REVIEW: The Croft


Rating: 4 out of 5.

goosebumps and intrigue


Ali Milles’ chilling thriller “The Croft” is a story of many elements – part Scottish folklore, part real-life history, part family drama, combined with love, grief, violence, hatred, and ripples of consequences from past decisions. 

The play, directed by Alastair Whatley, unfolds in an old crofter’s hut in Coillie Ghillie – a deserted village in the Highlands, out of reach of the rest of humanity. Laura (played by Gracie Follows) and Suzanne (Caroline Harker) arrive after a long drive up from England, and over the course of a few days, and amidst unexpected events, a tangle of threads emerges from past and present lives connected with the croft. We hear Coillie Ghillie described as ancient, and a ruin built on a ruin, that you need to feel in your blood to be welcome within. 

Laura and Suzanne’s weekend unfolds with the stories of Laura’s parents, Ruth (Caroline Harker), Tom (Simon Roberts), and the local ghillie David Ross (Gray O’Brien); and that of a far older history, dating back to 1970s, with Enid (Liza Goddard) on the verge of eviction following claims of witchcraft and blasphemy, and Eileen (Gracie Follows) who’s ultimate fate was never understood. 

Much of the focus is on Laura and Suzanne’s storyline, and their interactions with David, who knew Laura as a child. The performances are solid, and there are moments of comic levity peppered throughout to offset tenser moments, frequently delivered in a typically Highland deadpan manner by David, such as crowning Suzanne “the banshee from Barnet”.  Although there are distinctly Scottish undertones, there is sufficient exposition provided to make it understandable for those not familiar with folklore. A noted example being the “Selkie vs Selfie” conversation, between the three. Gracie’s portrayal of Laura is wonderful, however, it felt at times the character was veering on the more petulant side. As the play progressed into the second act, (and without spoiling anything!) some of the parallels in the relationship felt a little over-emphasised. 

With the set being a deceptively simple cut through of the croft’s living room, the onus is on the actors to denote the different characters they play, and they change cleanly and rapidly, often as we watch them on stage, with something as simple as whirl of a shawl. The lighting design by Chris Davey, is especially evocative, with no additional light from the house lights, the on-stage lighting created a deeper intimacy in the changing storylines. 

This is not a play with a continuous string of jump-scares, but there are some genuinely spooky moments in Act 1, and this increases in Act 2, as the tension ramps up, and I had definite goosebumps as it reached the climax of the play. Judging by the audience reactions around me, others felt the same way, with sharp intakes of breath and rapt attention. 

However, the story of the croft is more than a ghost story – much like David notes when comparing spirits and ghosts, it is more complex. The story culminates in a satisfying conclusion of the various threads, but the characters remain with you, long after the show. 

The Coille Ghillie may not be in your blood, but everyone looking for a tale of relationships with chills and intrigue should consider heading for “The Croft”. 

The Croft runs at Edinburgh’s Festival Theatre from Wednesday 25th – Saturday 28th June 2025. For tickets, see: https://www.capitaltheatres.com/shows/the-croft/

REVIEW: The Girl on the Train


Rating: 3 out of 5.

“A moody psychological thriller based on the bestseller, elevated by immersive staging and atmosphere.”


Having read the novel and seen the film a long time ago, I entered the theatre with only a vague memory of the plot. I knew there was a twist but couldn’t recall what it was exactly, which felt like an ideal way to approach a mystery play. Though not directly comparable, if you enjoyed 2:22, this production might also appeal to you. Set in a British city and driven by the mystery’s tension, it delivers a similar dramatic unease.

The production’s greatest strength lies in its dynamic set design. Clever use of lighting and sound created a brooding, rain-soaked atmosphere that reflected Rachel’s troubled inner world. The backdrop of continuous rainfall added to the mood and helped anchor scenes visually. Rather than feeling abstract, the scenes of the train were surprisingly immersive. The final scenes ramped up the suspense, and I found myself invested in who would survive the climax.

