REVIEW: Desert Thirsts and Jerusalem Winds


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A story told with unmistakable passion and urgency, tracing one man’s spiritual awakening against the noise of history.


Desert Thirsts and Jerusalem Winds is based on the real-life story of Muhammad Asad, born Leopold Weiss, an Austrian Jewish journalist who travelled across the Arab world in the 1920s, who interrogated the early Zionist movement, converted to Islam, and later became one of the most influential Muslim thinkers of the twentieth century. The play marks the first theatrical dramatisation of his autobiography The Road to Mecca, a text that blends political reportage, spiritual autobiography and philosophical reflection. That ambition, to hold Judaism, Islam, Zionism, and Western modernity in the same frame, is clearly what draws this production forward, even when its execution occasionally falters.

Directed with pace and clarity, the play leans into Asad’s restless curiosity. The set is deliberately spare but effective: an elevated central platform, sometimes used as a perch at its edge, brings the actors physically closer to the audience, who sit on rows of chairs directly in front. Two staircases flank the front of the stage, allowing the protagonist to move up and down, mirroring the sense of travel, urgency and intellectual momentum that defines Weiss’s life. At one point, Junayd of Islam, who plays Muhammad Asad, moves through the audience while Elsa remains on stage, creating a moment of communion that is immersive, if a little self-consciously reverent.

First developed as a solo performance, the play now takes shape as a four-hander with a fresh cast for its Hoxton Theatre run. That origin still show – Junayd, a writer, activist and clearly passionate custodian of Asad’s legacy, dominates the stage. His commitment is undeniable: he acts, sings and prays in multiple languages, carrying the narrative with earnest intensity although at times, the portrayal veers into hagiography.

The supporting characters, by contrast, are more lightly sketched. Ehsan Khan appears in three roles, Zayd, Haji, and Hakim, successfully shifting his physicality and tone to suggest, respectively, youthful idealism, grounded pragmatism and philosophical authority. Maeve-Anne Allen delivers a nuanced and convincing portrayal of Elsa Schiemann, lending emotional maturity and quiet authority to a character canonically over twenty years older than Asad. James Sampson’s Dr Simon injects moments of levity, his cheerful encouragement punctuating the play at useful intervals. Casting associate Elleanne Green has clearly prioritised emerging actors who can handle both ideological weight and stylistic flexibility.

Zareen Taj’s costume design is simple and purposeful, relying on restrained black-and-white garments and signal transitions between East and West, Leopold and Muhammad. Lighting, by contrast, is more adventurous: lasers and sharp shifts in tone distinguish dream from reality, internal reflection from public discourse, and help maintain momentum in a text dense with ideas.

Where the play stumbles is in its tendency to over-explain. In its eagerness to communicate its political and moral messages, it sometimes underestimates its audience, smoothing complexity into clarity and subtlety into declaration. The result can feel on-the-nose, even faintly pretentious, when the material might benefit from greater ambiguity and trust.Still, Desert Thirsts and Jerusalem Winds remains a striking and timely work. In an era shaped by renewed violence, ceasefires and contested histories, its insistence on spiritual and political reckoning feels urgent. If it occasionally mistakes passion for depth, it nonetheless invites reflection, and that, in today’s climate, is no small achievement.

REVIEW: Woolwich Works Burns Night Ceilidh


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A warm, lively celebration that would make Rabbie proud.


Burns Night, a celebration of the varied, romantic and often irreverent work of Scottish poet Robert Burns, always seems to arrive at exactly the right moment. With music, poetry, dancing and enough good cheer to cut through the damp gloom of late January, it offers a welcome excuse to gather and celebrate. Woolwich Works’ annual Burns Night Ceilidh fully embraces that spirit, staying true to Burns’ joyful and irreverent nature.

For those unfamiliar with ceilidhs, they are traditional Scottish and Irish social dances, usually accompanied by live folk music. The dances carry evocative names such as Strip the Willow, The Dashing White Sergeant and The Gay Gordons. The real joy is that absolutely anyone can join in—even those with two left feet. In fact, getting it wrong is very much part of the fun.

