REVIEW: Karen


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A brilliant, funny, and heartwarming breakup comedy.  


Written and performed by Sarah Cameron-West, and directed by Evie Ayres-Townsend, Karen is a short but wild ride through the life of a freshly dumped 30 year old woman. 

Karen’s humour is heavily grounded in the relatability of modern millennial life. A mix of snappy comebacks, sardonic quips, and some occasional physical cringe make Karen a consistently hilarious show, performed superbly by Cameron-West. 

Despite being a one-person show, Karen is not performed as a monologue. Instead, we as the audience are privy to the conversations our protagonist has with the people in her life around her during this tumultuous time. Those people are just not present on stage. Cameron-West performs opposite nobody, allowing the conversations to be half inferred, as though the audience were eavesdropping on a phone call. This provides an excellent platform for the humour of the show, as Cameron-West showcases her excellent comedic timing through a torrent of reactive gags opposite, effectively, a blank canvas. 

Our lead, the only ‘seen’ character in the performance, is a bit of a modern Bridget Jones. Passive in love and in life, led by her desire to conform into a conventional life that society expects of her, conflict and risk averse, with a normal amount of insecurity beneath the surface. It’s this relatability that makes Karen such an easy, comfortable watch. You bond with the immensely likeable protagonist immediately as she suddenly becomes an underdog in her own life. 

Despite there being no other cast members, the personalities of other characters are projected effectively through the words, actions, and reactions of our protagonists. The script leans on stereotypes and simplistic characters (e.g. selfish boyfriend, overbearing mother) that the audience are comfortable understanding and visualising. That way, when our protagonist says something funny about them, we get it, because we know them too, and we laugh along. 

The plot of Karen is not particularly profound, or novel, and this is why it’s so enjoyable. It’s trying to be funny, easy, and medicinal for the soul in its relatability. It doesn’t need to be anything more than what tries to be, particularly as it succeeds so convincingly.

REVIEW: Still Life with Onions


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A compelling, touching tale of life after war for 1940s Britain


Still Life with Onions is written by Rob Burbidge, directed by Amalia Kontesi, and stars Olivia Steele, Naomi Bowman, Christopher Kouros, and Kieran Dobson. Set shortly after the end of the Second World War, the Still Life with Onions revolves around four people struggling to find their place in post war Britain. 

Failing artist Jonesy (Steele) is living on the poverty line, unable to sell the art she toils over. She bonds with socialist neighbour Sue (Bowman) over shared loss during the war, and feeling redundant in the world. They cohabit their building with a German refugee, conveniently named Bermann (Kouros), who fled Nazi Germany prior to the war. Rounding out the characters is David (Dobson), a recent love interest for Jonesy who spent the war at a desk pushing papers, and is then deployed with the military in Berlin throughout the play. 

The plot centres around the relationships of the four characters, against a backdrop of Jonesy suffering from increasingly worsening pneumonia, and the play explores many challenging topics throughout its relatively short run time of approximately 70 minutes. Dense with commentary on the roles of women in the 1940s, the broader, tragic impacts of war on society, racism, class, and love. Still Life with Onions certainly tackles a lot. It would have been easy to fall into the trap of taking on too much and the script feeling bloated and messy, with the plot compromised for the sake of social statements, but this isn’t the case. We have characters where the conflicts are natural, and the plot allows them a lot of time to talk. The strife is aired naturally, and effectively, which makes the play captivating. 

Elevating the narratives were the actor performances. Steele nicely captures the essence of a woman lost as she perceives the world to think very little of her. Bowman’s Sue begins as a charming cockney cliché, but reveals layers of darkness, brought on by the suffering of war, with an artful nuance. Dobson is given the least to work with, and while playing the part well, is the only character arc that is a little uncertain. Before his departure, David is modest, and polite, but upon return feels overly cocky and hostile, with explanations for this alluded to, but feeling quite rushed towards the end of the production. 

A highlight was Kouros, at one point delivering a chilling monologue on Berman’s life prior to fleeing Nazi Germany, and his experiences that followed in England during the war. 

