IN CONVERSATION WITH: MEXA


Food, farewells, religion, transition – Brazilian artist collective MEXA present The Last Supper, a performance-banquet at Leeds Playhouse, 25 Oct 2025 as part of Transform 25 Festival. We sat down and discussed with the ensemble to talk about this performance and art activism.


MEXA was formed out of activism—how does that urgency and resistance continue to fuel your art today?

I think the fact that, over the past few years, we have been able to work with art, coming from very precarious backgrounds and speaking about queer lives, is deeply political. The group has become a laboratory of practices: many people started working with us and are now developing their own projects, either as solo artists or in collaboration with other groups. For us, keeping a project like this going for more than ten years, and turning it into a permanent space for exchanging knowledge, sharing life, and creating opportunities, has always been the goal for most of us.

Why did you choose the form of a shared banquet to tell stories of memory, loss, and farewell?

In our work, it is always important for us to somehow break the distance between the audience and the performers, both inside and outside the theatrical space. One of our main questions is: how can we live together? And how can we acknowledge our differences while still being willing to sit together at the same table and try to talk about them? In this sense, since the beginning of the process of this play, we knew it was important to share food, not only among ourselves, but also with those who came to see us and who would later know and tell our story after leaving the performance. In the first part, we represent a dinner, and in the second, we live it, as a ritual, in our own way of being remembered.

How do you balance grief and joy when creating a piece that is both deeply personal and celebratory?

We are very used to farewells. Many people have left the group, disappeared, come back, and gone away again. Saying goodbye is not an exception, we’ve had to keep living while everything around us kept ending. That’s why, I think, we always balance grief and joy: it’s always contradictory. While some give up, others continue, and this is, at the same time, both sad and glorious, the simple act of being able to keep going. We also don’t want to talk only about failure and sadness, because yes, death is always around us, but we are also full of joy, nerve, and courage. This is one of the defining marks of our performances: a roller coaster of emotions, just like life itself.

What does queering iconic images like The Last Supper allow you to say that traditional narratives cannot?

All images are choices. They don’t remain in our memory by chance, they are always part of a project of remembering. It is a political decision: what we choose to remember and what we choose to forget. The Last Supper, like all iconic images, helps to create an imaginary that often appears to be the only version of a story. Yet we all know there are many versions: even the different Gospels offer contradictory accounts, depending on which apostle wrote them.

This was our starting point when we decided to look at the image of The Last Supper. Through our research, we came across a theory, supported by Da Vinci’s diaries, that he chose actors to represent the apostles. By doing so, the faces of the saints are, in fact, the faces of ordinary people. Performers, like ourselves. The original Last Supper is already deeply queer in this sense, and we feel that we are simply keeping Leonardo’s practice alive.

How does inviting the audience to eat and sit with you transform their role in the performance?

For us, it was fundamental that at some point in the show we would break representation and make the audience part of our farewell. It is their farewell too, in a way, since this group of people who sat together for almost two hours will never meet like this again. Every encounter is a goodbye, and we didn’t want to simply talk about it, we wanted people to feel it. Our desire has always been to move people, to make them move themselves while watching us.

MEXA, in Portuguese, means move. When the audience sits with us, they are no longer distant witnesses; they become part of the action, taking responsibility for the paths that unfold during and after the show.

What do you hope people carry away from this encounter with your collective and your stories?

We hope for two things to happen: that people carry our story and our memory with them, but also that they question themselves, their own images, memories, and the stories they choose to recount; that they remember what they forget. The last scene of the play is a shared table projected in the screen, where everyone becomes an apostle, together with us, because on that night, they were. Our hope is that the play functions in a dialectical way, for both us and the audience, so that we can all rethink the images together.

REVIEW: NEST

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Fantastic visuals and committed performances

An interesting display of talent, creativity, and commitment was showcased by the National Youth Theatre in a production of NEST, which occurred in a 355-hectare nature park. The story takes place in the year 2050, on the grounds of St Aidan’s RSPB Nature Park in Leeds, where climate change has had disastrous consequences for the flora and fauna of our planet. As a result, bird watchers have no birds to watch, politicians are committed to the idea of net 0, and people are considering flying to Mars as a way to save themselves.

Skyler, the protagonist, embarks on a formative journey that shapes her perspective of the past, present, and future, as well as her relationships with her loved ones. In an attempt to derive meaning from the journal that she unexpectedly receives, she must confront the challenges of the world she lives in and reevaluate her priorities.

