REVIEW: After the Act (A Section 28 Musical)

Rating: 5 out of 5.

A refreshingly emotive, Queer fusion of musical and documentary – deliciously camp and absolutely unmissable

The appeal of Breach Theatre’s After the Act (A Section 28 Musical), especially to the Queer community, is clear. Through the use of the voices of those who lived through this pivotal part of UK legislative history, it tells the story of Section 28, from its conception to its repeal, and the legacy that it has left us with. Against an ever-changing projection of relevant images and information, emotive personal accounts of self discovery, discrimination, and revolutionary acts are brought to life in a delightfully camp, powerfully evocative manner.

Section 28 prevented the ‘promotion of homosexuality’ in the UK from 1988-2003 (2000 in Scotland), coinciding with the height of the AIDS epidemic – a point in time where the demonisation of non-heteronormative lifestyles was rampant and comprehensive sexual education was very much needed so, understandably, feelings of isolation, fear, and hopelessness are prevalent throughout the show. But they are not overpowering; this isn’t an entirely sombre affair. There is a very relatable, undeniably British, quintessentially gay humour weaved throughout – the sort of optimism that becomes vital to so many marginalised groups in times of adversity. There is a determination to it, as well; knowing that the stories come from real people, are real experiences, and that these fellow human beings have been able to find moments of silliness and joy amongst the institutionalised trauma they experienced, brings a measure of much needed comfort; writers Billy Barrett, who also directs the show, and Ellice Stevens, who performs in it, have captured something integral to the Queer experience that is hard to define. Perhaps it’s the subversive irony, or the effervescent campness that emanates throughout – whatever it is, it hits the mark.

The music, composed and orchestrated by Frew, is great. It’s not world changing, and you could be forgiven for thinking that the tracks are a little bit same-y, but they are incredibly well put together. Vocal harmonies and counter melodies are abundant, and – notably – the cast’s voices compliment each other gorgeously. Throughout the performances were solid, characters were well defined, dialogue was delivered with a sincerity that felt more like a conversation than theatrics. There is a incredible, jovial irony to Sung-Im Her’s choreography that, alone, makes After the Act worth the ticket price; occasionally sexy, often silly, but consistently well thought out. On top of all of this, the four performers (Ericka Posadas, Nkara Stephenson, Ellice Stevens, and Zachary Willis) play a host of roles, from school children to politicians, entirely successfully. Willis, in particular, was a stand out; there was a sensitivity, an incredible attention to detail, and an innate understanding to every aspect of his performance; from adorable Danish schoolgirl, to angry Scottish father, to the lovely, darling, tragic, camp Ian – his execution of the script was immense from start to finish.

The show culminates in a reminder that, in light of the discourse surrounding trans people – trans youth in particular – discussion of Section 28 is as relevant now as it was in the 80s. For those of us who are intimately familiar with these issues, who are cognisant of the historical landscape surrounding LGBTQ+ legislation in the UK, the parallels are already very clear – but there are people, both within and outside of this community, who are not aware of how similar the rhetoric being used is. After the Act (A Section 28 Musical) is as much an educational tool as it is an enjoyable piece of theatre. There are so many reasons to go and see this show; it is laugh-out-loud funny, heart-wrenchingly poignant, masterfully crafted, and performed with joy, respect, and a clear devotion.

REVIEW: The Boys In The Band

Rating: 5 out of 5.

Glorious storytelling of the worst birthday party ever

Edinburgh University’s Theatre Company is currently in a rich vein of form, with the latest being a terrific adaptation of Mart Crowley’s 1968 play “The Boys In The Band”, co-directed by Elle Catherine Willcocks and Aaron de Verés. The first act opens with Michael (played by James Cumming), fastidiously arranging his New York apartment for his friend Harold’s birthday party. The 1960s era is set with crackly gramophone recordings of movie soundtracks, and one by one, we’re introduced to our party-goers, with tantalising hints as to their interrelated histories and relationships – Donald (Ewan Little) observer of the group; Emory (Noah Sarvesvaran) with an unusual taste in birthday gifts, Bernard (Kikelomo Hassan), and a couple comprising teacher Hank (Dylan Kaeuper) and artist Larry (Issac Williams). Whilst they await their guest of honour, they’re unexpectedly joined by Michael’s old (and notably straight) college roommate from Georgetown, the tuxedo-clad Alan (Rufus Goodman). Emory’s ‘birthday present’ to Howard in the form of Cowboy (Ewan Guthrie) also arrives, before the guest of honour himself appears – Harold (Oscar Bryan). 

