REVIEW: Kim’s Convenience


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

You leave the theatre feeling like you’ve just spent an hour inside someone’s real life, not just a sitcom set. That’s no small feat.


This week at the Oxford Playhouse has seen the warmth and wit of Kim’s Convenience, a play that’s been charming audiences from Toronto to TV screens and is now making its UK tour debut. Written by Ins Choi and directed by Esther Jun, the production is centred around Appa Kim’s small Toronto corner shop—and the family tensions, generational divides, and immigrant experiences that simmer behind the fluorescent lights.

The set was very cleverly used throughout. Mona Camille’s design was impressively detailed—a fully kitted-out convenience store, from stacks of ramen to the ding-dongs that reminded me of entering a konbini in Japan (although don’t let Mr Kim hear me say that). It created a genuine sense of place that the actors moved through naturally, adding texture and realism without ever pulling focus from the performances.

Despite a relatively small cast, each actor brought a lot of personality to their roles. James Yi was instantly lovable as Appa, balancing blustering dad energy with real emotional depth. Daniel Phung’s Jung and Candace Leung’s Umma shared some of the more emotionally resonant moments. Caroline Donica played the exasperated daughter Janet with a convincing blend of frustration, tenderness, and comic timing, grounding the family with a sense of reality and heart. Andrew Gichigi also stood out, deftly juggling four different roles—Alex, Rich, Mr Lee, and Mike—each with distinct personality and delivery. His ability to switch gears so seamlessly added sharp comic value and kept the pace fresh.

There were times when characters switched into Korean for conversations and became a little difficult to follow. This was then not helped by the lack of microphones which in theory helps keep the performance natural and grounded, but in practice meant that some lines—especially in quieter scenes like the church—were lost if you weren’t sitting near the front. A few key exchanges between characters were barely audible, which felt like a missed opportunity to connect more deeply with the material. That being said, even without understanding every word, the emotional gist always landed, giving the audience a more intimate glimpse into the family’s dynamic.

Still, these issues were minor compared to the overall strength of the performances. The cast clicked together with easy chemistry, and the dialogue, even when lost in moments, was full of warmth and razor-sharp timing. 

The show doesn’t overreach—it’s simple, sweet, and often quietly moving. It’s a comfort watch, but not a shallow one. You leave the theatre feeling like you’ve just spent an hour inside someone’s real life, not just a sitcom set. That’s no small feat.

REVIEW:Everybody’s Talking About Jamie


Rating: 4 out of 5.

If you’re looking for a feel-good, toe-tapping night out with heart, MYCO’s Everybody’s Talking About Jamie is well worth talking about.


Musical Youth Company of Oxford (MYCO) has once again lived up to its reputation with a vibrant, heartfelt, and thoroughly entertaining production of Everybody’s Talking About Jamie. With slick choreography, infectious energy, and a cast full of talent, this was a classic MYCO show—confident, youthful, and bursting with passion.

From the moment the curtain rose, the energy from the ensemble was electric. Catie Marie Simpson’s choreography was outstanding: sharp, dynamic, and impressively precise for such a large youth cast. The group numbers were a joy to watch—full of movement, colour, and sound—with ensemble vocals that brought real vitality to Dan Gillespie Sells’ catchy pop score.

At the centre of it all was Caleb Gill as Jamie. He balanced the bold sass and sparkle of a would-be drag queen with the uncertainty of a teenager trying to find his place in the world. His performance was charismatic and touching, bringing real emotional depth to the role. Hannah Peel delivered a moving portrayal of Jamie’s mother, Margaret, full of quiet warmth and maternal strength, especially in her tender solo moments. Giacomo Ruffmann wowed as protective Hugo and his glamorous alter ego Loco Chanelle, bringing both wisdom and campy flair to the stage. His performance had just the right mix of grit, heart, and fabulousness, making his scenes some of the most memorable of the night.

