REVIEW: Steel Magnolias


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“A funny, nostalgic retelling of Robert Harling’s famous play”


Steel Magnolias (1989), based on the 1987 play by Robert Harling, is one of my all-time favourite films. Depicting an intimate, funny friendship between six women in Louisiana, and inspired by the death of Harling’s sister Susan as a result of complications from Type 1 diabetes, the film is both heartwarming and devastating. So, naturally, when I heard that the OSO Arts Centre in south-west London was putting on a production of Steel Magnolias, I lunged at the opportunity to watch it!

It absolutely paid off. Steel Magnolias is every bit as deliciously sarcastic and sugary sweet as we all know it to be! We get to hear the fabulously memorable lines, e.g. “There’s no such thing as natural beauty” (Truvy Jones) and “I’m not crazy. I’ve just been in a very bad mood for forty years” (Ouiser Boudreaux). The distinctive personality of each character shines brightly, so they are all easy to connect with. While the film shows us a multitude of characters and colourful locations, this play strips all that away; instead, we see the six protagonists in one room, examining their lives and relationships with each other.

I was pleasantly surprised to find that Joanna Strafford, playing the strange young Christian fundamentalist Annelle Dupuy-DeSoto, delivered my favourite performance of the night! Annelle’s shy, fly-on-the-wall demeanour tends to be squashed by the cheekiness of Clairee Belcher (Zoë Ann Bown) and the iconically sharp tongue of Ouiser Boudreaux (Robin Miller). For Strafford to infuse Annelle with double the eccentricity, in both her elongated Southern-accented vowels and bewildered facial expressions, this is really an incredible achievement! 

Nova Skipp, who is also producing this play under Skipp Productions, portrays stoic matriarch M’Lynn Eatenton. She brings to this role an incredible sense of maternity. Her chemistry with Isabella Heaver, playing M’Lynn’s feisty daughter Shelby, is fantastic to watch. All the actors succeed in creating a sense of community and laughter, delivering the largely older audience the nostalgia of the film and the time period. Truvy’s (Kate Harbour) salon, where the play is set, is cleverly designed to be both bright and homely, and Harbour’s enthusiastic performance fits this very well.

Steel Magnolias is a wonderful play. All the actors tug at our heartstrings, bringing the laughter and tears that make Harling’s story so memorable.

Steel Magnolias is running at the OSO Arts Centre from April 14 to April 18, 2026.

REVIEW: I Was A Teenage She-Devil


Rating: 5 out of 5.

Carrie meets Heather’s meets The Pick of Destiny, this show is bonkers!


I Was A Teenage She-Devil really exemplifies the wonderfully mad spirit of The Other Palace. A Theatre known for putting on shows that break the mould or are a little out there in nature, this crazy 80s-inspired musical fits the bill.

The best word to describe this musical is bonkers. It’s absolutely wild in every conceivable way, and that’s exactly what makes it work. Sometimes, in fact, more often than not, things that are trying to be 80s don’t work as intended. Either because they try so hard it feels inauthentic, or they just don’t capture the magic of the era. This stands out because it fully leans into itself. Into the madness, the 80s tropes, the cringe and the iconic. It knows it’s insane and fully embraces it, usually in very funny ways. Most importantly, it doesn’t take itself too seriously. It fully recognises that the era it lives in is full of melodrama and goofy energy, both in the films it pays homage to and the music. It captures the romance and the teen angst, but also isn’t afraid to make fun of itself. It takes thoughts you’ve had about every 80s movie, like “why does this high school student look like they could have a mortgage and kids of their own?”, and fully presents it to you through humour, with the reveal that Rod, the jock who looks way too old to still be in education, is in fact 35 years old.

It has fun with all these tropes, the jock who’s a total jerk, the popular mean girl head cheerleader who goes out with him and the glasses-wearing loser girl who just wants to fit in. We know them all because they’re classic (if somewhat overused) themes of virtually every single film from that decade. Then we have the best friend who’s in love with the protagonist, but this is where the use of these labels gets interesting, as it becomes this queer love story with Debbie having a crush on her best friend Nancy, the story’s “loser girl”. In the 80s, people often weren’t bold enough to tell stories of this nature, so it’s nice to see how well it can work for the time period.

