REVIEW: When We Were Us


Rating: 3 out of 5.

A well-meaning performance that forgets to trust the audience to read between the lines


As the audience enters the room, Brooke (Victoria Broom) is already on stage, seated alone on her couch with her head in her hands, the lighting isolating her in a moment of quiet distress. Before a word is spoken, it is clear that something is wrong, and that whatever has brought Brooke to this moment will unfold over the course of the evening.

The action soon shifts to a pub where Brooke reunites with four friends she met at university: DJ (Emily Cordell), Moira (Lottie Bell), Kelli (Katie Hamilton), and Blake (Violet Grace Fink). What Brooke believes to be a long-overdue catch-up carries a quieter motive for the others. 

Each character occupies a clear place within the group dynamic. DJ brings an awkward sincerity to conversations; Kelli is the polished professional who tries to keep things orderly; and Blake arrives openly irritated with Brooke. These distinctions are reinforced through costume: DJ’s darker, emo aesthetic contrasts with Kelli’s sharp suit, Blake’s sleek black jumpsuit projects a guarded confidence, while Brooke’s jeans and Converse keep her visually disarmed. Moira, who appears later in the play, is dressed in relaxed sporty attire, presenting an easy, laid-back exterior.

The stage is split in two, with the pub table on one side and a living room on the other where flashbacks unfold. The dual spaces allow past and present to coexist on stage, visually reinforcing how memory intrudes on the present moment.

Running parallel to the reunion is a highly publicised celebrity domestic abuse trial, clearly echoing the 2022 media spectacle of the Depp–Heard case. As the friends debate the credibility of the alleged victim while awaiting the verdict, their own experiences begin to surface, shaping their views on relationships and abuse.

This is where When We Were Us is most ambitious, but also where it occasionally falters. The play tackles coercive relationships and the difficulty of recognising harm within intimate partnerships, a subject still rarely explored in portrayals of lesbian relationships on stage. In that sense, the intention is welcome. However, the script often delivers its message with a heavy hand. Several flashback sequences feel less like dramatic moments than illustrative examples, at times resembling training scenarios rather than organic theatre. The result is a work that frequently states its themes outright instead of allowing them to emerge more subtly through character and action.

The cast nonetheless grounds the material with committed performances. Victoria Broom anchors the play with a restrained portrayal of Brooke’s growing emotional strain. Emily Cordell captures DJ’s hesitant warmth, while Katie Hamilton’s Kelli initially appears slightly stiff before settling into the character’s controlled professionalism. Violet Grace Fink brings energy to Blake, balancing sharpness with flashes of vulnerability. 

Curiously, the play concludes with an extended tirade from Moira rather than centering the voice of Brooke or her friends. Dramaturgically, this choice feels somewhat unbalanced. After spending the evening building empathy for Brooke and the support network around her, ending on the abuser’s monologue is a surprising shift in focus that leaves the emotional weight of the story in an unusual place. Moira herself appears comparatively late in the play, and her presence sometimes feels less like a necessary dramatic counterpoint and more like a device used to explicitly demonstrate the abusive dynamics at the centre of the story. Much of what her scenes convey might arguably have been communicated just as effectively, and with greater nuance, through Brooke and the group’s perspective, rather than being played out so directly on stage.

Tonally, the production feels distinctly millennial in its references, styling and soundtrack. At times this familiarity edges towards cringe, though it also carries a certain charm.

Jade Winters’ When We Were Us is ultimately a sincere production with a clear intention. Its attempt to foreground coercive dynamics within a queer relationship is important, particularly given how rarely such stories are staged. Yet the play’s tendency toward overt messaging means its themes often feel delivered rather than discovered. Even so, the strength of the performances and the relevance of the subject ensure it remains a thoughtful, relevant and engaging, if uneven, piece of theatre.

When We Were Us runs until Saturday 14th March at Brockley Jack Studio Theatre, London. 