Ceilidh music has an instantly recognisable sound: chirpy melodeons, bright banjos and a fast-paced fiddle leading the melody. The Wraggle Taggle Ceilidh Band, active for over 30 years, bring a vast and lively repertoire of Scottish and Irish folk music, honed through decades of playing together. Many are award-winning musicians, but it is their easy camaraderie, as much as their technical mastery, that gives the music its irresistible charm. In an age where live music and dancing rarely share the same space, being led by such a band feels truly thrilling.

Woolwich Works itself is a distinctive venue. Set within the former Royal Arsenal, this multidisciplinary arts space plays an important role in Woolwich’s flourishing cultural scene. The evening took place in the Fireworks Factory, the largest space in the complex, where exposed brick walls, a striking sawtooth roof and flickering candles created an atmospheric setting. Strong acoustics and a cheerful, welcoming front-of-house team helped set the tone from the outset.

The narrowness of the space did occasionally work against the dancing, with some of the two-partner sets feeling somewhat cramped. Removing some of the unused seating would have allowed for a more generous dance floor. Similarly, the ceilidh caller appeared to pitch instructions towards a more experienced crowd, assuming a familiarity with the steps that may have left complete beginners a little baffled.

Burns Night holds a fond place in the hearts of the Scottish and wider Celtic diaspora, bringing together food, music and poetry. Burns himself—a rebel, romantic and political firebrand—remains a complex figure, but one idea rings out clearly in his most famous work, Auld Lang Syne: the enduring importance of friendship.

As the night closes, voices rise together:
“Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And never brought to mind?”

There is something quietly moving about standing among strangers—hands linked, voices raised—sharing in the themes of warmth, generosity and friendship that so define Burns’ words, more than two centuries after his death.

REVIEW: Jessica Barton: Dirty Work


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A masterclass in physical comedy that takes the Dirty Work of domestic life and polishes it into a sparkling triumph


Dirty Work arrives as a highly anticipated exploration of “invisible” labour following a sold-out run at the Edinburgh Fringe. Created and performed by Jessica Barton, she uses her background in clowning and musical theatre to deliver a show that blends the two to brilliant effect. This show is an unequivocal 5 stars.

What makes this performance truly spectacular is Barton’s reliance on physicality. The show is primarily mimed, channeling a comedic style reminiscent of Mr Bean. Aside from a few exclamations and the odd sentence or two, Barton communicates almost entirely through movement and incredibly expressive facial work.

Her control over the audience is exceptional. Within the first five minutes, she had the entire room eating out of the palm of her hand, enthusiastically cheering for the correct way to fold a pillowcase. There is a genuine sense of joy radiating from the stage and Barton seems to be having just as much fun performing as we are watching.

Underneath the laughter and the rhythmic movements of domestic life, Dirty Work has some important things to say about the unpaid domestic labor of women and the stifling weight of societal expectations.

What makes the show so successful is its accessibility. Barton delivers her critique in a way that is never alienating. Even the most slovenly of husbands would find themselves nodding along in agreement. However, don’t let the humor fool you. The show eventually pivots toward a gut punch emotional moment that feels like a natural, necessary progression. It lingers just long enough to let the impact be felt, remaining poignant and real without ever veering into the self-indulgent or preachy.

Dirty Work is an incredible achievement by an utterly fabulous performer. It is a show that manages to be both a riotous night out and a sobering reflection on the domestic sphere. You’ll never look at your laundry the same way again. Dirty Work played at the Soho Theatre from 21st-24th January.

REVIEW: We Will Rock You


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A thrilling, wonderful production that brought lots of laughter and entertainment


Queen is without a doubt one of the greatest bands of all time. The legacy they’ve created is unlike any other band in modern history and their music is a source of joy and inspiration for people the world over. We Will Rock You is Ben Elton’s love letter to that legacy and Hamilton Theatre Arts honour everything this show represents, embodying the true spirit of rock.