Louisa Lytton as Rachel gave a committed performance, but at times the script made it hard to fully empathise with her. The character’s unreliability, due to both memory lapses and alcohol use, was central to the mystery but something which I found frustrating. The ‘whodunnit’ element repeatedly hinged on Rachel recalling the events of a single night, which began to feel overly repetitive. Her memories would shift or prove confused, and while that may be realistic, it limited the audience’s ability to piece together clues, as so much rested on information that wasn’t available until Rachel could recall it.

There were also moments of confusion in tone. Occasionally, lines received unexpected laughter from the audience. Yet the cast continued without pausing for laughs, leaving me unsure whether these moments were intentionally humorous or not. The smoke machine was overused and towards the end, it became excessive. At one point, the smoke obscured the stage and even spilled into the audience area, creating a distracting fog that felt more accidental than intentional.

Despite these issues, the show had its gripping moments. It succeeded in building tension and one thing I particularly appreciated was how easy the storyline was to follow. For a psychological thriller, it maintained clarity without oversimplifying, making it accessible without losing intrigue. I’ve found myself really enjoying this genre on stage, it offers an engaging, relatively easy watch that still gives you something to discuss with friends afterwards. I would like to revisit the novel, if only to compare what was kept and what was changed for the stage.

While the title might suggest a story heavily grounded in train journeys, the story is only loosely tethered to that setting. Nevertheless, for fans of psychological thrillers and stage adaptations, The Girl on the Train offers a moody, intriguing evening at the theatre.

The Girl on the Train plays at the Liverpool Everyman until 17th May. Tickets are available here.

REVIEW: Goner


Rating: 4 out of 5.

The element of surprise is alive and well in Goner, a horror-infused choreographic piece that scintillates and fascinates with frightful dexterity 


Marikiscrycrycry’s choreographic piece graces Battersea Arts Centre this May, joining a host of other gory shows that have made their way to this venue in recent months. An exciting cacophony of snapshots into this ill-fated character’s life, Marikiscrycrycry takes on a character that is unmistakably doomed. The piece begins with 20 minutes of non-stop dancing, repeated sequences that morph as they explore space and duration. Marikiscrycrycry draws the audience in, his back to us for what feels like an agonising amount of time, bringing identity, or lack thereof, and thus questions as to its relevance, into viewers’ mind from the onset. In an excellent nod to shock-horror and jump scares that horror fans will most certainly be aware of, the piece snaps to its next segment. This truly sets the production into motion; blood is splattered, props emerge, the gore and shock-value is ramped up, and the audience is left well and truly electrified.

While the production is best consumed without searching for narrative for it transcends conventional storytelling, a particular tale comes to light. It is both funny and horrifying, a cognitive dissonance excellently utilised throughout the production. Things were pretty dark before, but the story of the Goner signals it’s time to strap in, because it’s about to get a whole lot darker.  

Inspired by the lost causes of the horror genre, Goner utilises social context to extrapolate how we create monsters out of marginalised groups. It considers alienation and marginalisation with a hard-hitting, conscientious perspective. Marikiscrycrycry drums up questions of who do we perceive to be a hopeless case, and why? Do we just blame fate, that people, most often those of marginalized groups, are bound to live out a life of horror, or do we fence people in, manufacturing these conditions, and then blame the individual for living out the seemingly only life they were left to choose? 

Malik Nashad Sharpe’s (aka Marikiscrycrycry) choreography is a phenomenal amalgamation of style and gesture. Waacking and whining meet contemporary dance and a lot of booty shaking, carried out by Marikiscrycrycry with genuinely mind-boggling skill. A performer of note, Marikiscrycrycry is thrilling to watch. Tabitha Thorlu-Bangura’s musical direction and Luke Blair’s sound design create an auditory spectacle that is unwaveringly intricate and physical. The sound moves through you, the many surprises that await you shocking you seemingly from within. 

