REVIEW: With Nail and Without Nail

Rating: 4 out of 5.

A witty, eloquent lyric for a new generation of struggling artists

Maria Telnikoff insists you don’t have to have seen the 1987 British film Withnail and I to enjoy her modern, feminist reimagining, but I admit it was this very premise that had me rushing for a chance to review it. The cult classic has captured the imagination of anyone who has dreamed of making it in the harsh reality of the creative industries, ever since Richard E Grant and Paul McGann first staggered about ‘60s Camden in fraying coats to match their fraying relationship, and my friends were no exception. Sitting around in a series of chilly Edinburgh flats as a student, Withnail and Marwood’s irresponsible play-acting as grown ups justified our behaviour; we saw part of ourselves in their ricocheting between moods and dingy pubs, uncertainty about the future quashed with another tinny and the promise we’d always have each other. The romantic notion of the ‘struggling artist’ withers under the lights in Bruce Robinson’s film – both eponymous characters went to ludicrously expensive private schools, and when the day-to-day existential angst exacerbated by an ever-growing mountain of washing up gets too much (‘I think there may be something living in there’, pleads Marwood in a pivotal scene), they can capitalise on their privilege of having a conveniently loaded uncle with a house in the Lake District to escape to.

With Nail and and Without Nail’s set-up mirrors the original film, following the lives of two struggling artists, Nell and Christie, in their 2020’s Camden flat. In this version, however, they have ‘no rich Uncle Monty to help bail them out and no Eton education or white male  privilege on their side’. ‘It’s a radical departure from the original movie’, Telkinoff writes, ‘yet brings the film’s central question into focus: what is the reality behind the romantic notion of a ‘struggling artist’? And crucially for this production, what does it mean to be a struggling artist today amid a cost-of-living crisis and with funding for the arts at an all-time low?’ For Nell and Christie, the dire situation for would-be full-time creatives and the arts as a whole manifests in the bemoaning of nepo-babies and the easy life of ‘Tom Hollandaise’, bare fridge shelves (the exciting find of a jar of olives is hastily abandoned upon reading the sell-by date), and a desperate mining for sellable content (‘offed by an olive!’/ ‘that’s good, write that down’). Nell has a dim flash of inspiration while balefully scrolling past an advert for ‘depressed girl tears’ on Etsy, as Christie mourns an empty Cheerios box. Nell readies us for the emotional rollercoaster of the play’s tone from the off here: ‘I’m going to cry – quick, get a jar! Oh, never mind, the feeling’s passed’.

Chakira Alin and Rachel Andrews sing – often literally – as Nell and Christie, the comfortable chemistry between them enabling an unbridled, irresistible nervous energy. Their whiplash-inducing traversing of soaring highs and devastatingly low funks reflects that of Withnail and Marwood, in the context of a post-pandemic generation trying to make a living in London following years of austerity, arts-hostile government policy and astronomical rises in living costs. As in the source material, an existential panic hums beneath the two twenty-somethings’ banal, frustrating ventures, rising to fever pitch when the pointlessness of it all swims into unignorable vision. They give voice to the exhaustion of having three jobs to pay the bills on top of trying to make their dreams a reality, with Nell sighing, ‘I just wish I could have a day off’ – not from her side hustles, but from the pressure of having to be constantly creatively productive in order to justify calling herself an artist.

The pair decide they need a holiday; specifically, to get out of the city. ‘There’s life outside London, you know!’ Christie points out. ‘Is there?’ Nell wonders. They peer into the audience as if trying to find it, speaking to the London-centric bias of artistic opportunities in the UK, with a recent diverting of £75 million of Arts Council funding outside the capital in order to level up access to the arts. The ventriloquist friend they set off to visit in Glasgow turns out to have received a £30,000 state-funded grant, prompting Nell and Christie to decide they’d actually rather not see her any more, passionately dismissing her work as a ‘pile of wank’. They muse on the idea they may be terrible people, but there simply isn’t enough of this vital financial support to go around: the economic stability and connections in the art world reserved for the elite are as important as ever in opening doors for up-and-coming imaginative practitioners. The young women can’t escape this bind, and as the initial excitement of a spontaneous holiday wears off, their old fears and the unshakeable reality of their situation stays with them.

Foraging in Epping Forest, renditions of Oedipus Rex and Joseph and the Technicolour Dreamcoat, cursed knickers and cereal jewellery delight on the absurd comedic journey to an uncertain, though hopeful close. While the play’s end felt a little rushed – more like that of a first act – this is a testament to the feeling of not wanting the story to end, invested as the audience was in the unstable, open-ended lives of these two young actors. Razor-sharp, deeply funny, relatable, timely and poignant, With Nail and Without Nail deserves all the accolades it will surely get – and if you’re reading, Arts Council, a healthy chunk of funding to boot.

