REVIEW: ASBO BOZO


Rating: 4 out of 5.

“An insightful play about the struggles of keeping people united”


Suitable for ages 16+. 

Asbo Bozo is a thought-provoking one-woman play about community in all its forms. We follow a woman as she navigates her professional life as an Antisocial Behaviour Officer, trying to solve the problems reported by the local residents, and her personal life as a woman who’s just turned 30 to the excitement of absolutely nobody. Despite life’s stresses, she is determined to keep people together. 

Solo shows are tough as hell – the heavy responsibility of keeping the audience engaged falls on the performer’s shoulders. Well, writer-performer Georgina Duncan is fantastic in this play! Her emotions feel truthful, expressed through frantic lines and palpable microexpressions. She has a brilliant sense of comic timing and her stage presence is electric; the whole time, I couldn’t take my eyes off her! Although some of the characters are portrayed via voiceover, it is Duncan’s responses to these voices that really bring them to life. Asbo Bozo is a show with integrity and soul, because Duncan does not hold back. She wears her heart on her sleeve, passionate about telling the stories of those who are often dismissed. 

Duncan also confidently utilises the set design to convey the story’s locations. We initially only see a table and a revolving chair on the far left of the stage. However, her ability to change her entire body language is crucial for immersing us in each scene, whether it takes place in the drab chill of an office cubicle or the slight sweat settling on your body just outside a nightclub. Just as Antisocial Behaviour Officers must be empathetic towards the people with whom they interact, Asbo Bozo requires an empathetic audience. Duncan successfully evokes within us all the emotions. 

My only issue with Asbo Bozo is a storyline that seems to end quite abruptly. For her 30th birthday, the protagonist meets an old friend with whom her relationship is quite strained. Though Duncan’s amazing performance gives us a sense of this friend’s personality, there seem to be only two or three scenes involving the character – after that, we never really hear about her again. Other than this, however, Duncan still shows us the stories of those who truly matter, which makes Asbo Bozo a brilliant viewing experience overall. 

In a society that is overt in its hatred for working-class people, and those at risk of falling into poverty or becoming involved in crimes, Asbo Bozo is a step towards destigmatising the disadvantaged. Theatre is seen as an entertainment hub of the rich, but it is also the medium through which the stories of those on the fringes are told. The protagonist, through all her anxieties, fights for her community, and so must we all. 

Kudos to all involved! 

REVIEW: Birds of Passage


Rating: 3 out of 5.

A Thought-Provoking and Timely Exploration of the Refugee Crisis


Birds of Passage is a powerful and thought-provoking play that explores the complex relationship between tourism and the refugee crisis. Set on the idyllic Greek island of Zandros, it follows British tourists Emma (Milly Walters), Bill (Jan van der Black), and Sandra (Maggie Daniels), who arrive expecting a luxurious and uneventful trip. However, very quickly, they are confronted with the fact that the island is actually a stopping point for refugees, arriving by boat from treacherous journeys. 

The play delves into the characters’ contrasting reactions to the crisis, as their good intentions collide with the reality of the situation. Emma, the most well-meaning of the tourists, is eager to help but finds her naive idealism challenged by a refugee who’s found himself on the island, Jusef (Jerome Kennedy) and by the lived realities of some of the locals, Elena (Marissia Petropoulou) and Christos (Christopher Kouros), who have watched the crisis unfold over many years. 

The simple set design enhanced the atmosphere of the play. With white and blue fold-out tables and a line of four plant pots, the set effectively transports the audience to the Greek island. The bold use of deep blue and pink lights, combined with lilting Greek music, sets the scene beautifully while maintaining an underlying tension. This contrast between the idyllic setting and the mounting crisis reflects the central tension of the play—the disparity between the tourists’ expectations and the local reality.

Birds of Passage strikes a delicate balance between serious subject matter and moments of levity. The humour, while not always effective, provides much-needed respite, helping to prevent the narrative from becoming too overwhelming. The play uses these moments to explore deep themes with a light touch, offering unexpected twists that challenge the audience’s preconceptions and shed light on the complexities of migration and humanitarian aid.