The narrative of this musical then gets a bit nuts and adds Satan in. Having been humiliated by head cheerleader Tiffani and boyfriend Rod following an incident in which Tiffani is banned from homecoming and kicked off the cheer squad by the gym teacher, this part of the plot possibly sounds familiar as being more or less the story of Carrie. However, the show being as self-aware as it is points this out through the character of Doobie, resident film expert and manager of the video store. After the humiliation, this is where the Heathers aspects come in. “Nancy’s Lament”, a short emotional number where she sings of how she’d sell her soul for love, leads to the sudden appearance of the devil. Naturally, she is given exactly what she wishes for, but is also turned into a she-devil. She then proceeds to punish her classmates for their wrongdoings. Nancy is like a cross between Veronica and J.D. from the cult classic. If it wasn’t already crazy, Debbie challenges Satan to a rock-off for Nancy’s soul. We go pretty far from the 80s here, as this is essentially the plot of Tenacious D In The Pick of Destiny. It’s a mashup of wild proportions and the sort of mix that maybe feels like it shouldn’t work, but somehow, it just does.

The music helps greatly with that and is across the board, intrinsically 80s. When it comes to the voices behind it, they’re nothing short of perfection. The vocals from this cast are so powerful, so strong that it makes the atmosphere of the whole performance feel absolutely epic! Ashley Goh as Debbie really embodied that rock vibe from start to finish, especially when she sings about her feelings for Nancy in “Lookin’ For Love”. Aoife Haakenson goes from loser girl to succubus she-devil in a transformation that appears effortless. The talent was unreal as we see her change from the girl who wants love and acceptance in “I Wanna Be Someone’s Girlfriend”, a girl who is far more timid and less sure of herself, to this extraordinary demonic creature in songs like “She-Devil”, where she has much more agency over herself. Haakenson’s She-Devil felt akin to Jim Carrey in The Mask when she speaks, and it felt right, like that was exactly how she should sound. It was brilliant! 

Overall, this musical’s mad energy is fuelled by passion, fun and outrageous talent from everyone involved. It’s only at The Other Palace for a limited run, so be sure not to miss it! You’ll have a hell of a time.

This show runs at The Other Palace till 26th April. Tickets available here.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Jez Bond


Artistic Director Jez Bond, Executive Director Catherine McKinney, and the whole team at Park Theatre announced further details of Whodunnit [Unrehearsed] 4, the next instalment of its hugely popular fundraising comedy spectacular, which returns from 11 May – 27 June 2026 with the most ambitious version yet. We hold this exclusive dialogue with Jez.


Each performance features a different unrehearsed guest sheriff. What continues to surprise you about that format?

I think it’s a perfect blend of comic structure and comic chaos. Looking on, it might not seem like it all the time but the cast are utterly in control of every moment. Interestingly the blocking (unless we specifically allow it not to be for a short time) is the same from person to person; which is all about the skills of how the actors manipulate the stage space. The star is always exactly where we want them to be – which is particularly important, of course, for the jokes that rely on them facing the wrong way or addressing the wrong person! But the surprise is also that there’s plenty of space for each actor to bring their flair to the table, to portray the character in a different way and – here’s the real answer, I think – for the audience to enjoy the different live reactions on the stars’ faces. Many people come more than once and you might see one actor taking it very seriously, another trying to but with a glint in their eye, yet another might have a number of corpses throughout (yes, I know it’s a murder mystery but I’m not talking about dead bodies, I’m talking about the kind or corpse where you allow yourself to visibly laugh).

How does the success of Whodunnit [Unrehearsed] directly impact the theatre’s ability to develop new work and support artists?

We need to raise around £600,000 per year on top of regular box office income to stay afloat. Because we believe that theatre is for everybody, and a big part of accessibility is affordability, we don’t want to charge West End prices. We also do a huge amount of work in the community, from programmes with young people through to our flagship dementia work. As such, as a charity, we need to make up our shortfall by fundraising. We don’t get any core funding from the Arts Council or local government – and with individual donations, smaller scale events and trust and foundation support we’re able to bring in half of what we need each year. The Whodunnit show, running every other year, makes up that gap. It’s not exaggeration to say that it’s totally vital to our continued operation. In terms of supporting new work and new artists, this is a big commitment of ours. Across our two spaces we programme more new work than revivals and we also provide space and support to a number of companies and individuals each year to develop their work.