REVIEW: The Wedding Party (The London 50-Hour Improvathon)

Rating: 4 out of 5.

The actors’ reactions are whip-smart, their sense of fun the perfect marriage with an ironically well-studied and carefully honed craft

Improv is by nature an unruly beast, the genre facilitating both dizzying heights and abysmal lows of my theatre-going experiences. Let’s not forget about the particular nadir which involved my mum laughing much harder at an inebriated audience member vomiting over the row in front, bringing the performance to an abrupt end, than she had throughout the audience suggestion-based sketch show itself. When it’s good, though, it’s just about the most fun you can have in a theatre, creative spontaneity and a healthy dose of the absurd making for a ephemeral slice of comedic joy. At its best, improv is a personal, participatory adventure into the unknown, with hundreds of factors on any given night influencing a unique interplay between cast and audience, producing a work of art never to be recreated, and savoured all the more in the moment because of it.

The first two episodes of London’s 50-Hour Improvathon, an improvised sitcom comprising of twenty-five two-hour live sessions running continuously over a full weekend, were a dazzling testament to just how fabulous improv can be. Originally created by award-winning Canadian troupe ‘Die Nasty’, the London’s 50-Hour Improvathon has been running more or less annually since 2008, now back at Wilton’s Music Hall after a three year break. The event was brought to London by esteemed theatre maker Ken Campbell and since then has been produced by director Adam Meggido and Extempore Theatre as an annual event, likened to binge watching an entire DVD box-set of comedy drama in one viewing. This year’s theme is ‘The Wedding Party’, inspired by cinematic classics such as Four Weddings and a Funeral, My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Mamma Mia!, Muriel’s Wedding, and Bridesmaids. One thing’s for certain in determining the fate of this off-the-cuff dramatic extravaganza: that the actors are incredibly talented, reactions whip-smart, their sense of fun the perfect marriage with an ironically well-studied and carefully honed craft. They are the very best in the business, coming from all over the world to bring a cast of characters to life that include handyman Matt Finish, socialite James Bootsen-Katsen Butsenkatsen, and journalist Anita Scoop.

Spirits are high in the iconic venue, although events on stage are guided by directorial puppet masters Meggido (Peter Pan Goes Wrong; A Christmas Carol Goes Wrong; Mischief Movie Night; Burlesque) and Ali James (PS I’m a Terrible Person; Peter Pan Goes Wrong; Showstopper! An Improvised Musical) rather than audience suggestions. These marionettes are loose on their strings, with no controlling the direction of a scene after its initial set up. Highlights include the origin story of protagonist and groom-to-be Mr. Scott’s friendship with best man ‘Norwegian conference-goer’ Bjorn Fjords, who tells us a tale of a ship that can travel over the sea, through the air, across the land, and through time. Jasper Everafter entertains with variations on a bit that he is (not so) secretly a ghost – ‘I haven’t felt so alive since I was alive!’ – and Sister Margaret strikes up a rewarding friendship with Inbal Lori’s character, ‘officially a waitress but mostly a drug dealer’, after bonding over the freely available, hallucinogenic wonders of creation – ‘Sister, let’s go to the back yard and talk to Jesus’. The spirit of Wittgenstein visits loveable rogue Mike Powell, and Julie Clare shines as Jewish aunt Becky Kvetch. 

Alex Marker’s set design is highly accomplished, immersing us in the world of Everafter Manor, with the split-stage layout allowing scenes to reach their full comedic potential. Marion Reasonable, general manager of the wedding venue, sits at her office desk on the top level while characters run desperately in to see her below, throughout a scene in which ‘members of different departments come to Marion with their problems, who solves them quickly’. Sister Margaret’s confession of a spiritual and sexual awakening is met with a brusque ‘well, keep it to yourself’, Mike Powell’s complaints of belittlement by the spirits of late philosophers are remedied with the suggestion he finds real people to fight, and Matt Finish’s alarming discovery of a giant c*ck and balls painted on the helipad is revealed to be the work of Marion herself. Episode two continues with more ghostly mischief and culminates in Scott’s marriage to Fjords in the wake of an absent bride. I’ve found myself wondering in exactly what direction the narrative has taken at various points over the past 46 hours, a full weekend ticket being the clear recommended choice for the improvisationally curious. Make sure you catch these masters of their craft next year – the Improvathon is a riotously fun rite of passage for performers and audience alike.