Marcia Kelson’s writing is sharp and engaging, highlighting the nuances of the refugee crisis and educating the audience. Penny Gkritzapi’s direction ensures that the emotional weight of the play lands effectively, guiding the cast through moments of both lightness and intensity. Jan van der Black’s performance of Bill was particularly striking in this regard. We quickly come to understand that he is extremely anti-immigration, with lines like “stop the boats” and beliefs that refugees are “sponges”, which are hard-hitting and difficult to hear. Yet, despite his often harsh rhetoric, he frequently becomes the target of jokes from his wife, Sandra, providing much-needed levity. As the narrative unfolds, however, Bill’s transformation becomes a quietly moving journey—showing how the play masterfully shifts from sharp satire to emotional resonance, illustrating both his personal evolution and the play’s deeper emotional stakes.

Birds of Passage is a timely and important play that challenges audiences to rethink their assumptions about migration, privilege, and aid. It is an emotionally resonant piece that stays with you.

Reviewer: Eliza England

REVIEW: Tell Me You’ll Think About It  


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A night of passion and revelations

Suitable for ages 16+. 

Recipe for success in a two-hander: 

  1. The engagement of the audience relies largely on the stage presence of the two actors. 
  1. Both actors must maintain the energy of both themselves and the narrative, from start to finish. 
  1. Both actors must have an incredible chemistry. Even if the two characters are in disagreement, this dynamic is only effective if the actors have an excellent working relationship. 

Lyndsey Ruiz and Boyan Petrov are the two actors in Tell Me You’ll Think About It. They fulfil the recipe for success and then some – this play is exquisite! It is dramatic and hilarious, passionate and truthful. Certainly an unforgettable piece! 

Tell Me You’ll Think About It is about a jaded theatre reviewer named Phoebe (Ruiz) and her boyfriend Dave (Petrov). For 75 divine minutes, we watch the two characters go from having polarising opinions of a play – Dave thinking it was good, Phoebe hating every second – to exposing each other’s most ugly, vulnerable, and fervid traits. It is reflective of the legendary classic film Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966), with the principal actors bouncing lines off each other like a record-breaking game of tennis, but with much more brilliant humour and heart. The play refuses to slow down, but the lines are still piercing enough for us to mull over them long after we leave the theatre. 

The play is intense, but not a single second is wasted on exaggerated or unnecessary emotion. The strained dynamic between Phoebe and Dave feels relatable; Lyndsey Ruiz, also the writer of this fantastic play, perfectly articulates the ways in which we may sabotage our relationships. The characters are neither saintly nor cruel, merely victims of their own flaws. Ruiz and Petrov clearly know their characters inside and out, approaching the more difficult scenes with patience while also holding their characters accountable for their maladaptive traits. It is always refreshing to see this in a story – must we always root for a character, or despise them? Phoebe and Dave aren’t our heroes, they are just like us. We are boring, we are dissatisfied, we have unfinished and unrealised dreams, and we have the spark in our hearts that allow us to keep going.  

On the surface, Tell Me You’ll Think About It mocks the idea of “speaking your truth”. This phrase seems like a fallacy, something stupid people say to get us to do something with our lives. But that’s the epic thing about the medium of theatre, and Ruiz clearly recognises this – acting allows those with a truth too complex to speak to convey exactly what is on their mind. This was evident in Ruiz’s microexpressions; just as Phoebe was being confronted by Dave about her imperfections, it seemed as if Ruiz had put herself on trial with this play. Stories like these allow us to process our traumas, and forgive ourselves for simply being human. 

Kudos to everyone involved! I certainly will think about this play, that’s for sure. I loved every moment! 