Goner is an embodied experience, possibly unlike anything else you will ever see. Don’t miss it at Battersea Arts Centre this May – runs until 10th May before transferring to Canada.

REVIEW: Murder, She Didn’t Write


Rating: 4 out of 5.

‘An entertaining improvised murder mystery. Not one miss!’

This hilarious whodunnit is an Agatha Christie-inspired masterpiece, that is completely improvised based off of the audience’s ideas, making it your very own classic murder mystery play.

As everyone took their seats, the detective of the show ‘Agatha Crusty’ sat down in the corner of the stage, isolated from the rest of the set, interacting with the audience and writing notes, accompanied by jazz music to give it the 1920’s feel.  When the show began, she briefly introduced herself and the play, and then the lights came up on the audience. One lucky member of the audience was chosen to be ‘Jerkins’, her assistant. The plot of the show was then decided by audience members shouting out ideas for the location and murder evidence and then Jerkins picked out of their suggestions, ours taking place at a taxidermy convention, and a wet instruction manual for deep lunging found at the crime scene. What made the show hilarious was that any other suggestions that were shouted out which didn’t make the cut, the actors tried to somehow incorporate throughout. 

We were then introduced to the cast, each of the five with their own signature colour – a bit like Cluedo! They improvised scenes based on the audience’s decisions, which was very cleverly helped by the detective in the corner of the stage as she prompted them with ideas or told them what would happen next to move the show on. They were also helped by the lighting team, who would bring the lights down to end the scene if the actors were struggling or it was going on too long. Detective Agatha Crusty then made her way to ’Jerkins’ in the audience who picked from 5 character cards who would be the victim of the murder, and then who would commit the crime. 

One of the stand out things was the lack of props and set. It was brilliant watching the cast use their imagination, using rolling pins as rhinoceros horns, and miming the missing items, but it didn’t take away from the piece at all. The show was accompanied by Sara Garad, an improv pianist, who played during the show, following everything that was happening on stage and adding character and emotion to the piece.

The only thing to note was that there were a few lighting issues throughout the show; the lights coming up on the audience when they weren’t meant to. But honestly the audience were enjoying themselves so much that it wasn’t really noticeable and didn’t affect the performance. 

The show was a true testament to how skilled these actors were. Being able to stay in character whilst thinking of everything on the spot, and then having the ability to remember every little thing that the other actors had said so that the story flowed. It was honestly incredible to watch. Of course there were a few laughs that were held in  from the cast, but it’s expected from an improvised comedy. It’s definitely one to watch, even better if you watch it more than once. Not one show will be the same but every single time you will be laughing your head off and leaving the theatre impressed!

Murder, She Didn’t Write tours across the UK this summer, tickets are available here.

REVIEW: Ghost Stories


Rating: 3 out of 5.

“A thrilling experience to be had! Not for the easily scared.”


From the writers of the League of Gentlemen and Derren Brown’s show “Dead set” Jeremy Dyson and Andy Lyman’s “Ghost Stories” has landed in Edinburgh this week at the Festival Theatre. “Ghost Stories” certainly does set the atmosphere well and expectations for a thrilling night full of intrigue and fear are definitely achieved. The lighting and sound add a great level of suspense and tension superbly crafted by lighting and sound designers James Farncombe and Nick Manning. As we wait to enter the auditorium there is tension built with unpleasant banging and rumblings leaking out as theatre goers order pre theatre drinks. Upon entering all sense are heightened as the sounds are louder and the lights at random points flicker on and off. With the safety curtain down and a lectern set up in front of it there is certainly a feeling of all not being as it seems. Throughout this high tech show the lighting and sound are key to each story’s tension and suspense being effectively impactful and frightening as without them the jump scares would, I fear, land flat.

