REVIEW: Mandela: A New Musical

Rating: 5 out of 5.

Expect to be moved by the ultimate human rights story of sacrifice, hope and culture.

Mandela: A New Musical, follows the historical events of Nelson Mandela’s (played by Michael Luwoye) fight for justice and freedom for South Africans oppressed by the apartheid regime. The narrative leads us up to the imprisonment of Mandela, and the subsequent on-going fight lead by his wife Winnie to continue his political work for equality, rallying up support and protesting. What makes this show spectacular is the decision to transform the narrative into a musical!

The chorus open the show with powerful singing in English and Afrikaans, the melodies teamed with fierce dance moves, capturing the audience. Mesmerised by the vocal soulful spirituality of the freedom fighters, empowering – gospel like in intensity, you watch with bated breath. The music and lyrics (Greg Dean Borowsky & Shaun Borowsky) were powerful and emotive, the use of the drums, wood wings, percussion and the base amplifying the dialogue. The incredible ensemble cast of exceptional singers, dancers and actors, were directed by Schele Williams. The strength, courage and pride of the cast representing the black and brown Africans fighting for freedom, was further intensified by the symbolisms and shapes executed in the traditional dance routines (Choreographer, Gregory Maqoma). Special mention to Danielle Fiamanya’s (playing Winnie) exceptional performance, her strength of character when heading the Women’s League as she announced “when you strike a woman you make a rock!” gave me goosebumps! Prudence Jezile (playing Praise Singer), Posi Morakinyo (playing Thembi Mandela) and Michael Luwoye (playing Nelson Mandela) sent shivers down the spine with their sensational solo singing pieces!

Avoiding too many spoilers, there was an interesting attempt in the narrative to give an insight into the British and American Heads of States and their positions in apartheid   – perhaps shining a light on the global political climate during this time period.

The play’s visionary experience was enhanced by cultural South African outfits – these bright bold block colours and prints (Costume Designer, Fay Fullerton) underneath multi-coloured spotlights (Lighting Designer, Jon Clark) gave an earthy breath-taking atmosphere. 

Clever set design (Set Designer, Hannah Beachler) used a centre space with earthy tones to allude to a desert-like landscape, with movable parts of the set used to create intimate settings. Further use of the top wings to the left and right of the stage were used to show key events taking place in other locations, this gave an immersive feeling – wherever you sit in the auditorium you will feel a part of the Cape Town struggle. In addition, an illusion of rocky mountain-like environment to represent Robin Island was achieved using high-quality projection onto the back stage screen (Projection and Video Designer, Akhila Krishnan). 

Mandela: A New Musical was created in proud partnership with Nandi Mandela, Luvuyo Madasa and the Mandela family, and honours a timeless feat that should not be forgotten. You will leave the Young Vic Theatre, having experienced a taste of the South African culture.

REVIEW: Mixtape – Celebrating 20 years of ZooNation: The Kate Prince Company

Rating: 5 out of 5.

 ‘Mixtape’ trailblazing, vibrant innovative dance masterpiece, suitable for the whole family – you will dance, sing and laugh throughout this entertaining and interactive show!

In celebration of 20 years of ZooNation: The Katie Prince Company really over-delivered in this electric energetic display of the best UK ensemble dancers at Sadler’s Wells Theatre! The extraordinarily talented dance company effortlessly combined street, jazz, contemporary, salsa and ballet styles of dance, through bold characters. The dark deep simple backdrop for the set design (Ben Stones), enhanced each music piece (sound designer – Tony Birch), alongside the strobe lighting and shapes made by lights (lighting designer – Charlie Morgan Jones) impacted the audience powerfully. 

A particular iconic piece that stood out was Message in A Bottle, the song Shape of My Heart (music and lyrics Sting), choreographed by Kate Prince, with the attached dramaturg being Lolita Chakrabarti. The duet dancers for this piece were exceptional, they performed contemporary and ballet dance, with the use of mirroring, the changing of levels and speed to the music in a way which was incredibly precise and visibly stunning. The telling of this love story under the blue lit lights and Stings vocals, melted my heart and gave me goose bumps – trailblazing!

Expect to be wowed by the complex choreography and clever storytelling (artistic director – Kate Prince) with slices of gymnastics, beat-boxing, body popping and isolations, this fast pace, detailed ensemble piece received a standing ovation by all. It’s a show that is capable of satisfying all members of the family, as well as music lovers, dance enthusiasts and all those in between. We are taken on a visceral feel -good journey of entertainment, through a range of music genres! 