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Khawla Ibraheem and Oliver Butler


A Knock on the Roof by Khawla Ibraheem has been directed and developed by Oliver Butler to produce unforgettable play about obsession, survival and everyday life in Gaza. It follows Mariam as she rehearses for the appearance of small warning bombs – a knock on the roof – which give tenants in Gaza 5 – 15 minutes to evacuate before their home is destroyed.  

Khawla Inbraheem and Oliver Butler talk about the journey they have been on to develop A Knock of the Roof and how it grew into the play it is today.


Q. What is A Knock on the Roof about? 

OLIVER. A Knock on the Roof is about Mariam, a mother from Gaza training for war. She’s living her regular life, when another war breaks she remembers, from previous wars, that the Israeli military had started using a technique called a knock on the roof, where they alert residents of a building with a small bomb on the roof to give them 5 to 15 minutes to escape. She has this creative inspiration to try and train for it, to see how much she can carry and how far she can run in that amount of time. She becomes obsessed with it, the idea of survival, of figuring out what she is capable of and what matters to her if she’s going to have to leave her house forever. 

KHAWLA. It’s about Mariam, a woman and a mother that is trying her best to save herself, her son and her mother in a crazy situation, but also in the midst of all this, she’s also trying to maintain herself, her personality, her character. She’s just like any of us, dealing with her own strangers. But her’s take place in the middle of a war. 

Q. Can you talk a little bit about the journey that the show has been on? 

K. This play started as a 10-minute monologue in 2014, and then it went in my drawer and I forgot about it. In 2019 Oliver and I met in Sundance theater lab, developing a different play that I wrote. Through our collaboration, we discovered that we have a unique way of working together, we started dreaming of developing more projects together. In 2022 I shared with Oliver this idea about this woman that trains to run from the bombings in Gaza because of the knock on the roof. I started with larger research about war, motherhood, and training for running a marathon, and when I say research I don’t necessarily mean only reading articles or books, but a huge part of the research was interviewing people and especially mothers that went through wars: in Gaza and some from the Golan Heights (the place I come from). When I felt that the materials I have can carry me through to start I did. So I started writing and sending Oliver drafts, and Oliver would send me back notes and questions . Half a year later, we met again in person in New York, where we workshopped the play for two weeks at the mercury store and New York theater workshop, the aim was to get me on my feet and out of my head as a writer, by the end of the two weeks we held a private reading to get a chance to see if and how the material would be received by the public 

O. As a result of the reading in NY, we got invited by PalFest to have a public reading of the play in Ramallah. So, immediately after the readings in New York (spring of 2023),and with the support of the Hakawati theatre in Jerusalem, I went out to work with Khawla in the Golan Heights to develop the play, leading up to the  reading in Ramallah. On the day that I arrived, when the plane landed, people on the plane were talking about how Israel had sent a rocket into Gaza. So when Khawla, picked me up from the train in Akka (Acre), she said, ‘we’re on the verge of war.’ We spent the whole time working at the theater in her small town, where Khawla first

learned she wanted to become a theater-maker, in Majdal Shams, and for the whole time we were not sure if the reading was going to happen, or if we could even get into Ramallah. The day before, we saw that it would work. So we traveled there, and we did the first public reading of this play at Ramallah for largely audiences of Palestnian and international writers. 

K. To me, it was very important because this play has been written in English since the beginning. Up until this moment, I have shared the script with a few people from Gaza that I interviewed, to make sure that the play reads for their reality, I’m not from Gaza, I’m writing based on interviews and research, and I wanted to make sure the play and the reality aligned. 

Gaza and the West Bank and the Golan Heights are all very separated areas. It was the first time that I shared this play in the West Bank and for me, it was a very important moment to see how the local audience would react to the materials. And I was very happy with the reactions that I got from the local audience, that they actually did engage with the play and with the material. 

The plan was to self produce the play, so after the reading in Ramallah, we applied for a small fund at A.M Qattan foundation, and we got it, and we launched an Indiegogo campaign to self produce the play. Through the campaign that’s when we met piece by piece productions, and they became our co-producers. We started planning the rehearsals for September, and October. The original plan was to open mid October in Haifa and in Jerusalem. 