The Second World War and the years bookending it contain hundreds of thousands of stories, many of which (and rightfully so) have been told numerous times. But here, Still Life with Onions creates an alluring story that feels fresh, with narratives that feel relevant to 2024, but also don’t feel forced into history to satisfy modern audiences. 

REVIEW: Casserole

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A tense, intimate window into a modern, dysfunctional relationship

Casserole is the first in-house production by theatre Company Actors East. Written by Kate Kelly Flood, James Alexandrou (also the Director), and Dom Morgan. Starring Flood and Alexandrou as Kate and Dom, a couple in a dysfunctional relationship living together somewhere in London. 

Upon entering the theatre prior to the show commencing, we’re greeted with a meticulously designed set of total chaos; a kitchen/lounge/bedroom strewn with cans of Red Stripe, pizza boxes, and dirty plates that looked as though it had played host to a party the night before. Alexandrou’s character is already present on the set as the audience filter into the room, wallowing in the filth he’s created, occasionally moving to smoke or put food in the microwave – doing an excellent job of giving us some prior context into the emotional state his character is in. Credit to set designers Paulina Camacho and Paul Weedle for creating such a beautiful, disgusting mess. 

Casserole takes place over one evening, in Kate and Dom’s flat. The plot centres around the culmination of their failures at processing their own problems. These problems drive a wedge in their relationship that reaches boiling point on the night we’re with them. Kate is grieving the recent loss of her mother, suffering panic attacks in public, and Dom is unemployed, lost without a place in the world, evidently finding it to look after himself. 

Because of this, Casserole is fraught with tension. The script is a near constant stream of sadness, snark, shouting, and the occasional blunt insult. It carries well in the lower tempo moments. In exchanges where the pace picks up, the script suddenly feels a bit bloated, with the characters repeating words of confusion or dismay at each other rather than communicating properly, which feels unrealistic. 

For the most part, Flood and Alexandrou played their parts well. Alexandrou did a good job showing Dom as deflated, foolish, maybe even ignorant, but not quite malicious. Though at the points where conflict was coming to a head, Alexandrou played Dom perhaps with a little too much rage and not quite enough anguish or despair. Flood begins by playing Kate as cold, and a little unkind, but does well to convey the slow unravelling of vulnerability from the grief that Kate is feeling at the loss of a parent. At the end, you’re left pitying both characters, as the closing minutes of the performance involve both characters physically tidying up the big mess that they’ve found themselves with, not saying a word to each other, finally. A poignant closure that felt right, in its ambiguity. 

REVIEW: The Land of Lost Content


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Poetic storytelling over pints, that sometimes stands in its own way.


Land of Lost Content is an autobiographical coming of age story written by Henry Madd, and co-directed for the tour with Nic Connaughton and Lauren Lambert Moore. The show is performed by Madd alongside co-star Marc Benga, playing Henry’s boyhood friend Jake. 

The play is told as a collection of stories. Henry and Jake are two friends from a small village in rural England, sat together over a pint in their local pub, recounting tales of their lives, sharing the stories with the audience that surround the key moments that defined their growth from boys into young men. From village folklore, school discos, and first experiences with girls, to secret woodland raves, substance abuse, and mental illness, we’re given intimate insights into Henry’s life that seek to both celebrate and chastise the quiet English village experience. 

For the entirety of the show, Madd’s script is exquisitely poetic. We’re given wonderful spoken imagery that is so well crafted, I’d love to get hold of the script just to re-read it at my own pace. Because while it was beautifully written, this sometimes made the script feel a little overly convoluted, and sometimes confusing. A trade off to performing sublime poetry is that your audience members are at risk of falling behind, lost in the weeds of your words. 

For the first three quarters of the play, there isn’t too much of a plot to speak of. We’re simply being told stories because they’re there to be told. These stories had an unfortunate inconsistency in how engaging they were, however. Much like a good but not great musical album, I’d probably skip a couple on later listens. 

