REVIEW: Instructions


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A paradigm-shifting investigation of AI and Humanity


Nathan Ellis’s Instructions is a groundbreaking theatrical experience that pushes the
boundaries of performance art while delving into the complex relationship between
artificial intelligence and human creativity. Produced by SUBJECT OBJECT, this innovative production challenges audiences to confront the ethical implications of AI in an increasingly automated world.

At the heart of Instructions lies a daring concept: each day, a different actor steps
onto the stage without any prior preparation. Guided solely by on-screen prompts,
the performer becomes a puppet to an unseen digital puppeteer. This unique
approach not only highlights the raw talent of the actors but also serves as a chilling
metaphor for the potential control AI could exert over human behaviour and decision-
making. As the actor follows each command, we see a stark representation of a
future where AI systems might dictate our actions, choices, and even our creative expressions.

On the day I attended, Nikhil Vyas took centre stage, delivering a performance that
was equally captivating and unsettling. Vyas’s ability to seamlessly transition
between emotions and keep a palpable sense of vulnerability, created an intimate
connection between him and the audience. His journey became our own, as we
collectively grappled with the implications of an AI-driven future.

David Doyle’s masterful lighting design amplifies the production’s unsettling
atmosphere. The stark contrast between blinding illumination and engulfing darkness
mirrors the dichotomy of AI’s nature—its potential to expose truths and shed light on
hidden aspects of our world, while simultaneously concealing its own potentially dark
and malicious intents. This visual metaphor serves as a powerful reminder that while
AI may offer unprecedented insights and capabilities, its true motivations and long-
term impacts stay shrouded in uncertainty. A particularly haunting sequence bathes
Vyas in crimson light as he rotates on an LED platform, evoking the sensation of being dissected and ensnared by an all-seeing, yet inscrutable, algorithmic presence.

Ellis’s script cleverly weaves in Shakespearean references from As You Like It,
notably the famous quote, “All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women
merely players,” which takes on new meaning in the context of AI-driven
performance. This juxtaposition of classical theatre with cutting-edge technology
underscores the play’s exploration of what it means to be human and individual in an increasingly digital age.

Instructions also forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about the future of
creative industries. As AI capabilities grow, will human artists become obsolete? Is
the pursuit of technological perfection worth the potential cost to human livelihoods
and artistic expression? The play offers no easy answers but compels us to engage with these pressing ethical dilemmas.

While the spectre of AI dominance looms large, Instructions is not merely a
cautionary tale. It is a call to action, urging us to critically examine our relationship
with technology and reassert our humanity in the face of automation. The
production’s recurring refrain, “Are we stuck in a loop?” echoes long after the final
blackout, challenging audiences to break free from the cycles of complacency that threaten to define our AI-assisted future.

Instructions is a must-see for anyone interested in the intersection of technology, art,
and human consciousness. It is a thought-provoking, sensory-rich experience that
will leave you questioning the nature of creativity, identity, and what it truly means to
be human in the 21st century.

https://tickets.edfringe.com/whats-on/instructions

REVIEW: The Diviners

Rating: 3 out of 5.

A whimsical approach to Artificial Intelligence exploring what is actually real leaves me wanting more.

‘The Diviners’ is brought to the Golden Goose Theatre by the innovative The People Show theatre company. The Diviners explored four broken A.I entities trying to navigate and make sense of the world that they were in. The show was vibrant, colourful and engaging to watch.

I really enjoyed the use of colour in this show, it really helped to bring it alive and be playful. Because it was rich with so much colour and warmth, you quickly forgot that you were in a black box theatre. The way the piece involved music and movement was really impressive, at certain times the movement and music took place felt right and justified. Whenever the A.I figures were trying to explain something that they couldn’t articulate well, movement took over their bodies and music took over their mouth and did the explaining for them. The choices were very clear and it worked.

Fiona Creese, who played one of the A.I entities had a beautiful movement piece to which she was fully committed to. She used her body as an instrument and let the sound of the music flow through her. All of the Actors were fully committed. It was nice to see how much conviction they had over their characters. I was very impressed to see that they gave so much depth to a character that was artificial.

It would have been easy to go down the route of playing robot like caricatures but I loved that they were filled with so much emotion even if the A.I wasn’t sure of what emotion it was. They leaned into the awkwardness and quirkiness of their characters. I thought Gareth Brierly’s comedic timing was great. You could tell how much fun he was having on stage and invited the audience to do the same. He was so easy to watch. Unfortunately, there was a leak in the theatre due to the weather, however Brierly used this to his advantage whilst having one of his opening speeches about water and directly referencing the leak. This immediately let the audience know that they were in for a good time and that the show was going to be light hearted and entertaining.

One of my favourite moments from the show was Sadie Cook’s monologue about all of the different types of love. It was such an immersive moment that brought the audience in to her head. The lighting for that moment really helped create this illusion. The stage lit up into a soft rosy tinted spotlight on her. Everything else was a blur. The other two actors walked slowly around her whilst she spoke. It was a very compelling speech.

Over the duration of the show, I enjoyed the journey the characters went on, from waking up distorted and closed off from one another to then opening up and exploring who they were to each other. As the show continued it began to get a little darker and more mysterious, eventually seeing the characters begin to turn on each other. The ending was especially clever, finishing in with a cyclical slant, though with a lot of unanswered questions. It definitely left me wanting to know more, which is a good thing. However I find that on rating the show I struggle to award it higher as they weren’t necessarily questions I could find answers to and I would have preferred the show to give slightly more insight.

Reviewer: Rhiarna Hall