O. I came out in September to Haifa, then a week before tech, Khawla and I are in her car driving towards Jerusalem for a meeting with Elhakawati theater when she gets a text. 

K. After COVID, I stopped listening to the news in the morning. It was a Saturday, and usually there is no traffic on Saturdays, so I wasn’t alert that something weird was happening. We are 15 minutes from Tel Aviv, I get a voice message and I see that it’s Amer Khalil the artistic director of the Hakawti theatre. I don’t open the message and I call him to say we will be 15 minutes late. And he’s like, 15 minutes late to what? Did you listen to the news? I park in an abandoned gas station, and I open the news and I see all the videos from the attack of October 7th. Without much thinking I turn back to Haifa, we collect our stuff, and I drive us to Majdal shams, my hometown in the Golan Heights. Everything is chaotic. The Nova party has people from all over, so the victims are from all over. Every place felt like a place that got damaged in this moment. 

O. I felt very sad to be leaving people I love, but I flew out. Everyone there just looked terrified.

K. For a while, I hesitated to engage with the play. I felt overwhelmed and unable to face it. A mix of guilt and frustration made me start questioning why I had even thought of writing it, the scenes of the play started to feel too real, and reality itself grew unbearably loud, so I wondered if the play could add anything at all to the horror we witness every single day. In December 2023, piece by piece productions suggested that I come to visit New York for two weeks, to revisit the material and see if we want to do this. 

O. So she came to New York, and we met for dinner. It felt like I was seeing a friend from 10 years ago. It felt like these two friends coming together after this immense amount of time, and it was very meaningful, but also sad. 

We did this workshop. We talked a lot about whether we should embrace more of the reality of now. Trying to update it to the now felt in some ways cheap. You don’t have to be like, Have you thought about today? No. People are living today. 

K. Also, this play has been in the making for a decade, but is shaped by a reality that, sadly, keeps repeating itself. And who knows what the next decade will bring. Will this cycle ever break? I desperately hope so. But the other question is: for how long the impact of these events will continue to echo in our collective memory as humanity? 

O. We then found out that the Traverse theater in Edinburgh wanted to produce the play. New York Theater Workshop decided that they were going to produce the play the following year. 

The whole existence of this play, from my perspective, has been this play that almost didn’t happen. The play itself embodied this sense of existential crisis. At every step it either didn’t happen or it was about to not happen. The process of the play, and the content of the play ended up being also stuck in the same kind of reality. 

K. Then, a few weeks before Edinburgh, a rocket landed in a football field in my village (Majdal Shams) and killed 12 children. And again, it was the same feeling, do I really want to do this? Does this really matter? Because the grief was again, louder. But we went to Edinburgh, and we did the shows. And at the end of every show, I would stand and read a note, of the children that were lost in my town, and all the children and people that were lost in this horrific war that has been going for way too long. 

O. Then we went to Dublin, which gave us this huge boost going into New York Theater Workshop, where we opened last month. 

K. Up until the New York Theater Workshop production, we did not actually have a real rehearsal process. We had rehearsals in Haifa a year and a half before the opening in New York. And also the rehearsals were cut short, we only managed to rehearse half of the play before everything was stopped. Then in April, when we were supposed to prepare for Edinburgh, my arrival was delayed because there was the Iranian attack and all the flights were canceled. And on the way out of Edinburgh, my flight was canceled because of rockets falling, and I was stuck in Greece for a few days. 

Q. How did it feel to finally have that dedicated time to rehearse the show? 

O. It gave us the chance to really question every choice that we made. It wasn’t an overhaul, but it was an opportunity. Over the course of this process, Khawla really became an actor. I mean, she was always an actor, but I think she might have called herself more of a director, writer, sometimes, actor. And over the course of this process, she really became an actor. And even practically, at home for her, she doesn’t do runs that are multi weeks long, right? 