We Will Rock You definitely has one of the wilder narratives as musicals go, even when it comes to jukebox musicals, which do love to stretch a plot to fit around the songs they desire to fit in. In this instance, it works to the advantage of the overall show. Set in a dystopian future, Earth, now known as the iPlanet, is controlled by the corporate entity known as Globalsoft. All music is digitally manufactured by Globalsoft while real people are banned from creating music of their own. Rock music, individuality and any form of expression is strictly prohibited by Killer Queen, CEO of Globalsoft. Those who rebel against the corporation’s directive are outcasts, fugitives known as the Bohemians. Even names don’t exist in this cyberworld. So, when a boy calling himself Galileo Figaro hears ancient lyrics in his head and a voice telling him to break free, police chief Khashoggi sees to it that he is silenced, as well as another rebel. A girl who speaks her mind and isn’t afraid to name Globalsoft as fascists. Upon being arrested, she ends up in the same prison as Galileo, realising he is different to the Gaga Girls she is usually surrounded by. Galileo doesn’t know who he is or why he hears so many songs and words in his head but he knows that the corporation’s enforced uniformity is wrong and escapes with the rebel girl. He then gives her a name, one of the many words that come into his head; Scaramouche! Finding a new sense of identity in this name, Scaramouche sets off with Galileo where they stumble upon the Bohemians, other rebels like them who believe in rock, love, sex and free expression. They also have insight into why Galileo hears things, labelling him as “The Dreamer”, a prophesised saviour who will lead them to a long-lost instrument and to a new age of rock, restoring the music lost in the ancient texts. 

Conceptually, it’s pretty bonkers, there really is no better word for it but that is precisely why it works. There’s a madcap energy woven throughout the show that really resonates with the themes of rock and roll and taking a stand against injustice. We really see that energy throughout the cast and especially in characters like Scaramouche. Hayley Doyle played this character exactly the way it’s meant to be portrayed, down to a tee. Scaramouche’s sarcasm, defiant spirit and refusal to conform are translated beautifully through Doyle’s performance. This was by far some of the best acting I’ve seen in a non-professional production and she really makes you fall in love with the character. Doyle’s comic timing is well suited to the role, particularly in moments where she is mystified by Galileo’s behaviour. Harry Reid did an excellent job with demonstrating some of Galileo’s more eccentric traits, like the tics when lyrics enter his mind, as if the spirit of Queen is possessing him. This was also showcased through his voice as Reid reminded the audience just how difficult songs like “We Are The Champions” can be and how satisfying it is when a performer can do them justice. Doyle’s singing was just as impressive, both in vocal quality and endurance. Queen’s music is arguably some of the most challenging ever written to perform, with some songs going as high as a G5. The music requires commitment and some serious vocal stamina, both of which Doyle demonstrated, most beautifully in “Somebody To Love”. 

In truth, the entire cast were rather extraordinary in this regard. Robyn Jager’s performance as Killer Queen could only be described as iconic, excelling in this villainous role. Her vocals during “Another One Bites The Dust” were stunning, giving a performance which drew many cheers from the audience. The relationship between her and Adam Gallagher’s Khashoggi was one of the most entertaining parts of the evening and it was in their scenes that the true comic nature of their characters shone through. Gallagher’s vacuum entrance in one sequence was one of the funniest moments and a mirror of the classic music video for “I Want To Break Free”. His comic abilities stood out even in a show with a lot of humour. 

This show’s humour is clever, often using old song lyrics to punctuate regular conversation but the thing that made people laugh the most were the names. Each Bohemian character chooses their own name, taken from the sacred texts of rock. This leads to characters such as Madonna, Buddy Holly and The Crickets (yes, used in full when introduced), Oz for Ozzy Osbourne and the male leader of the rebels, Britney Spears (Brit for short). The varied references to musical legends were always met with a laugh.

While humour is a common theme and the scene in which the captured rebels being electrocuted is played for laughs, it also paints a dark picture of the use of re-education through torture on prisoners to ensure they comply with the regime. It could even be interpreted as a potential allegory for conversion therapy, acting as a link to Freddie Mercury’s sexual identity and enforcing the corporation’s views on expression of identity.