The script is lightning fast, and through the first act, the ripostes and repartee flows easily between the cast, with insults and put-downs that come with the familiarity of friendship groups. However, the strength of the performances really lies in the characterisation that the actors bring to the roles, a difficult task when there are so many characters on stage at once. 

As the play progresses and moves into the second act, and as tensions mount and flare, the change in atmosphere brings a razor-sharp tension to the group. Whilst the original screenplay was written in 1968, there are still many elements that feel fresh and still relevant to our society today. The production has not shied away from instances of homophobic and racially offensive language, which are used sparingly, but dramatic effect, drawing intakes of breath from the rapt audience. Set solely within the confines of Michael’s apartment, the staging has been thoughtfully constructed to provide insights into what happens up and downstairs. Care has also been given with choreographing the one-sided telephone conversations, which were eminently believable. The accent work was also fantastic – I particularly enjoyed the low growl of Alan.  

Given the range of cast members, stage time was always going to be at a premium, but if the first act didn’t provide justice to the characters of Emory and Bernard, we were richly rewarded in the second act with nuanced and emotive monologues about lost loves from Noah Sarvesvaran and Kikelomo Hassan. The doe-eyed sweetness of Ewan Guthrie’s Cowboy charmed the audience, and was well contrasted with the wry observations from Ewan Little’s Donald. The fractious but loving relationship between Hank and Larry was beautifully observed, with a natural chemistry between Dylan Kaeuper and Issac Williams. Harold was a deliciously spiky and discerning portrayal by and Rufus Goodman’s (reportedly) straight-laced Alan provided natural foil to the others.  

Even with such a strong cast, James Cumming’s Michael was an extraordinarily magnetic performance – descending through layers of light-hearted bantering, into increasingly barbed attacks and bullying as he spirals out of control, into an abhorrent version of the character we first met. This was an absolute triumph to keep the audience with him, right through to his contorted form screaming in anguish on the floor. Heartbreaking, awful and utterly wonderful. 

The Bedlam Theatre is a notoriously cold venue, so whilst the provision of blankets from the café is much appreciated, it’s recommended to wrap up warm. Happily, the strength of the performances of stage means the chill doesn’t detract from the enjoyment of the show, as confirmed by the well-deserved standing ovation.

REVIEW: Not in the Mood for Quiche Anymore

Rating: 4 out of 5.

A sleek one-woman show not to be missed

Nestled beneath a charming pub in West London, Barons Court Theatre is an intimate space, boasting a traverse-style stage and potentially the comfiest seats of any Off West End venue around. With minimalistic staging, the audience is faced with four chairs and a stool, with a couple of props strewn around for good measure. 

And so begins Not In The Mood For Quiche Anymore, a highly engaging one-woman show written by Victoria Buse. Following a particularly tumultuous period in the life of teacher and serial single lady Becks, this play explores how loneliness can manifest and transform a person without them ever even realising. 

Becks falls head over heels for a man who turns out to be rather decorated criminal, but she doesn’t let that stop her from pursuing the guy who has dubbed her ‘wife material’. More and more extreme acts of desperation ensue as Becks struggles to keep afloat in the mess she’s made. 

Every one-woman show in recent years is doomed to be compared to the smash-hit Fleabag, regardless of content or actual similarities. However in this case, the main character Becks has definite Fleabag-esque qualities. Played beautifully by Laura Matthews, Becks is a deeply flawed protagonist who constantly toes the line between endearing and thoroughly unlikeable.

Becks victim blames a rape survivor, tries to have sex with one of her former students and constantly brushes off her friends and commitments for a man. But she also cares deeply for those she loves, wants to see the best in people and is facing loneliness head-on. It’s impossible not to see yourself or your friends reflected in Becks, making it hard to cast her off as just a terrible person. Buse does an exceptional job of creating a flawed but likeable leading lady, who carries the engaging narrative through a more and more unfortunate series of events. 

Direction by Michael Gyngell is similarly strong, as Matthews lights up every corner of the small space, keeping the stage alive. Despite the risks of a 60-minute monologue, Gyngell’s direction keeps the pace high, effectively bringing the story to all three seating banks.