Special mention to live guitarist and singer (DJ Walde) whose song Invisible Me (Some Like It Hip Hop) was especially poignant. Walde was accompanied by a solo dancer who performed a mime and comedy-based dance piece with great humour and flare, and backing singers who harmonised beautifully, this was refreshingly unique and engaging piece of artistry. 

REVIEW: Sus

Rating: 5 out of 5.

 ‘Sus’ is set on the eve of Thatcher’s landslide victory in 1979, with shocking similarities with the current climate as Liz Truss takes the reins of the Conservatives and the Met Police come under scrutiny.

‘Sus’, written by Barrie Keeffe is a contrast of cultures, politics, race and perspectives on morals and values. As we enter the auditorium, Margaret Thatcher’s voice boomed through the speakers “without the rule of law can be no liberty”, this is intercepted by a melody of “everythings’ gonna be alright” sang over a soft reggae tune. These elements set the tone for the play which puts systematic racism within the police force and the oppression of black men, under a microscope; ‘Sus’ of course being short for ‘suspicion’ or ‘suspect’.

 ‘Sus’ is staged in traverse, with minimal set (Mark Hesketh, Set Builder), lighting (Jamie Platt, Lighting Designer) and music (Philip Matejtschuk, Sound Designer) with no over the top enhancements or distractions, simply there are 2 chairs and a table that remain on stage throughout. This leaves both the cast completely exposed to the audience as well as the audience members on opposing sides of the stage in eye line with each other. This makes for a very intimate environment for what is an impactful, though close to the bone piece of writing. All actors, Stedroy Cabey (Delroy), Alexander Neal (Karn) and Fergal Coghlan (Wilby) gave exceptional truthful performances, creating palatable tension and sorrow.

 At the start of the production Karn sets the English political climate in the 1970s; which is paramount to underpinning the race relations themes throughout the piece, and poignant as many of these issues we see are still very evident today. In order to balance the debate, we also get an insight into the difficulties police officers may face, in terms of lack of support and protection from their commissioners at the top rankings of the force. It also explores more visceral aspects such as the continual increasing legislation to learn to enforce, on top of the old English laws which are no longer relevant in current affairs. ‘Sus’ digs deep, the themes within the writing are complex, multifaceted and generational.

When Delroy joins the stage, as a young black male, attempting to navigate a broken legal system through the use of humour, at first we are taken aback, uncertain of how to deal with the light being shed on what is a suffocating situation. It was an interesting director’s choice (Paul Tomlinson) to select humour as a tool to express police harassment of marginalised groups. Half of the audience seemed to find this hysterical, half did not laugh at all – I was in the latter cluster. Though, in hindsight, I can appreciate it was needed due to the seriousness that was to follow.

Through the character of Delroy, we gain a deep understanding around modern day policing issues such as biased ‘stop and search’ powers and police brutality. Whilst through the roles of Karn and Wilby, the play highlights how significant impact party politics have on policing. Overall, a play that tackles racial discrimination, politics and reduced circumstances due to poverty. The narrative certainly is much needed place on our stages, hopefully it will tour rural parts of the UK following it’s run at the Park Theatre!

REVIEW: Horse-Play

Rating: 3 out of 5.

 Seductive show with a healthy dose of terms such as ‘flutter-bitch’, ‘fitter-fuck’ and large black dildos flung around for shock comedy value to ensure we stand to attention.

 ‘Horse-Play’, written by Ian Hallards’ is a seductive, sarcastic and sometimes, sadistic adult comedy. The set (designer – David Shields) is an S&M sex dungeon, decorated black and red themed ropes, leathers and latex, low-lit candles housing an iron cage centre-stage. Through characters Tim (played by David Ames) and Tom (played by Jake Maskall) we are taken on an exploration of a couples attempt at saving a relationship that’s gone stale in the bedroom long before, the slice of life theatre that we’re looking to be exposed to. 

  At the start of the show Tim and Tom are introduced via their superhero alter egos’ as they plunge into a pre-arranged date inside the chamber of a male dominatrix. The fast pace, quick wit, tongue in cheek humour filled with loud sex references, gave us as an audience a sense of ease, as we laughed at the very relatable and over-exposed pair.  Between the horny puns the fragility of the couples’ relationship starts to unravel as it becomes clear, this ‘event’ is more of a last resort than a ‘fun time’.

  Not to give away any spoilers, but something ‘interesting’ occurs that acts as a catalyst for the truth coming to light, that this is Tim’s sexual fantasy and as he is clearly the needy neurotic counterpart in the relationship, he has Tom on strings, as Tom desperately tries to manage Tim’s emotions and reignite the flame in their marriage. There was an outstanding performance from Matt Lapinskas who plays Karl, the handsome male escort, who becomes compromised amongst the couples unravelling. 