Something that truly stood out in this production was the choreography. Every member of the cast showed a remarkable skill level throughout the entire show and this was highlighted in scenes at Globalsoft headquarters. The passion and intensity were staggering; it blew me away how co-ordinated everyone was. The level was genuinely that of a professional West End show. Outstanding!

The thing that really made this production so incredible was the fact that every single person gave their all to it. Nobody gave less than 100% which is crucial as this show really demands it. Vocally, physically, mentally, in every way you can imagine. Especially due to the fact these characters have so much personality and energy, there is no room to let that drop and not a single person did.

My only note is that the mics definitely could use some attention as there were moments where they didn’t work well or cut out completely. However, this is a minor scruple in an otherwise superb show and by no means the fault of anyone onstage.

Overall, We Will Rock You was a thrilling, wonderful production that brought lots of laughter and entertainment. All cast members from Hamilton Theatre Arts should be very proud of themselves and everyone should rush to see any performances they produce in the future. They’re really something else.

REVIEW: Ghost Grandma


Rating: 2 out of 5.

A promising and ambitious premise is unable to compensate for uneven writing and heavy-handed punchlines


As the audience is ushered upstairs into the theatre at the Hen and Chickens pub in Islington, we are handed a copy of the programme as staff say, “sorry for your loss.” Whilst still finding our seats, we can see the cast silently pacing back and forth at what appears to be a funeral wake, thus setting the scene for Arista Abbabatulla’s new play Ghost Grandma, co-written by Anamika Srivastava and Pallavi Kumar.

The play begins with Dee, played by Srivastava, attending this wake, only to find out that her formerly estranged grandmother has left her a large house in her will. Dee is then forced to reckon with the typically tedious legal processes that come with inheritance, but with the added complication of being haunted by the ghost of her late grandma. The pair attempt to fend off eccentric tenants, covetous neighbours, and conniving council members, all the while attempting to resuscitate any semblance of a relationship they may be able to have with one another.

It is an engaging and thoughtful premise, however all of the interweaving plot points unfold in such a sudden and slapstick manner that they leave little room for emotional depth or exploration. For example, the character of Dee is not given the development she deserves and is instead reduced to near-caricature, with an insistence on melodramatic and unrealistic gags and what feels like a dated obsession with selfies and social media. The supporting cast suffer a similar fate; most of their stage time is taken up by exaggerated punchlines or clichéd misdeeds, allowing them neither the space to come across as a genuine villainous presence nor to provide effective comic relief.

And therein lies the main issue with Ghost Grandma. Marketed as a comedy, it struggles to maintain any consistent comedic impact. Despite the cast’s evident commitment, the script and direction leave many jokes falling flat, and the actors’ often overstated delivery of punchlines makes the tonal shifts that come later in the play all the more jarring and uneven.

Despite this, Selina Patankar, who plays Grandma, stands out as the most engaging and consistently funny character, with much of her humour stemming from quick quips and retorts in her conversations with Dee. These quieter interactions provide the show’s most effective moments of laughter and pathos, and the play would have benefited from more of them, as opposed to the loud physical comedy relied upon by the supporting characters.In her conversation with A Youngish Perspective, the play’s directors and writers stated that “in the UK, South Asian culture is often known for its food and places, but the way people actually live is frequently misunderstood. We wanted to bring these authentic experiences to the stage.” This commitment to telling a distinctly South Asian story is a welcome one, and it is refreshing to see a play that endeavours to portray the lived experiences of British Asians without relying on stereotypes, while still retaining cultural specificity. Unfortunately, over the course of its hour-long runtime, the play is not quite able to make its characters feel fully fleshed out or to grant them the humanity and tenderness it valiantly aims for.

REVIEW: Pierre Novellie


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Precise observations, as funny as they are well constructed


Pierre Novellie’s business suit and florid tie are incongruent with Soho Downstairs’ crammed-in seating and smell of stale beer. But this exceptionally well-pitched show is unimpeded, and delivers a masterclass in observational comedy. The incisive descriptions and occasional flights of fancy in You Sit There, I’ll Stand Here feel capable of running for twice as long without ever losing momentum.

