FEATURE: Metropolis


“A mind-melting modernist masterpiece as fresh as ever- the very best of Weimar era German cinema”

It is testament to the excellent programming at the BFI this summer that within a fortnight you can see one of the worst films ever made* followed by one of the best. Fortunately for us, today was the latter.

Fritz Lang’s 1927 modernist masterpiece Metropolis is set rather fittingly in 2026. A black and white dystopian tale exemplifying the powerhouse of German silent film, there is no exposition to give you context and you are left to your own mental contortions for the next two and a half hours.

Simultaneously anti fascist and anti communist, the film follows Freder Frederseon (played by Gustav Fröhlich), the son of Jon Fredersen (played by Alfred Abel) who runs the art deco monstrosity that is the city of Metropolis. Freder learns of the plight of the underground workers whose labour with machinery fuels the city’s function. Switching places with a worker, he soon finds himself enamoured with Maria (played by Brigitte Helm) whose Mother Mary-like figure appears to galvanise the workers into waiting
for The Mediator who will join the Head (Jon Fredersen) with the Hands (the workers) via the Heart (Freder). Unbeknownst to Maria and Freder, who by this point have fallen for each other, Jon’s mad scientist colleague Rotwang (played by Rudolf Klein-Rogge) has turned to revenge. He is obsessively in love with Jon’s wife Hel who died giving birth to Freder. He decides the way to destroy Jon, Freder and his city is to create a sinful android clone of Maria to turn the workers against Jon and Freder, eventually destroying the city, and taking the original Maria to be his new incarnation of the perfect Hel. The ending will remain spoiler free.

This film is staggeringly visually complex, using optical illusions and techniques that were named after their inventors in this film. The art deco forced perspective of the city is given over to a scale matched possibly only by the operatic sets for Wagner’s Ring Cycle. The Schüfftan process was created here by cinematographer Eugene Schüftan, using angled mirrors and careful projection through cutouts in the mirror’s silver backing to create scenes in which live actors can be placed seamlessly into large futuristic cityscapes. Enigmatic grayscale backed by the panache of the pantomime performances compliments the sci-fi representation of android Maria- an image so iconic it inspired the design for Star Wars’ C-3P0.

Watching Metropolis on the big screen is s truly special event, not least because the BFI’s NFT1 screen is itself beautifully designed for it- an art deco recessed proscenium arch and plush red chairs. The audience too respected the requirements of a nearly 3-hour long silent film- not a cough or phone screen light around. Barely anyone dared to get up to go to the toilet lest they miss something- just getting to watch the full film feels like a coup- in 2008 almost 25 minutes of lost footage was recovered when a near intact copy was found at Argentina’s Buenos Aires Cinema Museum. Being able to watch such a cinematic spectacle on a huge widescreen (notwithstanding its 4:3 aspect ratio) is emblematic o the efforts the BFI undertakes to ensure older classics, rarely seen completed features and everything in between gets a chance to be enjoyed as it was meant to- on the silver screen, wowing audiences and making them pay attention to cinematic creativity that’s politically and thematically relevant as any current podcast.

Metropolis is part of the BFI’s Kinaesthesia season, which took place from 17th – 19th April 2026.

REVIEW: Kinaesthesia + Q&A with Gerald Fox


Rating: 3 out of 5.

A richly intelligent excavation of early cinema’s dream logic that fascinates throughout, even as its length and restraint hold it back from full sensory immersion


At BFI Southbank, Kinaesthesia arrives as both film and manifesto. Directed by Gerald Fox, the documentary forms the centrepiece of a wider season dedicated to dreams in early cinema, positioning itself as a kind of cinematic archaeology of the unconscious.

Fox is no stranger to essayistic, archive-driven filmmaking. A BAFTA and Grierson award-winning director, his work has consistently engaged with the history of film form and spectatorship, often privileging montage, rhythm, and visual association over conventional narration. That sensibility is deeply felt here. Kinaesthesia draws on a vast archive, tracing how silent cinema visualised dreams across movements as varied as French Impressionism, German Expressionism, Soviet Montage and the American avant-garde.

