IN CONVERSATION WITH: Henry Patterson

We sat down for an exclusive interview with Henry Patterson, a performer, broadcaster and rising musical theatre talent bringing a fresh twist to the traditional talk show format with his new live series, House Seats.

Launching at Crazy Coqs, the monthly show blends intimate interviews, live music and candid conversation with some of the West End’s most exciting performers.

House Seats premieres 15th March at Crazy Coqs – Tickets here.


House Seats blends interviews, live music and audience interaction. How did the idea for this format first take shape for you?

It came about very organically. Like many people my age, I spend a lot of time doomscrolling on TikTok until the early hours of the morning. My feed is flooded with either late night talk show clips or videos of Rachel Zegler on the balcony of the Palladium. It got me thinking how interesting it would be to combine formats and create a talk show themed entirely around musical theatre.

You’ve described it as inspired by the spontaneity of The Graham Norton Show but tailored to theatre artists. How did you adapt that energy to suit a live cabaret setting?

I’ve been fortunate enough to be performing my own shows for a while and find the atmosphere in the room always feels laidback and easygoing. I think channeling that energy and not taking the interviews too seriously is the secret, after all they’re interviews not interrogations!

When you’re interviewing someone like Ian McIntosh, what kind of space are you hoping to create for them?

Something homely and relaxed. I want the show to feel like we’re catching up with old friends, as that’s when you get people sharing their best stories! The audience will help to create that space too. They’re all big fans of Ian’s so expect the reception will be very warm.

How do you prepare for a conversation that you want to feel both structured and spontaneous?

I met with Ian a few weeks ago and spoke about his journey. We share similar roots in musical theatre, both having started our careers performing in the same venue. The conversation is mainly structured around the songs Ian’s picked to sing. Other than that, we don’t have a set script or talking points. We want to let the conversation go where it goes!

You’re known for your reinterpretations of musical theatre through jazz. How has developing that sound influenced the atmosphere you’re creating for this series?

My musical sound will take a familiar song and put an unexpected twist on it. In a way, the same applies here. We’re all familiar with watching Ian as Jesus in Jesus Christ Superstar or as Valjean in Les Miserables, but have never got the chance to find out more about his story. For most of the audience, it will be totally new to see West End stars as themselves and not in character, putting their personality firmly in the spotlight.

You’ve performed in London and New York, and built an audience online. How does hosting a live, intimate show at Crazy Coqs compare to those other experiences?

It’s actually very similar. My shows often feel like they’re one on one conversations with the audience. I never plan what I’ll say in between songs and the show often runs very naturally. The one difference here is that I’m in a conversation where the person I’m talking to will be talking back! I’m so excited to be sat in the best seat in the house to listen to Ian’s story. In some ways, I’m just an additional audience member, so I feel very lucky.

FEATURE: A History of Scottish Drama in Six Plays

Scottish theatre has a rich and varied history, not confined to the written text. As explained by journalist and critic Fergus Morgan at the launch of his new podcast “A History of Scottish Drama in Six Plays”, it has undergone a rather unique evolutionary process, often out of necessity, from the obstacles in its way. From the Scottish Reformation in 16th Century, development of music hall entertainment as the country became more industrialised; through to the 20th century, with successes as part of Glasgow’s European City of Culture in 1990, following the previous darker era from Thatcher’s time in power in the 1980s, and ending with the establishment of the National Theatre of Scotland in the 2000s, and the current uncertainty of arts funding in Scotland.     

Today’s event was a live panel recording of what is to be the seventh episode of the podcast. The first part of the event was an overview of the topics that will be covered in the preceding podcast episodes. Episode one, which is now available, features discussion of Sir David Lyndsay’s 16th Century play “A Satire of the Three Estates” in the context of the Scottish Reformation, where Scotland was deprived of traditional theatrical representation, and sparked the move to folk drama beyond ‘playwrights writing plays’. Subsequent episodes cover plays such as “Men Should Weep”, “Losing Venice”, “Passing Places”, and “Black Watch” and the era of its time of writing, in discussion with playwrights, performers, academics and critics.    