A consistent highlight is Novellie’s brilliant use of analogy, sketching hilarious portraits of everyday life sparingly. Comparing competitors on The Traitors with a 13th-century peasant mob is multi-layered and impressively accurate. More conventional stand-up fare – from moving house to growing older – remains fresh thanks to this unique ability to describe things with precision and hilarity. Novellie worries about his weight in the same way a Tesco security guard encounters a shoplifter, relayed through a joke-dense description that is right on the money.

Increasing cantankerousness with age (and middle-class comfort) is a recurring theme, as Novellie interrogates which “new opinion” is reactionary nonsense and which is a sensible worry – a distinction captured through evocative analogy with 70s punk rock. Along similar lines, he also discusses the evolution of observational comedy in the modern era – “so many of the things I observe are depressing” – and the ever-shrinking sphere of shared reference in an age of on-demand content and algorithmic recommendations.

Longer stories dotted throughout allow Novellie to show off his full skillset. Many anecdotes surround hospitality, from a game of chicken with cleaning staff at a Melbourne hotel to a precise dissection of Premier Inn’s “looking forward to your stay” e-mail. You Sit There, I’ll Stand Here culminates with a joke-packed story racing across London to beat a moving company, only realising, once stood in the middle of a tube train clutching frozen meat to his chest, that he could be mistaken for a hallucination. Novellie’s trust in his audience to get the joke is compelling – one minute painting a surreal image, the next referencing the fall of man through Winnie the Pooh – and his biggest laughs often come after the second of silence it takes for a reference to click. This pause amplifies the enjoyment, and encourages intelligent punchlines.

Perhaps a consequence of this intelligence, You Sit There, I’ll Stand Here can feel quite rigid – audiences on this 12-night run will hear the same ideas in the same order. Novellie’s jokes aren’t any less funny as a result, and their delivery is no less skilled, but some audience interaction or off-the-cuff remarks would add a welcome element of unpredictability.

Surprisingly, Novellie’s cynicism crescendos into hope, which likely helped earn his fourth “Best Reviewed Shows of the Fringe” listing in a row, and is also very satisfying and funny in its own right. In a world of mainstream alternative comedy, there’s something reassuringly solid in the ‘intelligent observations, a microphone, and an audience’ simplicity of You Sit There, I’ll Stand Here. A masterclass in modern observational comedy.

“Pierre Novellie – You Sit There, I’ll Stand Here” plays at the Soho Theatre until 31st January, before embarking on a tour of the UK and Ireland. Tickets for Soho Theatre can be purchased here, and for the tour on Novellie’s website.

REVIEW: Nowhere


Rating: 5 out of 5.

Stripped back yet emotionally expansive, Nowhere is an impassioned exploration of exile, resistance, and shared humanity.

Khalid Abdalla’s Nowhere, currently playing at the Oxford Playhouse, is an intense and deeply affecting piece of theatre that uses space, light, and the human body to explore themes of displacement, belonging, and collective identity. Seen in the Playhouse’s intimate setting, the production’s stripped-back staging and powerful central performance combine to create an immersive and emotionally demanding experience.

The simplicity of the set is central to the production’s impact. A largely bare stage is punctuated by projected images and video, all drawn from Abdalla’s personal archive: photographs of family and friends, alongside material gathered during his time protesting in Egypt. Rather than functioning as abstract visuals, these images root the piece firmly in lived experience. Their presence adds intensity and specificity, reminding the audience that the ideas being explored are not theoretical but deeply personal and politically charged. The careful use of light and shadow continually reshapes the stage, creating moments of confinement and exposure that echo the play’s concerns with exile, imprisonment, and the search for refuge.