However, the real star of this show is Matthews. Masterful in her characterisation of Becks, she has expertly crafted a person we all recognise and find impossible to judge too harshly. She is perfectly natural in her mannerisms, moving seamlessly from family gatherings to prison visitations to car rides and post coital disappointments. Effectively transforming time and space, Matthews easily guides the audience through this story and it’s hard to imagine anyone doing it better. 

The play does ramble somewhat, needing a little more structure and some pruning to really hone the focus. Some loose plot lines are left floating, with an anti-climactic ending leaving the script just a little lacking. But with some further tightening, Buse could really have her hands on a winner. Next stop Edinburgh Fringe… and then perhaps the BBC?

REVIEW: Stories: A Tap Dance Sensation

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Percussive music and intense movements makes for a great evening

Stories – The Tap Dance Sensation, is a show by the acclaimed RB Dance Company. The show initially premiered back in 2019 in St. Witz France, before opening in Paris in 2020 and winning a slew of awards in 2022 at the Trophees de la Comedie Musicale ceremony. There have been over a hundred performances of this show in Paris, and it is now in London. It tells the story of a young actor starring in a film, while dealing with an oppressive director as the line between fact and fiction becomes increasingly blurred. The show also just so happens to contain some of the best dancers that France has to offer.

This show starts incredibly. The percussive music and intense movements of the dancers immediately grab your attention and bring you into this world. The opening song also builds incredibly well, heightening the intensity again and again. I was enthralled. The show also seems to know that this is an incredible number, as it also acts as the curtain call reprise, which I was thrilled about. All of the dancers were incredible, entirely synchronised when needed, and doing great character work as well as great dancing. I make no claims to be a technical expert on tap and jazz, but everything seemed to be marvelously well done with some truly impressive and breathtaking moments of talent. 

I was also a fan of the music in this show. Most songs had strong percussion, which matched with the tap dancing moments perfectly. Some of the spoken word lyrics worked really well and helped to set the tone of the piece, however some of the lyrics, especially in the titular song “Stories”, felt very on the nose for me in terms of cliche and it took me out of the show a bit. Overall though, I was a big fan of the music and if they release the soundtrack I will definitely be listening.

The story of this show almost felt a bit irrelevant at times. Some of my favourite moments in the show were the more scene setting sequences, rather than those that drive the narrative forward. It is a relatively simple plot with some surrealist aspects, which worked well in this medium. I did not find myself particularly connecting with any of the characters, and I was more focused on being impressed by the fantastic dancing happening in front of me.

The set itself is very clever with lots of different locations being created swiftly and smoothly, and the strobe and lighting effects were very well done, although the strobe was perhaps a little overused by the end.

In conclusion, I do not go and see many dance shows, but I was enchanted by this show. I highly recommend it to anyone, whether you be a seasoned dance fan or not. There is lots to enjoy for all and could act as an excellent gateway into seeing more dance performances in the future.

REVIEW: HOW TO MATE: The Second TED XXX Talk

Rating: 5 out of 5.

 Leaves audiences quite literally howling with laughter in a night of well-meaning and hilariously constructed advice on how to land a mate

Steve Porters is just a regular old lad from South West London (Surrey) who has aced feminism and has subsequently landed himself a girlfriend. He may still live at home with his mom and is probably no older than 20, but Steve has a lot of advice to give. 

In the second installment of Steve Porter’s educational seminar, HOW TO MATE: The Second XXX Ted Talk is designed to give you a holistic overview of everything needed to nab yourself a romantic partner. We explore a series of modules, supported by some expertly crafted visual aides, that are designed to leave the audience totally equipped to find their special someone. In the previous seminar, we learned how to flirt. Now, we shall learn how to ‘luv.’ Steve Porters is the man for this – he has had a girlfriend for an almighty two months. 

This show is not a parody of a Ted Talk; the audience is an intrinsic participant in this production. Steve Porters somehow communicates with each individual without having to single them out. He has us bobbing our heads to strangers like a pigeon, communicating with those next to us, whether we know them or not. Leaning in for a potential kiss, holding unwavering eye contact, and so much more. The actual advice Steve Porters gives is not necessarily expert, but surprisingly, none of it is outrageously bad. There is a genuine undercurrent of well-meaning earnestness and authenticity for every posited idea. Steve Porters wants us to know that it is ok not to be ok, that bros need to tell their bros how they feel, that we should always confirm that someone is indeed available and interested, and that if we face rejection during an attempt to find a mate, it is important to say ‘no worries’ and simply move on. 