K. I never did more than a few shows in a row . 

O. So now she’s done 44 shows in New York, ahead of our 17 shows here, plus Edinburgh plus Dublin, which is 80-something shows in half a year. She’s become something different. There’s been a transformative quality to the whole piece. 

K. Sitting in the rehearsal room, questioning everything we had done up to that moment, felt both like a privilege and slightly unsettling. A constant push and pull— whether to ask questions and look for new answers into the unknown or stay within the safety of what you know and experienced, and you know that it works, we already won awards in Edinburgh. 

But Oliver has been an incredible creative partner in challenging me to step outside my comfort zone. I’m grateful for that every day. He has no fear of finding the wrong answer again and again until he finds the right one, I tend to chase perfection. We might be very different in that way, and it can be challenging sometimes, but somehow we manage to push each other toward the right balance in our work. Our rehearsals have been a constant exchange— that allowed both of us to grow in new directions towards the process 

Q. Do you think those differences between the two of you are part of what makes it work? 

O. Before Khawla and I got to know each other as collaborators, you could look at the difference in our life experience and think, what do these two people have in common? Well, we connected in Utah at Sundance, and what we found was that ineffable thing, sensing between both of us that there was the potential for some kind of electricity to happen, because there was this thing that we couldn’t even name that

felt similar, even though there was all this difference. We also flip. There are times where I’m the one who’s more protective, and she’s the one who’s knocking stuff down. But the point is we dance. When she’s expanding, I take some room to contract and give her space, and then when I’m expanding, she takes time. And it’s that dance that I think leads to the sort of ineffable creation, the manifestation of the relationship and our creativity into this thing. 

K. The differences that we have, create a space that makes the play resonate with so many different people and audiences. 

Q. What makes the play universal? 

O. At its core, it is a play about someone in a terrifying situation, waiting and then preparing. There are ways in which Mariam’s experience in Gaza feels like what it’s like to live in our world today. I’m not saying we all have a similar level of actual, existential threat of war, but we all live in a world now, especially after COVID, where we’re waiting to get some sort of notice of some terrible thing that’s going to change our life. We keep having this recurring experience which tethers us to the warning that we’re going to get a notice that another plane has gone down or another pandemic is starting. Our world has oriented us towards this constant level of preparedness and vigilance to just stay safe. When we watch someone who is in a situation like that, trying to figure out how to prepare and keep their loved ones safe, we immediately connect to it in a human way, and say, that is also my story with a different reality, and I think right now in the world, and everywhere we’ve done the show so far, it’s been proven that that is something that we can relate to. 

K. Also, what makes it very universal is that it’s built on a very basic instinct that we have, which is love to one another, a love of a mother to her child, or a mother to her daughter, a daughter to her own mother, a woman to her own city, to her own house, to her own stuff. And a complicated marriage and love that is trying to survive in the modern world. It’s built on experiences as all can relate to. I have received messages from people from all over the political map saying how much they related to the play, and I think that’s because even if we are not participating, we are all someone’s daughter or son, and we all are trying to save something we love, while fighting our own battles in the day to day life. 

Q. How does humor sit in the play? And why is it important for it to be there? 

K. Humor is a magical way to connect to people. Laughter is a reaction. When we laugh, it’s something that we don’t even think about. Something funny happens and we just laugh. And it’s a trick way to make the audience engage in something when you make them laugh, because then something about the conscious relaxes and then the dramatic moments can enter easier when we’ve taken down the walls, when we laugh. People come to the play with certain expectations about how a play about

a war in Gaza should sound. But honestly, in our most horrific moments in life, we often grab this moment of joy and laughter as humans, because this is what will make us want to survive for the next day. Otherwise, we’re just going to lose our minds. For me, it’s essential for the play to be funny in order for it to survive. 