REVIEW: The Marriage of Figaro


Rating: 4 out of 5.

an accessible and visually impressive production that brings Mozart’s classic opera to life


Opera North’s new production of The Marriage of Figaro brings Mozart’s well known opera into a setting that feels both familiar and refreshed. The original work was composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart with a libretto by Lorenzo Da Ponte and has remained popular for centuries thanks to its lively story and memorable score. This new staging keeps the heart of the opera intact while placing the action inside a modern country house. It feels like a thoughtful update that makes the piece approachable without losing what makes it such a classic.

Director Louisa Muller’s staging makes good use of the country house setting. The production moves at a steady pace and the staging allows the characters to move naturally through the space. The set design by Madeleine Boyd was particularly impressive. Each part of the house felt distinct and carefully considered. The boot room filled with coats and wellies immediately sets the tone, while later scenes reveal other areas of the house that feel just as detailed. The transitions between acts were smooth and the set never felt static. It gave the sense of a real household rather than just a theatrical backdrop.

One of the real stand out performances of the evening came from Hongni Wu as Cherubino. The character brings a burst of energy to the stage and Wu’s performance captures that restless personality perfectly. The role requires both strong vocal control and physical presence, and Wu delivers both. Cherubino’s appearances were some of the most engaging moments of the evening and the audience response reflected that.

The music is led by conductor Valentina Peleggi with the Orchestra of Opera North performing live. Even as someone new to opera it was easy to appreciate the richness of Mozart’s score. The orchestra carries the production forward and supports the singers without ever overpowering them. The balance between stage and orchestra felt carefully managed and allowed the music to remain the centre of the experience.

What stood out most was how welcoming the production felt for someone watching opera for the first time. The staging keeps things clear and the performances help guide the audience through the story. By the end it was easy to see why The Marriage of Figaro continues to be performed so widely. It is a lively production with strong performances and an impressive visual setting.

The Marriage of Figaro continues its Opera North tour following its performances at The Lowry, Salford Quays, with the run concluding at Hull New Theatre on 28 March.

REVIEW: Iron Fantasy


Rating: 5 out of 5.

an explosion of comedy and sound with a quiet and profound centre


Iron Fantasy is a play about female strength. Written and performed by Shamira Turner and Eugenie Pastor, it is a semi-autobiographical narrative that blends real life with fiction, alongside a great soundtrack composed of electronic beats, live flute, autoharp and singing. Even writing that list makes me feel a wave of awe at these two performers, who have created a production that is both hilarious and emotionally brave.

The concept is Turner and Pastor’s pursuit of physical strength, pumping iron, attending fight choreography classes and downing raw eggs (a memorable moment.) They rush from workout to workout, expounding on their experiences through quickfire comedic poetry. They put on clownish outfits, throw themselves into each new move, and pause to reflect on their girlish heroine, Xena, Warrior Princess. Within the chaos of props, brightly coloured costumes, quick asides and mock-heroic songs, questions of depth and urgency arise. 

Amidst the clownish comedy, these questions hit the audience with even greater force. Why do these women want to be strong? Is it purely for the physical satisfaction of getting stronger, gaining muscle? Or is it for deeper, and more painful reasons? 

The play addresses the violence, and/or threat of it, that women face daily, touching on it gently first. Towards the end the painful heart of the story is reached, a meditation on how to come to terms with grief and abuse. The cartoonish fantasy of stereotypes of female strength begin to interplay with a sense of real emotional strength from two immensely powerful women. And even more movingly, powerful women who are also normal, recognizable, and middle aged, a time of life where, as they explore in the play, women’s power often goes unrecognized. 

Pastor and Turner have been astute in their use of meta-theatricality within their writing. The performers integrate the process of creating the play within the finished product, including the interviews about strength they conducted as research and references to the difficulties they experienced in trying to put on a play in the current theatrical climate. The play grows as it progresses beyond the moment of performance, drawing the audience both into the past of its creation and the future where it has done its work as catharsis for both audience and performer. It is immensely hopeful in its realization of the power of theatre to process experience. An explosion of colour, sound and surprise, the way this piece addresses trauma is both extremely clever and completely without artifice. It isn’t one to miss.