Created, written, and performed by Daisy Doris May, Steve Porters as a character is so complex and intricate, a totally unpredictable drag performance that highlights the artistry of this artform. Daisy Doris May has expertly created a character that could go on forever, never ceasing to make others both laugh and ponder at the idea they find so funny. Mpilo May’s incredible direction gives the piece a youthful quality while also shrouding it in existential wonderment. HOW TO MATE: The Second XXX Ted Talk created a community out of the audience, and I truly cannot wait to watch what on earth Steve Porters might have in store for us in the next seminar.

REVIEW: Giselle

Rating: 4 out of 5.

A hauntingly beautiful portrayal of love and loss which dips into the realms of the supernatural

As October casts its enchanting spell, the English National Ballet’s performance of Mary Skeaping’s Giselle at the Liverpool Empire Theatre feels like the perfect embodiment of the season. The production artfully intertwines the celebratory feeling of Oktoberfest in act one at the Rhineland wine festival and act two follows with the ethereal dread of the afterlife mimicking the eeriness of Halloween. This sets the stage for a ballet that demonstrates what happens when you give love your all.  

From the outset, the production immerses the audience. The opening scenes are vibrant with natural tones in the understated set, designed by David Walker. The set is beautifully complimented by the costume which dresses the cast in a natural toned Germanic style. This helps to unify the cast and assists in creating a moving tableau similar to a Northern Renaissance painting as the curtain draws on Act 1. This allows Giselle, portrayed by Katja Khaniukova, to elegantly to stand out in her innocent baby blue amidst the neutral tones of the rest of the cast. The only costuming I would question would be the choice to dress her two love interests, Albrect and Hilarion played by Aitor Arrieta and Fabion Reimair, so similarily. 

At points Khaniukova, with her whimsical bunny hops, draws the viewer into Giselle’s innocence, and demonstrates her pure, yet weak, heart. This is reflected in the playful and game-like dancing throughout in the Rhineland scenes.  

One of the most striking aspects of the first act is the debut pairing of Adriana Lizardi and Lorenzo Trossello in the Peasant pas de deux. Their chemistry is undeniable; their duet in captivated the audience with calculated, mirrored movements that convey both tenderness and tension. At the point where we see them dance, their connection seems far stronger than that between the leads. 

The orchestral accompaniment, which builds a buzz of anticipation, serves as a harbinger of Giselle’s descent into madness—a pivotal moment that foreshadows the haunting arrival of the Wilis in the second act.    

At crucial times during the performance the storyline becomes muddled, a moment of confusion arises as Albrecht’s motivations shift suddenly, and I overhear some audience members pondering the intricacies of his character in the interval. 

As the second act unfolds, the production takes on a dreamlike quality, thanks in part to David Mohr’s lighting design. The stage transforms into a mystical realm, shrouded in blue fog and punctuated by sudden pockets of light that create a sense of otherworldly tension. Precious Adams shines as Queen Myrtha, leading her troupe of Wilis with a captivating presence that elicits audible excitement from the audience. The Wilis’ movements are executed with the precision of synchronised swimmers, entrapping the men in a deadly dance. Adams’ portrayal resonates deeply; her drawling movements evoke both grace and menace, enhancing the haunting atmosphere of the act. The ghostly costumes, reminiscent of ethereal l brides, glimmer in the light, and the harp’s delicate notes in the orchestra further envelop the audience in a spellbinding trance. 

Where the chemistry between Giselle and Albrecht lacks in act I it deepens in the second act, suggesting a newfound honesty that transcends the barriers of life and death. Their connection feels more profound, evoking sympathy and understanding as they navigate the treacherous terrain of their love. 

As the final curtain fell standing ovations and cheers echoed throughout the theatre, a testament to the exceptional talent and the production’s overall brilliance. 

The English National Ballet’s Giselle at the Liverpool Empire Theatre is a hauntingly beautiful portrayal of love and loss which dips into the realms of the supernatural. The artistic choices—both in choreography and design—create a mesmerising experience that lingers long after the final bow. This production is not just a retelling of a classic; it is a reawakening of its hauntingly relevant themes. 

This production runs until October 26th at The Empire Theatre in Liverpool before moving onto The Palace Theatre in Manchester where you can catch it from October 30th to November the 2nd.

In Conversation with: Rory McGregor

The landmark National Theatre and Neal Street production of The Lehman Trilogy, directed by Academy Award, Tony Award, and Golden Globe winner Sam Mendes, is now playing a limited encore season at the Gillian Lynne Theatre in London’s West End. Hailed by The New York Times as ‘a genuinely epic production’, The Lehman Trilogy is a sweeping story of a family spanning generations and a company that changed the world.