From the start it is clear the intention is to be a highly immersive experience with audience interaction and responses important to the plot moving forward at the beginning. We begin with a lecture in real time about the paranormal and the study of parapsychology lead by the main character Professor Goodman executed brilliantly by Dan Tetsel. Tetsel gives much needed comic relief after intense moments with little nuances adopted into his role. He successfully puts the audience at ease bringing a good balance of light and shade throughout the performance. During the opening scene Professor Goodman talks of the relationships we all have with the paranormal. With a quick poll taken using hand raises it is revealed that a large percentage of us are believing in paranormal existence or simply wanting to believe. No spoilers will be revealed in this review for the sake of secrecy for the shows continued success however I can say it was more enjoyable to learn something about our understanding of paranormal activity as a premise compared to the story unfolding later.

A cast of 5 strong actors certainly made the stage feel as though there was a larger presence there continuously as each part came into realisation with an intense and heightened sense of fear. Some moments are truly terrifying and the actors narratives are beautifully delivered by all the cast who use their voices well to set the scene and fully absorb the audience. The senses truly are immersed as with every ‘ghost story’ told the auditorium gets considerably colder. A clever way to really get the hairs on the back of your neck standing on end. Director Sean Holmes has cleverly crafted all scenes using shadow effectively along with well chosen props and staging designed by Jon Bausor which all enhance the unsettling moments and help to build the tension well. It is certainly the sound design by far that keeps the suspense prolonged and further praise needs to be awarded to how slick and effective this has been excellently put together by Nick Manning.

Overall this exciting horror performance is definitely worth a look with its palpable tension and scary moments which are highly thrilling to watch. Check it out this week before it closes this Saturday 29th March.

IN CONVERSATION WITH: Michael Maloney and Bob Barrett


We sat down with Michael Maloney and Bob Barrett who play iconic characters Poirot and Monsieur Bouc in Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express visiting Newcastle Theatre Royal from Tuesday 14th to Saturday 18th January.


What can audiences expect when they come to see Murder on the Orient Express on stage?

Bob: It’s funny, it’s exciting and it’s adventurous, and it’ll also make you think. 

Michael: If we get the speed and the pace right, people won’t be able to think fast enough during the show itself. It will be a night of intrigue with a great denouement.

How would you describe your characters’ relationship? 

Bob: Monsieur Bouc is the man who runs the train, he’s very passionate about it and his best friend is Hercule Poirot, so he’s very supportive towards him. Poirot is a genius and Bouc isn’t, so he’s often a sounding board and there’s a little bit of Sherlock-Watson in it. 

Michael: There are some very interesting scenes going on around Poirot in which he just observes, and I think he’s quite a lonely person. In order to be on top of his game, in order to take care of his little grey cells, he has to distance or isolate himself from being too involved with people – so that he can objectively see what their characteristics are, what their behaviorisms are and what they’re up to full-stop, really. But yes, he and Monsieur Bouc are old friends.

Michael, Poirot has been portrayed by many actors over the years. How are you making the character your own?

Michael: When you play a role, it will naturally become your own, but I carry the memory of everybody that I’ve watched play him with me. I don’t try to compete with them, and I like to acknowledge what they’ve done. I’ve really enjoyed all their performances, but I think David Suchet in particular has dominated the national consciousness because he did it for about 20 years on television, so when people say ‘Poirot’ they automatically think of his appearance, his persona and his acting of the role. 

You have a great rapport. Have you worked together before? 

Bob: It’s our third time. Previously we were in Hamlet together. The first time, he was Hamlet and I was Rosencrantz, then I was Horatio to his Hamlet. Both times it was blissful, and the second time was a longer tour, so we shared digs. What’s lovely about it as well is that there is a sort of element of Hamlet-Horatio in the Poirot and Bouc relationship, and there are a lot of references to Hamlet in this play.

What do you think makes Christie such a revered storyteller?