At the centre of the production is a remarkable physical performance from Abdalla. His command of the stage is immediate and sustained, with movement used as a primary expressive tool. Every shift in posture, pace, and proximity carries meaning, turning the body into both subject and site of the narrative. This physicality makes the piece emotionally gruelling at times, yet it never feels excessive. Moments of light comedy and humour are woven throughout, offering brief relief while reinforcing, rather than undermining, the emotional weight of the work.

One of the most striking moments comes when the audience is invited to draw themselves while looking into a mirror, without glancing down at the page. This simple yet disarming act collapses the boundary between performer and spectator, forcing a confrontation with self-perception, vulnerability, and embodiment. It is a powerful reminder of the play’s suggestion that while we all share the same body, we are not yet one body, a distinction that resonates throughout the piece.

Another idea that lingered strongly was a quote described as having been found scrawled on a wall: they thought they could bury us, but we were seeds. Though not a repeated refrain, it encapsulated much of what the production gestures towards, survival, resistance, and the possibility of growth in the face of erasure. It remained with me long after the performance ended.

What distinguishes Nowhere is its refusal to offer easy resolution. It does not seek to neatly resolve the fractures it presents but instead invites the audience to sit with discomfort and reflection. Through its precise staging, evocative design, and uncompromising performance, the production demonstrates theatre’s capacity to hold space for difficult truths.

Ultimately, Nowhere is a powerful and impassioned piece of contemporary theatre. Its use of personal imagery, physical storytelling, and participatory moments creates an experience that is both intimate and expansive. I would wholeheartedly recommend it for its emotional intensity and its thoughtful engagement with what it means to belong.

REVIEW: The Wedding, Gecko


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A visually stunning, ensemble-driven physical-theatre piece where “brides” become a darkly funny machine for belonging.


Physical theatre company Gecko mark their 25th anniversary with a restaging of their 2017 production The Wedding, debuting at Sadler’s Wells East as part of MimeLondon 2026.

It opens on a bare-ish stage: a slide juts out from the left, leading into a pile of abandoned teddy bears. An open closet, full of white wedding dresses, hangs in plain sight. Behind it all, a dark, expectant stage. Then the lighting design does something quietly exquisite – carving out pockets of glow, bubbles of atmosphere suspended in the dark, spotlighting performers as they move. The space becomes a series of display cases where interiority strains for freedom. It’s beautiful stagecraft, reshaping the room with costume and choreography into overlapping ideas of playground, altar, courtroom, factory floor.

Performers enter via the slide, farewelling their teddy bears as they arrive. They speak in different languages, dressed as brides regardless of gender, and are pushed outward into something like the workforce. The piece asks: What is the wedding? A romantic milestone, a contract, a celebration, or a mould we’re meant to pour ourselves into? In Gecko’s hands, it’s all of these – and something stranger. The wedding becomes a social machine: an engine for belonging that can also devour.

The ensemble are extraordinary. Their movement is precise and dynamic, alive to one another in the shifting scenic pictures and the space between them. There’s an almost electric responsiveness – the group operating as one organism. Gecko make movement feel like behaviour turned inside out: dialogue and verbalisations extended through the body. They build a physical logic where one shift ripples through everyone else, and yet the individual is still clear and traceable in the group.

Language works the same way. Every performer speaks a different language, which everyone seems to understand (including the audience) but not necessarily listen to. Communication happens constantly, bodily, imperfectly. The show is very funny in that specific Gecko way: comedy not from punchlines but from social choreography. The hilarious, horrifying labour of fitting in. Watching people adapt in real time, until belonging itself becomes a kind of contortion and something breaks. Some tonal transitions don’t land as cleanly and slow the pacing between sections, but the playfulness of the performers keep the piece buoyant.

The Wedding twines protest with happy endings in an interesting way. It conjures revolt – bodies gathering, collective momentum building – only to fold back into ritual. A double movement: resistance and compliance, anger and celebration, push and pull. The wedding becomes a metaphor for corporate conformity, a prescribed pathway where success is measured by how well you replicate the expected shape of a life. The unsettling part isn’t the oppression, but how hard alternatives are to make real. There’s shorthand here for systems of power keeping the “brides” in place: recognisable, if not always fully detailed or felt.