What does it say about Park Theatre’s identity that an event like this has become part of its DNA?

Ha! Financially I suppose it says that this creative idea borne out of need is now a regular fixture necessary to stay alive. I hope for our patrons it says that Park Theatre is known for exciting, fun work and for being able to harness the incredible power and generosity of its high profile friends (all of whom perform, I must add, for free to support the charity).  I should also add that as a fundraiser tickets for this one are purposefully significantly higher – as it’s doing this show that enables us to run for the rest of the year. But even so we’re keen to ensure some lower price tickets and booking early is the best strategy as prices may change based on demand. Conversely there are also a limited number of standing tickets released on the day of each performance at our discretion. We are also going to be doing Lottery tickets – a small number of tickets for each performance at a reduced price. Full details on how to enter that will be announced closer to the show.

When audiences leave Graveside at the end of the evening, what do you hope stays with them?

So much! From the wonderful, themed food and cocktails throughout the night to the exciting touches across the building – whether that be actors conversing in character in the bar, or the addition of hay bales and whiskey barrels throughout. Of course, on stage I think there’s a few gags that will stay with them for a long time (there are still people who tell me they haven’t forgotten a particular gag in the first reading we did of this new script a year ago). But overall, I think the feeling you’re left with after Whodunnit (perhaps more so than ever in this all-encompassing immersive version) is the joy of having experienced something truly special that will never be repeated.

For tickets and listing,  see https://parktheatre.co.uk/events/whodunnit-unrehearsed-4/

REVIEW: The Constant Wife


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A pivotal and highly relatable piece of comic theatre


The festival theatre in Edinburgh this week presents “The Constant Wife” by stage and screen writer Laura Wade, famously well known for her TV-writing- “Rivals”- and her award-winning writing for stage performance “Home, I’m Darling”. This play has been adapted as a piece of comedic writing for the stage based on its original themes from the book written by William Somerset Maugham.

We meet Constance at the height of success, married to the perfect partner, a successful surgeon, John Middleton, in their beautifully decorated London flat, in 1927. The action dives right into the outside looking into what appears to be a perfect life. However, we learn early on that John’s infidelity has been ongoing for some time and right under Constance’s nose.

Her sister and mother share strong opinions about how this should be handled as they are aware, but believe that Constance is not. As “The Constant Wife”, Constance cleverly highlights the struggles in all women as they desire to be seen as more than a wife and a mother.

Packed with wit, hilarity and pivotal moments, the play reflects on difficulties and change, themes within the original story and their relevance today in particular the “empty nest” syndrome as children leave home and its impact on a marriage as time passes and infatuation fades.

There are stellar performances all round by this talented cast. Kara Tointon takes on the leading lady as Constance Middleton, embodying the play’s title as the constant wife. She does a great job of driving the cast through, however at times can present a little wooden in her movement and comfortability on stage. Certainly, she finds her pacing and strength as the character develops her independence more into the second act, complimented well by Amy Vicary–Smith’s brilliant performance as Constance’s unmarried sister. She is highly successful with her own business and continues to embrace every aspect of the key theme of independence and how it frees her creativity as an interior designer.

Tim Delap (John Middleton) delivers the persona of a steady husband. He commands the stage with grace and aplomb holding himself to the patriarchal standards expected of him at this time. His expectation of his wife simply to continue in her role with his devotion offered as enough for her is highly reflective of historical relationships of the 20th century.

Alex Mugnaioni (Bernard Kersal) is highly likeable and shows great comical timing during awkward moments with a simplistic, naturalistic air in his delivery. Philip Rham as butler Mortimer, when playing the piano, adds an additional charm and fun to his character, enhancing the high society ambience on stage and bringing warmth when moments truly need them. Gloria Onitri’s portrayal of Mary Louise is at times a tad melodramatic; however, it works well with her character’s frivolous and often shallow behaviour. Sara Crowe sustains a great level of energy throughout as Constance and Martha’s opinionated and critical mother. Her views encompass those of a generation who perhaps wish they had had more courage to change. Whilst her mother seems dismissive of the undoing of her daughter’s marriage, she nevertheless supports her decisions to take back her independence whatever way it may present itself. Her journey is beautiful to watch as she transforms into a supportive mother determined to understand the choices her daughters make for their own good.