Even when the stories were less interesting, Madd and Benga performed their roles well, both bringing their best boyish charm to the more whimsical stories, and a melancholic poignancy to the darker moments. 

The closing moments of Land of Lost Content are wrapped up with a sombre tone, and we’re left to reflect on how painful growing up can be. And while the play doesn’t make us drink, it certainly leads us to the water around the social issues of men’s mental health, and the neglect of the rural corners of our country. I applaud Madd for writing and telling those stories. 

REVIEW: Cherry

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A brief, entertaining window into the ageing mind of a destructive ex-punk

Written by Maygan Forbes, Cherry is a one woman monologue about a destructive ageing former punk, as she reflects on her life. 

Cherry’s first action on stage is taking a swig of a can of Foster’s, and kicking it away. This sets the tone for the character whose mind we’re entering. Cherry is, for the most part, not a pleasant person. This is a brand she attaches to herself and wears as a badge of honour. Proud of bad behaviour that ranges from gate crashing gigs, to compulsive infidelity. 

In the short 40 minute show, Cherry talks us through her local neighbourhood, romantic partners, and challenging relationships with her family. The guiding force for the monologue is music. Music plays overhead as though reverberating in Cherry’s mind, guiding us between cherished or challenging memories. 

The issue with Cherry, as a piece of theatre, comes from the question of which lens you look at it through. Billed as a comedy, the genuine laughs are relatively sparse. Most of the humour revolves around a bad thing Cherry did, or a quirky take Cherry has about herself. Often mildly amusing, but rarely truly funny. You’re cringing at her rather than laughing with her. 

If you look at it through a dramatic angle, Cherry is the insight into a deeply troubled, self destructive individual. At first this feels quite shallow, but as time goes on it becomes increasingly engaging. Cherry’s life was, at times, tragic. This feeling compounds as the play goes on and Cherry’s perception of herself becomes increasingly unclear – you’re compelled as she unravels and she peels back the layers. 

The climatic finale to Cherry is superb and overall the show does stick its landing well – without wanting to reveal any finer elements to the plot, the whole show is wrapped up smartly. Cherry is short and sweet, but by the end you’ll find it executes itself well. 

REVIEW: Journey of a Refugee

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Creative storytelling in this immersive show about the challenges of seeking refuge in the UK

Journey of a Refugee is an immersive theatre experience directed by Sue Buckmaster, starring Adi Detemo, Mohamed Sarrar, Vivian Triantafyllopoulou, and Kassichana Okene-Jameson, showing at the Stanley Arts Centre in Croydon, as well as some local in-school performances. 

The cast occupy the space in a range of ways in order to facilitate the story of Zain (Sarrar) , a refugee in the UK from Sudan. In order to make this work, the audience are never fixed in one place for very long. We’re herded into a certain part of the room, invited to sit on the floor or stand further back to watch the next scene, before then being moved into a new position, perhaps at a 90 degree rotation, or maybe split up so that the cast are now performing in the middle of the room. This constant movement allows for an inherent variety in the storytelling without needing a larger cast or crew to support with prop or set changes. It also keeps the audience from getting too comfortable, which provides crucial for later on when they kick the immersion up a gear. 

Across each scene, a range of devices are used in order to tell the story, with dialogue often not being relied upon. Instead, Journey of a Refugee prefers to show you the plot using puppetry, dance, and make-shift props, all of which work reasonably well and keep the audience captivated through the continual change. Most impressively was a scene that involved Zain riding in a raft, represented by a line of empty life jackets in a crate, across the Mediterranean, represented by a thin plastic sheet that spanned the stage, being wafted by the other members of the cast. It was a technique that while reminiscent of a child’s birthday party, conveyed the danger in the waves of water surprisingly well. 

Towards the end of the show is when things start to really get immersive. As Ali is attempting to engage with the bureaucracy of the UK’s Asylum Seeking system, the cast seeks to highlight how difficult it is by bringing the whole audience on stage, breaking us into groups, and guiding us through a series of challenges whereby we need to fill in sequential elements of our own asylum seeking paperwork, with enough caveats and hidden pitfalls that suddenly make you feel like you’re participating in an episode of Taskmaster. This was an inventive way to highlight how twisted the Asylum Seeking process can be, whilst also letting the audience have fun. For anyone who cringes at the thought of audience participation, I am normally that person, and I’ll concede that I really enjoyed this. 

