting and sound to aid Arthur Kipps to life, something of such simplicity but effect, and two, us watching it roll out, being hypnotised by said lighting and sound, believing it all and making this ghost story feel all the very realer.

Mystery was generally what led the production forward, in all means. Arthur Kipps perplexing experience, the paranormal and haunting doubt and the suspense as the story was told. This production is not one to be missed, and certainly is one to leave you feeling frightened.

The Woman In Black will be at the Bristol Old Vic until the 25th of April 2026. Tickets are available here.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Christopher Howell and Desireé Burch

Step into a world where illusion and storytelling intertwine, and magic becomes something far richer than a sequence of tricks. In Rabbits Out of the Hat, performers Christopher Howell and Desireé Burch reimagine the traditional magic show, weaving narrative, character, and emotion into every illusion. Drawing on years of international experience, their work invites audiences to be swept up in a theatrical journey, one where the mystery is only part of the magic, and the story takes centre stage.

As long-standing members of The Magic Circle and creative partners since 2006, the duo have developed a distinctive collaborative process grounded in curiosity, experimentation, and a shared passion for performance. In this interview, they reflect on what sets their show apart, the personal inspirations behind key moments, and how audiences around the world continue to shape the way they bring magic to life. We sat down with Christopher and Desireé to discuss their upcoming performance.


1What makes Rabbits Out of the Hat different from a traditional magic performance? 

Christopher: Most magic shows are presented in a ‘for my next trick’ sort of way. It’s all about the ‘tricks’ for their own sake. What we think really takes magic to another level though is when you can use it to tell a story. That’s what we do in Rabbits Out of the Hat. We think it’s really exciting when the magic grows organically out of the story you’re watching on stage. You get swept away in the drama of it all and leave having been moved by it rather than just being left wondering how on earth we did the magic (which you’ll get in this show as well!) We hope that wondering about the secrets becomes the least important part of the experience. Probably part of why many magicians choose not to tell stories with their magic is that to do it in a way that feels natural and unforced is very hard work!

Without giving too much away, is there a particular illusion in the show that feels especially meaningful or personal to you? 

Desireé: The levitation on the broom scene is a very meaningful moment in the story. We wanted Josephine to be active in this illusion, since most magicians assistants are usually hypnotised while it’s performed. In our case, the assistant is actually the one ‘willing’ herself to levitate. When I was growing up, I always loved watching old episodes of Lucille Ball. She made me laugh and ultimately without me realising, she showed me the blueprint of what you can do as a female performer. It was a joy when we were told by our mentor, the master magician Jeff McBride, that Lucille once did this illusion with Orson Welles and that she was the first assistant to talk all the way through the routine. It all makes sense. That’s why this is one of my favourite moments in the show. 

How has being members of the The Magic Circle influenced your approach to performance?

Christopher: The Magic Circle was actually founded the year that this show is set: in 1905. Its founding president was a very influential British magician called David Devant. One of David’s mottos was ‘All done by kindness’. This was something he thought was important when performing magic, rather than ridiculing audience members, making them feel uncomfortable. Kindness and fairness are certainly two themes that we deal with in our story. Also, one of the core values of The Magic Circle is that a magician never reveals their secrets. This is also something we hold true to. In fact every person who works with us in a capacity where they will have to learn our magic secrets has to sign a non-disclosure agreement to ensure they take any magic secrets they learn with them to the grave! Magic is so much better when it leaves the audience in a state of wonder and disbelief.

You’ve worked together since 2006 – how has your creative partnership evolved over time?

Christopher: By now we can read each others’ minds! (Hey, we should put that in the act!) But seriously, our ‘method’ – if we have one – hasn’t really changed over the years. The starting point to a routine or idea is always different. It might be a classic magic effect that needs to be redressed to fit a new sort of situation, so then we brainstorm ways to do it. It might be a story we’re trying to flesh out and looking for magic that could help tell it. We just try things and get on with them. It can be messy, with lots of trial and error. We’re both a couple of work horses and that helps get us through the dark moments! 