Bob: She’s the best at what she does. It’s not just that she’s great at the narrative, she’s also very good at painting characters. She’s very good in terms of the psychology of people in extremis, when people are pushed to the edge, she’s so accurate about human nature. I think that’s why people keep coming back to her stories, because there is an authenticity to what she does.

What do you think makes Murder on the Orient Express a particularly compelling story?

Michael: This is one of her all-time greats. Her writing is very dependable. You have a world created for you, which you can observe from the audience and still feel non-threatened by, but you’re intrigued by the terrible goings on in other people’s lives.

Are there still surprises for people who know whodunnit from the novel and previous adaptations?

Michael: There are, yes. The way it’s staged, there are plenty of diversions and there are enough red herrings.

Bob: Our director Lucy Bailey has done a lot of Agatha Christie’s, and she’s got a real handle on it. She pushes the stories into unexpected areas and it’s thrilling. She brings in elements that maybe aren’t there on the page, and I think that’s exciting for an audience.

What have been your career highlights on film and TV?

Michael: I enjoyed my little bit in Belfast with Kenneth Branagh just a couple of years ago and I enjoyed doing Henry Vfor Kenneth Branagh as well, playing the Dauphin. 

Bob: I was in Holby City for 12 years, so that was a huge part of my life, and I just loved doing it. I did an Ab Fab, which was exciting, and I really enjoyed doing Shakespeare in Love and learned a lot from that experience. They’re the big standouts for me.

The tour calls at Newcastle Theatre Royal. Does it have any significance for you?

Michael: I did six weeks with the Royal Shakespeare Company in Newcastle. We were feted and we had a fantastic time.

Bob: My mum was born in Newcastle, so it’s an incredibly special place.

Murder on the Orient Express plays Newcastle Theatre Royal Tue 14 – Sat 18 Jan 2025. Tickets can be purchased at www.theatreroyal.co.uk or from the Theatre Royal Box Office on 0191 232 7010.

In Conversation with Erik Kahn

We sat down with director and writer Erik Kahn whose thriller Canned Goods comes to the Southwark Playhouse Borough from 16th Jan to 8th Feb.

Canned Goods tells the gripping true story of a little-known – but pivotal – moment in history.

  1. Can you tell us about Canned Goods

Canned Goods is based on a German operation designed to keep the UK out of WW2 long enough to allow the Nazis to launch a single front war against Russia. If their plan had worked, there could have been a horrific nightmare of Nazi dominance in Europe that likely would have lasted for generations. Basically, Himmler planned false attacks on Germans by people dressed as Polish soldiers, as justification for invading Poland on September 1, 1939 – the start of WW2.

  1. What drew you to the specific historical moment depicted in Canned Goods? Why is it important to bring this story to light now?

Everything about this story rings true today – false facts, invasions of sovereign countries, the rise of autocrats and of course the never-ending hatred of Jews.

  1. The play revolves around themes of propaganda and manipulation of truth. How do you think these themes are relevant in today’s political climate, especially with the rise of “fake news” and social media?

Sadly, the times change but people – and their awful treatment of each other – that seem to stay the same. 

  1. How did you balance the historical accuracy of the event with the emotional depth of the characters? Was there a specific moment in writing the play where this became particularly challenging?

I’m not an historian and this play is not intended to be a history lesson. I did research the events and tried my best to portray facts as accurately as possible. The point of the play though is the characters. I wanted to examine how people of different backgrounds relate to each other and to their oppressor at a time when their lives are at risk. I also thought it would be interesting to look at the Nazi Major who controls the three prisoners as a real person, not an archetype. 

  1. The characters in Canned Goods come from very different walks of life—a farmer, a Jewish philosopher, and a German janitor. How did you decide on this particular trio, and what do they represent in the larger narrative?

The farmer Honiok was a real person, although not much is known about him. The German and Jewish prisoners are fictional characters. The Jewish character studies Christian theology. I suppose my thinking is that religious inquiry can be a product of intellectual curiosity rather than ideology, and that Birnbaum’s primary role is to reflect humanity not tribalism. The German character is in some ways base and amoral, but he is still a human being with deeply held beliefs formed from a difficult childhood. In short, they are all just people.

