REVIEW: The Passenger


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Paranoid and considered – an adept adaptation worth attending


Thoughtful and imagistic, The Passenger does justice to its source material, tackling the
challenging task of re-imagining Jewish businessman Otto Silbermann’s paranoia-ridden world on the compact Finborough Theatre stage.

Experienced director Tim Supple expertly utilizes physicality, spacing, and pointed
movement to evoke the visceral reality of transport asylum in 1938 Germany.
Having been fleeced of his home, robbed of his business, and torn from his wife, Otto must seek safety aboard the German rail system as a Jew navigating the perilous world created by Hitler’s Third Reich. With nothing but a briefcase full of money and his “lucky” Aryan-passing appearance, he faces scrutiny at every turn, cherishing each forgiving stare or deflected glance while constantly evading suspicion.
The play runs ninety minutes straight with no intermission, a choice that intensifies the
rail-grinding tension as the miles pass beneath Otto’s clenched feet.

The fearful, gritty, dreamlike atmosphere of the piece is its greatest strength and central
focus. This is established through constant fog, dim lighting, clever spotlights, and a truly remarkable effort from the costume department—trench-coated, hat-clad nameless stalkers keep both our protagonist and the audience teetering on edge. However, this brings me to one drawback of the Finborough Theatre’s intimate space.
The shoving, claustrophobic sensation of trying to escape through a throng is captured well as the actors clamber over audience members to traverse the stage. While this achieves the desired effect of never quite allowing the viewer to sit comfortably, I couldn’t help but wish for slightly fewer aisle-shuffling interactions.

The cast consists of five actors, four of whom take on multiple roles to flesh out the web of characters surrounding Robert Neumark Jones’ Otto. Once again, the illustrious set and costume designer Hannah Schmidt ensures each character is distinct, and in concert with the cast’s entertaining and nuanced performances, I never once mistook one character for another.

That said, some of the writing felt redundant. Themes or character traits were often revealed cleverly through subtext, only for Otto to immediately state what had just transpired, functioning as an unnecessary, shoehorned narrator. While this may have been an attempt to replicate the novel’s inner monologue, it felt clunky in an otherwise slick production. Fans of the book won’t be disappointed, and theatre lovers will appreciate this thoughtful adaptation.

REVIEW: Goldie Frocks and the Bear Mitzvah


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

“Bright, enthusiastic and fun – a good entry to
the London panto scene”


Goldie Frocks and the Bear Mitzvah was an intriguing entry into the ever-expanding world of the holiday pantomime. Theatres across London are filled with renditions of fairy tale fables and Christmas classics but this unique story introduces audiences to a bit of Jewish culture while maintaining the fun and hilarious panto tradition. While the show dazzles with humour, music, and visual spectacle, there are moments where the pace could use a bit more finesse to truly shine.

The story reimagines the classic Goldilocks tale with a cultural twist: Goldie Frock, a brilliant designer forced to work in a sweatshop, stumbles into the Bear family’s home just as they’re preparing for their cub’s Bear Mitzvah. Hijinks ensue as Goldie disrupts and aids their traditions, leading to a great mix of slapstick, heartfelt moments, and lessons about family, identity, and inclusion.

Along the way, familiar panto tropes such as villains, singalongs, and plenty of audience interaction keep the energy high. One of the standout performances came from Simon Yadoo as Calvin Brine, the villain of the piece. As the cruel owner of the clothing factory, Yadoo, a LAMDA-trained actor, delivered a masterclass in comedic villainy, stealing every scene he appeared in. With a perfect maniacal laugh, sharp timing, and commanding stage presence, Yadoo kept the energy high, and I found myself looking forward to every time he appeared on stage.

The real highlights of the production were its costumes, set, and musical elements. The costumes were bright, big, thoughtfully designed and dazzling, while the expansive set struck a perfect balance between fairy-tale whimsy and cultural specificity. The trio of live musicians brought a begrudging levity to the stage, expertly weaving familiar pop songs with a klezmer twist. Hearing popular music transformed this way injected the production with some much needed familiarity for those unfamiliar with many of the Jewish words and customs. The acting was suitably over-the-top, as every good panto demands, and the story was easy to follow for younger audience members.

