We sat down for an exclusive interview with Tatty Hennessy, writer of National Youth Theatre REP Company’s production of Dracula at the NYT Workshop Theatre. This world premiere production is written by Tatty Hennessy, writer of the 2025 UK Theatre Award-winning and Olivier Award-nominated adaptation of Animal Farm, and directed by UK Theatre Award Best Director Nominee Atri Banerjee.
This show runs from 25th February to 13th March at the NYT Workshop Theatre – Tickets here
What drew you back to Dracula now, and what felt most urgent to re-examine about the story for a new generation of audiences?
I’d actually been talking to the NYT for a while about totally different project, about technology and ethics, and maybe doing a genre, horror inflected interpretation of that idea, when Paul Roseby approached me and asked if I’d be interested in Dracula. I’m a big horror fan, and love using genre stories to probe at contemporary issues, so I was absolutely thrilled. I think the question of, well, what actually is a vampire, what does that mean to us today, how do we think about exploitation and consumption, about greed transforming us into something we don’t recognise, about how fear of the unknown changes us, all felt really timely and exciting to me.
Writing for the NYT REP company, how did the presence of young performers shape your approach to power, desire and vulnerability in the piece?
I was very fortunate that a part of the process of making Dracula was a week long R&D process with the Rep company themselves, so we were able to throw all those ideas out onto the floor, grapple with them collectively and get a feel for not only what I thought Dracula was about, but what they wanted their Dracula to be about. It was clear really early on that they saw this as a story partly about exploitation and vulnerability, consent and exploitation. When we asked ourselves ‘What is a vampire? what are the modern vampires?’ they were really adventurous and daring in their answers. They’re a cohort of thoughtful and bold artists, so while writing it I knew I had to live up to what they’d brought and not hold back.
Your work often reframes classics through a contemporary moral lens—what did you want to strip away, and what did you want to protect, in Stoker’s myth?
I wanted to strip away the cultural baggage that we, myself included, bring to Dracula; the cinematic, gothic monster melorama of it all, to root it in the lives of the young characters in England, who felt very real and recognizable to me. I always try to remember that the classics were contemporary, innovative and daring, in their time, I want to figure out how they were speaking to their own age and how I would speak to mine. It’s helped that Dracula is so much a story about modernity and progress, about being on the cusp of enormous social and technological change, feeling excited for your future, only to have it stolen by malevolent forces from the past. That felt contemporary to me. Familiarity with a story can sort of dull us to what’s really there, so the first step is always to greet the original story as though its something entirely new, to try to understand how a reader in the 1890s might have felt encountering this for the first time.
With Hammer Films’ gothic legacy in the background, how did you avoid nostalgia while still engaging with the genre’s rich visual and emotional language?
It’s funny, there’s this conception of Dracula, and I had this myself before rereading, that I think is more to do with its cinematic legacy than Stoker’s novel. Going back to the book I was really struck by how fresh and timely it felt; this was a novel about young people anticipating huge technological and social progress, starting their lives with excitement and promise of a hopeful future, only to have a malevolent force from the past dash those hopes. The nostalgic, gothic castle in the mountains imagery we’re all so familiar with through osmosis is only a small part of the book. The novel is actually for its time formally really inventive, and I felt like this gave me license to be a bit irreverent and push the story to new places. although you;ll have to come and see it to know what I mean…
At the start of NYT’s 70th anniversary year, what does it mean to you to place a reinvention of such an enduring story in the hands of emerging artists?
It’s everything! Collaborating closely with the REP artists has been an integral part of my process for writing both Dracula and Animal Farm and both shows are richer, wilder and more daring than they could have been without their voices. It allows emerging artists a big bold canvas to work on, to make work on an ambitious and challenging scale, and it gives younger artists ownership in our historical canon of literature.