REVIEW: Constella Music 10th Anniversary Concert

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

Constella derives from constellation, meaning ‘a grouping of stars’, and the bringing together of professional musicians, dancers, artists, and historians lies at its heart

Constella Music aims to harness the expressive power of music for social good, an ambition driven by its clearly lovely (not to mention copiously talented) founder, artistic director and conductor Leo Geyer. Geyer essentially is the company, working alongside Managing Director Nathalie de Potter and Administrator Susan Carter to bring his impressive portfolio to the stage, which ranges from opera and dance to film and concert music. As you might imagine, Constella derives from constellation, meaning ‘a grouping of stars’, and the bringing together of professional musicians, dancers, artists, and historians lies at its heart. Constella has even collaborated with a garden designer, winning a medal for a show garden based on Geyer’s music at the Chelsea Flower Show.

Sadler’s Wells’ Lilian Baylis theatre hosts Constella Music’s 10th Anniversary Concert, simultaneously marking an official rebrand and expansion of Constella OperaBallet, as the company was formerly known. The show celebrates ten years since Geyer launched the first Constella Orchestra concert series aged just nineteen, and features a selection of re-imagined pieces, premieres, and excerpts from upcoming projects. After a few technical difficulties in hearing from patron Willard White, we move straight into London Portraits, a contemporary classical music and jazz fusion opera-ballet for piano and voice. While veritable songbird Sofia Kirwan-Baez’s soprano is outstanding, the piece falls flat; routine observations on urban life are set to a bizarre dance sequence, seemingly inspired by Gene Kelly’s performance in Singing in the Rain, complete with umbrella. The four dancers’ movements are obscured by oversized suits, which have the unfortunate effect of simply being ill-fitting. These young artists are skilled and passionate – it’s frustrating they haven’t been given something fresh to wear, let alone to dance to.

Thankfully Toby Hughes’ premiere live rendition of Water Boatman, Geyer’s complex, stirring piece for double-bass and loop pedal, is remarkable, with soaring harmonics and impressive bariolage segments layered over the expert, rumbling manipulation of lower strings. Next on the programme, the showcase of Connecting Stars, Constella’s virtual and interactive performance programme makes clear the joy Constella has brought to so many. Geyer explains how he set up the initiative over the first lockdown after streaming live concerts for his isolated Grandma: inspired by the positive feedback received from herself and other residents in the care home, Connecting Stars has now given over 1500 virtual performances across the UK, winning the company ‘Most Innovative Performing Arts Organisation’ in the Acquisition International Non-Profit Awards.

The final section of the evening is composed of excerpts from the company’s in-progress opera-ballet The Orchestras of Auschwitz, a product of seven years of work in collaboration with the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, historians and holocaust survivors to restore previously unheard arrangements written in the concentration camp. Nothing can really prepare you for hearing the jarringly upbeat, marching band-style songs as prisoners would have been forced to play them, nor the compositions written by the prisoners themselves. Geyer highlights the rebellion in the orchestras’ covert playing of non-German tunes, including ‘The Stars and Stripes Forever’ by American composer John Philip Sousa and ‘St Mary’s Trumpet Call’, a Polish bugle call. Ultimately, however, it feels in poor taste to place these pieces within a programme of disparate parts. The Orchestras of Auschwitz project is a laudable one, and the music of shocking gravity; a dedicated full length production would do greater justice, as will be the case throughout a scheduled 2025 premiere and European tour. As a whole, Constella Music’s 10th anniversary launch suffers from incongruous tonal shifts, and an unpolished feel at times. More thoughtful programme curation and careful attention to production detail would raise the bar to the starry heights Constella Music deserves.

REVIEW: England on Fire


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

A breathtaking, shimmering patchwork of an achievement.

England on Fire is BalletBoyz’ most ambitious project to date, an extraordinary collaboration between over 40 creative artists, dancers, choreographers, musicians, theatre directors, designers and composers. Inspired by curator Stephen Ellcock and writer-musician Mat Osman’s book of images, after which the piece is named, the dancers propel us into ‘a visual journey through England’s psychic landscape’. 

Launched by Royal Ballet vets, now Sadler’s Wells Associate Artists Michael Nunn and William Trevitt in 2000, BalletBoyz is known for its innovative work and support of new dance makers. The company’s latest venture responds to Ellcock and Osman’s ‘magical, anarchic account of England’s maze of culture, art and history…a secret history of this country…a very English rebellion of the nameless many against the privileged few’. The performance is organised into ten chapters spanning ancient and modern worlds, in which folklore is brought to vivid, nightmarish life, monarchism is mocked and overturned, and socio-political subcultures celebrated. A portrait of a land of hope and glory this is not – rather something more enticingly rich and strange.