The show is most compelling when it unsettles gender and expectation – when “bride” becomes a condition rather than a costume, and the work presses at what we’ve been trained to want. Some images resist the comfort of tradition, scratching at the seam between what’s promised and what’s lived. Others collapse back into expectation.

Physically, the work is spectacular. Images layer and accrue weight without ever feeling busy. The physicality carries ideas of birth and belonging: bodies emerging, arranged, delivered into community. Gecko theatricalise constraint so you can see it working as an everyday force – not always violent, but always shaping. The restricted lighting supports this, turning visibility into both opportunity and trap.

Where it falters is narrative crispness. The thread loosens, and the sense of journey with it when it moves between characters – between who have been born to the wedding and other’s living within a suitcase, begging on the street, trying to find their way into the machine and the safety of belonging. In wanting to hold and overlap so many ideas, it risks diffusing its own meaning. Watching, I found my head full of questions.

Sometimes it’s unclear why the piece lingers where it does, or how it moves through tone, or what a story beat or choice is meant to imply – and what are the stakes in this world of breaking free? The ending – though there’s a vivid collusion of sound, music, and celebration with the audience, supported by a gorgeous shared energy from the ensemble – doesn’t quite land as a transformation so much as a fantasy. It offers a gentle reunion, somewhat heteronormative in its pairings and reconciliations. It balances the themes, yes, but slightly smooths over the complexity the earlier material opens up: the messier negotiations of belonging.

And still, Gecko are an incredible company. Even when narrative clarity thins, the work remains stunning, curious, and powerfully human. It may not always cohere cleanly, but it’s deeply worthwhile to experience.

REVIEW: Beautiful Little Fool


Rating: 5 out of 5.

An assured and thoughtful new musical that succeeds not by reinventing its story, but by choosing carefully where to stand within it.


Beautiful Little Fool at Southwark Playhouse Borough is an assured and thoughtful new musical that succeeds not by reinventing its story, but by choosing carefully where to stand within it.

At its core, this is a retelling of Zelda and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s marriage, a narrative that theatre and literature have returned to many times. What distinguishes this production is its framing. Rather than centring the familiar myth of the male literary genius, the story is filtered largely through Zelda’s perspective, with her daughter Scottie acting as both narrator and emotional anchor. This choice allows the audience to approach Zelda not as a footnote to someone else’s career, but as an artist, a mother, and a woman gradually stripped of agency.

Musically, the show is impressively coherent. The score flows naturally from scene to scene, and the interaction between the cast and the live band is well judged. Songs are placed with a clear sense of narrative purpose, and the musicians feel integrated into the dramatic world rather than added as accompaniment. That said, the score occasionally leans too heavily on lyrical repetition. While repetition can be effective in expressing emotional fixation, here it sometimes slows narrative momentum. A few numbers would benefit from clearer musical peaks rather than extended emotional circling.

The design work makes excellent use of the space. The set is flexible and responsive, allowing scenes to shift smoothly across different physical levels without disrupting the pacing. Lighting plays a key role in shaping atmosphere, particularly through the contrast between cool blues and warmer orange tones, which mark emotional and temporal shifts. Costume design is similarly thoughtful, especially in the visual dialogue between mother and daughter. These details quietly reinforce character relationships without feeling overstated.

One of the production’s strengths lies in its historical specificity. References to the Fitzgeralds’ financial difficulties, literary rivalries, and the cultural milieu of the Jazz Age feel well researched and purposeful. Most effective is the sustained attention given to Zelda’s loss of authorship. The gradual loss of her creative ownership is treated not as a single injustice, but as a process, which gives weight and credibility to her growing frustration.

The portrayal of Zelda’s mental health, and of institutional attitudes toward women at the time, marks the emotional turning point of the show. When this material is finally confronted head on, through an intense and explosive sequence mediated by Scottie’s narration, the musical’s thematic concerns come into sharp focus.