However, the standout for me was Chanice Whealy as Pritti. Her clear, strong vocals and calm strength gave the character real presence. She embodied the best-friend role perfectly, offering both support and inspiration without ever fading into the background.

The band, led by Ali Kane, played with real flair, driving the show forward with pace and energy. However, at times the balance between the band and the cast was off, especially during ensemble numbers where lyrics were lost. Mic issues on opening night didn’t help, but hopefully these are quickly resolved in future performances.

A few elements slowed the pace: set changes were often clunky, relying heavily on blackouts and stage crew rather than cast-led transitions, which added time to an already lengthy show. And while the raised stage was used effectively in places, from my seat near the front of the stalls, action taking place upstage was often obscured during full-cast scenes.

Still, the spirit and sheer commitment of the cast made this a joyous celebration of identity, community, and courage. If you’re looking for a feel-good, toe-tapping night out with heart, MYCO’s Everybody’s Talking About Jamie is well worth talking about.

REVIEW: A Man for All Seasons


Rating: 5 out of 5.

An unmissable, beautifully crafted theatrical experience that lingers in the mind long after the final bow.


Theatre Royal Bath productions and Jonathan Church Theatre productions of A Man for All Seasons is a thought-provoking, impeccably staged triumph. Under the expert direction of Jonathan Church, Robert Bolt’s searing historical drama is brought to life with both grandeur and intimacy, immersing the audience in the high-stakes world of Tudor politics and personal integrity.

The production’s minimalist set surprises audiences as sliding screens open and close to allow for the viewers to be transported to Cardinal Wolsey’s chambers, a boat yard and Thomas More’s garden, all helped seamlessly by small set changes of plants/candles/and fireplace being added when needed. Then there are the costumes which were beautifully designed to ensure the audience were transported to the court of Henry VIII. 

Martin Shaw delivers a towering performance as Sir Thomas More, portraying him with quiet dignity, razor-sharp intellect, and unwavering moral strength. His ability to convey both the warmth of a devoted family man and the steely resolve of a man facing his fate is nothing short of remarkable. Gary Wilmot, as the comical ‘Common Man’ adds a touch of humour to the production and literally reminds the audience to breathe at the end. Alongside a stellar supporting cast, every character ensures that this intricate power struggle is fully realized and compelling.

A Man for All Seasons is a play of profound relevance, exploring themes of conscience, power, and the price of staying true to one’s beliefs. A masterclass in theatrical storytelling and a privilege to watch. A Man for All Seasons is an unmissable, beautifully crafted theatrical experience that lingers in the mind long after the final bow.

REVIEW: Stewart Lee Vs the Man-Wulf


Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

Stewart Lee Vs the Man-Wulf is not stand-up for casual comedy-goers—it’s an exploration of the art form itself, filled with sharp wit, knowing absurdity, and a touch of existential despair”

Oxford Playhouse patron Stewart Lee returns by popular demand with his brand-new show, Stewart Lee Vs the Man-Wulf. This latest offering sees the critically acclaimed stand-up share the stage with a ferocious werewolf comedian from the depths of his subconscious—a primal, angry alter ego that despises humanity and challenges Lee’s status as a master of his craft. Can Lee’s signature wit and self-referential humour silence the beast within, or is he, at nearly sixty, a relic of comedy’s past?

From the outset, Lee plays with audience expectations, deconstructing the format of stand-up and addressing his place in today’s cultural landscape. Rather than attempting to chase mainstream appeal like his contemporaries Dave Chappelle or Ricky Gervais, Lee leans further into his idiosyncratic approach—pushing boundaries, mocking the conventions of comedy, and testing the patience of his audience with long, winding setups and repetition.

The first half of the show lays the groundwork, with Lee explaining how the evening will unfold. His delivery is as dry and ironic as ever, and while longtime fans revel in his precision and craft, newcomers might struggle to find their footing. There’s a sense of detachment—at times, it almost feels like Lee is exasperated with the audience, challenging them to keep up..