The show runs until the 21st March 2026 at Soho Theatre. The ticket link can be found here: https://sohotheatre.com/events/iron-fantasy/

REVIEW: Two Knight Stand


Rating: 5 out of 5.

Incredibly funny and the silliest of antics- these knights will have you stitches


Two Knight Stand, a production by Martyr Theatre Company, somehow managed to be both unexpected and meet expectations precisely. They were met in the sense that it was exactly the kind of silly fun I was hoping for. The unexpected came in the form of the cast for when the two knights in question rode onstage, they were in fact maidens! It also managed to be even sillier than previously imagined. In the best possible way, this trip to Riding Room in Glasgow was one of the craziest experiences.

A mix of clown and drag theatre, this two-hander is written by Moira Hamilton, who also stars as Sir Sigwin alongside Courtney Bassett as Sir Wendelgaud. When it comes to a two-hander, it’s imperative that two things be true; the writing has to be solid and so does the cast. Thankfully, this was 100% the case. The play focuses on two knights and their “rivalry”. They are locked in this apparent feud over the affections of a maiden. However, the maiden does not know they are fighting for her. In fact, the maiden isn’t even aware they exist as these two brave knights have been hiding at the top of the hill or in the bushes with a pair of binoculars. They do this every day but never actually attempt to talk to her. Well, if they don’t plan to court the maiden, then why would two noble knights spend so much time watching her? Why, to spend time with each other of course. While they would never admit it, Sigwin and Wendelgaud are infatuated with one another and no matter how much they may stare at maidens, it’s clear they only have eyes for each other. Every skirmish is just another chapter in their epic love story. Fighting actually is their love language as we see them cross blades several in many ludicrous ways, always in ways that will not actually harm each other (well, except perhaps once). 

The chemistry between Sigwin and Wendelgaud is unmatched and that is largely due to the exceptional talents of Hamilton and Bassett. Their comic timing and approach was a delight to behold. More than once, the entire audience were howling with laughter and that doesn’t come without people who have a real talent for comedy. A good script is nothing without actors who understand it and have the ability to make it real. Hamilton and Bassett took us into this medieval world and managed to make everyone laugh as we all got swept up in this very silly love story. 

Much of the script’s comedy is presented through double entendres and the physicality of swordplay, with the blades often getting stuck places and requiring two people to get it out. However, the humour was greatly accentuated by the work of sound designer Frederik Bang, using items such as whistles for the sounds of swords being unsheathed, tin for the sound of armour falling to the ground and his own voice in a ridiculously hilarious Duel of the Fates reference. It really adds layers to the clowning aspect of the performance and it wouldn’t have been the same without it.

The only slight issue was honestly just the seating. Riding Room is a lovely venue and in theory a really good location for performances like this but the way the chairs were stacked in so tight did lead to some discomfort. This is a hard one to get around in a small space but if there is a solve, it would really make all the difference. That being said, it did not affect the quality of the performance.

Overall, this is a riotous, raunchy work of art and even funnier than you’re probably expecting a tale of two medieval knights obsessed with each other to be.  One note would be to write more stories of Sir Sigwin and Sir Wendelgaud as these characters absolutely have the potential for further adventures. The whole show was so wonderfully gay and to have more of that energy would be sublime. However, it also works well as a one-off and is a brilliant entry in the Glasgow International Comedy Festival. You won’t stop laughing!

Categories New

REVIEW: The Unfortunate Adventures of Pierrot 


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

A clever new take on an old form


Francesca Masini’s The Unfortunate Adventures of Pierrot, presented by The Travelling Players at  Omnibus Theatre, is a modern take on a much older form of theatre: Commedia dell’arte. Popular  in Europe between the 16th and 18th centuries, Commedia dell’arte consisted of improvised  dialogue, masked stock characters and flamboyant physical comedy. Characters were divided  into three main groups: the zanni (servants), the vecchi (masters/old men) and the innamorati  (young lovers). The eponymous Pierrot, a classic stock character dressed in all-white, falls into the  first camp. He is a loyal servant, a sad clown whose role it is to fall in love with an unattainable woman and then resign himself to supporting the love stories of others. His dramatic destiny is simple: he is supposed to fail, and his failures are supposed to make us laugh. However, in Masini’s production, Pierrot rejects his sorry fate and escapes the confines of the Commedia dell’arte plot in order to pursue his own love story in the real world.  