The intellectual backbone of the project lies in the influence of Vlada Petrić, whose scholarship on film form and perception helped shape modern understandings of cinematic language. Crucially, Petrić did not simply influence Fox at a distance, he taught him. That pedagogical relationship is palpable throughout the film. Kinaesthesia feels, in many ways, like a continuation of Petrić’s teaching: a visual extension of his ideas, attempting to restore early cinema to its original sensory and perceptual intensity rather than reducing it to narrative history.

There is a lot to admire. The material itself is endlessly rich. Early cinema’s fascination with dreams lends itself naturally to experimentation, and Fox’s curatorial instinct is sharp. The film moves fluidly between canonical works and lesser-known fragments, creating a kind of visual essay on how cinema learned to mimic the logic of dreaming. It is, at its best, a genuine reawakening of the strangeness and invention of silent film.

Yet the film’s greatest strength is also where it begins to falter. At 97 minutes, Kinaesthesia feels just slightly too long for its mode. The structure, built on accumulation and association, occasionally slips into repetition. Ideas are reiterated rather than developed, and sequences that initially feel revelatory begin to lose their impact through overextension. This is where the film’s formal approach could have been pushed further. Given its subject, a more adventurous relationship between image, editing, and sound would have been beneficial. While the montage is elegant, it is rarely surprising. The editing tends toward reverence rather than intervention, and the soundscape, though effective, seldom disrupts or reframes the archival material in a way that might generate new meaning. For a film about dreams, there are moments where it feels tethered to waking logic.

The Q&A that followed, with Fox himself, helped illuminate some of these choices. His emphasis on fidelity to the archive and on allowing the material to “speak” explains the film’s restraint, even if it doesn’t entirely justify it. There is a clear tension between scholarship and sensation here: between presenting a history and embodying one.

Still, Kinaesthesia remains a compelling and beautiful work. It situates early cinema not as a precursor to modern filmmaking, but as a space of radical possibility, where form was fluid and the boundaries between reality and imagination were still being invented.

Ultimately, the film succeeds as an act of curation and devotion, even if it stops short of fully embodying the dream logic it seeks to explore. Fascinating, rich, and undeniably intelligent, Kinaesthesia is also, at times, a touch too long and a little too cautious in its formal ambitions.

Kinaesthesia had its world premiere at BFI Southbank and opened in UK and Irish cinemas on 17 April 2026.

FEATURE: Million Dollar Baby

As part of the BFI’s ‘The Cinematic Life of Boxing’ season, a screening of Million Dollar Baby (2004) was followed by a Q&A with broadcaster and former athlete Jeanette Kwakye, retired boxer and writer Ruth Raper and professional boxer Laura Akram. The season explores the boxing lens and its unique ability to platform stories of love, social injustice, politics and above all, the strength of the human spirit.


Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby is one of cinema’s greatest examples of this; on the surface it’s the sad story of a remarkable female boxer and her reluctant trainer, but in truth it’s a story of family turmoil, gender inequality and, as Clint Eastwood himself described ‘a father-daughter love story’.

Oscar-winning Hilary Swank stars as underdog Maggie Fitzpatrick, who finally convinces coach Frankie Dunn (Clint Eastwood) to take her under his wing, aided by gym caretaker and narrator Eddie Scrap-Iron Dupuis (Morgan Freeman). It’s got everything you want from a boxing movie: grit, determination, heart-warming success, out-of-character vulnerability and a devastating ending.

Eastwood’s idea for the film was initially rejected by Warner Bros – ‘It’s about a woman in boxing! Nobody will want to see that!’ – but he convinced them with a small budget and strong will. It’s true, in 2004, not many people did want to see women in boxing; women’s boxing wasn’t even in the Olympics until 2012, and even now women’s matches are knocked down to the bottom of line-ups. Raper discussed the current attitude towards women’s boxing, noting that there is ‘still a long way to go’.