It’s easy to come away from Journey of a Refugee with conflicted emotions. The performance ends on such an emotive high note, that one could be forgiven for forgetting that this is satirical of real strife that people experience every day whilst trying to make a better life for themselves in the UK. But that’s not the intention of the show. Journey of a Refugee doesn’t want you to come away feeling sad. It wants you to come away feeling full of warmth and positivity about what providing asylum can mean for people like Ali, and I’m confident it delivers that.

REVIEW: Six The Musical

Rating: 4 out of 5.

The history re-told comedy-musical that continues to set the West End alight

Starting out at Edinburgh Fringe, written by Cambridge peers Toby Marlow and Lucy Moss, Six has grown to become a global phenomenon, currently showing on Broadway, and Toronto, and tours of the UK, the US, and Europe, and Australia. A recent change of line up for the ‘Queendom’, as they refer to themselves, puts Six on its fifth West End cast. 

The life of King Henry VIII and his six wives has been covered across classrooms, history books, and the performing arts countless times over centuries. Six sets out with its banners of Modern Feminism to reclaim the stories of those Queens back from the narratives written by the men who treated them like chess pieces all those years ago. 

You’d be forgiven for thinking that being in an on-stage history lesson and dedicating itself to a righteous cause, Six might be a high brow intellectual watch. While it does a good job of giving us a different view down a well trodden path, it’s the script, songs, set and costume that make it a truly fun show. 

We start with Six Queens introducing themselves, and why we’re here. They playfully address the audience in the manner musicians would address their fans in the crowd to declare that tonight, united together in pop purgatory, they’re going to decide once and for all: ‘Which one of us had it the worst?’  The dynamic between the Queens on stage is reminiscent of rival siblings, they tease and bicker with each other to provide a light hearted atmosphere with well timed gags that offer consistent, gentle laughs. 

Each of the Queens is given a distinct personality, and this is reflected well in the casting – the actors all play their parts exceptionally well, and are inseparable in quality of performance. The show avoids falling into the trap of retelling the same story six times with slightly modified endings. A springboard to this is that each of the six are shrewdly based on a modern female pop star. As each Queen takes centre stage to lead a number that serves as the post-mortem of their life, the performances feel unique, and their stories feel like theirs alone. It’s hard to single out a song or performance, they do all combine to become greater than the sum of their parts, but as I write this I can’t get Thao Therese Nguyen’s Anne Boleyn number ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’ out of my mind, which takes Avril Lavigne chords and tempo and blends them with Lily Allen style lyrics. 

Six tries to do lots of things at once, it balances being informative, empowering, funny, and playful. It does all of these things well, all without ever taking itself too seriously. It doesn’t swerve necessary historical context to what it deems significant developments in its characters lives. You will be introduced to people you’ve never heard of through stories in songs, because these people are important to the lives of our Queens. But it chooses to not dedicate itself too deeply to serious rhetoric or debate, which may have made for a compelling story, but could easily have detracted from the humour or made the script feel more laboured. The goal of Six is for the audience to have a good time, and it achieves that very well. 

REVIEW: Leaves of Glass

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Chilling and enthralling as we examine our understanding of truth and perception

Phillip Ridley’s Leaves of Glass is written to challenge our understanding of the world, where the perception of seeing so much of each other’s lives can lead to the perception that we know so much. Leaves of Glass sets out to usurp expectations and question what we think we know.