Flung out into the 21st century, a complicated world that seems diametrically opposed to his own,  Pierrot immediately falls in love with a young, somewhat cynical woman called Lune. The only  problem? She already has a boyfriend called Victor, and he’s the jealous type. Brutish and tall, he  is the uninspiring macho man, the “I’ll get the bill” man, the “I’m going out with the boys” man. Their relationship is dominated by Victor’s not-so-subtle put-downs of Lune, his latent aggression, and the eventual revelation that he has been cheating with a minor called Mindy. It quickly becomes apparent that Pierrot’s world has more in common with modern realities than we’d like to admit. Victor himself is a stock character, a blubbering product of the manosphere. He is 21st century Commedia dell’arte gold.  

Masini has done well to combine traditional Italian comedy with contemporary satire. It feels very  timely given the recent report that almost a third of Gen Z men believe that a wife should obey her  husband. Apparently there are many Victors (and many Lunes) out there! Indeed, there are also a  great many Pierrots. Although this innocent fool is unfailingly kind to Lune, helping her out of her  abusive relationship by showing her a compassion to which she is no longer accustomed, he too is a bad match. Pierrot (the archetypal “nice guy”) is born to chase the object of his affections, to  suffer unrequited love, and so when Lune eventually confesses her feelings for him, he necessarily  loses interest. The sad clown is not meant to get what he wants! Sound familiar? I’m sure it will to  some. Again, Masini adapts Commedia dell’arte to mirror the romantic concerns of the present.  The Travelling Players are a talented bunch and their revival of this older form is remarkably effective, especially with regards to physical comedy. Every actor in the company is clearly well versed in slapstick. Pantalone and Arlecchino, in particular, were hilarious throughout. It was as if  they’d been lifted straight out of that fast-paced, nonsensical Italian cartoon, La Linea, and  brought to life onstage. Nevertheless, in spite of this production’s many successes, some elements still felt a little unfinished: the subplots could benefit from being fleshed out slightly and  better integrated into the whole, while the ending arguably requires a sharper comic edge to  match the energy of earlier scenes. Even so, Masini has worked wonders with what many would  consider an out-of-date form, reminding us that Commedia dell’arte can be made relevant to any and every century, including our own. Stock characters never die!

REVIEW: F*ckboy at Camden People’s Theatre


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Part night train confession, part club-night fever dream, F*ckboy navigates dysphoria with sharp humour and sincerity. 


A performer leans casually against a dark stage wall under purple and blue lighting, wearing a black outfit with fishnet tights and chunky boots; a chair and a pair of scissors dangle from a chain.  This is Camden People’s Theatre, and we have entered the world of F*ckboy.

A one-person show that explores gender dysphoria and bodily autonomy, the play unfolds as a drunken night journey on the District Line where Frankie spirals into a series of memories and fantasies. 

Written and performed by Freddie Haberfellner, F*ckboy follows an overthinking Frankie through a sliding-doors journey towards self-acceptance. Frankie is on a long Tube ride home, drunk, with a pair of scissors in their coat pocket. They are also in a club, doing shots, trying to ignore the feeling of boobs jumping to the beat of their dancing.

Colours wash over the black stage, making the metallic glitter in Frankie’s make-up sparkle in a giving fabulous kind of way. From pulsating club lights to pink-hued love fantasies with none other than Andrew Garfield, the lighting design by Oli Fuller and Rowan West tells the story as much as the writing does. 

The technicolour journey is tightly paired with an atmospheric sound design by Marta Miranda and Gareth Swindail-Parry, evoking DJ beats and Tube announcements alike, and adding an enveloping texture to the 50-minute piece directed by Isobel Jacob.