Lines from Ellcock and Osman’s book ring out across the theatre, the alternate evocation of pastoral scenes offset by the hallucinogenic, and warning us our journey has no destination. Spectral pagan figures loom out of the darkness. Dimly framed by Andrew Ellis’ sophisticated lighting design, a body is splayed across a lumpy altar, revealed to be made up of other bodies, dancers who unfurl and slink into the shadows. The company’s principal dancer, Artemis Stamouli, slowly, precisely, elegantly convulses. It becomes difficult to take your eyes off her, praise indeed for one in a show you want to watch as many times as there are company members, focusing your attention on each in turn. Ellis is fantastic in this respect, diverting focus with pools of light, evoking the bottom of a deep cavern or revealing a dancer previously unnoticed, a foil to Stamouli’s glow.

Stamouli writhes, folds and contorts; pitches, seems to float; is born into an unsettling landscape of England’s mythical collective memory in which masked and horned dancers envelope her. A detail from a green man depiction, and a painting of an obscure creature, in that way the middle ages hadn’t quite figured out how to paint animals yet, are splashed against the back wall – fittingly enough, for a show that makes it hard to determine what beast it is, and is all the richer for it: amorphous, staggering, many-faced, beautiful.

The first time the company dances as one is pure electricity. They shriek and vocalise, swim and scoop and beat and reach, faces twisted into silent screams. When post-punk band Gag Salon bursts onto the scene, they adopt a listening pose one by one, hands on heads, one hip cocked. They become a raving crowd, headbanging like never seen before; an exquisitely controlled unleashing of a raw, primal energy. Katharine Watt’s costumes are outstanding, borrowing elements from cabaret couture, Elizabethan pomp, britpop paraphernalia, the underbelly of Victorian city life, punk uniform, pilgrim’s tunics. Later, red stripes as if daubed in blood link the dancers and the newly centre stage St George’s Cross.

A resistance to the nationalistic imagery bubbles up, flags wielded by all fifteen dancers staring dead ahead, the unappealing red cross splayed across the stage – usually such symbols denote a particularly nasty brand of british neo-fascism, a misguided nostalgia for a non-existent pastoral idyll invented by the ruling classes to serve their own political interests. However, this production is a far cry from a blind expression of patriotism, asking us to see the country’s past in myriad and more complicated ways, unpicking the systems of oppression that riddle and deface this island’s mountains green. The keys to the labyrinth are held only by the guardians of the city, we are told, exploring origins of the gatekeeping of mass access to power, safety and economic security. Dissonant sounds as if from a xylophone of bones accompany this segment, with screeching strings, discordant shatterings, a deep pounding beat. Angela Wai-Nok Hui, Britain’s hardest working percussionist, steals the show here. 

One chapter stands out for its surprising, expert physical comedy. Three dancers in shaggy rounded costumes made of rags and hidden bells tumble and play and fight, the court jesters of Where the Wild Things Are. It is all the more delightful for its grounded unexpectedness, contrasting with Stamouli’s desperate efforts to find any space left in this country to spread her wings and soar. Stamouli falls into the arms of her company, and we all take a breath with her, and dive into it, our history, our undoing. They yelp and clap and spin to a fiddle, leaning back into the manic fever dreams of a dying island. 

REVIEW: Boy Parts


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Eliza Clark’s bestselling 2020 novel arrives on stage in a darkly comic dissection of art, power and gender politics

Can the male gaze be inverted? The authority on patriarchal voyeurism in film, Laura Mulvey, is sceptical, concerned that the sexist conventions of cinematic language are so deeply entrenched that they are impossible to break from by simply switching up traditionally gendered roles: the one who is looked at, and the one who does the looking. Not that Hollywood and Marvel haven’t tried, bringing us relief in recent years in the form of Ocean’s 8 (2018), Hustlers (2019), and She-Hulk (2022). We don’t need feminism any more, folks – women can be The Hulk, too!

Eliza Clark’s 2020 novel Boy Parts parodies the protagonists designed to capitalise on highly marketable iterations of feminism in the 21st century, female empowerment serving to rack up serious profits, with her strong female lead Irina Sturges. Irina’s unreliable narration takes these characterisations to the extreme, mirroring Brett Easton Ellis’ Patrick Bateman in her penchant for menacing sex and ultra-violence. A sabbatical from her bar job and an unexpected opportunity to exhibit at a trendy London venue reignites a pursuit of her artistic career: Irina takes erotic pictures of average looking men scouted from the streets of Newcastle, pushing her subjects – preferably young, vulnerable and eager to please – ever further for the perfect shot.