The costumes are tailored beautifully and are designed by co-costume designers Anna Fleischle and Cat Fuller. Using lovely bright colours and at times relaxed casual wear the female characters embrace the theme of independence holding themselves with warmth and relaxed togetherness during challenging moments. Contrastingly the male characters hold closely to traditions with a very formal presentation at all times and are formally well turned out. They desperately try to sustain composure during entertaining and particularly stressful moments however come off more hysterical and childish than intended. The set is simple, but effective depicting elegance and art deco design trends. Transitions in time- as the action takes place in one location- are cleverly executed by set changes which are swift and never detract from the action on stage. Jamie Callum’s musical score, in addition, creates lightness and relaxing vibes when it is most needed increasing the light heartedness of the piece between scenes. Creative team director Tamara Harvey and producer David Pugh successfully bring everything together, enhancing the comedic style of the piece. The cleverly crafted and powerful dialogue compliments the direction well and incorporates Maugham’s intent behind the blueprint of how women may choose to live their lives in the future. There are some echoes of Ibsen’s Nora throughout this entertaining and quick-witted comedy.

Running from 31st March – 4th April at the Festival theatre in Edinburgh this relatable comedy drama is definitely worth a look.

Tickets here.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Lucas Closs

The Sequel is a new comedy-drama from emerging writer Lucas Closs. When a novelist returns to the place that made her, she must face the people living with her version of them. We sat down with Lucas to discuss their upcoming production.


What was the very first spark that led you to write The Sequel?

I kept coming across places that had become museums of themselves, honouring their own depiction in a work of art. The setting of The Sequel (designed by Peiyao Wang) is a cafe preserved as the novelist’s description of it, not only out of the need for tourism but to celebrate a shared story, in the play this is Grace’s novel. I like how with these kinds of places there’s a gulf between the expectations set by the artist and their reality. 

The play explores what happens when real people become characters in someone else’s story. Is that something you have ever worried about in your own writing?

Grace Thoth (played by Nisha Emich) writes the story of her adolescence. Though I don’t tend to write non-fiction, the characters I write are composites of quite a few people that I tend to be unaware of while writing them- I usually don’t realise who they resemble until the last minute and quickly must change a few details. 

Grace returns to the place that inspired her book and discovers the consequences of turning life into literature. What fascinates you about the relationship between writers and their “material”?

How Grace used her surroundings for material, particularly her encounters with her old mentor, John (played by Jim Findley), is like how we all at times extract from and neglect our environment and the people in it for the sake of a story. Viewing things as ‘material’ can prevent us from existing or connecting with what’s in front us. Neither Grace or John are really able to hear or see each other due to their emotional distractions. 

Your work has been described as blending contemplation with menace. How do you balance humour and darker themes on stage?

I tend to try and find the balance by what feels plausible. A good dose of humour can sometimes feel more real that pure drama. I also think humour is a grounded and enjoyable way to explore themes such as resentment and isolation. I’m very dependent on the director, Imy Wyatt Corner, to tell me what are strange jokes I’ve made up with myself and what translates on stage. 

If audiences leave the theatre debating one question about authorship or responsibility, what would you hope that question might be?

This is the core tension for Martha played by Julia Pilkington- should I live my life as the central character in a story, or should I live ‘unnarrated’? 


The Sequel comes to Kings Head Theatre, London on Monday 20th April – Saturday 2nd May 2026. For more information visit: https://kingsheadtheatre.com/whats-on/the-sequel-5tbn

REVIEW: Government Inspector


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“Guildhall students are outstanding in this timely and hilarious political satire.”


“The news that a government inspector is on his way throws a small Russian town into chaos, as its corrupt officials scramble to cover their tracks. A simple case of mistaken identity spirals into farce, exposing vanity, hypocrisy and greed in this razor-sharp satire from the grandfather of Ukrainian drama.” (Guildhall website). Gemma Brockis skillfully directs David Harrower’s adaptation of the Government Inspector, originally by Nikolai Gogul. The play stars final year acting students at Guildhall School of Music and Drama who give consistently bold and hilarious performances throughout. 