Freddie Haberfellner brims with charisma. He involves the audience in playful ways: someone in the corner becomes the subject of their loving gaze every time Andrew Garfield enters the story; while two people in the front row become the dull-looking cis couple that Frankie scrutinises on the Tube. 

The chaos within is on full display: intrusive thoughts, second-guessing, the discomfort of untamed hair brushing their throat on a club night.  Yet, the play carries the polished quality of someone who has a rearview perspective on their own story. The path has already been walked, audiences follow its trace.

But this journey offers no neat origin story, Frankie remarks. While loving cars from a young age or experiencing trauma is what people might expect, Frankie’s life has no ‘inciting incident’ to offer for their experience with gender dysphoria. And yes, they have done the work of self-reflection with excruciating meticulousness ¾ scrutiny that, they point out, the cis man on the train would surely never have to endure should he decide to undergo cosmetic surgery. 

Haberfellner’s charismatic performance and sincere storytelling are engaging, even if the delivery maintains an even rhythm that does not always allow for deeper engagement with the emotional peaks and valleys. But this is no trauma porn. The humour in F*ckboy softens the darkest moments: Frankie runs for the toilet to collect themselves. But this is a club toilet, so the breakdown moment (and the storytelling) must wait in the queue. 

There are, however, moments of vulnerability that pierce the air.  A speech embracing madness and uncertainty in a Shakespearean vein challenges the idea of normality, turning inner turmoil into defiance.  Past and present selves blur, so does fantasy and reality, moving tentatively towards self-love and healing.In a time when public discourse around trans and gender dysphoria is, to say the least, fraught with misunderstanding, theatre like F*ckboy feels crucial. Some may recognise their own journey; others may find new ground from which to understand dysphoria. Either way, the show opens up a space to reflect on how we construct our sense of home, in the body, in the mind, and within the society we move through.

REVIEW: Cavetown


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Cavetown came to the Toon and wowed the crowd


On Wednesday the 11th of March, Robin Skinner, professionally known as Cavetown, performed the 14th show of their ‘Running With Scissors’ world tour at The Boiler Shop in Newcastle. 

The Boiler Shop has around a 1000 capacity and can feel like quite a large venue, but on this particular night, the crowd didn’t quite fill the room. While there was a tightly packed group standing around the stage, the back of the space didn’t seem very full. In some ways though, the small crowd worked in the artist’s favour, creating a much more intimate environment for the audience. 

The evening began with a set from support act Dreamer Isioma, Nigerian-American singer-songwriter. While their performance was energetic, it felt quite out of place compared to the atmosphere that Cavetown’s music typically creates – their overall style and sound didn’t quite match the tone that the audience were probably expecting. The set was also cut short due to a technical issue, meaning they only played a few songs and the support slot ended fairly quickly.

However, once Cavetown took the stage, the whole room came alive. They started the set with ‘Skip’ – the first track on their most recent album, which effortlessly transitioned into ‘Cryptid’. By this point I was already immensely impressed by the musicianship between Robin and their band. They were joined by Nick Johnson on bass/keys, Willaby Morse on drums and James Rapp on guitar, all of which also provided strong harmonies during some of the songs. Another thing to note was the impressive lighting design of the whole show – throughout the night, it enhanced every song perfectly.  

Towards the end of the set, Skinner spoke about how he wanted to create “a space where we can forget about everything for a second”, after reflecting on the issues of the world we live in today. He ‘ended’ the set with ‘Boys Will Be Bugs’, an obvious crowd favourite, and then left the stage before coming back with an encore consisting of ‘Home’ and another clearly popular song ‘Devil Town’. It was a fitting end to the performance, with Robin on his back, his legs in the air and playing his guitar, and the whole crowd jumping and singing along.

Going into the gig, I was only vaguely familiar with a few of Cavetown’s songs, and wasn’t entirely sure of what to expect from a live show. However, by the end of the show it was clear that Robin and the band had created something that really engaged and connected with the audience, making it a very enjoyable night.

REVIEW: Landscapes at Sadler’s Well East


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Three works explore how light and movement can reshape the stage, turning the theatre into a series of fleeting, self-contained worlds.