  ‘Horse-Play’ is certainly an exciting piece of writing which is bold and unapologetic. It’s not for the fainthearted, as a number of sexual fetishes are detailed. So, if you don’t know your Viagra from your poppers, you will leave having learned a thing or two about S&M. Another theme throughout the piece was an on-going references to 80’s soap operas, the memories expressed giddily from Tim’s perspective, indicating a blurring of make-believe with reality. This served as a novelty nostalgia for older audiences and infused intrigue for the younger viewers. 

  Director Andrew Beckett did a good job at managing the pace, ensuring the staging, the use of physical theatre and props was varied throughout to hold our attention and maintain tension.

REVIEW: Hungry @ Soho Theatre

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Overall a mediocre comedy which attempts to explore several large themes, though fails to assess at any meaningful depth – a single viewpoint on gentrification.

To set the scene, before ‘Hungry’ the play written by Chris Bush begins, the audience within the upstairs space in Soho Theatre are sat in a darkened room, the seating is in the round, centre stage lies only 2 metal dinning trolleys on wheels; that house a few covered plates. Setting the tone (Lydia Denno – Set and Costume Designer) an 80’s disco music sound track is played, showcasing the likes of Diana Ross and Whitney Houston, members of the audience sing along and we are made to feel ready for a party as we await the start of the show! Funnily enough, as the play makes an abrupt start – we are snapped out of this, as we instantly become aware that the verbal exchange occurring between Bex (played by Melissa Lowe) and Lori (played by Eleanor Sutton) is anything but happy go lucky and in fact rather passive aggressive. Under the bright yellow lighting (Rajiv Pattani – Lighting Designer) the characters are portrayed as polar opposites, as though in direct combat with each other, changes in time are signposted by the characters smashing their opposing trolleys into each other!

 Despite this, what keeps us engaged at the beginning is the fast-paced dialogue, the short witty sentences, tongue in cheek sense of humour that dances around racial and social class slurs, all expressed in Northern accents and executed extremely well by actors Melissa Lowe (Bex) and Eleanor Sutton (Lori). This makes the first act of the play a joy to watch, as the majority of the audience laughed along at the uncomfortable dynamics and red flags portrayed within this lesbian relationship. Unfortunately, this came to a halt when an extremely awkwardly choreographed (Kloe Dean – Movement Director) sex scene was danced out underneath flashing lights and a bass-heavy instrumental track. It was supposed to have been a sensual love making scene but it fell short uncomfortably. From this point of the show onwards, we were taken on the journey of this relationship, the writer (Chris Bush) briefly referencing the power dynamics within sexual relationships at work, and even the abuse of power within the workplace, but we find, as soon as the hint had been made, the audience is thrown straight into the next topic, with no resolve for the topics highlighted.

‘Hungry’, is advertised as being a “blisteringly funny play about what we eat and who we love, exploring class, queerness, cultural appropriation and the cost of gentrification”, it is fair to say the topics of food and class were investigated at length. Sadly, the other themes were only touched upon, thus lacking the depth needed to explore, debate or come to any sort of conclusion. However, as an audience we were certainly taken on a culinary experience by the chef Lori. I thoroughly enjoyed envisioning the journey of food from the perspective of Lori, the language used to create vivid pictures of a range of food from oysters to chicken nuggets and both the physical and emotional impact food had imparted on the character was remarkable. I laughed uncontrollably as I listened to Lori’s story, explaining her “spiritual experience with oysters aged 14”. Though at times this character was almost a middle-class yoga-mum caricature, Eleanor Sutton was able to bring the realism and embody Lori as a relatable perfectionist and functioning alcoholic with flaws, as we see her begin to unravel when her judgements about and in fact her own prejudices are reflected back to her.

The class argument was dealt with at length by the play, with both sides being debated in equal measures, the issue being that it wasn’t a unique discussion that would maintain an interest. As ‘class’ was the only constant subject matter throughout the play, it quickly became repetitive, I would have loved the writer to have selected fewer themes to focus on and explore them fully. ‘Hungry’, wrestles with big concepts such as how do we as a culture define “success”, “lack” and even what we perceive as “good enough”. As an audience member I was intrigued to know more about Bex’s relationship with food; specifically relating to her eating disorder, which was merely indirectly remarked upon.