Adapted for the stage as a one-woman show by Gillian Greer and produced by Metal Rabbit, Boy Parts is showing at Soho Theatre until Saturday 25 November, starring the compelling Aimée Kelly. Gallery-style labels are projected in sequence across the theatre’s back curtain as the audience takes their seats, giving an idea of Irina’s photographic signatures (‘Boy with glass in his eye, 2023’; ‘Boy in Bunny Head, 2023/ nudity, fur’), and the opening sequence, with production and acting credits populated solely by Irina’s name giving way to a lingering close up of her eye, establishes her controlling, voyeuristic nature from the off. She is thrilled when she chances upon her latest target Eddie behind the checkout in a supermarket, ‘the Oscar Isaac of random lads who work in Tesco’. ‘I don’t usually touch the models’, she tells us less than reassuringly for the second time, but her charm, beauty and assertiveness invariably has her subjects ready to do anything she wants.

Irina portrays her flatmate Flo with a definitive menace and sneering superiority, her exaggerated girlishness and earnest, high-pitched tones played for comic effect. Flo reminds Irina that she likes to think of herself as ‘not like the other girls’, a depressing soundbite proliferated by social media in line with the Cool Girl phenomenon, internalised misogyny sparking a desire to separate herself from all women. Irina is an antithesis to ‘other girls’ taken to extremes, wondering ‘what I have to do for people to recognise me as a threat. Do I have to smash a glass over the head of every single man I come into contact with, just so I leave a mark?’ Most women don’t like to chop people up and put them into bin bags; she finally stands out from the crowd, with a darkly humorous nod to the logical conclusion of ‘quirky girl’-type tropes.

Irina’s tastes for sexual violence and exploitation translate into an anecdotal spectacle of horror. We are desensitised to such spectacles: an influx of media from mainstream news sites, netflix true crime documentaries and celebrity revenge porn distributed via online channels show people doing awful things to each other, all the time. People who grew up in the internet’s early years had very little regulation over the content they could access with the click of a mouse. Contemporary, oversaturated horror does not have the same effect, the same call to revulsion and action produced in someone seeing such shocking images for the first time. Susan Sontag speaks of this familiarisation in her criticism, implying the artist’s responsibility to defamiliarise the horrific, rousing the viewer with a reinvigorated desire to tackle the world’s problems. 

Irina expresses her frustration in attempting to escape and address the imbalance of the male gaze. The production seems hyper-aware of the difficulty of doing so, the one-woman piece stripped back and bare in terms of set with little to distract from us watching her, the audience’s gaze as razor-focused on lone Irina as her camera on her chosen subjects. However, rather than shocking us into truly seeing the violating objectification of the visual arts by placing a woman behind the lens, Boy Parts has the effect of the familiar, this role-reversal horror porn inevitably feeding back into and reinforcing countless other depictions of eroticised sexual violence. While often challenging, complex, and funny, the production’s satirisation and critique of contemporary media takes on female agency is too nuanced. That our sadistic storyteller is a woman feels like a rehearsed rather than revelatory reimagining of gendered power dynamics; depicting non consensual brutality in the hands of conventionally attractive women is ultimately not particularly helpful. The very thought structures that built the sexual imbalance of the gaze need to be examined and deconstructed in order to break from its confines: it certainly won’t be broken with the ‘female gaze’ in the form of pandering to the same objectifying masculinity. American Psycho, Girlboss edition? There’s work to be done yet. 

REVIEW: Eating Myself

Rating: 5 out of 5.

‘Food is a gift. Something you give to others. A privilege. An excuse to be with the ones you love’.

London-based Peruvian writer/performer Pepa Duarte writes, produces and stars in her debut play Eating Myself, directed by Sergio Maggiolo. She kicks off her UK tour in Brixton House before moving on to the likes of Bristol’s The Wardrobe Theatre, Newcastle’s Northern Stage and Cumbria’s Theatre by the Lake. If there was ever an excuse for a road trip, it’s catching this warm, exquisite play that tingles and fizzes with flavour. 

Pepa’s multi-disciplinary working process begins from the performance space and often explores themes of identity, migration, feminism and belonging, in this instance through the lens of her relationships surrounding food. The stage is adorned with artfully suspended noodles, tea towels, utensils, bulbs of garlic, ears of corn, and pots and pans, all trussed up above a domestic cook’s mise-en-place: a table set with stock cubes, sunflower oil, salt, colourful plastic bowls, and a clay pot over a tiny gas stove. Throughout the 60 minute production, Pepa cooks a traditional Peruvian soup for her audience in real time, inviting us to share the tastes and rituals that make up the story of herself. Far from a gimmick, this feels like a wondrous gift. She adds ingredients to the soup and stirs at perfectly timed intervals, transitioning from one chapter, mood or voice to another by means of this familiar, repetitive process. The synchronicity with which she weaves together both art forms, and the soft billows of aromatic steam rising gently from the pot as the play’s constant, are magic. 

