REVIEW: Classical Coffee Mornings: Chantefable Duo 


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“A wonderful medley of poetry, spoken word and classical song”


On a drizzly, autumnal Sunday lunchtime at the iconic Royal Albert Hall, the duo  comprising of Mariana Rodrigues and Andrew Cowie performed a collection of poetry, song and improv. A cuppa in hand and a few pastries really did epitomise the Classical Coffee Relaxed. This informal event was part of the “relaxed performance” whereby people can move around, chat as loudly as they like, leave if they wish etc, which is a good idea and made this performance assessable to everyone.  

A selection of poetry was on offer; most I had never heard of before and had an air of light heartedness to it. I spoke to Mariane briefly after who said that the morning performance was more serious, so they went for something to balance it out. The theme they had chosen was animals and we were treated to either poetry or spoken word on this topic Frog, Whale, Butterfly and Ant were the animals of choice.  

Mariana’s singing was mesmerizing and along with the piano music, really brought to life he pieces of poetry that they were performing. The mixing of poetry/spoken word with classical song kept the performance engaging. The songs were possibly more unknown classical (my knowledge of the subject is limited) but it is easy to appreciate the beauty in  classical and on a drizzly day in London, it was just a cozy thing to do.  

Both Mariana and Andrew are not only talented but have clearly put a lot of time into  creating this concept, with the improv music being something that we only heard in that  moment and would never be repeated, which adds something special. There were a couple of recognisable pieces of music, the theme music for Pirates of the Caribbean for one, but  this didn’t detract from engaging with the performance. A nice touch, even though I am not a huge fan of audience participation, was Mariana coming round with an annotated poem suggesting tone/atmosphere to explain how they approach the performance, which just made it feel even more unique.  Classical Coffee Mornings is a wonderful concept and perfect if you want to go on a solo  date, or if you are catching up with friends. It was heartwarming to see a small group of retired women out together having a catch up over a coffee. It’s a good concept for anyone  who finds a packed venue overwhelming as it gives people a chance to enjoy classical music almost on an individual’s own terms. It was a lovely, welcoming atmosphere, if a little quiet but sometimes peace and some classical music is all you need.

REVIEW:Clarkston


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Clarkston sets out to chart emotional wilderness, but often loses its way among clunky metaphors and rushed storytelling”.


“Maybe we’re like the last American pioneers” muses Jake, a drifting young man stacking shelves at a Costco in the titular small town of Clarkston. The line encapsulates the play’s core ambition; to draw a thread between the rootlessness of modern American youth and the idealism of the Manifest Destiny era of westward expansion. But while Samuel D. Hunter’s Clarkston aims for thematic depth and scope, it too often opts for telling over showing – subtlety is not on the shelves here.

Jake arrives in Clarkston while tracing the historic route of Lewis and Clark, hoping to find purpose along the way. He meets Chris, a night-shift worker at the local Costco, and the two quickly form a bond over their shared sense of purposelessness and emotional trauma. Their evolving relationship is the emotional core of the play, which also weaves in Chris’s difficult relationship with his meth-addicted mother. This is a new work by Hunter, known for his explorations of isolation and working-class American life, though here the execution feels more heavy-handed. 

Directed by Jack Serio, the production is mostly well executed, but not without its odd choices. A portion of the audience is seated on adjacent sides of the stage – perhaps in an attempt at intimacy – but the effect never really takes hold. Instead, it occasionally feels gimmicky rather than immersive, and is distracting in scenes that demand emotional intensity.

The pacing also feels uneven. In the first few scenes, Jake and Chris go from barely knowing each other to sharing deeply personal traumas, to a riverside sexual encounter, to an abrupt crisis point – all seemingly within a matter of hours – or at least, it feels that way, as the timeframe is never made clear. These transitions feel rushed and confusing, undermining what could have been a more organic development of connection and tension.

Ruaridh Mollica delivers a quietly powerful performance as Chris, thoughtfully capturing the character’s fragility and desperation with convincing nuance. Sophie Melville is excellent as Chris’s mother, teetering between manipulative volatility and raw, almost animal desperation – her presence is often genuinely unsettling.