As the show progresses, The Man-Wulf persona emerges more strongly, transforming the performance into a surreal, philosophical battle between Lee’s self-aware comedy and the raw, aggressive energy of modern, attention-grabbing stand-up. References to a “$60 million Netflix right-wing liberal werewolf” highlight his satirical approach to today’s comedy landscape, positioning himself somewhere between self-deprecating critic and unwilling participant.

The result is a show that is both thought-provoking and divisive. Those who appreciate Lee’s meticulous craftsmanship and layered irony will find plenty to enjoy, while others may find his style alienating or frustrating. Stewart Lee Vs the Man-Wulf is not stand-up for casual comedy-goers—it’s an exploration of the art form itself, filled with sharp wit, knowing absurdity, and a touch of existential despair. If that sounds like your kind of thing, this is a show you won’t want to miss.

REVIEW: Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“What’s stopping you, Go,Go,Go see Joseph”


I have fond memories of watching the 1999 VHS of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat and for most musical theatre kids, Joseph will hold a place in their heart, whether good or bad. So I was thrilled to learn of the touring production of Joseph at the New Theatre, Oxford and had to grab a ticket. 

The touring production of this new arrangement which was first performed at the London Palladium on the 27th June 2019, and saw this tour opening at the Edinburgh Playhouse with Donny Osmond himself in the role of Pharaoh, is seeing a spectacular run in Oxford. 

The buzz in the auditorium was clear and it was fantastic to see a variety of ages across the audience, showing that no matter the age, children and adults alike can enjoy Joseph and by the end of the performance, everyone was on their feet dancing along to the megamix. 

The role of the Narrator is a hard role to pull off, as they are part of the story from start to finish and is involved in every number and Christina Bianco was a powerhouse in keeping the energy and momentum up throughout the performance, her relationship with the children’s cast was lovely to see too. Adam Filipe as Joseph, has a beautiful voice and one that gave me chills in his version of ‘Close Every Door to Me’ and I would even go so far as to say he was a better Joseph than when I saw the Palladium production in 2021. Alex Woodward as Pharaoh did a brilliant job and even though only for a short space of time made a big impact with his ‘Song of the King’. I mention these three by name only because they are “the principal parts” in Joseph but quite honestly the whole cast (both adult and children) were phenomenal. Huge props has to go to the female ensemble as the energy they all brought to the numbers they were in and then standing still in their Egyptian postures, was just incredible. And we mustn’t forget the Brothers. The Brothers were a well formed unit and the way they all acted off each other worked superbly. All of the numbers they were in were well executed and I loved watching the different dances. A special mention must go to the child who played Judah, I was blown away by his voice and moves when he started singing ‘Benjamin’s Calypso. 

I could go on about this production but won’t because if you have the chance to get to the New Theatre this week then you should go. It was an evening of light heart fun with the classic musical buzz you get after seeing a group of actors who are so good at what they do. I couldn’t help but smile as I left the theatre, hearing others around me debriefing, words such as “wowzers” and “spectacular” were used.

With three performances left and all of them limited availability, what’s stopping you, Go, Go, Go see Joseph at the New Theatre now.

For those not in Oxford, check tour dates near you here

REVIEW: A Sherlock Holmes Christmas


Rating: 5 out of 5.

If you have been able to bag yourself a ticket for one of the remaining performances, then you are in for a real festive treat and a show that leaves you feeling light-hearted.


When I first heard of ‘A Sherlock Holmes Christmas’ I was fully expecting a classic take on Sherlock Holmes where I would leave feeling more confused than when I arrived, however I did not expect to leave having laughed more than I have in a while. 

Performed at The Source at The Old Courthouse, at first glance, I was dubious, but the venue is small and intimate and allowing the audience to feel as if they were a part of the story, this was put to good use when character Gerald Sandeford tries to get everyone involved when he rants about the language Watson uses. The lighting and sound are simple but works with the size of the venue and credit goes to Felix Morton and Jon Smith for their involvement.  