The most delicious fourth wall break ensues for the production’s finale. The soup is real, Pepa tells us, to laughter, and you are invited to taste it. We line up tentatively, gladly, for our small bowls, and find ourselves sitting around the intimate theatre afterwards, talking, eulogising, sharing a meal with strangers. It is this carefully curated togetherness, which nonetheless has all the joy of spontaneity, a happy accident, that rounds off her narrative arc so spectacularly. Pepa dedicates a good deal of stage time to unpicking the painful, restrictive relationship with food she experienced throughout her adulthood. Being around other people was disastrous for her diets: all that criticising, commenting, worrying and not to mention tempting (some rice won’t kill you. Won’t you try this? Go on, it’s a Sunday. You can’t be on a diet forever) meant that she preferred to eat, and be, alone. There were practical considerations too: she rarely made plans after 2pm because that would mean carrying around three plastic containers filled with precisely measured, perfectly balanced, tasteless meals. She enacts this in a surreal register, depicting a maniacal protectiveness over her rituals of control – containers representing her mornings, half mornings, dinners, quantifying her consumption and shutting out her life with the snap of a lid.

Pepa navigates her themes with impeccable comedic timing, charisma and warmth: it’s impossible to draw your eyes away from her. She speaks of her kitchen-based conspiratorial alliance with her Grandma as a child, secretly adding stock cubes to the soup, and then waiting gleefully for her mother to taste it and smile and announce in vindication: see, there was no need for additional flavourings. She hails the mouth-watering flavours of her home country, and the delicious comfort food that characterises Peruvian cuisine – ‘it’s cold in Peru, that’s why they need all the calories’. Her grandfather walked from Machu Picchu to Lima, a journey that takes eight hours by bus, fuelled by such life-affirming victuals as Papas Rellenas, breadcrumb-coated, deep fried ground beef, cheese and rice-filled mashed potato balls. She struggles to reconcile desires surrounding her self-image and the conflicting parts of her identity, influenced by British beauty standards to arrive at the conclusion she will never be thin and Peruvian. She was young when her Grandma died, and thought it was a game, running downstairs to see how her cousin would take the news. She didn’t cry. She didn’t know she wouldn’t see her again, that she would disappear forever. Now, the soup is all she has left.

The play charts this movement from such an insular, isolated place, with Pepa starving herself of food and company, eating to survive but not to live, to a momentous common experience, her grandmother’s memory incarnated in the act of cooking her recipes, an act of shared joy and boundless, transformative love – the boundaries between audience and performer are broken down by her cooking, transforming us from strangers into loved ones eating soup around a table. The programme encourages audience members to take to social media and share their thoughts on the show with the hashtag #HowWastheSoup? Spoiler alert: the soup is very, very good.

REVIEW: The Retreat

Rating: 4 out of 5.

A sharp, distinctly Jewish, and often spellbinding reflection on craftsmanship, the search for love, faith and redemption.

First produced at Toronto’s Tarragon Theatre in 1996, Jason Sherman’s The Retreat sees its European premiere at the multi-award-winning Finborough Theatre, directed by Emma Jude Harris. 

33 year old Rachel (Jill Winternitz) grapples with forging a belief system between her conservative cultural upbringing, her father’s politics and her work as a Hebrew school teacher in early 90s Toronto, finding herself forced to apologise or quit after criticising the Israeli government during a class. She longs to be a writer, and wants to make a difference, writing a screenplay in the hope that many people will one day see it. 

David (Max Rinehart) appears to have it made as a successful script editor in his film production company. He also wants to make a difference – in his case, to his life, which he has decided lacks integrity, like the big-budget hollywood slasher flicks that he’s been churning out for fifteen years. ‘I have to get back to what I believe in’, he evangelises, ‘real films with heart, about real people!’ 

David believes he has found what he is looking for in Rachel’s earnest, unyielding script, landing heavily on his desk in an act of divine providence, and more so when he meets the intelligent young woman on his writing retreat in the Calgary mountains. Over dinner, he waxes lyrical about how stories help us make sense of what it means to be human, and the duty of the storyteller to tell us our place in the world, to remind us, as the world becomes more confusing, that we deserve unconditional love. Read, he deserves unconditional love and a heroic starring role in his own story, bored with the path his choices have led him down.

As they embark on a whirlwind affair among the pines, with David slipping off his wedding ring when his marriage looms between them, there is a startling moment where Rachel sees off an elk, advancing with hands for antlers, and leaving David no choice but to follow suit. She ultimately battles against more insidious threats, navigating the shaping of her own desires and artistic vision in the face of David’s narcissistic infatuation.