Russell Maliphant has always been fascinated by space — not simply the stage as a physical site, but something sculpted by light, shadow and movement. In Landscapes, presented at Sadler’s Wells East, that fascination becomes the evening’s central language. Across three works, bodies seem less like performers occupying a stage than figures moving through shifting environments of light and shadow, each piece forming its own self-contained world.

Afterlight begins almost disorientingly — like drowning.

Daniel Proietto’s movements feel submerged; his arms trace fluid arcs and his turns are slow and controlled. The choreography feels watery and hypnotic, almost lulling. Watching Proietto, there is a sense of being held within a steady rhythm.

Towards the end, strips of light begin to flicker in rapid succession, creating an effect reminiscent of a spinning zoetrope — movement broken into flickering fragments.

And then the lights come up for Proietto’s bow. The transition is oddly unsettling. After so long inside the piece’s carefully contained world, the sudden reveal of the theatre — the vast black box of the stage — feels almost intrusive. The dancer had occupied the space so completely that seeing its actual scale comes as a quiet shock.

If Afterlight flows like water, Two feels almost architectural.

Alina Cojocaru remains contained within a square of light — a box within a box — and the movement responds accordingly: sharper, more angular, limbs carving precise trajectories through the air. Where Proietto dissolved into fluidity, Cojocaru slices the space into sharp outlines.

Maliphant’s choreography becomes a study in shadows. Dressed entirely in black, Cojocaru sometimes dissolves into the darkness so that only fragments remain visible: an arm, a hand, a flicker of a shoulder. Certain movements leave a faint visual trail — the blur of an arm slicing through the air like an afterimage. 

Towards the end, the lighting narrows further until only the dancer’s arms remain visible, hovering in the darkness like disembodied forms. When the final flash of light illuminates the entire square again, there is an audible “wow” from the audience — the unmistakable sound of a theatrical trick revealed at precisely the right moment.

The final piece, In a Landscape, is danced by Maliphant himself, and it carries a more reflective atmosphere.

It begins behind a heavy drape, luxuriously textured and softly lit. Once again the lighting does most of the dramaturgical work, shifting Maliphant between solid presence and ghostly outline.

One particularly striking moment places him between two gauze curtains. Spotlights positioned either side throw twin shadows across the fabric so that his body appears tripled: the dancer flanked by two shifting silhouettes. There are no projections, no elaborate set pieces, no elaborate costume — only light, fabric and a moving body. The effect is unexpectedly moving.

This simplicity feels almost cleansing. Watching Maliphant move in that stripped-back space becomes a quiet reminder of how powerful dance can be when reduced to its most essential elements: body, light, and time.

Landscapes offers something rare — an evening where choreography and lighting feel inseparable, each generating the other. At its best, the result is not just dance, but atmosphere: environments that briefly exist, before disappearing back into darkness.

REVIEW: Kid Sister


Rating: 3 out of 5.

A heartfelt look at a broken system


Kid Sister, written by Owen Lloyd Richards and directed by Adam Laboda, offers a poignant yet uneven glimpse into the Welsh social care system. Although rooted in its Welsh setting, the play’s themes of belonging, abandonment and family identity resonate far beyond it. 

At its centre is the relationship between two sisters, Shell waiting seventeen years to reunite with her sister Nat, separated from her by the care system. As Nat finally turns eighteen, Shell’s hopes collide with the realities of a system in which people too often get left behind. The production’s emotional core lies in its exploration of chosen family and the long shadow of abandonment. Geri McNamara delivers the standout performance as Shell, capturing the prickly defences of a young woman hardened by a world that has only ever let her down. McNamara balances Shell’s hostility with biting wit and flashes of vulnerability that feel entirely genuine. Ceri Gifford and Mark Rush support as the battle-worn foster carer and an idealistic social worker respectively. However, several pivotal scenes fall short of the emotional intensity needed to fully carry the play’s heavier themes.