You’ve performed all over the world – from Hollywood to Berlin – how do different audiences respond to magic and humour?

Desiree: American audiences wonderfully extroverted; they’re rooting for you even before the show begins! British audiences – thanks to the panto tradition – like to play with you and be a part of it. There can be a fun cheeky tension there. Then you go to a Russian audience where they’re intense and observant: they can love your show to bits, but you’ll never know until they rave about it afterwards. It’s always different. But every audience is always different, even in the same theatre! The important thing to remember is that they’re at your show to have a good time, to escape their routines and to dream. So regardless of what ‘temperature’ you might feel in the room, just keep dishing it out. Sometimes a ‘good’ audience is loud and responsive and sometimes a ‘good’ one is very quiet because they’re leaning in to hear a pin drop. 

There will be two performance of Rabbits Out The Hat at Jackson Lane on 10th May. Tickets are available here.

REVIEW: Her and The Voice in Her Head


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Fuelled by spoken word and banter, Lorraine Adeyefa’s lively performance blends the playful and the painful, exposing the open wounds of a young Black woman’s search for love.


In the intimate black box of Theatre Deli’s Studio Ten, cluttered with laundry and
empty wine bottles, a young woman’s inner world spills outward. Her and the Voice
in Her Head, written and performed by Lorraine Adeyefa, plunges into the emotional
comedown of a situationship, tracing the fragile terrain between heartbreak, self-
doubt, memories, and the beginnings of healing.

Through banter, spoken word, and a lively performance, the piece captures a mind in
flux: messy, funny, and emotionally vulnerable. Adeyefa vividly embodies “her” as we
witness an internal dialogue made external with a mysterious voice floating onto the
stage. Warm, teasing and commanding, the voice (by Effie Ansah) becomes both
companion and counterpoint, and its verbal exchange with Adeyefa feels at once
deeply personal and performatively dynamic.

The story takes us on a journey through love anecdotes, from teen puppy love to city
girl dating. Moments of carefree bliss in the highs are followed by deep struggle in
the lows, revealing a profound craving for acceptance and love.

Connection becomes one of the production’s strongest points. From early on,
Adeyefa acknowledges the audience with a deer-in-headlights look, surprised not to
be alone. But she quickly turns the crowd into confidants. Banter flows easily, oversharing her every thought, from bits of songs to romantic delusions, yet avoiding
what hunts her the most.

And the room responds in kind. Laughter, sighs, and even spontaneous call-outs
ripple through the space as she shares her story, creating a sense of connection.
Theatre that manages to build collective care on the spot like that is something to
praise.

The piece is unflinchingly honest and raw. In such close quarters, every shift in tone
lands with no filter. Joy travels as quickly as sorrow through voice and movement
(with Adeola Yemitan as movement director), and the air feels thick with both the
playful and the painful.

Spoken word gives the piece a beautiful texture, becoming its beating heart. The
words ripple in ways that feel soft yet cutting, crystallising as the most truthful vessel
of the young woman’s feelings.

Meanwhile, sound design by Immanuel Baptist and lighting design by Jahmiko
Marshall play a crucial role in shaping the inner world. Baptist’s soundscape comesas an echo, particularly the voice, blurring the lines between internal and external,
and drawing audiences into the inner rollercoaster.

And so, audiences follow a mind brimming with intrusive thoughts: from rap breaks
to rabbit holes about, say, Black love, power couples, and films. The stream of
consciousness is occasionally interrupted by phone calls, but more often pulled back
by the inner voice’s calling, which becomes an anchoring presence that urges “her” to
cut through the noise and let the deepest feelings surface.

As the work peels off its layers, it carefully handles the darkest moments with
honesty. It gestures towards a reflection of self-worth and solitude, without losing
sight of the need for connection. Healing emerges as a process, one that exists
between self-love and being held by something beyond, and perhaps stronger than,
romantic love.

In a world that preaches self-worth through likes, prince-charming tales, and
relationship goals, all while encountering loud dynamics of situationship culture, Her
and the Voice in Her Head counters with a beautifully vulnerable story of self-
discovery.