Joe Locke (best known for Heartstopper and Agatha All Along) brings a quiet sincerity to the role, and his onstage presence has a natural warmth, but the emotional range required for Jake’s internal turmoil often feels muted. His frequent quoting of Lewis and Clark’s journals comes off more as a clunky narrative device than a believable character trait. 

Set design and lighting work reasonably well, evoking the sterile, fluorescent world of the warehouse and suggesting something of the wider emotional wilderness these characters inhabit. That said, with part of the stage occupied by audience seating, the set never feels fully realised.

Hunter is wrestling with ambitious themes: disillusionment, illness, poverty, legacy, and the mythology of the American Dream. The writing, however, does not always trust the audience. Lines like Jake’s repeated “I’m f****d up” feel over-insistent, and much of the dialogue leans towards exposition over genuine discovery. There are flashes of real emotional depth – especially in the explosive scenes between Chris and his mother – but they’re often undercut by forced imagery and on-the-nose dialogue. The link between modern disaffection and the journey of Lewis and Clark never quite lands. It’s a metaphor stretched thin, and while it provides a narrative frame, it rarely deepens it.
Clarkston is an ambitious play that poses some worthwhile questions but fumbles in its delivery. There are glimmers of emotional truth and strong performances, but the writing too often gets in its own way. Some audience members may find themselves – like Jake and Chris – lost in the aisles of Costco, searching for a story that never quite finds its frontier.

REVIEW: Cinderella (La Cenerentola) at London Coliseum 


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Cinderella is back but not as we know it


One of Gioachino Rossini’s most popular operas, La Cenerentola has been making a comeback in recent years. Director Julia Burbach has chosen to present an English version of the Italian opera, a translation presented by the English National Opera so genius it’s hard to believe it’s not the original language. 

Rossini altered many key details from what is considered the original version written in 1697 by Charles Perrault, changing the iconic glass slipper into a bracelet, the evil stepmother into a stepfather and fairy godmother to the male Alidoro, a tutor of the prince. Burbach adds a silent female counterpart, the spirit of Cinderella’s mother, who dances alongside Alidoro, peeking around doorways and over balconies at her much-maligned daughter. She also adds a group of children dressed as adorable mice to assist Alidoro in his dealings, some of whom randomly transform into miniature versions of the family members for no discernible reason other than for the great amusement of the audience. 

Recontextualising the 1810 story into present day London, the large ensemble are dressed in a curious array of modern-ish costumes, designed by Sussie Juhlin-Wallén. However, she triumphs in her creation of the chorus costumes, dressing them as Ramiro’s ancestors in a stunning array of crimson, adding extra humour with many chorus members dressed in voluptuous skirts and towering wigs. 

Deepa Johnny is an exquisite Cinderella, with Isabelle Peters and Grace Durham bursting with talent as they play the hilariously vain and conceited step-sisters Tisbe and Clorinda. Aaron Godfrey-Mayes is a stunning Prince Don Ramiro and Simon Bailey an amusing and quick-tongued Don Magnifico. 

Yi-Chen-Lin expertly conducts the Orchestra of English National Opera with vigour and elegance, although at times the performers struggle to keep up with the escalating music. Set by Herbert Murauer is both functional and unique, with two sets of elevator doors set within a grand mansion allowing for many exciting moments to keep the audience entertained during what is a very lengthy opera. 

A thoroughly enjoyable presentation of a beloved romantic opera, English National Opera have created a production that is both accessible and visually exciting. A cohesive and talented ensemble made up of singers, dancers and children ensure this presentation is truly worthy of the esteemed Rossini name and a production not to be missed by any opera-lover.

REVIEW: Choke Me


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A brilliantly acted one-hander that explores the psychology of a woman trapped in a loveless marriage and a violent affair with her stepson.


choke me., written and performed by Alexandra Montalbano and directed by her and Brock Looser, is a modern reimagining of Lope de Vega’ Punishment Without Revenge. Casandra guides us through how she found herself in a loveless marriage with a controlling and cheating husband and an affair with her violent stepson.