Where the play truly shines is in its humour. Richards demonstrates a sharp ear for dialogue, creating exchanges that feel natural while still landing well-timed comedic moments. One standout scene sees all four characters on stage at once, trying desperately to avoid each other. What follows is a carefully choreographed sequence of near-misses and frantic movement around the space, as entrances and exits are timed to keep the characters from crossing paths. The rising tension blends seamlessly with energetic farce.

The production struggles most in its staging and technical choices. Much of the dialogue is delivered while the actors are seated, which, combined with the theatre’s layout, leaves sections of the audience straining to see key moments pulling focus away from the story. The use of rock and pop anthems between scenes works well in capturing the characters’ internal energy, but background radio and music during certain scenes sometimes distracts from the dialogue rather than enhancing it.

Kid Sister is a play with a big heart and a sharp sense of humour. Geri McNamara’s compelling performance and Richards’ witty script make it engaging to watch, but the production is held back by staging issues and a lack of emotional weight in its climactic moments. It’s a thoughtful piece that shines a light on vital social issues, even if it does not fully realise its potential.

Kid Sister runs until March 21st at The Bread and Roses Theatre, Clapham. 

REVIEW: Smalltown Boy


Rating: 4 out of 5.

The joyous joining of drag and drama is masterful.


Not often does drag not hit the mark. Not often does a drag performance leave you considering your own experiences of grief. Brenda Callis seeks to deconstruct the reality of a queer body within rural living. On it’s final stretch of its tour, having debuted at Bristol Old Vic, Smalltown Boy takes over The Pleasance Theatre with an immersive, cabaret of song and sorrow. It’s lead, Edie, played by a talented Elliot Ditton, maps a physical and emotional journey to rural Cornwall as she discovers the death of her lover- Leo. This endeavor is not, of course, without its many hurdles. As Edie learns of her lovers family, local community and disapproving looks, we are presented with the bright artistry that is drag and small-town drama.

The amalgamation of form is initially established within the set. Audiences sit and enjoy a drink at the cabaret-esque tables for two, on looking a set reminiscent a classic British sitcom. As Edie encounters Leo’s mother’s (Claire) home, we see the merging of worlds- a basic, family home with the addition of an on-stage-stage, glittering in the middle. Through some audience work and an opening musical number, the play suggests to follow a solo drag performance. Yet this is quickly swayed, as Edie lays down some uncomfortable conversation with the audience, and though confusing at first, we learn to understand this as Edie’s attempts to converse with Leo.

The initial interaction between Claire, played by Kate Milner-Evans, and Edie is certainly awkward. The beautiful costume design of Alice Sales, places footwear as a metaphor of these two worlds colliding- the high-camp heels of Edie, versus the simple practical walking boot of Claire. Claire’s bewilderment at Edie is very noticeable, yet at times it felt somewhat too uptight, and I must note as the performance continued you could feel a relaxation from the actors. Nevertheless, as the characters come together and loosen up, there is a real overwhelm of emotion and discomfort around their situation. We meet Hannah, played by Shiquerra Robertson Harris, who is suggested to be the reason Edie had to come down to cornwall, and her partner Stephen, played by Theo Cowan. I have to point out the excellent characterisation of Stephen and Frazer Meakin’s direction is rather superb. The cabaret moments are hilarious and perfectly comedically timed, as drag is intertwined so neatly into the performance.

The emotional narrative certainly becomes a huge factor at play, and as Edie’s physical costume delayers, as does the layers of the story. As the play enters its climaxing

moments, the key theme of grief is really deconstructed. A back and forth between Edie’s coming and going, and conversations of her place in the spreading of Leo’s ashes takes place. Important discussions are held, as the family are hinted of leo’s real connection to Edie, and we begin to understand their stance on otherness within their community. Though very moving, I found this unfolding to be slightly prolonged and I feel the script would have benefitted from some refinement, to ensure clarity and precision in its message. Regardless, all aspects of this performance, from the sound, through to the costume and props, proved to compose a deep, hilariously-camp portrait of grief and I can’t wait to see where this beautiful show is taken next.

For Listing please visit: https://bristololdvic.org.uk/whats-on/smalltown-boy

Author:Isabelle Scerri