  1. The title Canned Goods is intriguing. What does it symbolize in the context of the play and the characters’ fates?

The Germans dehumanized. It is difficult to murder ones neighbors, teachers and colleagues.  How better to dehumanize one’s victims than to refer to them as Canned Goods – products pulled from a shelf.

  1. The tension in the play is palpable as the Nazis prepare to stage an attack. How did you work to maintain suspense while exploring deeper philosophical themes like survival and morality?

The characters struggle to understand how and why they are going to be used by the Nazis. They also evolve, in a short period of time, obtaining a strength that comes from recognizing that oppression can only go so far, and that we are all in charge of our own will and sense of dignity or humanity. At the same time, it is interesting to watch Major Naujocks sparring with the prisoners, learning about them, respecting them on some level, while also maintaining his will to commit evil.

  1. What was the most surprising thing you discovered while researching the historical event that inspired this play?

The history of this event struck me as something out of an episode of the Godfather or the Sopranos. It is in many respects the work of low-level criminals, but with broader implications that could have changed the world.

  1. How do you think Canned Goods speaks to the broader human experience of being manipulated by larger political forces?

The evil of autocracy typically requires extinguishing liberal humanism. The first thing dictators do is take away books. Then they tend to imprison or kill anyone who supports independent thought. The Khmer Rouge first killed people who wore glasses, because those with glasses were more likely to be educated and literate. In the Cultural Revolution, the students under Mao beat and killed their teachers. In every age, it is important to protect speech and free thinking at all costs.

  1. What do you hope audiences take away from the play, particularly in terms of understanding the power of narrative and truth in times of conflict?

I am grateful for the opportunity to share the play with curious people and am hopeful that the play results in thinking, questions and even arguments. In the end, I am more interested in provoking thought than in telling people what they should or should not think about the play.

  1. What do you hope audiences will take away from the show?

Birnbaum says that “The fire of hatred has burned here long before Hitler. And that hatred will continue to burn long after he is gone.” I think that sums things up for me.

REVIEW: The Haunting of Hoxton Hall


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A spook-tacular show with some beautiful storytelling and physical performances: a great Halloween night out


The Haunting of Hoxton Hall is an on brand Halloween experience, offering a thrilling mix of vivid storytelling, eerie ghost tales, skilled aerial performances, and physical theatre. This immersive show takes you on a spine-chilling journey, where each moment is designed to keep you on the edge of your seat.

Not knowing quite what to expect from a production like this, I found myself pleasantly
surprised. From the moment the lights dimmed, I could sit back and enjoy the spectacle, all while being kept gripped by the heart racing jump scares. The show really works to draw you into its supernatural world.

The Haunting of Hoxton Hall is a show by Airealism, with an original score by the talented Tristan Jakob-Hoff. Taking place in one of London’s most atmospheric venues, the Victorian-era Hoxton Hall. The hall’s historic charm and eerie ambiance serve as the ideal backdrop for this ghostly tale where three friends reunite to discover the truth about their friend’s mysterious death.

While the show occasionally lost clarity in certain moments, it made up for it with heart-stopping acrobatics and daring aerial stunts. The performances were skilful and committed, creating genuinely creepy characters. At several points, the audience was left gasping, and I found myself jumping in my seat. The aerial sequences, in particular, added an extra layer of beauty and tension that complemented the narrative. The performers used the space with incredible physicality, blending circus arts with storytelling in a way that was both graceful and unsettling.

Although my attention occasionally wavered, the vivid storytelling kept me hooked. The
creepy revelations and unexpected twists always pulled me back in, heightening the sense of suspense and mystery. There were enough spine-tingling moments to maintain a constant level of intrigue.