The Retreat sees a stand-out performance from Jonathan Tafler, beautifully portraying Rachel’s father Wolf, with whom she has a wonderful relationship. His long-refuted requests for herring and sour cream from the deli opposite the care home, and suggestions Rachel attend the local Jewish singles dance, seem always to come with a wink, as if Wolf is remembering to play up to his role as Jewish father. ‘Dad! The guilt,’ Rachel protests, placing a hand over her heart, ‘it sits right here’. He takes her hand, and throws those feelings to the wind, providing steadfast advice and support amid the turbulent events of the play’s action. ‘Say it’, he insists, ‘I’m not alone’.

The Finborough Theatre’s intimate space is transformed by Alys Whitehead’s masterful set design into a bright, elegant snapshot of their world. A Chagall-esque painting of swirling houses reiterates our characters’ fraught search for a sense of belonging, and the carpet is surrounded by a dark wood chip forest floor, crunched over by the audience in the process of finding their seats, lending the stage a fittingly mystical quality. 

The venue’s reputation as ‘probably the most influential fringe theatre in the world’ (Time Out) holds true – with lovely staff and a vital focus on vibrant new writing and unique rediscoveries, I fell in love with the play and the space, and can’t wait to return.

REVIEW: Animal

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Gripping from start to finish, Animal is not to be missed.

Winner of the Through the Mill prize, and shortlisted for the Papatango Prize, Animal makes a rip-roaring arrival at London’s Park Theatre after its successful run in Manchester. Disability activist and equality trainer Josh Hepple approached writer Jon Bradfield with his idea for the play, centring around the rapidly blooming love life of twenty five year old David (Christopher John-Slater) – gay, disabled and profoundly horny.

David’s romantic odyssey is sparked by a familiar technological frustration, and resulting deeply unhelpful helpline conversation. David’s anger, however, is directed towards a sex toy designed with able-bodied consumers in mind. Living with cerebral palsy and unable to feed, shower or dress himself, this becomes the final straw. His flatmate Jill (Amy Loughton)’s annoyance at his carnally-motivated cancelling of their plans leads him to download grindr, after some hesitance in anticipation of people’s response to his disability. So begins a heartfelt and often hilarious quest for sex, love and connection, with all the highs and lows that come with navigating the online dating world.

David’s casual hook-ups include the lovely but very much married Bob (William Oxborrow), who interrupts their sex to call his husband and add deodorant to the weekly shopping list – ‘I’d forget my own head!’, he laughs – and the seriously weird Alan, who arrives with a Sainsburys bag and asks if he can put some meat in his fridge – ‘I dunno how long I’ll be here, and it’s reduced’. Amongst them is Liam, gorgeous, somewhat reserved, and harbouring severe body issues, becoming self-conscious at David’s open admiration. ‘You lie there like you’re the only one with stuff going on’, he fires back angrily in response to David’s questioning, ‘you’ve only known me an hour’. There is a beautiful reconciliatory moment when Liam asks David if he’d like to be picked up, to which David beams, ‘yeah!’ His utter joy and no small amount of delighted lust is apparent as Liam takes him in his arms.

David subscribes to the social model of disability, telling Liam he doesn’t have disabilities, he has the medical condition cerebral palsy. It is an ill-equipped society that disables him with physical and mental barriers, be it a building’s lack of level access or people’s attitudes to difference. Such attitudes have resulted in a generally shameful treatment of disability in the media, or else a tokenistic approach, with disabled characters portrayed as perfect, one-dimensional heroes, seemingly representative of the entire disabled community. Bradfield comments that ‘Josh’s willingness of this play into existence is, perhaps, a kind of activism, asserting not only that the central character in a play can be severely disabled, but also that they can be complex and flawed, and that the needs and relationships that arise from their impairments are a worthwhile source of drama and comedy’.

The formidably talented John-Slater is supported by a stellar cast. Harry Singh proves one to watch as both David’s friend Mani, an irresistible whirlwind of devastating one-liners and sage advice imparted from the club, and Jill’s boyfriend Michael, a North-London hipster whose studied zen is portrayed with hilarious accuracy. Park Theatre’s intimate stage is an ideal setting for the play’s domestic dramas to unfold, with Gregor Donnelly’s simple yet clever set and video designer Matt Powell’s effective representation of social media dating perfectly crafting the space into David’s world. Gripping from start to finish, Animal is not to be missed.

REVIEW: Wasteman

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Joe Leather turns garbage to gorgeousness in charming performance

I tried to think of a good bin-based pun to open this review, but they were all rubbish. (Sorry). We’ll leave the jokes to comedian and theatre maker extraordinaire Joe Leather, whose show Wasteman returns to VAULT festival after a sell-out run at the Camden Fringe. Tickets were again sold out on the night I saw the show, and for good reason – Wasteman is a highly polished, sharply funny ‘love letter to hard-working northerners and gender euphoria’, in Joe’s words, and a fabulous night out is guaranteed in their excellent company.