This show’s run is now concluded and ran at The Theatre Deli, London.

REVIEW: Relay


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A warm and inventive one person show that blends comedy, music and animation to explore queer family.


Relay follows Leila Navabi’s debut show Composition, which sold out at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival before transferring to Soho Theatre. Here, Navabi writes and performs a one person show that blends stand up, music and animation to explore what it means to build a queer family on your own terms. It is a simple premise on paper, but one that opens into something much more layered.

The show drives forward each event with humour, it’s punchy and personal and at times improvised. This only makes the more reflective moments stand out, as Leila is the very show itself and when the themes get more pensive so does she. There is a clear sense of control in how those shifts are handled. It never feels like it is trying too hard to land a point, which makes the emotional beats more effective when they arrive.

The performance style leans into something conversational. It feels relaxed, almost like being told a story by someone you who know at your local bar. That ease is matched by strong writing. Even moments that appear spontaneous are clearly well structured, giving the piece a steady rhythm throughout.

Structurally, the show avoids a straightforward retelling. Instead, it weaves together stand up, electro musical numbers and hand drawn animation. The use of cut out figures stands out and really gives personality and presence to all the people involved, even if in reality it’s just Leila breathing life into cardboard. They could easily feel like a novelty, yet they bring surprising depth. The people within the story feel distinct and recognisable, despite only appearing as illustrations. It is a simple idea executed with real care.

There’s variety to the music. Each number feels purposeful, you have the punchy intro, the funny catchy brunch number, and a sombre song, because sometimes despite your best efforts, life puts your wants on hold. Plus, I love punk singers. 

What resonates most is the balance between humour and sincerity. It’s a personal story, told intimately by the one in the middle of it, that first hand telling of is rich and gives you so much to engage with. It all plays on the strengths of a one woman show.

Relay is an engaging and thoughtful piece of theatre that manages to feel both personal and expansive. It offers a fresh perspective on family, told with warmth and clarity, and delivered in a way that feels genuinely inviting.

This show was a one-off that ran at The Lowry, Manchester.

REVIEW: Managed Approach


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Jules Coyle’s poignant play historicises a critical moment for British sex workers


In 2014, the UK’s first legalised red light district was trialled in Leeds, a scheme which was referred to as the “managed approach”. This sterile term is where Jules Coyle’s show takes its name from, exploring the scheme through a mixture of verbatim accounts of women who worked under it and a storyline following a mother and daughter dealing with living in Holbeck, where the scheme was trialled. The show puts forward poignant and complex arguments for and against the managed approach, but its main offering is the empathy it handles all of its characters with. 

The mother Kate (Eanna Ferguson) and daughter Abbie (played by Jules Coyle also) are played with great complexity. Coyle’s writing displays an excellent skill in storytelling, something each actor really brings to life, whether it’s Kate describing the fear growing up at the time of the Yorkshire ripper attacks, or it’s Abbie describing a particularly messy eighteenth birthday that saw her escorted home to safety by one of the sex workers in the area. This first story does some necessary and unexpected work reminding us of how ubiquitous and normalised male violence is, and how it is that violence that sits behind every concern and fear driving the conflict between the various women living under the managed approach. It critically centred the experiences of northern women. It made me think of my mother, who grew up in the North at that same time, and has expressed the exact same feeling Kate was recounting on stage.  Abbie’s story is particularly compelling, written in a way that also plays on this normalisation of male violence, through the audience’s expectations. It’s a harrowing moment, not in anything that actually happens, but in the imagined scenario it instantly invoked. Managed Approach is worth watching for these moments alone. It is at once an intriguing and revealing piece of work. 

The verbatim segments of accounts from sex workers were performed brilliantly by Áine McNamara and H Sneyd. These moments were done with great observation and respect for those interviewed, really humanising the stories told on stage. The inclusion of these moments really strengthened the overall narrative and ethos of the play. It would be great to see these bleed into the main narrative between Kate and Abbie some more, intertwining the two to remind us of the messy nature of community. It would overall be great to see the sex workers get more focus directly, being at the helm of their own story a little more. 