Montalbano expertly flits between multiple characters in an astoundingly dynamic performance. Each one feels fully drawn and alive – there’s a string of awful first dates, Casandra’s well-meaning but useless parents, her friend who knows her better than she knows herself. Then there’s her husband, an oppressive control freak who can’t be bothered to hide his affair; and her stepson, who twitches terrifyingly from apathy to violence learnt from watching too much pornography. Montalbano finds impressive psychological depth in all these figures, but we never lose sight of it being Casandra’s story. It’s an elegantly judged balancing act that many one-handers get wrong.

The story is staged between two cameras that feed to two TVs upstage. Sometimes we see Montalbano from three angles at once, cleverly simulating the feeling of a crowd. At other moments we ‘cut’ back and forth between one angle and another as if watching a film conversation. This technique is most effective when Casandra talks about her, or her husband’s, affairs. It gives Montalbano and Looser the uncanny ability to conjure three presences in the space that can never meet each other’s gazes.

At times, this live-cinema element feels underused. There are stretches when nothing is on either screen and they, along with the cameras, break the immersion of the world being built. By the end, though, there is a theatrically exciting use of the set-up that develops the idea beyond a simple live feed. I wished that moment had arrived earlier and stayed longer once it did.

choke me. expertly builds a sense of dread in its audience. It reveals Casandra’s affair with her stepson early on (enough that I’m not spoiling the play by mentioning it). This allows the piece to explore the devastating psychological effects of this incestuous relationship rather than saving it as a late shock. Casandra’s entrapment is clearly conveyed, as is her use of humour to mask trauma.

It is a play that grapples with serious, complicated issues: the morality of infidelity, coercive partners, incest, and how pornography has normalised men desiring hyper-aggressive sexual acts. It trusts its audience to think seriously about these questions and manages to fit a huge amount into a tight runtime. There are moments of humour and lightness, but it’s also bold enough to believe that theatre can be the catalyst for conversations about what society finds acceptable and unacceptable.

choke me. is a brave play – all one-handers are, but this one especially. It’s brave in its choice of subject and brave in its staging. Montalbano’s acting is so vivid and her presence so captivating that in less skilled hands the play might have managed only to shock. With her, it shimmers with life

REVIEW: I’ll Be Back


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“Comical, surreal and touching.”


If you’re a fan of the terminator franchise, a lover of self-deprecating humour, 90’s references or comedy then you’re in for a treat with this show.

Justine Malone’s one woman show takes us on a somewhat confusing journey that is a mix of sci-fi cheese, excellent visual comedy, some meme-worthy referencing to the 90’s and heartfelt story that shares some similarities to moments in the series ‘Spaced’ (For those old enough to know what I mean).  While many may have ended up creating a fanfic with a piece like this, Justine managed to layer the story with cultural insight and hit on something we’re all guilty of, by thinking things were better or easier in the past.

The Old Fire Station has been fully stripped back for this piece, a black box with minimal props, through some very fun disco lighting when required, which it most certainly is for the excellently silly dance number we are given. I do feel this brings me to my only criticism of the show, which is the tech. I feel there was a lack of precision and slickness to the ques throughout the show, which unfortunately did leave the piece feeling a little slow in pace for me. There were delays between action and sound that stalled the show only for a few moments, but consistently so.

Justine’s menagerie of character’s kept me giggling throughout, and her delightfully awkward Windows ’95 powered Terminator made for an excellently awkward protagonist for this story vehicle. The method of telling was challenging at first to get into, though this may also be due to all the exposition and caching up everyone who either; a) Wasn’t around in the 90s or b) Has never seen the Terminator series. Once we’d gotten the setting, background and goal of the show secured in our minds, the mix of theatre of the mind, mime, multiple characters addressing each other as one person and use of projection flowed well together and kept the comedy fresh. I’m loath to say I enjoyed the appearance of Clippy (the old Microsoft Office help assistant that would never leave you alone) but it was a delightfully silly joke throughout.

