AI meets sketch comedy in this rollicking two-hander
Following the 2022 staging of We Wrote A Show at Camden Fringe, Hannah Adams and Jack Cray have returned to the stage with a new iteration. Based on the same characters and loose plot line as their previous production, they now focus their new show on the complexities of love and dating in the digital age.
This latest production, Chemistry Test, follows the same characters (two Artificial Intelligences, Steve and Evie), as they complete the final stages of testing before being sent to Earth. Their mission? To teach humans that art of romance…without the apps.
Although advertised with an 85-minute run time, this show just scrapes past the 50-minute mark, giving the audience a whirlwind tour through life as a bot in training. Presented more as a set of high-energy sketches than a cohesive play, Adams and Cray perform one amusing situation after the next, all nestled within the context of their sci-fi world.
Crammed with audience interaction, Adams and Cray enlist backstage help to choose crowd members from every part of the intimate space. Avoiding the front row won’t keep you safe in this show! From forming the line for a meet cute in a coffee shop, to protecting the bots from murderous engineers, the audience of this show form a strong ensemble.
The lengthiest interaction features an audience-sourced couple brought onstage to act as friends of the bots, eliciting some impressive improv from the two civilians. The performers do seem somewhat unequipped to handle too much interaction however, with Cray in particular being oddly aggressive in every exchange with an audience member.
Despite this, the scenarios are amusing, intriguing and touching, with pop-culture references guaranteed to leave the audience in giggles. Written by Cray, the script continually subs out standard vocabulary for ‘bot speak’, like when Steve tells Evie she’s ‘switching him on’. Each time one of these clever substitutions appear the audience breaks out in a new round of titters, a testament to some truly amusing writing by Cray.
Although often funny, the script does lack a clear structure, we’re never really introduced to the characters, the world or the premise, rather left to figure that out on our own. The ending is similarly confusing, with a bazinga-style punchline delivered that leaves some uncertainty around the relationship between the two characters and where to from here.
However, this show has great potential as it continues to develop. The inclusion of a director in particular would no doubt boost the production to even greater theatrical heights. Adams and Cray are a natural performers and handle the material with ease, just needing an outside eye to bring it all together.