Rory McGregor is a British theatre director based in New York and London. He holds an Masters of Fine Arts in Theatre Directing from Columbia University. He is an associate director for The Lehman Trilogy (also West End and Broadway) for the National Theatre. We sit down with Rory to discuss the show, which is showing at Gillian Lynne Theatre until 5th January.

  1. You’ve worked extensively on both Broadway and the West End with The Lehman Trilogy. How has the show evolved in its various international performances, and what new dynamics can audiences expect from this West End run?

The beauty of this play is that every time we go back into it, it deepens and deepens. With every new company new discoveries are made. It truly is a remarkable piece of writing. When Sam asked me to direct this newest version I knew I wanted to make the most detailed and alive version of the show that I possibly could. It has such a strong framework built over years which we know works sublimey – it moves almost like a piece of music or choreography – but inside of that structure there is such freedom for creativity from our three actors. John, Howard and Aaron have an incredible chemistry and bring a real playfulness to the show, so I feel as though the storytelling is very alive and active in a very exciting way. They have really made it their own and it was a pleasure to rehearse with them. On top of that, we are always tweaking things – even six years on from the original production! In my rehearsal process, Sam would come and watch a run in the room and be struck with a new idea for us to try out for a scene or a new line that we might want to add. He’s also always been very open to my ideas – meaning this version definitely has my flavour of theatre and alchemy with the three brothers.

  1. The Lehman Brothers’ story is deeply intertwined with American history. How do you balance the epic scale of this narrative with the intimate, personal stories of the Lehman family?

I actually think that the answer to this question is in Sam Mendes’ first design meeting with Es Devlin. He wrote five precepts on a sheet of card with a marker pen which became the basis of the design process for Lehman: 

1. Animate the Idea, 2. Make concrete the shape of history, 3. Understand the order present in chaos, 4. Understand it in your head.. .. because you can feel it in your gut, 5. Reveal the simple human needs behind the creation of complex human systems. 

When rehearsing Lehman I think about the 5th precept a lot as for me it is the core of how the play functions. The 5th precept really guides the way Lehman is presented and structured, the intimate and the personal are so intertwined with these huge economic and political systems that are created and so cannot be divorce from one another. In my opinion, one of the great successes of the show is that we tend to think, in society, of these large machinations as being divorced from human considerations, but in Lehman we see how enormous financial and political decisions are constantly made for deeply personal reasons. After Philip says that Lehman is going to build the Panama Canal, that scene is immediately followed by the birth of his son Bobby, who will one day succeed him, but in that moment, we see a brief glimpse of the joy of family for him.

Family and tradition are central to the story of Lehman. And as the family and subsequently the business loses connection to tradition, religion and family, the human aspect is gone and is replaced purely by numbers. What the business meant to the original three brothers is stripped away and gone. 

  1. Working with Sam Mendes as an associate director must be an incredible experience. What have you learned from collaborating with him, particularly on such a monumental production?

I’ve always tried to be very intentional with the directors I associate for, only working with people who I truly admire. I believe that great artists come from great mentorship and want my associate work to inform my own work as a director. I’ve had the great privilege of working with Sam for over four years and really rising through the ranks of Lehman – starting as the US Associate Director when the show went to Broadway and LA, and then being asked to direct the International Tour and now becoming the West End Director. Sam has always given me a tremendous amount of freedom and trust, meaning I’ve been able to conduct the rehearsal process in the way that I want and find my own language inside Lehman. To have started working alongside him and then to have been entrusted with taking Lehman on its next steps on an International Tour and then back into the West End has been one of the great honours of my career. 

It has been a gift to witness his creative process and see how his mind works, I’ve learnt a great deal from him and his leadership. The thing I most admire about Sam is his ability to communicate an incredibly complicated note to an actor with a real simplicity and efficiency. In one simple sentence he is able to tell an actor everything they need to know. As directors I think we are always prone to waffle, and I’ve always felt he only speaks when necessary and only says what is necessary. It is unbelievably rewarding to admire a director’s work for your entire career, get in a room with him and see that he is at the top of the game for very good reasons. He is the best at what we do. And it pushes you to work harder and be better everyday. 