O. I think humour is a revelation of things that should not be said or cannot be said or should not be done. When something happens in relief, it’s that surprise of something happening that should not happen, right? I also feel like, at least in America, there is this portrayal of Palestinians as being humorless. You know, as if there’s no humour in their lives. But to me, some of the funniest people I’ve met are Palestinians and people who live in really terrifying situations. Humor is something that cannot be taken away, it is a right, and so I think that this ends up being an incredible opportunity to build connection through how we end up finally saying the things that should not be said, or giving our characters the right to say the things that should not be said or cannot be said. It’s a form of resistance and freedom. 

Q. Khawla, what do you think that you and Mariam have in common, and what’s different about you? 

K. Our sarcasm is totally the same, and our dark humour. Also, this overthinking quality, the way our brains work, is very similar. And how are we different? We are maybe different in the specificity of life: I don’t live under siege, Mariam does, I’m not married, she is, I’m not a mother, she is. But the qualities are the same 

I come from a small community, a Druze community in the Golan Heights, and the relationship to living in small place with a small community is also a common experience between me and Mariam, and I think both of our communities have everyone in everyone’s business, but mostly with an attitude of love and caring. Mariam loves Gaza and I love my community. Mariam can be any one of us, I made sure of writing the character that way. 

O. I think the instinct to try and understand the relationship between Khawla and Mariam also mirrors what’s happening in the play. I think there’s this core idea that trauma in life can cause us to dissociate as a protective mechanism. And I was interested in that. And then in the same way that an actor embodies a character and trying to understand where the separation is, is sort of where the magic is. I can’t discern a difference, really, between Khawla and Mariam, except for the details that she mentioned. But the pursuit of the difference, trying to see if there is a line in between, is one of the things that draws us in. 

Q. What do you want audiences to take away from the show here in London? 

O. My core hope is that people engage with the human story. I want to release the audience from thinking that this play is asking you to be someone different or do

something different. I want them to laugh with Mariam. I want them to engage with the story. I want them to feel the similarities between them and her. I want them to see, at least from my opinion of the way the American media presents Palestinians, a different kind of Palestinian story that they may not be used to hearing. And yeah, I want them to feel connected and closer to Mariam, and then, by association, connected and closer to Gaza, and then hopefully connected and closer to themselves. 

K. If, even for a single moment during the play, someone in the audience thinks, I know what you’re talking about, then my mission is accomplished. 

Each person might connect with Mariam in a different way—through her relationship with her son, her mother, her husband, or even something as simple as the way she prepares her coffee. It doesn’t have to be a profound realization; just one fleeting moment of recognition, one thought of “Yes, I’ve felt that too.” And if they carry that moment with them when they leave, then we’ve done more than just humanize the people we often see reduced to headlines—we’ve stepped into their lives, even if only for an instant. 

I’m not trying to provoke grand revelations, deep philosophical reflections, or overwhelming emotions. My hope is that the story creates a space for connection, where Mariam feels real—not just a character on stage, but someone whose experiences resonate. 

The most important thing to understand is that behind every political decision, behind every conflict, there are real human beings paying the price—with their lives, their loved ones, and their dreams. Even before war, Mariam had already lost so much to political decisions beyond her control. She lost her dreams to a reality she never chose. 

By the time the play ends, I hope we all carry a piece of her with us.

REVIEW: Run Rebel


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

“The play embraced culture and bravery and standing up for what you believe in”


“Run Rebel” is a stage adaptation of the novel by Manjeet Mann, an actor, author and playwright. The play was performed by Pilot Theatre who are a York based international touring theatre company who makes work targeted at young people. Run Rebel tells the story of Amber Rai, a young teenager who is really passionate about running but is dealing with her emotionally abusive, alcoholic father. The play explores her life and escaping her father to achieve her dreams of being a professional runner. Run Rebel was dynamic and thought-provoking and told a deep and meaningful story.

The script was really grounded and worked to explore poetry as a form of telling a story. The script was eloquently told through the actors drive and emotion. It was coupled with music and sound effects that deepened the story further. The Bollywood music captured the culture of the characters. The 6-strong cast multirole so incredibly seamlessly and build such specific and beautiful characters so well. Jessica Kaur led the show as the lead, Amber. She had impressive projection and diction skills as well as a brilliant ability to attain so many lines and stamina throughout the whole show. Heather Forster portrayed wonderful characterisation and was thoroughly enjoyable to watch as Amber’s best friend in the play.