Tonight’s panel comprised critic Mark Fisher, the playwrights Nicola McCartney and Isla Cowan, and Traverse Theatre Artistic Director Gareth Nicholls. In an engaging and thought-provoking section, Fraser had asked them to focus on a play or production from the last decade that exemplified Scottish drama. You’ll have to listen to the podcast to hear the examples being discussed, and a particularly impassioned statement from Nicola McCartney should not be missed, describing every new play as being ‘a desperate, longed-for, heartbeat’ within our culture. 

As the discussion progressed, clear themes emerged about the uniqueness of the Scottish theatre environment, how to nurture new talent, and ensure inclusivity and new voices to emerge, and inevitably the subject of money. The ‘good night out’ vibes that emanated first from the Glasgow music hall scene, and persists to this day, and the collective energy of groups being able to speak with authenticity and lived experiences. A general consensus also being that Scotland has always had to show resilience in face of adversity, been squeezed to do more, with less, but is particularly stark in the current economy, following years of austerity, and perils of risk-averse attitudes at the expense of innovation and experimentation.     

For further context about the importance of this conversation – in early October, Creative Scotland revealed that their Multi-Year funding announcement, expected in October, would not be announced until January 2025, leaving 281 applications with an ask of £87.5 million in limbo, and many in the industry with uncertainty about their future past April 2025. 

Tonight’s discussion was a fascinating insight into the past and present climate of Scottish theatre. Fergus is an engaging and knowledgeable host, as those familiar with his own Substack publication, the Crush Bar, will attest, and it is recommended read. On the basis of tonight’s event and the first episode, this promises to be a valuable addition to the Scottish arts scene.   

“A History Of Scottish Drama In Six Plays” is written and produced by Fergus Morgan, created with support from the Scottish Society of Playwrights’ SSP@50 Fellowship Awards and from Creative Scotland. The first episode was released on Monday 28th October and is available across podcast platforms now. 

Listen to the podcast here

REVIEW: The Rest is History: Mozart and Beethoven with Live Orchestra


Rating: 5 out of 5.

The famous podcast’s debut at Royal Albert Hall prompts us to rethink two of the greatest composers in history


Well received by millions, The Rest Is History is a popular podcast that delves into fascinating historical events and figures with a lively, conversational approach. This time at the Royal Albert Hall, Tom Holland and Dominic Sandbrook explore the lives of two most famous composers throughout history: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Ludwig van Beethoven.

The two-hour experience is a full-flavoured blend of their life stories and “anecdotes”, insightful analysis, as well as humour. For instance, Tom and Dominic vividly illustrate Beethoven’s relation with Napoléon Bonaparte – admiring him at first and intending to dedicate his Symphony No. 3 to him as a champion of democracy and equality, only to feel betrayed by Napoléon’s self-coronation. He ferociously scratched out Napoleon’s name from the title page of the score. 

This incident actually highlights the influences of Enlightenment ideals on Beethoven, but Tom and Dominic wittily interweave the fact that Beethoven did compose The Battle Symphony dedicated to Arthur Wellesley to celebrate his victory over Napoleon in 1813, drawing loud, knowing laughter from the audience. 

Such a method of engaging storytelling seamlessly fuses with the live orchestra music performed by the Academy of St Martin in the Fields and the Philharmonia Chorus, conducted by Oliver Zeffman. The programme features a mix of the composers’ most iconic works, including Mozart’s Symphony No.25 and Requiem, and Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5 and No. 9, as well as their lesser-known ones. For instance, Mozart’s Violin Sonata No. K304 is a delicate piece written shortly after his mother’s death. As Mozart’s music is often described as joyful, elegant and light, this composition exquisitely manoeuvres woe and melancholy interweaved within the notes. 

In Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony No. 6, you may astonishingly find that Beethoven incorporates several compositional techniques that Mozart mastered, such as the graceful and beautiful flowing themes featuring lyricism, and the prominent use of wind instruments for tone painting. 

The Rest is History: Mozart and Beethoven draws interesting parallels between the two, revealing that both composers are very contingent on their own times: the economic background, the war affairs, and the cultural development such as the Romantic movement and the Enlightenment.  While Mozart is celebrated as a Genius with the capital G, Beethoven elevates music as Art with the capital A. While Mozart basically functioned a servant to the aristocracy, Beethoven regarded them as clients – more his equals. These parallels not only show their different life circumstances, but also invite us to further reflect upon how our epistemologies of art and culture have been shaped and evolved.