  1. Es Devlin’s set design plays a crucial role in The Lehman Trilogy. How does the visual and physical world she creates enhance the storytelling and atmosphere of the show?

There may be three actors playing the three brothers on stage, but in reality there are five actors in total which make the magical music box of Lehman tick. We have the incredible pianist playing Nick Powell’s composition live every night and underscoring the actors, and of course the environment created by Es Devlin and Luke Halls (who designed the video). All these elements work together to create the magic of the show. 

The set in particular evokes the Lehman office at the brink of its collapse in 2008. Everything that you see on the set has a function and a purpose, and the three brothers use everything from board markers to flowers to banker boxes to tell their story. It is going back to the fundamentals of storytelling, how can you tell a huge story with very little? The fact that our huge beautiful glass box then revolves, allows us to create dynamic and different stage pictures in the same environment, and also suggesting the passing of time or of location. Luke’s video gives us a sense of time and place in a really specific and simple way. And as the play grows and grows the simplest gesture such as integrating colour into the video or having the video move quickly – becomes a visual feast for the audience. 

  1. You’ve directed a range of productions, from classic Shakespeare to modern works. How do the themes of ambition, legacy, and collapse in The Lehman Trilogy resonate with contemporary audiences today?

It’s no secret that The Lehman Trilogy was first performed in English in 2018, and that Stefano Massini’s original version dates back to 2013, and so there is always the question of relevancy – if the play will land in the same way as it did at the beginning. The sad reality is that in 2024, the giddy sheen of capitalism which was felt by many in other eras, such as the 1980s, has long worn off and been replaced by inflation, stagnant wages and lower standards of living. Many are now asking, how does this system actually benefit me? I think to really understand something you have to start at the beginning, understand how it was built. The Lehmans by no means invented these systems but they participated in them and what they built was goliath, and our play deconstructs that and shows you the human face underneath. I think that is vital for understanding our current world. 

REVIEW: Fly More Than You Fall

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

Catchy pop tunes only reach shallow depths in this show which misses its target

Fly More Than You Fall is a story of loss, of strength, and of the power of stories. While the show doesn’t necessarily flop, it certainly struggles to fly.

Let’s get the good stuff out of the way as the show has its fair share of it. Keala Settle shines as Jennifer, the mother whose illness rocks the overly-positive world of the show. Settle is an accomplished performer (you don’t need me to tell you that) with an astounding voice, who beautifully embodies her character–and often adds more depth than the show might otherwise provide. Robyn Rose-Li also puts in a fantastic turn as Malia, our wide-eyed protagonist, with a great voice and bubbling energy; these two are a lot of the reason the show stays in the air.

Stand-outs from the rest of the ensemble include Max Gill as Caleb who deserves more stage time from their iconic vibes alone, and Gavin Cornwall for his more conflicted moments as Malia’s struggling father.

But how does it sound? Catchy, for a start. Nat Zegree’s music is bouncy and earworm-y (to coin an adjective) and clearly inspired by pop artists and more contemporary musical theatre writers. Read: Pasek & Paul. However, one gets the feeling that the incessant bounciness leaves money on the table and greater depths to be plumbed. The show seems uncomfortable sitting in the darker moments, meaning we stay mostly in the light. This might be fine in the kind of YA novel that Malia wants to write, but less so for the adult audience in the Southwark Elephant.

This is the main issue the show is grappling with: where does it fit in? Eric Holmes’ book has moments of probing depth and observation but is mostly content to remain in the land of the cartoon, with the swearing feeling the same kind of gratuitous as it does in a TV show like Only Murders in the Building, or as jarring as it would in Bluey. There’s a paint-by-numbers feel, with characters singing and saying almost exactly what you would expect them to. At worst, it’s cringey. At best, it’s boring.

As someone who has experience of profound loss, I left the theatre disappointed that the creative team didn’t seem more interested in digging deeper in order to fly higher. Not all shows need to do this, of course, but sometimes it’s as if a theatrical production is relying on the power of its story alone to do the heavy lifting. The problem is that it’s alive in front of us, and so the facts alone won’t cut it. 

No one can argue this isn’t a feel-good show. I just think audiences are wanting to feel more.

REVIEW: The Flea


Rating: 4 out of 5.

James Fritz’s ‘The Flea’ is a creative, humorous masterpiece


The Flea, created by James Fritz, is a hilarious, genius satirical tale of the Cleveland Street Scandal in 1889. Throughout the parody performance, the show explored how multiple people attempted to sweep this scandal under the rug to save themselves and their reputations. Ultimately, The Flea tells the tale of how the higher-class people involved, like Lord Arthur Somerset, managed to get away scot-free. While the working-class victims were punished. 