Overall, this was a very fun piece to watch. With some improvement and sharpening up, it would vastly improve the pace and unite the comedy with the speed of the action it needs. It does well to capture the sense of ‘Golden Age Syndrome’ that seems to be going around currently while also being a love letter to action sci-fi of the 80’s and 90’s.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: John O’Neill 


We sat down with John O’Neill, actor and co-producer of the upcoming show Orphans. In a modest home on an ordinary evening, Helen and Danny’s quiet night is disrupted by an unexpected visitor, Helen’s brother, Liam. As the night unfolds, the atmosphere tightens and uncomfortable questions emerge—about family, loyalty, and the truths we’re willing to ignore to protect those we love.

Get tickets here.


As both actor and co-producer, how do you juggle the dual responsibilities of being inside the story on stage while also shaping the production behind the scenes?

This is difficult – but I really enjoy doing it. And knowing Oli & the team helps! We understand when eachother needs to prioritise a particular aspect of their role. Acting is my favourite thing, I just love it and it never really feels like a job, more a privilege.

Orphans digs into loyalty, morality, and uncomfortable truths—what excites you most about exploring these themes in front of Manchester audiences?

I think the play feels incredibly relevant right now, Manchester and the country are in a really difficult place politically. Tensions are rising, people are angry, hurting and fuelled. On both sides of the line. I think this play can offer insight into some of these tensions, and hopefully create a space for people to talk about it – share thoughts, feelings and discuss the reality we are living in.

You’ve worked with Red Brick Theatre before on MOJO—what makes this new collaboration feel like “building something special” for the city’s theatre scene?

I think Oli and I have a really strong understanding of eachothers craft and both love this industry and storytelling so much. Together it feels like both sides of a coin are met – it’s rare to meet a director who you just click with and share the same artistic ambitions with on many levels. And we have. This play felt like the natural next step for our collaboration.

Liam’s unexpected arrival sets the play’s tension in motion—what drew you to this role, and how do you approach inhabiting a character who disrupts the family’s fragile balance?

Liam is a deeply troubled character – and though his actions are terrible his reasoning for doing what he does felt true. He is so loyal to those who he loves, he is a fierce protector of his family and support unit and that fascinated me. It’s always interesting to play a character who feels so far removed from my beliefs and behaviours. It allows me as an actor and a human to dig, think and try to understand the why of what he does.

Why do you think Orphans, first staged over a decade ago, feels particularly relevant and resonant in 2025?

The relevance is scary. And that’s why it needs to be done today. The divide in the country and in humanity is growing and it really makes me sad to see where we are. I feel it has characters from both sides of the line in it and that’s important for storytelling.

Looking at your career across stage and screen, what unique opportunities does producing your own work give you as an actor?

Producing your own work allows you to take control of your career, I can be an actor and artist without having to wait for someone to pay me to be. It allows me to explore the roles and stories I may never be considered for because we have the steering wheel. And it’s fun, like really fun.

REVIEW: Batshit


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Perfectly merging the political, personal, and entertaining, “Batshit” powerfully calls out the centuries-old monsterization of women


Batshit, created and performed by Leah Shelton and directed by Ursula Martinez, was an Edinburgh Fringe hit in 2024, winning both the Scotsman Fringe First and Mental Health Foundation Fringe Awards in the same year. Now touring around the UK with Soho Theatre in London as its first stop, Batshit presents a piercing gaze towards how the patriarchal society defined and monsterized women through the so-called “female madness.”

Despite the deluge of solo shows in recent years, Batshit shines through with unique precision and intentionality. The show opens with a sensory overload of flickering lights and loud, glitching noises. Then, a dim spotlight reveals a monstrous, almost-animal-like creature moving slowly, revealing itself bit by bit—a “mad” woman. An opening that is peculiar, eerie, and visually striking.

It is rare to see a fringe show where every element speaks so directly to its central message while also calling back to itself. All design elements speak to each other. The lighting echoes the character’s inner world; the sound embodies the voices in her head and those that tame her. The set, consisting only of an armchair, storage boxes, and an old-fashioned TV, blends the hospital world with the home, the public with the personal, and order with (later) destruction. 

Leah Shelton’s performance is as impeccable and precise as her writing. Her acting strikes a perfect balance between the dramatic and the contained. She drives the tone of each scene, making every one feel just right. 