In any later iterations, which I hope there will be many more of, the show would benefit from a slightly stronger aesthetic vision. A little more thought behind the design of the show would give the actors a stronger sense of space to work with on stage. But these are minor notes, and Coyle’s play is nothing short of critical for the public’s consciousness. It’s work like this we need exactly more of in the theatrical landscape, work that examines and builds community, critiques policy, and solidifies our own history. Both arguemnts—that the managed approach was only trialled in Holbeck because it was a poorer area in the North, and that the approach helped give the workers the protection they needed for the work they had to do regardless—are compelling and thorny for audiences. The answer? We can’t know for sure, but probably a nationwide ‘Managed Approach’, and crucially, better protections for sex workers. This issue can be dissected all sorts of ways. Coyle has certainly given us great grounds to work on. 

FEATURE: Million Dollar Baby

As part of the BFI’s ‘The Cinematic Life of Boxing’ season, a screening of Million Dollar Baby (2004) was followed by a Q&A with broadcaster and former athlete Jeanette Kwakye, retired boxer and writer Ruth Raper and professional boxer Laura Akram. The season explores the boxing lens and its unique ability to platform stories of love, social injustice, politics and above all, the strength of the human spirit.


Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby is one of cinema’s greatest examples of this; on the surface it’s the sad story of a remarkable female boxer and her reluctant trainer, but in truth it’s a story of family turmoil, gender inequality and, as Clint Eastwood himself described ‘a father-daughter love story’.

Oscar-winning Hilary Swank stars as underdog Maggie Fitzpatrick, who finally convinces coach Frankie Dunn (Clint Eastwood) to take her under his wing, aided by gym caretaker and narrator Eddie Scrap-Iron Dupuis (Morgan Freeman). It’s got everything you want from a boxing movie: grit, determination, heart-warming success, out-of-character vulnerability and a devastating ending.

Eastwood’s idea for the film was initially rejected by Warner Bros – ‘It’s about a woman in boxing! Nobody will want to see that!’ – but he convinced them with a small budget and strong will. It’s true, in 2004, not many people did want to see women in boxing; women’s boxing wasn’t even in the Olympics until 2012, and even now women’s matches are knocked down to the bottom of line-ups. Raper discussed the current attitude towards women’s boxing, noting that there is ‘still a long way to go’.

The first ever all-female boxing card to headline a major venue was just last year at the Royal Albert Hall, and still they are paid a fraction of what their male counterparts receive. The former boxer turned writer/presenter discussed this with current boxer Laura Akram after the screening. They discussed the truth of the film, its moments of dramatisation and accuracy, and how it made them, as female boxers, feel. It was clear that the film’s tragic ending isn’t conducive to improving the sport’s dangerous reputation, but that its portrayal of the typical boxing gym, the themes it discusses and the relationship between coach and athlete were handled truthfully.

There was a general sense of hope from the panel; female boxing has come a long way since 2004, with world champions Katy Taylor, Caroline Dubois and Claressa ‘T Rex’ Shields, to name but a few, leading the way for aspiring young women. Representation in cinema is gaining traction, with Ryan Destiny’s portrayal of Claressa Shields in The Fire Inside (2024) Sydney Sweeney starring in Christy, the 2025 biopic of legend Christy Martin.

Also up for discussion was the accuracy of the film’s ‘Hit Pit’ gym, Raper noting that boxing gyms are often ‘in places where they are needed’, in deprived areas, working mens clubs, and that Million Dollar Baby does a good job of representing this element of the sport. The side stories of Danger Barch (Jay Baruchel) and the gym regulars are a big part of this, symbols of the social and symbolic power of boxing beyond its definition.

Wonderfully facilitated by Jeanette Kwakye, the evening was an inspiring and eye-opening peek into the world of women’s boxing, and an excellent meeting between cinema and sport, highlighting the importance of their intersection expertly.