The synergy of Jakob-Hoff’s haunting score, the striking lighting design, and the dedicated performances brought the show together in a way that made the experience unnervingly beautiful and for the most part, captivating. The lighting, in particular, was masterfully curated to enhance the suspense, drawing the audience into the supernatural world.

In summary, The Haunting of Hoxton Hall is a genuinely thrilling, spook-tacular show,
packed with surprises and perfect for anyone looking for an entertaining Halloween
experience that will both delight and unnerve. The audience, including myself, left buzzing with excitement, a little shaken, but overall a really memorable experience.

REVIEW: The King In Yellow


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A haunted play in a haunted venue that is sure to get your heart racing.


The King in Yellow is a play of unknown origins with the last recorded performance having taken place in Paris 1895. Rumours of a curse have kept this story largely in the dark, but this production feels like a well-deserved and overdue resurgence. Half Trick are certainly not scared to put in the effort and do groundbreaking things. With limited source material, they have created a spectacle that is unlike anything ever.

The audience is welcomed into the world of Carcosa before the play fully starts, with the actors seeming like they have inhabited the space forever and can never leave. The introductions provide a false sense of security and warmth to the first act. The intimate setting of the venue makes the audience feel like a united collective and the interspersed cast members give voice to accurate concerns.

When asked at the beginning and the end if there are “Any questions?”, the audience is faced with a mind so full of thoughts that there is nothing to be said. The King in Yellow poses a challenge for all who encounter it and is an enigma that is best shared no matter the cost. C.W. Scott does an impressive job of translating and bringing about a script for this lost story. However, I found the words secondary to the more expressive choreography. Indrid Heron in particular does a mesmerising job of this. The constant interruption and aside makes the whole show more unsettling as the audience really has no idea what is coming.

Everything is thought out and the actors are switched on the whole time. There is always something to see even if you are too scared to turn around. It is a true masterclass in screaming by all of the performers. There is something good to be said about every one of this small but mighty team. Isabella Velarde’s portrayal of Camilla is seemingly incompetent to start but makes way for an impressive and realistic breakdown. The teary tantrum of Alex Medland is also hard to forget. Joshua Fleming’s truly remarkable performance lives up to his very dramatic entrance following the prophecy of his absence. Joshua’s voice alone is standout and commands both attention and concern. There has never been a more menacing laugh or walk.

The set consisting of a stylised painted backdrop and limited props is simple but gorgeous. Rustic costumes follow the yellow colour scheme well and the use of draping on The Phantom of Truth and The Stranger is particularly effective. Nevertheless, the final reveal of The King leaves something to be desired.

The second act is cleverly done and indescribable. A secret inside joke that you really want to stay out of. Half Trick manage to create an atmosphere of hysteria that really stays with you. There are so many contrasting elements, leaving the audience to question what is ‘real’. The true horror lies in the (fictional) humanity of it all. Courtney Bassett as the disapproving director that is almost evil and C.W. Scott the writer that values the work over the welfare of the actors. The mystery of Lev is an added layer to the lore. Everyone in the vicinity is at the mercy of the play.

The King in Yellow is absolutely full to the brim. The unexpected quality makes it feel as though there is no escape from a show a show that is only an hour long. 

In Conversation with Alexis Gregory

We sat down with Alexis Gregory whose new comedy thriller Smoke comes to King’s Head Theatre from 2nd-11th November.

Get tickets here: https://kingsheadtheatre.com/whats-on/smoke

Smoke dives into the blurred line between reality and fantasy in the post-truth era. What inspired you to explore this theme, and how does it relate to your personal experiences, particularly your own encounter with privacy invasion?