Brockis’ version is gender-swapped, with male characters reimagined as female and vice versa, resulting in all the local officials (and the titular “Inspector”) being women. Gender swapping in theatre is often tricky to get right and can sometimes dilute the impact of a show’s message, but here it was extremely successful! The main political message of this piece is to highlight the corrupt upper-class officials and their self-serving attitudes. This is still effectively done by presenting the people in power as women. In the current cultural and political climate, this play cleverly alludes to the fact that women are also capable of abusing their power for their own gain. 

The performances from the final year acting students were undeniably the standout part of the production. The play is led by the Mayor (Meg Bewley), who strides around onstage with the familiar energy of a politician who is convinced they are in control while chaos follows her every move. A fantastically strong performance from Bewley, particularly toward the end of the play when the truth unravels and so does she. Bewley’s Mayor could have stepped straight out of a Home County office during the Conservative Party’s 1990s ‘sleaze’ era, with the perfect physicality and accent to match. 

The Mayor’s foil, the supposed “Inspector” (actually named Ivana Khlestakova) is expertly brought to life by Arden Wolfe. The way she morphs her physicality throughout the show is pitch perfect, going from a desperate and starving swindler to an almost comfortable and overconfident fraud. Her determination to rinse the corrupt officials is palpable throughout, driving the plot forward and leaving chaos in her wake. 

The Postmistress (Serena Birch) and Husband Alex (Ewan Labram) were other standouts from the ensemble, fully leaning into their comic characters and being reliably hilarious every time they were onstage. The whole cast had fantastic chemistry, bringing the absurd world of this provincial town to life. 

One aspect of this production that was confusing was the time period and location this play was set in. The characters clearly lived in Russia and would make references to the Tsar and St Petersburg but were costumed in modern British clothing (e.g. Met police uniform and Stanley cups). Additionally, the characters travel by horse and carriage and send letters, but speak with 21st Century language and accents. This can also be seen in the set design specifically creating a British hotel room with familiar-looking fire safety signs on the door. The mixing of modern and original contexts is clearly intentional (whether by Harrower or Brockis), but it was difficult to fully grasp the meaning behind this choice. Ultimately this doesn’t significantly affect the enjoyment of the show, but it does provide an extra mental hurdle for the audience. 

Overall, this was an outstanding production from Guildhall, and the final-year actors 2025-26 did a fantastic job.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Eva Feiler


We sat down with Eva Feiler for a quick chat about her upcoming performance in Dear Jack, Dear Louise at Arcola Theatre from 2nd April to 2nd May. For ticketing and info, please find here.


This is such a tender and personal story. What drew you to be part of telling it on
stage?

The writing is something that really made me think – I want to be a part of this. Ken Ludwig writes with such heart and humour. At a time when the world feels so unsettled, this true story is a reminder that light and hope can exist as well.

Even though the characters spend most of the story physically apart, there’s a strong sense of dialogue between them. How do you sustain that energy across the performance?

We are made to listen even more acutely – and I think it’s this which deepens the connection between us as actors. Ken’s writing also has a natural heartbeat to it, which pulls you along like a rollercoaster ride.

Louise is described as spirited, ambitious and full of big-city dreams. What aspects
of her personality resonated most with you?

I like how opposites seem to exist within her personality. She is brave and ridiculous. Wise and naive. Emotionally steady and also fluttery. I feel I resonate with all of these.

You’ve performed a wide range of classical and contemporary roles. What has been uniquely challenging or rewarding about playing Louise?

I find the way Louise thinks and breathes very exciting. Ken uses very few full stops with her. I’ve been thinking what that might tell me about her internal heart beat. She also has a wisdom to her – and a directness – which pulls her into the ground. So it’s a very rewarding challenge (!) to play someone who is connected to the earth and sky at the same time.

Is there a moment in the play that continues to move you each time you perform it?

I find Jack’s belief in Louise very moving. To able to see your partner not only for who they are but for their potential as well feels like real love to me. So when Jack (the brilliant Preston Nyman) talks to Louise about his belief in her, I find this very moving!

If someone were coming to the show knowing very little about it, what would you
hope they carry with them after the final scene?

A spring in their step and giddiness in their heart!