We’re introduced to Steven, performed by Ned Costello, as a successful, stoic, albeit tense man in his 30s. Steven can do no wrong in the eyes of his mother, Liz (Kacey Ainsworth). In contrast, Debbie has little patience for Steven’s brother Barry. Barry, (Joseph Potter) introduced as a recently recovered alcoholic with his head in the clouds, hardly able to hold down a job working for Steven’s cleaning company, more focussed on his unlikely ambitions to become an artist. The dynamic is apparently clear. Steven looks after Barry, even if he doesn’t always agree with him. Rounding out the quartet is Debbie, played by Katie Eldred, Steven’s wife. Debbie and Steven’s relationship is introduced as a fairly complex dynamic – we’re made to feel from the start that their relationship has been on the rocks, but surviving. Both parties test each other in early scenes but we’re made to feel like the fights are a fair match. 

The stage is set in the round, with 4 benches arranged in a square being the only mainstay of an otherwise minimal list of props and stage features. Our characters are exposed and vulnerable to prying eyes. We, the audience, feel like we can see everything. But as the play goes on this very understanding is subverted. 

The play runs for a single act, for around 100 minutes – an unusual choice, but one that feels like a stroke of genius upon reflection. At some point during the middle of the play, you find yourself feeling quite confused. The characters begin talking about things that you don’t understand. Scenes that otherwise feel quite out of place from what we’ve seen moments prior leave you scratching your head and wondering ‘Wait, how did we get here?’ This is all by design, and while initially jarring, is in fact brilliantly executed. All of a sudden, Steven’s life is unravelling amongst a myriad of accusations of bad behaviour, and Barry is on the moral high ground, appearing stable, on the brink of a breakthrough with his art career. Costello and Potter combine perfectly as our plot unfolds to show the complex dynamic of two brothers intermittently letting their masks slip to show the scars of the traumas they’ve been through together, or put each other through. The chemistry between the two actors is truly on-point, even demonstrated through some brief but wonderfully choreographed physical scraps. 

The play being a single act wonderfully increases that shift towards intentional confusion. It prevents the play from being split into a ‘before and after’ narrative, and also prevents the audience from having a break to collect their thoughts and share their understanding of what’s going on with their peers during an interval.

The final two scenes are the play’s finest, and where I commend the creative team, and Director Max Harrison. The lights go off and the scene is lit by just a few candles, as one character recounts through a deeply harrowing story from their past that deals the hypothetical killing blow to the audience’s perception of another. The atmosphere and dialogue here is unsettling, but sharp and captivating. Costello and Potter make wonderful use of the space to show their struggles for the control of the narrative. Despite the lights coming on, the final scene is equally as dark as we get our inevitably bitter ending. The sort that stays with you and you think about all the way home. 

REVIEW: Don’t Destroy Me


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Revival of the 1950s character driven drama serves up a round of stellar performances from the ensemble


Don’t Destroy Me is a play from London-born 20th century award-winning playwright, Michael Hastings, first produced in 1956. Despite experiencing a range of success across his career over theatre, television and radio writing, many would argue Hastings never saw the fame that peers from his era achieved. This modern adaptation is directed by Tricia Thorns. 

Our setting is a flat building in London, a few years after the conclusion of the Second World War. Sammy, played by professional stage debutant Eddie Boyce, is a 15 year old Jewish boy moving to London to live with his alcoholic father, Leo (Paul Rider) and his unfaithful but kind step-mother Shani (Nathalie Barclay). Sammy arrives in London having been living in the country with his aunt, full of hope and excitement about the life he’s about to begin in industrial London. As Sammy’s expectations are ripped away from him and he learns that his family and his neighbours are full of deceit and despair, he becomes embittered and maddened by the world before him. 

The strength of this play is in its characters. Here, Hastings created a range of complex and captivating personalities that are all so fantastically brought to life by the performers, and director, Thorns. The plot of the play is rather simplistic, and this isn’t a bad thing. The entertainment is granted from the interactions and escalating tensions of our cast and characters, as Sammy reaches breaking point. Boyce does an excellent job of starting the play with a joyful boyish charm, and removing that, layer by layer, as he becomes disillusioned with the state of his family. 

Paul Ridder’s Leo, a Hungarian Jew who fled the Nazis is a dark and resentful man, who sees no pleasure in his life in London, and often turns to drink to escape. Rider portrays Leo particularly menacingly when drunk, cool in demeanour with a vicious tongue to mask his insecurities. Leo brought Shani to London to marry after the death of his wife, Sammy’s biological mother. 