I think Smoke has really been brewing in me for decades. But the majority of the writing was done over the summer of 2022. I sat on my doorstep to do so, and got a suntan at the same time. I was struck by gay men, in my feeds, filming their psychotic episodes and sharing them, and writing and sharing posts that were also very heightened and clearly also indicated psychological delusions. As a gay man, and knowing how prevalent drugs are on the scene, I made an assumption that some of these episodes are drug related. I also got hacked, and they tried to get into all my accounts, from my social media to my Apple ID, to my PayPal. I had the idea of Alex, my character in Smoke, being hacked, and ‘receiving’ a message via his deceased lover’s account. A couple of days after that, I got a fake message on Insta from a gay guys account who had recently died. I couldn’t not continue to develop Smoke.

Your play focuses heavily on themes of surveillance, paranoia, and self-documentation in the digital age. How do you think the rise of social media and the loss of privacy have particularly impacted queer identities and relationships?

From a gay male point of view, self-documentation can be very appealing. Many gay men, especially younger, like to be looked at, and live elevated lives, or live lives that echo those of celebrities. I’m always fascinated by gay men posting ‘Ask Me A Question’ in their Insta stories. Many gay men also love sharing transformation pics; look at me then, and look at me now, and how much ‘better’ I look now. Modern gay lifestyles have always been fed by the aesthetic, and beauty. And today, the modern gay urban experience can encourage narcissism and self-obsession and self-centredness. These are not alien traits to many gay men. One can leave some of that behind, as one gets older. But not always. Presenting perfection on Insta is also appealing to gay men I think, as we often are driven to overachieve, and what’s the point of overachieving if no one knows about it.

In Smoke, Alex receives a message from his deceased ex-partner’s Instagram, sparking a dark and suspenseful journey. How did you balance the thriller aspect with the raw emotional exploration of queer life and relationships?

The queerness of the piece, in terms of it’s setting, themes, the characters, and what they experience is totally integrated into the script. In ’Smoke’ in the shape of a thriller, and dark, biting comedy. It is all from me, and so filtered via a queer lens; my own. You could look at the script, and your evening at the theatre in various ways. The tale, and journey of a queer man on the edge in London, or of ‘just’ a man on the edge in London. Much of what pushes Alex to act how he does is specifically because of his queerness; his experiences as a gay adolescent, with drugs, in gay relationships, the specific alienation he experiences etc. I think a queer audience will pick up on all this, and view in a certain way.

You’ve mentioned that this play marks a departure from your previous work. What challenges did you face while creating this more stripped-back, plot-driven production, and how did collaborating with Campbell X influence the direction of the piece?

Well this isn’t the first time one of my plays has had a plot!! I think the challenges will happen in the performance, in front of an audience. I am very exposed with this one. Nothing to rely on apart from me and the words in terms of conveying the story to the audience. No clever lighting design or soundscape. The audience is fully lit throughout too. We’re all in it together. Writing and performance wise, I’m quite ‘big. I’m interested in what theatre ‘is’, rather than reality. However, in Smoke, I do lean into a more naturalistic performance, although Alex is pretty wild which adds to the heightened nature of what’s unfolding on stage. I think, writing-wise, this is my most conversational piece. Again, that felt natural. Campbell has completely embraced my vision from the play, and added so much to it already; encouraging me to lean into the ‘selfie\ style documentation in the palms branding for example, and inherently understanding Alex’s journey as a gay man, and his drive to, quote simply survive the city as a man,

Humor plays a key role in tackling heavy themes like conspiracy theories and digital obsession in Smoke. How did you approach using humor to address such intense and personal topics, and what impact do you hope it has on the audience?

I don’t consciously approach integrating humour into my work. It just happens. I feel that I ‘channel’ the humour. It happens naturally. Normally when I write, I know how each funny line with land with an audience and how they respond. However, in each script I write there, are often two lines that get big laughs every-night, that I didn’t anticipate the audience would find funny. They can even be quote ‘throwaway lines’. So I am surprised by my scripts, and audiences, often. The humour is very knowing, from a queer perspective, I think. And so I hope there are laughs of recognition. Alex is a Bad Gay, and Bad Gays are ALWAYS more fun to depict.