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Preston Nyman


We sat down with Preston Nyman for a quick chat about his upcoming performance in Dear Jack, Dear Louise at Arcola Theatre from 2nd April to 2nd May. For ticketing and info, please find here.


What first drew you to Dear Jack, Dear Louise when you encountered the script?

I was really excited by the possibility of doing a play about two really nice people behaving nicely towards each other. I think a lot of theatre can be very guilty of being gloomy and unpleasant, but it’s much harder to tell a story about nice people doing nice things. The conflict of the play comes from the situation they find themselves in, rather than their relationship. I also love Ken’s writing and I really admire how unafraid he is to let the characters be funny.

The play is built entirely from letters exchanged during World War II. What did you
find most compelling about that form of storytelling?

Ninety-nine percent of the time it’s the sender reading their letter aloud, rather than the recipient. It makes a big difference because, as an actor, you get to dig into why they’ve chosen to write the character and would have written those specific words in that specific order. They start with a blank page each time and have to choose how they fill it.

Because Jack and Louise spend most of the story apart, their connection is built
almost entirely through language. How does that shape the way you approach the
performance?

The challenge is to make sure it doesn’t feel repetitive or stagnant. But Ken’s writing is such that the form of the play is always a step ahead of the audience. He explores and plays with the format constantly so even though these characters are 3000 miles apart, you can see their connection forming really beautifully.

What is uniquely challenging about carrying a two-person play night after night?

The main worry is that if you don’t get on with your co-star, you’re going to have a very
lonely run! But thankfully Eva is brilliant and lovely and a joy to perform with. You have to trust each other more than you would in a normal ensemble. If one person’s energy is different, the whole dynamic changes. This is true of any size cast but especially when there’s just two of you. So you have to find a good balance and a trust that you can support each other on stage during the run.

Your work spans theatre, television and film, including Mufasa: The Lion King. How
does returning to the intimacy of live theatre compare to those screen
experiences?

I love voice acting but it’s a lonely experience. Especially with Mufasa, which was ninety percent recorded during social distancing times. Theatre is a totally different experience. The reward of a live audience is massive, but you also have to be comfortable with repetition. With film and TV you do something a few times and then never again. But the fun of theatre is finding ways to keep the performance alive even though you’ve done it a hundred times.

Why do you think stories like this continue to resonate across generations?

If you look at how the world is at the moment, even within the last fortnight, there are lots and lots of people who find themselves in awful situations beyond their control. I think that’s something we can all connect with, and to see a story about people who were able to find some joy in a terrible situation is, hopefully, reassuring.

REVIEW: Scots – The Musical


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

This cast made sure to gie it laldie as they belted it oot for aww to hear


A show filled with laughter, songs and more than a few wee facts, Scots-The Musical is more than just a comic glance at the country. This show delves deep into Scotland’s past, its origins and its people; all told from the point of view of a toilet. THE Toilet, in fact. The very first. The Pavilion, being such a beloved theatre in Glasgow, made this the perfect venue for such an event, as the audience went on an educational, if somewhat ludicrous, journey.

Any story told by something people use to defecate in is going to be a bit mad. There’s really no way around that; it’s a pretty bold choice for a narrator. Yet, oddly perfect? It honestly sort of sums Scotland up in a brutal kind of way, or at least our humour. We do, undoubtedly, partake in a lot of toilet humour. Even the infamous “DISGUSTANG” meme gets a nod as we go through a variety of bog-related jokes. The reason for such an unusual storytelling device is that the first ever toilet was said to have been dug in Scotland. Throughout the show, The Toilet takes us on a journey through Scottish history, all beginning with the song “I’ve Seen Some Shit”. With this kind of storytelling device, you’d think all the humour would indeed be “shit”, but the audience was roaring with laughter as our narrator talked about how it had seen “a lot of arseholes”. This opening song has already become an earworm as it is incredibly catchy. It works really well to open the show, being a light-hearted, less serious number. 