Unlike many other solo shows, the story of Batshit is not narrated by the performer. Instead, it is revealed through mosaic-like scenes with projected hospital documents, voiceovers, movement, and direct audience interactions. Scenes switch between the theatrical space and the screen of a small, old TV. The setting itself also feels like a 20th-century entertainment TV show set, confronting how the public media and pop culture throughout history create “mad women” both on screen and in real life. This choice to unfold the story through design and pre-prepared footage, rather than the character’s direct narration, is poignant – it shifts its gaze from the “mad woman” herself to the environment that held her hostage and made her “crazy.” In doing so it also highlights how she is robbed of a voice, as were so many women throughout history labelled “hysterical” or “mad” by society. Thus, when we finally hear the performer’s own voice—not her grandmother’s character, but herself, speaking to her deceased grandmother—the moment is profoundly moving. 

By weaving together the political, personal, and entertaining, Batshit powerfully functions as both a poignant critique and a triumphant redemption of the centuries-old monsterization of women.

REVIEW: A Midsummer Night’s Dream


Rating: 4 out of 5.

‘An artful and lyrical production delivered by a dynamic company, oozing with magic and chemistry’ 


The New Rep Theatre Company’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream invites audiences into an Athens set in the midst of a distant Woodstock-esque music festival. An aptly fairy-lit space beckons as the cast fills the stage in white, flowing outfits and flower crowns. The mood is set to lean into the ecstatic and substance-fuelled mischief that ensues in the tangled web of magic and mayhem amongst mortal lovers and faeries alike.

Pace and precision make Shakespeare come to life, and this company skillfully satisfies both. The plot is kept constantly in motion, driven forward by the young and energetic cast. Their impressive commitment to maintaining both momentum and meaning allows the beats of the overlapping character arcs to land clearly throughout. Every actor is switched on in their performance, delivering an unrelenting story. 

This version of the text is decidedly lovers-led, which works beautifully. The scene work between the four lovers is agile and almost acrobatic in its direction. Married with electric pacing, New Rep crafts clear, enjoyable and distinct characters. Evie Butler shines in her turn as Helena. She carries an honesty and authenticity in her understanding of the text, delivered with heart and humour. Her excellent signposting through the language and effervescent chemistry with Hermia (Jamie Bunn) is a joy to watch.  

Not far from this woodland love square lies a considered interpretation of the play’s supernatural underside. The creature-like physicality embraced by the cast and impressive ensemble work is remarkable. The faeries, in particular, feel wired like a well-oiled Greek chorus. They breathe and move as one, becoming an effective extension of Titania herself. The realisation of lyricism in the text through the movement and musical moments is key to this Dream absorbing us into its world. 

Edward Neale’s performance as Oberon is a delight. His ethereal presence, coupled with a deft navigation of his speeches, is stunning. Notably, the power and weight found in his vowels unlock a further layer of musicality in the language, elevating an already assured performance. Lucy Blott’s movement as Titania is equally artful. Her chemistry with Oberon and feisty maternal strength in her initial speech set up expectations for more fiery, regal moments, which were disappointingly missed. Shakespeare gifts Titania some deliciously powerful imagery in her interactions with Bottom, which we never get to see. Her donkey-doting is brushed over, and she seems to be won over unsettlingly quickly by Oberon once her love spell is lifted. These cuts deny Titania the chance to step into her full potential as an equal and powerful opposite to her faerie king. A missed opportunity where cuts could’ve been better spent on a slightly drawn-out Pyramus and Thisbe ending. 

Having said this, New Rep gives us an endearing company of mechanicals spearheaded by Bottom the weaver. There is no doubt in Jack Gogarty’s command of the stage as Bottom, with plenty of puns and bits galore. However, a modern ad-lib too many tripped up an otherwise very entertaining performance.

Overall, this is a fantastic version of a much-loved classic encompassing all the magic, mayhem and mischief it deserves, driven by a committed and seamlessly cohesive company. A must-see!

REVIEW: Improbable Sessions


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

“Improbable Sessions is experimental theatre at its most alive: bold, imaginative, and unafraid to blur boundaries.”