The costume changes were super quick and really worked with the pace of the play. They were accurate to the characters ages and alongside the lighting design really emphasised the story being told. The use of lighting was engaging and really clever. It was really effective and was very exciting to watch. The acting from all was incredibly moving and emotional, it was beautiful to see what the company was presenting and telling. It was an important story being told and that certainly was achieved through the acting.

There were quite a few funny moments in the show which made the audience laugh. As the target audience is young people, the humour was created with children in mind and so it was comedic and balanced out the emotional parts really well. The skate ramp used for the play offered opportunity for levels and free movement across the stage. The script the script was created to break the fourth wall and this made the play immersive and engaging. The moments of silence were very effective and allowed the play to build suspense successfully going into the next scenes.

Overall, this play was strong and powerful. It embraced culture and bravery and standing up for what you believe in. The cast and creative team did a brilliant job on the show and I wish them all the best for the next leg of their run in Leeds, starting on the 22nd.

REVIEW: Anything With A Pulse / Pickle @ Park Theatre

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A cheerful and charming double-bill diving into modern dating and identity

Park Theatre’s fledgling programme Make Mine A Double is a nifty idea, offering a double-bill of one-act shows and showing off twice the talent. Its first combo of Eliana Ostro’s Anything With A Pulse and Deli Segal’s Pickle is an attractive, if slightly lopsided, look into modern romance: Hinge fails, splitting the bill and unsatisfactory sex abound.

Anything With A Pulse is a solid opener, both written and directed by Ostro. Our stock characters M (Rufus Love) and W (Annie Davison) have a nightclub meet-cute but, in spite of their clear chemistry, can’t seem to move beyond situationship due to poor communication and the constant lure of other flames, both new and old. 

Love and Davison build a great connection through Ostro’s witty, exposing dialogue. Unfortunately, the characters spend most of the play not talking to each other but to us. The actors are not as strong here. They seem to be at a halfway-house between character and narrator, making the narration fuzzy and not extracting all possible comedy – of which there is plenty.

The amount of narration also removes a lot of intrigue from the characters. As they clumsily flirt with each other, we are given no chance to imagine what these characters might be thinking because- oh, they’ve just told us. It’s a bit like someone giving you a crossword and immediately starting to fill it in for you.

In spite of this, Anything with A Pulse provides some good laughs and a thought-provoking look into how young people date today, how the prospect of romance with anyone all of the time can often hold us back from taking the leap into meaningful relationships.

Pickle, written and performed by Deli Segal and directed by Kayla Feldman, is a stronger companion. This one-woman show focuses on Ari, a Jewish woman in her late 20s trying to find a suitable man amidst endless waves of unsuitable men, and trying to reconcile her romantic desire with her (very vocal) Jewish Conscience.

One thing that Segal nails is the balance between authentic expression and providing enough education for those of us, such as myself, not clued up on the quirks of Jewish culture, explaining what is considered ‘frum’ (six hours between meat and fish, Tottenham, foil on Passover) and ‘not frum’ (three hours between meat and fish, Arsenal, cocaine). It’s deft, intelligent writing that welcomes everyone in without sacrificing any storytelling.

Segal’s characterisation is another strong point, Ari is elastic, energetic and always engaging. She excellently skewers the wide spectrum of awful North London men and builds a warm, vibrant Finchley community of family and friends around her. The picture she paints of a woman pulled apart by competing worlds is clear and compelling, and the conclusion she reaches – that acceptance is not found through conformity but finding your own people – is a lovely note to end on.

Any double-bill will inevitably draw comparisons between the two shows on offer, and while in this case one does out-shine the other, these are two enjoyable shows showcasing some fine new talent – a good omen for the programme’s future.