The simplicity of the venue makes sense as the play itself outshines everything around it. Writer and director Billy Moreton says, “I have adapted two of Conan Doyle’s more festive stories (The Blue Carbuncle, obviously, and The Beryl Coronet) to be told through a frame narrative device which I hope will amuse any Sherlockians in the audience. The stories are told in a light-hearted, comedic manner, but always in a loving tribute to Conan Doyle’s amazing work.” With only five actors, the use of the set, costumes and props helped to change locations and characters seamlessly (the clever use of white throw pillows becoming an unsuspecting goose was very clever).

As for the acting, in a cast of so few you can normally find one stand out performance but quite honestly every member of the cast was superb. The comic timing and delivery of lines was excellent and really helped with each actor playing a number of different characters, whether they were a well to do english gentleman or a Cockney thief. Led by writer and director, Billy Moreton played the often sidelined John Watson, while fellow actors Craig Finlay (Blessington/Holmes), Beth Burns (Mary Watson), Cyd Cowley (Gerald Sandeford) and Matilda Morissey (Clarissa Sandeford) each played their respective roles perfectly. 

My only criticism is that it wasn’t in a larger venue for more people to be able to enjoy it. It truly was an excellent evening of entertainment, one audience member described it quite aptly as a panto for adults (mild language, references to crime, and frequent innuendo) and understandably they now have a sold out run for the remaining performances. If you have been able to bag yourself a ticket then you are in for a real festive treat and a show that leaves you feeling lighthearted.

REVIEW: The Axiom of Choice


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

“The Axiom of Choice was an entirely
enjoyable evening of theatre and something a little bit different.”


“Did you assert your free will in your decision to come to our play?” The question that follows audience members throughout the play and even greets them as the opening sentence of the programme.

Written by Marcus du Sautoy, Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science and Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, The Axiom of Choice is at first glance an unusual production, following the story of Professor of Mathematics at the University of Strasbourg, Andre Weil. However the surprising take away was that despite the topic, the audience felt lightened and a number of laughs were had throughout.

Waiting for the play to begin, the audience were greeted with a steady ticking noise paired with pressure inducing music. This goes on to form almost an additional character in the production with sound playing a key role in the staging. The stage is a blank canvas with only an octagon in the centre and a selection of other mathematical shapes scattered around.

When the actors appear, they are all dressed similarly and with very natural hair and make-up , this is for a reason as each of the four actors play the role of Nicolas Bourbaki, the fictional character conceived by Andre Weil and a group of fellow Mathematicians. You follow the four Bourbaki’s as they explain how everything comes from zero and through this we learn, do we have a choice or are we all just following our path or ‘Dharma’, such as the one Weil faced when war came knocking on France’s borders.

Shipra Jain, Clive Mendus, Joseph Prowen and TJ Sulaiman, are four actors that come together and put on an impressive performance, I’d struggle myself to remember lines relating to the Riemann Hypothesis but apart from a few opening night jumbles, they pulled it off with ease. The stand out performance for me had to be Joseph Prowen, who took on the additional role of Andre Weil, bringing out a vastly different characterization to his portrayal of his Bourbaki.

The highlight for me was the combination of lighting and sound. With a minimal set, lighting and sound had to work extra hard to help move you from Rouen prison, to India, to a cafe in France. With the music from the start of the play featuring every time the Bourbaki’s were talking, allowed for more ambient sounds to set the other scenes, for example the use of warm orange lighting and the sounds of crickets, help bring audience members to the streets of India, or bright lights and the sounds of a bustling surround, we were transported to a busy cafe in France. This was especially prevalent further in the production when Weil finds himself in prison and it’s silent except for the sounds of his vocal cellmate.

My only critique was that sometimes the movement, which was interspersed throughout, went on for a touch too long and I started to lose track of what was actually being portrayed, particularly a piece after Weil was in India.

Apart from that, as a complete dunce when it comes to anything Mathematical, it was an entirely enjoyable evening of theatre and something a little bit different. The buzz of the audience as they left the Oxford Playhouse seemed to agree.