Improbable Sessions: AI and Consciousness at the Oxford Playhouse was an evening of ingenuity, unpredictability, and surprising resonance. Bringing together improvised music with thoughtful commentary on artificial intelligence, the performance created a wholly unique dialogue between sound and ideas that left the audience captivated.

The stage, minimal at first glance, became a canvas for invention. A pianist, cellist (Juliet Colyer), violinist, a range of wind (Max Gittings) and percussion instruments (Joley Cragg), and a vocalist combined to form an ensemble that built each piece from a single note into layered, shifting soundscapes. Guided by the pianist-conductor, the music unfolded with spontaneity, embracing risk and reward in equal measure.

Threaded through these improvisations were three short talks on artificial intelligence. Each reflection on creativity, consciousness and the unpredictability of new technologies found immediate responses from the musicians. A striking highlight came when one speaker described AI as “a cat out of the bag.” The vocalist transformed this image into a playful yet poignant vocal improvisation, supported by the ensemble’s witty and inventive accompaniment. The result was as humorous as it was thought-provoking

What distinguished the evening was its interplay of intellect and artistry. At times playful, at times deeply moving, the music was never mere backdrop; it challenged, complemented, and illuminated the spoken word in real time. The performers’ willingness to embrace mistakes and surprises gave the event an honesty and immediacy that felt rare.

The intimacy of the Oxford Playhouse heightened every detail, from the delicate resonance of strings to the smallest breath of the vocalist. By the final notes, the atmosphere was electric, and conversation buzzed long after the performance ended — proof of the event’s impact.

Improbable Sessions is experimental theatre at its most alive: bold, imaginative, and unafraid to blur boundaries. It is an experience that lingers, inviting audiences to continue the dialogue it sparks. An evening not easily forgotten.

REVIEW: Entertaining Mr Sloane


Rating: 4 out of 5.

An audacious revival of a black comedy classic 


Nadia Fall’s opening show as new artistic director of the Young Vic is a stunning revival of the 1964 British classic Entertaining Mr Sloane. Written by bright spark Joe Orton, this ‘deliciously wicked story’ follows a 20-year old Mr Sloane as he infiltrates the family home inhabited by an ageing widow Kath and her partially blind father. Immediately enticed by Mr Sloane, Kath makes her intentions clear, while her father is sure he’s seen him somewhere before…

Visited frequently by her brother Eddie, it becomes clear that Kath isn’t the only one interested in this pretty young thing, and Mr Sloane is caught in the middle of a sexually-charged kinky love triangle. Performed in the round, the audience is invited to lean into voyeurism as they observe the characters fight it out in the arena of their sitting room. Although this is a fun and symbolic staging choice, many physical gags and intimate moments occur facing one direction, constantly leaving one side of the audience laughing and the other perplexed.

Introducing Jordan Stephens (from hip hop duo Rizzle Kicks fame), in his stage debut, this production also features several theatre veterans. Stephens performance is admirable, but Tamzin Outhwaite steals the show with a hilarious but depraved Kath who yearns to be a ‘mama’ in every sense of the word. Daniel Cerqueira is a deeply repressed Ed, a successful businessman with a forgiving nature and a leather fetish. 

Peter Mckintosh stays true to time period with his costumes, leaving the audience to find the relatability in the play without recontextualising. His set is spectacular, taking the in-text references to the house sitting on a rubbish dump literally. Pieces of furniture and various bits of debris are suspended above the stage and stacked around the periphery creating a striking tableaux. 

Fight and intimacy director Haruka Kuroda manages to make a brutal fight scene both realistic and believable, a constant challenge for live theatre. The intimacy direction, while funny and sometimes shocking, also highlights the difference between Kath and her brother Ed, while both are arguably sexual predators one is in hiding while the other unashamed. 

Entertaining Mr Sloane is certainly an ‘audacious play’ and is presented beautifully by the Young Vic. As Fall perfectly encapsulates in her foreword, ‘underneath the charade of manners and society, we all have the same desires, vulnerabilities and venom running through our veins’, and this play follows this sentiment completely.