As previously mentioned, though, this show is about more than just laughs. This musical shows us many important figures in Scottish history, especially women underappreciated within their own time. Mary Somerville, the first-ever scientist, is one such figure. Mary gets to sing one of the most powerful numbers of the show, “I Don’t Need Your Approval”. The high notes achieved by Katie Barnett were sensational, acting as a perfect closer for Act 1. Themes of female empowerment continue into Act 2 with Annie Gibbons, a woman who was instrumental in the implementation of the first toilets in tenement flats in Scotland in 1972. She provided Raymond Young with a space to build his schematics, and this led to a movement which saw toilets be included in flats and tenements all across the country. The song “Som’dy Needs A Boot Up The Arse” accompanies this part of the story and rhymes the words “didnae” and “kidney” in an act of absolute lyricism.

One thing this show manages to do well is address Scotland’s missteps. Acknowledging that Scotland has made a lot of mistakes is actually one of the factors that will help it stand the test of time, and it can’t be stressed enough how important that is. Scotland’s not perfect. Nowhere is but especially not us. We have work to do to improve, grow, and evolve and this musical addresses that boldly, while remaining hopeful for our future. One such example of this is the homophobic attitudes towards gay people in Scotland, across time, but especially in the 1970s-1990s. We see how this led to many retreating to bathroom cubicles as a place to hide, in school, work, social settings and how the hostile environment towards the community exacerbated the AIDS crisis. It goes on to show how times have evolved, as being gay was no longer illegal in Scotland in 1980. It took over 3 decades for gay marriage to be legalised, with Scotland finally being at the forefront as the first country to do so in 2014. This is all beautifully captured in a moving song sung by characters Oscar and Daniel, “Things We Don’t Say”.

 Another example of Scotland’s biggest errors that gets mentioned, in which we got “so utterly shagged” as it was so eloquently put, is when we tried to colonise the Darien region of Panama from 1698 to 1700. Known as the Darien Scheme, William Patterson took over £400,000 (roughly £60 million in today’s terms) of money taken from Scottish citizens with the intent of establishing a colony and trading route known as New Caledonia. However, it was an absolute failure, leading to the death of Patterson’s whole family as well as 2000 others due to disease and attacks from Spain, who also wished to colonise the area. This is savagely summed up in the line “Scotland backed the horse that got malaria and died”. These financial losses are ultimately what led to the formation of the union with England in 1707.  Another brilliant quote that helps summarise our storied history as a country is simply, “Sometimes we’re a f—ing mess”. Harsh, but true. However, the show also states that we always get up and try again, that we never give up, and that is important. Scotland may have some work to do, but we’re doing our best, and if we can own our mistakes and learn from the past, our future can be brighter. Better.

It’s worth noting that there are a couple of excellent running gags in this show. One is the map girl, always getting in the way and always with a deranged look in her eyes. The other is the lute player, constantly trying to get away with playing an old Scottish song known as “How Can I Be Sad On My Wedding Day?” The Toilet is having none of it, which leads to some panto-like interactions as we feel sorry for the poor lute player, but eventually, she gets to fulfil her wish, and it’s worth the wait. Yana Harris had multiple roles, but this was definitely her most endearing. It should also be mentioned that Tyler Collins did superb work with all the humour throughout the night as The Toilet. He served as a perfect narrator.

Overall, Scots- The Musical is a total riot! The balance between silly and serious is just right, the songs are incredibly entertaining, and the cast is very clearly having an absolute ball. It was plain to see how much they were all enjoying themselves, which flowed through their performance and made this a memorable and enjoyable night. Gon’ yerselves!

This has Fringe energy written all over it. It’s funny, well-balanced in tone and even educational. Plus, the songs are all fabulous! Perfect length in runtime and perfect for Scottish audiences.

This show has finished its run at the Glasgow Pavilion. Find more tickets for the Glasgow Pavilion here – https://trafalgartickets.com/pavilion-theatre-glasgow/en-GB

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Onjali Q. Raúf


We sat down with Onjali Q. Raúf, author of Boy at the Back of the Class. For ticketing and info, please find here.


The Boy at the Back of the Class has touched readers around the world since its publication. When you first wrote the book, did you imagine it would resonate so widely with young audiences?

Honestly, I didn’t have the foggiest! My imagination didn’t stretch that far. I still find myself in awe at how far this story has travelled – and all the unexpected places it has carried me to. I came into the publishing industry with one simple goal: to get a story published. If it could help a kid, somewhere, anywhere, understand they weren’t alone in what they were going / have been through, then that would have been a bonus. But the book being taken into school curriculums? Kids raising tens of thousands of pounds for refugee charities around the world? Getting thousands of letters over the years from children asking how they could help refugees – or coming up with ideas of their own to do just that? Not an inkling!