A matter of personal preference perhaps, but I gained the most enjoyment from watching the portrayals of the neighbours. O’Hara’s George plays the paramour, and neighbour of Shani, with a young Brando-esque swagger that makes you feel certain that the quips of poison and a refusal to respect his peers are alluding to something dark beneath the surface. Upstairs neighbours, Mrs Pond and her daughter Suki provide us with a strange form of comic relief from their often maniacal behaviour. Nell Williams’ Suki craves attention and exudes a wonderful and strange domineering eccentricity – Williams is entirely captivating every moment she’s on stage. Alix Dunmore portrays a far more tragic form of fascination – a woman driven mad by the loss of her husband to the point where she appears to be completely detached from reality. It’s hard to look away as we see the pain through Mrs Pond’s facade. 

It would be unfair to say that a single member of the cast stole the show, they all excelled in bringing the flaws and follies to life, and that’s as much of a testament to the director Thorne as it is the cast. 

REVIEW: The Enfield Haunting

Rating: 2 out of 5.

A confusing ghost story that tries to take on too much in too little time

The Enfield Haunting, written by Paul Unwin and directed by Angus Jackson, stars Catherine Tate as Peggy, a single mother, whose council house is allegedly haunted by a poltergeist. The play is based on true events from the 1970s – that is, the story of an allegedly haunted house in Enfield that drew a lot of media coverage at the time. 

The play gets off to a frantic start. We’re introduced to a household in turmoil as Peggy’s neighbour Rey (Mo Sesay) arrives uninvited to impose his opinions on her family, what they’re saying to the media, and other unimportant neighbourly matters. His arrival is followed by Peggy’s three children, who barge through the door full of complaints about how they’re being treated at school. Finally they’re joined by David Threlfall’s Mr Gross, a paranormal investigator working on their case – who turns up unexpectedly with three ice creams for the children. Before long, middle child Janet starts behaving like a string puppet in a hurricane and we’re introduced to our ghost. 

Through the opening scene the audience is forced to work hard to understand the chatter and arguments between our characters in order to fill in the blanks with what’s actually going on. This a problem which persists throughout the play, even as we skip ahead to the night time to where the majority of the ghostly action unfolds. 

Throughout the scattering of paranormal events, oft-possessed daughter Janet (Ella Schrey-Yeats) and her older, abrasive sister Margaret (Grace Molony) alternate between fear, and suggesting that they’re making the whole thing up for a bit of fun. Mr Gross, suggests at one point that he’s sure there’s a ‘logical explanation’ for everything, but shortly after is hypothesising about the reason they’re joined by the poltergeist. These interactions would make more sense if we weren’t joining the characters months into the ghost bothering them. It’s these inconsistencies in the script that fail to connect us as the audience to what the characters are experiencing. 

We also never really get a consistent sense that any of the characters are deeply scared – Tate’s Peggy spends more time irritated by the ghost than afraid of it, and everyone simply seems bemused when a fireplace is ripped from the wall. 

On the surface level, there is some enjoyment to be had from the ghost story. The way we’re shown the ghost itself is also well technically executed – this serves up some suitably fun jump scares and chilling moments. The cast all put in solid performances through the challenging script, Schrey-Yeats plays the part of a possessed girl well, Molony and Noah Leggott (playing youngest son Jimmy) also excel. 

Unfortunately though, the play suffers from being only 75 minutes long. With more time we’d have more space to develop things at a slower pace, which wouldn’t leave the script feeling so convoluted. The characters would have had more time to evolve their opinions on the circumstances without appearing inconsistent. It would also have benefitted from being simpler. The motives and logistics of the ghost (for want of a better spoiler free term) are quite confusing and the final resolution for all the characters feels rushed in the final 15 minutes. 

There’s the bones of something good there somewhere, but I’d struggle to recommend this one in its current iteration unless you’re a fanatic of ghost stories on stage, but also want an early night.