Amy Parker, covering the role of Zelda, brings a lightness of voice and physical grace that suits the character’s early optimism, while allowing space for darker shifts later on. Lauren Ward’s performance as Scottie is a particular highlight. Her delivery is clear, grounded, and emotionally intelligent, giving the production its sense of balance and perspective.

The final moments return unapologetically to the marriage itself. I found this choice effective. Rather than simplifying Zelda’s feelings, the show allows love and damage to coexist, acknowledging that emotional attachment does not disappear simply because it is undeserved.

What ultimately convinced me was how little the show let go of me, even where it was imperfect. I noticed moments where the music lingered longer than it needed to, but I never felt pushed out of the story. Instead, I stayed emotionally with Zelda, particularly in how the production holds love and damage side by side without trying to resolve them. That honesty, and the confidence to trust the audience with it, mattered more to me than polish. For all its small rough edges, this felt like a complete piece of theatre, and one I kept thinking about afterwards.

REVIEW: Così Fan Tutte


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Simple and small scale, Cosi’s female trio pack a performance punch


Così Fan Tutte is not a modern tale. Full of sexist tropes aplenty, its simple plot explores how foolish men can be, though their stupidity is unfortunately only surpassed by the apparent superior stupidity of women. Mozart’s finale in a late 18th century trio, we follow two Neapolitan soprano sisters Dorabella (played by Anna-Luise Wagner) and Fiordiligi (played by Rosemary Carlton-Wiilis) as they console each other due to the loss of their fiancés, tenor Ferrando (played by John Twitchen) and baritone Guglielmo (played by Oshri Segev) who have been called to war, or so they think. The two men disguise themselves as Albanians at the scheming connivance of Despina, the maid (played by Helen May ) and local philosopher Don Alfonso (played by Flávio Lauria). They intend to seduce the women to test their fidelity, whilst the women have been told to take lovers to prevent melancholy from the loneliness. Everyone is dramatically duplicitous and eventually despite literally everything played out to the contrary for two hours, it all ends happily ever after.

The female trio here were the stronger of the performers, projecting power and passion as befitted their characters. May’s Despina really stood out, her cunning character being given the meatier of the female roles. She showed great wit, excellent comic timing and physicality, whilst also demonstrating a vast vocal range with clarity and expression. Wagner and Carlton-Wllis’ sisters were also zealous in their generous portrayals of duped sisters whose agency appeared in the hands of everyone but themselves.

Ensemble OrQuesta’s production is simple and small, scaled down to fit the Cockpit Theatre, though it curiously focused the action upstage, in the back half of the stage, practically part of its chamber orchestra by the end. Hanging half mannequins of disembodied women pose the only creative use of set design here, with a table and chairs for vague feasting, and a teal sofa so comically small it felt awkwardly intimate every time three people tried to sit on it. Other creative moments were utilised when Despina sang from the upper seating level, presenting an interesting balcony sequence with those down below. Truly though, fake moustaches carried this production. They were the key to everyone’s disguise. The Albanians had curled, cartoonish black tufts stuck on, to offset their inexplicable forensic white suits. Despina’s moustache whilst she pretended to be the doctor kept falling off, which in all honestly just proved to be excellent comic physicality as she tried to hold it up all the time.

For me though, this production showed very little of the “ground-breaking”, “outstanding creativity” previous reviewers have awarded the company. The presentation felt too literal and formulaic. I enjoyed the strong performances from the majority, whose fabulous arias carried the flimsy libretto, though the uninspired setting and bland staging left me cold and uninterested. The Hasting Philharmonic Orchestra Ensemble, conducted by four or five people on a rotating basis throughout its run, was exceptional in its delivery. Particularly expressive for me were flautist Elizabeth Marr and violinist Amy Le-Mar. Despite their small size, they filled the entire room with superb sonics, capturing the emotion of each scene as it hung on the lips of each singer.

Whilst this production of Così Fan Tutte felt mild in comparison to some of the other bombastic operas available to audiences, nothing should be taken away from its sensational performers who carried Mozart’s orchestrations to completion. Ensemble OrQuestra certainly seem booked and busy for the forseeable, so I am perhaps in the minority in my opinions here.