The script cleverly poked fun at its own penchant for exposition, keeping it from feeling overly tedious despite a tendency to over-explain. The puns, though enthusiastic, landed with varying degrees of success. While jokes were sharp and plentiful, the show would have benefited from more deliberate pauses to allow punchlines to land and the audience to respond.

Overall, Goldie Frock and the Bear Mitzvah is a fun romp with heart, humour, and flair. Younger audiences will love its themes and characters, while older audiences may be missing a bit of an edge. Its costumes, live music, and inventive adaptations of pop classics are undeniably its strongest assets, brightening the stage and showcasing the production’s creativity. With some adjustments to pacing and a sharper focus on audience engagement, this panto could go from fun to truly unforgettable. As it stands, it’s a solid addition to London’s festive offerings and delivers plenty of laughs, even if it leaves you wishing for just a little more polish in its comedic timing.

REVIEW: Lipstick doesn’t make you pretty


Rating: 3 out of 5.

A good start towards a personal and intimate look into childhood pain and recovery with a splash of humour and levity.


Lipstick doesn’t make you pretty is a personal story about family, self-image, bullying and the effect of childhood on adulthood. Creator and performer Christine Fang viscerally relives moments from her life in the intimate setting of the Baron’s Court Theatre. The show was honest and forthright, giving audiences a comprehensive look into Christine’s life and challenges. 

The show’s strengths lie in Christine’s unique personality and bravery. She held nothing back on stage, engaging with the text and committing fully to the wide range of emotions her character experienced. Her humour was playful and energetic, reaching out to the far corners of the space. The show runs at about an hour making it an accessible piece for anyone to go and see. 

Despite its emotional fluency, the show lacked a cohesive plot or structure. The program states “a woman participates in a new mental health treatment and is confronted with memories keeping her stuck in the past.” While there were allusions to this “treatment” throughout the piece, they were few and far between, and did not ground the play as a central theme. Instead, the treatment references felt as though they were added after the fact as a premise to showcase snippets from Christine’s life. 

All one person shows contend with the tug of war between providing an audience with information and patently telling them the information. Unfortunately, Lipstick doesn’t make you pretty became a victim of “spoon feed theatre.” Without a clear plot device to fall back on, much of the play ends up telling the audience what to think and what was happening rather than showing us. 

The format alternated between impersonations of people from Christine’s past and interview style explanations for the trauma these people caused. The interviews suffered from exposition but were clearly connected to an emotional place. There was a brief and intriguing suggestion that the memories were part of a science fiction style “simulation,” but the idea was never fully explored. Nevertheless, the impersonations were funny and transformative and far and away the most engaging part of the piece. 

Another strength of the piece was its deft and interesting use of different languages. Christine switched from English to French to German to Mandarin seamlessly. Despite only speaking two of those languages, I was able to follow what she was saying perfectly. This was also another area where Christine seemed most comfortable within her performance. 

Tech and set were necessarily very minimal, given the physical constraints of the theatre. There were lighting changes which were done smoothly and helped give the show some authenticity. However, there were too many different colours and schemes which seemed 

disconnected from what was happening on stage. The show would have benefited from more sound and music, in order to add texture, since just one person’s voice can become quite repetitive, even monotonous, without something to break it up. 

Christine is very clearly a talented actor. She performed memories and impressions with gusto and humour. The writing, however, restricted her performance, making it impossible for me as an audience member to fully engage, due to a lack of cohesive plot or through line. Christine finished the show with a statement that it was “a work in progress” and the “first step in a long journey,” and encouraged the audience to reach out with comments and criticisms. With this in mind, I think the show has potential to evolve into a great piece, but it requires some story devices to help it on its way. 

I am looking forward to seeing where it goes from here.