The director (Katie Posner) perhaps misunderstood the material, when it came to the character of Bex who was depicted as a two-dimensional racial stereotype, flickering between appearing aloofly immature and angry. This character presented as surface level, lacking depth as a person, I am uncertain if this was down to the writer or the director, though luckily actress (Melissa Lowe) still gave us some memorable performance points. As a black female audience member at times I was offended, confused and left wondering who this show was written for, I did not recognise the character as an accurate representation of any woman. I was further exasperated by having to sit through ten minutes of Bex jumping on crisp packets placed across the stage, to portray her rage and frustration. This is the first time I had witnessed a grown woman having a 2 year old’s temper tantrum, it was unrealistically uninspiring and tiresome as it lasted for such a long time.

The structure of the play was erratic, at times I was confused as to where the characters were in time, due to the constant reshuffling of present, past, future, there was no benefit of this play not being told in chronological order. And due to the staging and set design being limited, there was no clear signposting either, so as a viewer I was focused to concentrate to figure this out. Not what, anyone would what from a show advertised as a comedy.

  ‘Hungry’ ends with chef Lori (Eleanor Sutton) cooking an Asian dish on-top of a hot stove on-stage, which was one of the more successful directorial choices, really driving home the points made throughout regarding cultural appropriation. Activating all of the senses, with the smell of spices burning and the crackling of the oil; added to the atmosphere of the play and the love of food shared by the chef whilst also leaving the audience feeling rather hungry!

REVIEW: A Doll’s House, Part 2

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Fantastic actors, intellectually stimulating, with some explosive moments and abrupt ending. A great piece of theatre.

A Doll’s House Part 1, is a timely tale that was written by Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen in 1879. It was a trailblazer for its time, tackling issues faced by the character Nora – a middle class wife and mother, who rejects being the homemaker to husband (Torvald) leaving both her marriage and her children to find herself. A Doll’s House Part 2 now looks to build on this legacy examining the universal issue of a woman’s identity within a male-dominated society.

The writer (Lucas Hnath) makes a clear decision from the outset to engage the audience using humour in contrast to the clinical setting. This is pedalled through the character of Anne Marie (June Watson) who portrays a non-threatening woman who is blunt, yet so disarming that for the first act we are in hysterics. Not to call this a comedy piece – it certainly isn’t but the character, Anne-Marie, is honest in a way which most may find uncomfortable… and June Watson’s performance is electrifyingly magnificent, elevating the piece. In other news, the pacing is fast, the dialogue peppered with many references to the original A Doll’s House making it easy for those unfamiliar, to quickly get onboard for the drama ahead!

With minimalised staging, A Doll’s House, Part 2, is set underneath harsh yellow lighting panels that coat the stage throughout the play creating a sense of blinding intensity. The decision to keep character costumes in period dress, though have them speak using modern language, was perhaps a way of honouring the integrity of the original play, whilst allowing this new version to be more accessible to younger audiences.

Comic relief is needed to sustain the serious arguments driving the play which question whether marriage is necessary in the modern day. A Doll’s House, Part 2, also poses the question as to whether society will ever permit woman to abandon their children (in the same way men are able to with less judgement currently) – allowing society to find compassion for the mothers and their reasons on an equal footing to men. Facilitating these complex ideas, are 3 strong actresses, fighting differing feminist viewpoints with all their mite, whilst challenging our own belief systems. Difficult conversations about woman being reduced to puppet-dolls by husbands once married, were unapologetically driven throughout the play by Nora’s (Noma Dumezweni) power position; as she charged forwards as an independent woman in spite of societal stigma, stereotype and shame, refusing to play ball with society’s expectations. This was quite a revelation, causing audible sounds of gasps, tuts, mutterings and even laughing up and down the audience, moved by the subject matter and tremendous performance by Noma Dumezweni. A young perspective on the debate is introduced by Emmy (Patricia Allison) the daughter of Nora, which was refreshing allowing us to sympathise for the children left behind. Emmy certainly doesn’t play the victim having absorbed the survival qualities of both her birth mother and the mother who raised her, Anne Marie.

In A Doll’s House, Part 2, we see that Torvald (Brian F.O’Byrne), the husband figure, is portrayed as a fragile underdog, he is almost swallowed up by the fierce women in the piece. This is a complete contrast from the original play in which Torvald is certainly an alpha male. Did the writer (Lucas Hnath) make this drastic change to facilitate the feminism narrative, or perhaps to give a voice to men who feel somewhat left behind in this post Me Too world? Maybe, though, I can’t help but wonder about how explosive this could have been, if the spirit of the original Trovald had remained. How would these fierce women have navigated the events that unfolded up against a dominant male?