The story explores the refugee experience through the eyes of a group of children. Why was it important for you to tell this story from a child’s perspective rather than through the adults around them?

Because children’s sense of justice isn’t muddied and erased by the ‘grey space’ of racisms and racist geopolitics that infiltrates and diminishes the same in adults. They don’t dehumanise their fellow human beings as easily and as swiftly as so many adults seem keen to. Most children – unless indoctrinated from a very young age – don’t care about skin colour or where someone is from, what they look like, what their history is. They just want to be friends and play. They get the basics of humanity – that hurting someone – anyone – is bad. That dropping bombs on someone and punishing people for the crimes of others is not justice. That war and violence harms innocents – and that all of the aforementioned is inexcusable. They also see through the hypocrisy of adults with a sharpness too many underestimate. It’s why this story, which essentially revolves around a group of children making friends with someone who has had everything taken away from him – only works with children in the mainframe. World weary cynicism and racist hate and ignorance hasn’t captured them. Yet.

Your work as a human rights activist clearly informs the themes of the book. How have your experiences working with refugee communities shaped the way you approached writing Ahmet’s story?

This story would never have been written if I hadn’t gone out to the refugee camps of northern France following the breaking of Alan Kurdi’s story in 2015. There’s only so much any of us can learn from the sofa, telly or phone screen – especially when consuming news spun by our media channels. Getting out physically into the forests and muddy fields of those so-called ‘camps’, and witnessing, as I still do, the horrific, inhumane situations which the bravest, most courageous members of the human race are being forced to bear at the hands of ‘developed’ nations (the very nations bombing their countries and stealing resources), led to anger. Anger led to questions – questions such as, what on earth are refugee children, often forcefully separated from their families, supposed to do? How are they supposed to survive any of this? What kind of world are we creating where one groups of kids have everything, and the other has everything taken away from the again and again and again? Those questions – triggered by my team and I meeting a four-day old baby called Raehan in 2017, and to whom the book is dedicated – led to the story. It was the only way that story could ever have been born. There’s no way it would have been conjured up without my actively being in those ‘camps’.

Seeing a beloved novel transformed for the stage can be quite a special moment for an author. What was it like for you to see Nick Ahad’s adaptation bring the characters and their journey to life in the theatre?

Surreal. It still is, and I think forever will be. Especially when I get to see and hear the reactions of audiences – children’s and adults alike. Nick has done such a spectacular job of not just lifting the story up into reality, but giving Ahmet a roar that even I didn’t foresee him having. Whilst Monique, the cast, and all the creative teams have done such a beautiful job of bringing the characters I once had in my head into 3D life, that some days I still think I’m hallucinating. I’ll never forget watching the show for the first time with Nick – and barely being able to hear a word because I couldn’t believe any of it was really happening. Few moments in my life will top seeing the play for the first time. 

The book balances humour, adventure and emotional depth while addressing serious themes. Why do you think storytelling can sometimes open conversations with young people that news headlines cannot?

Because books, stories, characters, are safe spaces. We have so few of those growing up – spaces where we’re not being watched and tested and drilled and ordered around every minute, but where we are, as children, set free to roam new worlds, meet new people, explore our own reactions to events contained to the space of a page.  Reactions that include a freedom to ask questions. Questions that ordinary school lessons and other grown-up led activities might not give rise to. Without that freedom to roam and wonder and go on new adventures, we would all be lost, and living much smaller, constrained lives.

At its heart, the story celebrates empathy and the idea that even children can make a difference. What do you hope young audiences take away from the story when they encounter it on stage?

Hopes? I have three. I want kids to see this show and leave with real, actual knowledge of what is happening right now, in our midst. Real knowledge of the inhumane situations children their age, in families just like their families, are having to endure. Next, I want them to know that their questions – they ones they have swirling away inside them, are game-changing tools capable of leading them to great adventures, should they have the courage to ask them. And finally, that they DO have power, agency, a role in the world, no matter what the adults of that world might tell them. A power that often starts with changing the experiences of that world for the better, one friend at a time. That’s all.