The OffFest-nominated writer and performer opens with the brilliant original number ‘One Man’s Treasure Is Another Man’s Trash’, complemented by a floor-length lace dress in an eye-popping shade of Hi-Vis yellow. This is the winning entry to a dream drag contest, with us as the imaginary audience – it must be a dream, we are told, because their wig is lace-front, for a start. So begins a story about following said dreams, finding joy and beauty in the unlikeliest of places, and turning garbage into something gorgeous.

Based on Leather’s experiences while working as a Refuse Loader over lockdown, Joe paints a picture of their world in intimate detail. At 7am, the energy drink starts kicking in, giving them palpitations, which they’ve heard are very slimming. They negotiate a workplace in which hyper-masculinity and heterosexuality are the norm, with colleagues forever asking about The Mrs: everyone at work assumes they’re straight, because they’ve ‘got a deep voice and IBS’. Joe’s facing bigger issues at home, however, with a problematic boyfriend who can’t stand drag (‘why can’t gay men just be men?’), forcing them to bin their costumes and makeup. In the fallout of their relationship, they turn to Grindr with an emphasis on their manual labour job in their profile, selling the working man’s fantasy. Ironically, they find that the reflective jacket of their trade tends to make them more invisible in everyday life.

Joe finally gets a chance to fulfil their gender-euphoric performing potential in the Miss Stoke drag contest, practising the splits with the aid of spiritual youtube yoga sensation Tiffany Quaalude. She may look like her spirit animal’s a tapeworm, but she gets the job done, with Joe making it to the competition and hardly recognising themself in the reflection, feeling like one of the girls. A tender, big-hearted and frequently hilarious show, you’d be hard pressed to find better quality at the VAULT festival.


This is the last year VAULT festival will be staged at its home under Waterloo, with the venue stating its commitment to larger commercial work, and the festival’s future under threat. VAULT is vital for the showcasing of fringe theatre and new voices in the arts, and the #SaveVAULT fundraising campaign has been launched with the goal of raising £150,000 by the end of the current festival’s end on 19th March. Go to https://vaultfestival.com/save-vault/ to find out more and help if you can, or alternatively a great way to support the festival is to buy a ticket to an upcoming show, a drink or some merch at VAULT this year.

REVIEW: General Secretary

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Written, produced and performed by comedy theatre duo Cassie Symes and Georgina Thomas, aka Thick ‘n’ Fast, General Secretary is a rollicking production that skewers the overwhelmingly incompetent leadership styles seen in our recent political landscape. 

VAULT Festival’s Cage venue sees Cassie and Georgie waking up one morning to discover a new piece of United Nations legislation has appointed them both world leaders, the specially created roles of co-General Secretaries. Initially thinking the email informing them of their absolute power is spam, they are shocked to discover that no, this is very much real, and yes, they will have to do something about that incoming call from ‘Kim’ (not Kardashian, sadly, but Jong-Un). 

What pressing issues should they solve first? Global democracy? But hang on a second, they weren’t democratically elected, and they’ve just got a taste for benevolent world rule. How about taxing the rich? Hmm, they’re pretty sure they’re now totally minted. Maybe back to the drawing board for the time being. Come on, this can’t be that difficult – they just have to instate the greatest good for the greatest number of people. ‘Utilitarian, egalitarian…vegetarian?’ Cassie spitballs. They’re off to some kind of start.

The two highly under-qualified, over-promoted women initially plunge the world into unintentional chaos. Billionaires set up literal satellite offices on Mars in increasingly creative tax avoidance schemes, causing increased environmental damage (‘Earth sucks. YOU suck’ tweets Elon Musk to @General_Secretaries_xoxo), headlines scream of the global economic crash caused by their banning of oil (‘FTSE One ‘Plundered’, ‘Is Olive Oil Okay??’), and plans for the ‘Piers Morgan Centre for Polite Journalism’ and the ‘Silvio Berlusconi Centre for Women’s Rights’ fail to contribute to world peace.

Fast-paced, witty and packed with enjoyably topical bits, General Secretary explores imposter syndrome, the female urge to apologise for taking up space, whether absolute power comes with inevitable corruption, and exactly what is going on in the official UN whatsapp chat ‘Brussels Babes’. Highly entertaining and creative multi-media elements stemming from their first performing the piece during lockdown 3.0 make for welcome comedic possibilities, and the duo’s on-stage chemistry zings and pops. The production feels slightly loose with extra material at times, funny little darlings that they clearly couldn’t bear to kill – a bit of tight script editing would whip this delightful show into shape in no time.