The production was visually stunning, with impressive projections, immersive lighting, and great visual statement pieces that transported the theatre-goers to different locations. The acting was believable, and all performers were committed to their roles. Although it was not an ensemble piece, some characters stood out and were more important in the narration of the action. The moments that shone the brightest were the ones in which the young actors worked together as an ensemble to deliver a wonderful performance. Similarly to the activism for global warming, just by working in a team, they sent across a much stronger message.

Although open-air productions are appealing, they can pose challenges that are not easily overcome. During the performance, there were issues with the microphones of the main performers which made it difficult for me to understand the entire context of the piece. Additionally, walking for 12 kilometres through reedbeds, wetlands, meadows, and woodland resulted in a significant amount of dead time, which ultimately hindered the immersion aspect of the fast-paced story. As a result, many theatre-goers found themselves asking “Where is Skyler?” too many times. An important aspect of narrative immersive experiences is the transition between scenes and other elements, including decorum and music. Unfortunately, it seems like this aspect was not taken into consideration in this case.

In my opinion, the play that I saw left a lot to be desired in terms of world-building. While I could appreciate the concept of a future world set in 2050, I felt that the effort put into immersing the audience was inadequate. There was no creative infusion of new ideas and no unique identifiers that set the 2050 universe apart from our own. It was almost as if the playwright had simply taken a few newspaper articles from 2023 and extrapolated them into a future world. A truly believable dystopian future requires a lot of thought and consideration, including elements such as technology, social structure, and how humanity has evolved. Unfortunately, this play did not deliver on any of these fronts, and I found myself struggling to suspend my disbelief. 

I had difficulty understanding some of the concepts in the show. Throughout the play, I was unsure whether the birds were a metaphor for climate refugees (as suggested by the collaboration with Compass Collective) or were just missing creatures from the sanctuary. As the play progressed, there were many physical representations of birds, which made me question the narrative flow. Additionally, the desired-cathartic ending was somewhat unclear, and cliched, and left me wondering about the production’s intended message.

If the piece was meant more as an artistic expression of a pressing issue for the young audience, by a young cast – it was successful. It is commendable that the members of NYT collectively decided, through a survey, to address this issue artistically. The green fields were filled with diverse talent who demonstrated a strong commitment to their craft. If the goal of Nest was to transport theatre-goers to a potential future and inspire a change in their behaviour, then perhaps the play’s message should not have been so subtly nested.

REVIEW: In Dreams

Rating: 4 out of 5.

What happens when you blend Waitress, & Juliet and add a splash of Coco?

There are a handful of jukebox musicals that can make you deeply reflect upon your life, and In Dreams is one of them. After leaving the auditorium, I found myself contemplating my existence, loved ones, and relationships with the deceased. While I am not a huge fan of Roy Orbison’s music (which might betray my age), I thought the craftsmanship of David West Read (Schitt’s Creek, & Juliet) in creating both funny and heart-warming situations, along with the direction by Luke Sheppard (& Juliet, In The Heights), and the talent of the cast, produced an amazing piece of theatre.

When Kenna (Lena Hall – what a treat), the former lead vocalist of a semi-successful country-rock band Heartbreak Radio (we see what happened here) finds herself in a course changing situation, she decides to throw a party to celebrate her life with her former colleagues: the-serious-couple-with-multiple-children Jane (Sian Reese-Williams) and Don (Noël Sullivan) and her on-and-off long-lost fling Ramsey (Oliver Tompsett). Nicole (Gabriela García) and Oscar (Manuel Pacific), together with Grandma Ana Sofia (Alma Cuervo) are running a family Mexican restaurant that cater margaritas, Mexican food and traditional bereavement services. Together with Tom (Leon Craig), the cook that is also the number one fan of the band, they agreed to help Kenna cater for her event. Would Kenna find her peace, or will we see a Communication Breakdown happening?

The show was full of charm and wit, featuring amazing performances and well-crafted characters that taught us more about Day of the Dead and Mexican culture in general. The songs drove the plot forward, and few of them seemed shoe-horned in just to include audience favourites. Additionally, the majority of the jokes landed well with the audience. The use of projection was charming, and the set design was reminiscent of “Waitress”.

One area for improvement in future iterations of this show may be the pace and dialogue. The exposition felt heavy-handed, and I would have appreciated more information about the band during its heyday. At times, the dialogue was wooden – for example, when Nicole confesses to Oscar that she can never be his long-dead parents. Additionally, some characters seemed underdeveloped. All in all, You Got It, “In dreams”. Although the subject matter is a sober one, the music, humour, charisma and talent of the actors create a feel-good piece of art that remind us once again that life is worth living and, in our daily existence, “we build strength to carry over the memory of the people we lost”. I am sure this will not be the last time we would hear of this show.