The set designed by Naomi Kuyck-Cohen was an enchanted spectacle. With an Alice and Wonderland vibe to the design was joyous through the tiny chairs, the chairs of different levels screwed to the walls and even using a filing cabinet as stairs to a chair. The imagination and creativity behind this were incredible to witness. In addition, the costuming by Lambdog1066 and supervised by Emily Noble was a queer sensation, mixing 80s punk inspired by Vivienne Westwood, to big sleeves, to mixtures of extra buttons and glitter. 

The multi-rolling of the actors was fantastic with the change of posture and stance. It was shocking during the curtain call for it to be revealed, there were only five actors in the play. However, there were times when the changes weren’t so seamless. Stefan Race had the difficult task of playing Lord Arthur Somerset and Henry Newlove (he did an incredible job 

with both characters). Race often had very quick changes and at one point had to go on stage with his trousers unzipped. The quick changes stole the magic of the play at times. But, with this being said the acting from every actor was truly magnificent. 

The physicality brought within the show was a delight (created by Sung Im Her the movement director). The marching of all the actors when introducing the characters (and the videography this element brought- created by Gino Ricardo Green) was glorious and majestic. Throughout the entirety of the play, these elements were tremendous, particularly the videography used when Queen Victoria was seeing her future 

However, within the queer storyline, there is a feeling that there could have been more of a community feel with every queer man in the story. The rich men involved in this scandal were painted as villains but they were also victims of the times they lived in, with homosexuality being illegal. It could be said that this fact was overlooked, within the story. 

Overall, The Flea is a glorious, beautiful tale constructed to marvel in creativity and magic. Everyone should watch this! The Flea is on at the Yard Theatre till 30th November.

REVIEW: Jamie Allen’s Amaze


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Exciting magic, but lacked theatricality to live up to its name and West End status


Telling stories of his 80s childhood, Jamie Allen presented a nostalgic narrative interwoven with impressive illusions and sleight of hand. 

With the stage set up as his attic room above the pub that his parents owned when he was a child, Jamie Allen packed away bits and pieces into boxes, reminiscing on how magic came into his life. It all started with the fisher price magic box and went on to involve all sorts of other books and toys. The first trick involved a Rubik’s cube, playing into the 80s theme and brought surprise and delight to all. Whilst Jamie Allen is a pleasant to watch, I felt this first trick could have had more excitement built up around it, to really entice the audience into the show. It was impressive to see, but I felt there could have been more done with music and staging to make it more shocking as magic is expected to be. 

Throughout the show various audience members were brought up on stage, but there were also tricks that involved the audience as a whole, which did well to engage everyone without needing to submit them to the limelight. Allen’s narrative around the audience was interesting, acknowledging that some people watch magic so that they can try to figure out how it works, the ‘sceptics’ as he called them. It was a clever way to engage the audience, and the magic trick that accompanied this revelation had an enjoyable tongue in cheek element to it. 

After a lot of the scene setting with interspersed tricks, the first half ended with a trick that emulated the sort of bravado you would expect from a west end magic show. As the second half got going, it was clear there was going to be more of the theatricality that I was expecting. One card trick in particular which Allen had cleverly timed to its accompanying song really brought the style and panache that I had been looking for in the first half. The remainder of the magic in the second half brought the impressive stagecraft that I would expect of a West End show. Allen’s sleight of hand demonstrated in this half was truly a testament to his skill as a magician. 

Adverts for this show frequently remarked that Jamie Allen was following in the footsteps of Derren Brown and Dynamo with an extended West End run, and throughout the performance Allen regularly commented that this was the show he dreamed of doing. I therefore felt a little let down by the theatricality and storytelling. The magic itself was impressive enough, but a lot of the tricks, particularly in the first half, lacked build up and excitement. I also felt there was more to be done with the lighting, music and staging to make this really engaging. When performing to a big theatre, some of the more basic tricks were not as impressive as they could have been with slightly better build up. The narrative was a sweet idea, but the script lacked heart in order to provide the emotive response that they were trying to achieve. Perhaps if I had gone in without the expectations that had come with the advertising, I would have felt more engaged, but the staging and storyline lacked for me, which meant the impressive magic, whilst impressive, did not always fulfil the special feeling of the West End.