The first ever all-female boxing card to headline a major venue was just last year at the Royal Albert Hall, and still they are paid a fraction of what their male counterparts receive. The former boxer turned writer/presenter discussed this with current boxer Laura Akram after the screening. They discussed the truth of the film, its moments of dramatisation and accuracy, and how it made them, as female boxers, feel. It was clear that the film’s tragic ending isn’t conducive to improving the sport’s dangerous reputation, but that its portrayal of the typical boxing gym, the themes it discusses and the relationship between coach and athlete were handled truthfully.

There was a general sense of hope from the panel; female boxing has come a long way since 2004, with world champions Katy Taylor, Caroline Dubois and Claressa ‘T Rex’ Shields, to name but a few, leading the way for aspiring young women. Representation in cinema is gaining traction, with Ryan Destiny’s portrayal of Claressa Shields in The Fire Inside (2024) Sydney Sweeney starring in Christy, the 2025 biopic of legend Christy Martin.

Also up for discussion was the accuracy of the film’s ‘Hit Pit’ gym, Raper noting that boxing gyms are often ‘in places where they are needed’, in deprived areas, working mens clubs, and that Million Dollar Baby does a good job of representing this element of the sport. The side stories of Danger Barch (Jay Baruchel) and the gym regulars are a big part of this, symbols of the social and symbolic power of boxing beyond its definition.

Wonderfully facilitated by Jeanette Kwakye, the evening was an inspiring and eye-opening peek into the world of women’s boxing, and an excellent meeting between cinema and sport, highlighting the importance of their intersection expertly.

FEATURE: The Boxer and Q&A with Barry McGuigan

This year the BFI is hosting a season celebrating The Cinematic Life of Boxing, showcasing a diverse range of films that represent the sport on the big screen. From genre-defining giants like Stallone’s Rocky, to historical documentaries exploring its harsh realities, Dr Clive Chijioke Nwonk has curated a series of screenings and Q&As that see cinematic life through a boxing lens, using it as a way to ultimately explore ‘the human spirit’ itself. 


As part of the season, on Tuesday 14th April BFI Southbank screened Jim Sheridan’s 1997 film, The Boxer, loosely inspired by the life of prolific boxer Barry McGuigan. The film follows Danny (played by Daniel-Day Lewis), a former provisional IRA volunteer who returns to his hometown after spending 14 years in prison. His inability to escape his past and his reconnection with his childhood sweetheart forces him to confront his old allegiances, exploring the competing agendas and intense violence of the Irish Troubles. 

McGuigan’s boxing career, as explored in the Q&A session with him after the film, was marked by the conflicts sparked by his success. A man heralded in the international boxing hall of fame, he held the WBA and lineal featherweight titles from 1985-86, and has represented Ireland, Northern Ireland and competed for British titles in his fights. 

Though he advocated for an end to sectarian violence during the Troubles, McGuigan’s neutrality was ill received, with IRA members and loyalists wanting him to pick a side.The Boxer explores these tensions, released in the final year of the Troubles, and showcases how the sport became a place to reconcile political differences. Throughout his career, McGuigan chose not to wear sectarian colours, and continually asserted that boxing had nothing to do with religion, sect or division. His experience sparring in his local boxing gyms with Catholics and Protestants alike meant that to him, the sport was non-sectarian. Amidst a backdrop of riots and street violence, the gyms became a place to access complex emotions with structure and discipline.  

A striking moment in the film that embodied this sentiment saw Danny competing against a Nigerian man in a boxing match in London. The scene explored the intense physicality, strategy and high emotional stakes of boxing matches, made even more tense by the political weight of what Danny represented. As Danny was about to win the fight, he threw in the towel, recognising that any more contact could have ended his opponent’s life. McGuigan described how Sheridan and co-writer Terry George had changed the events, as the boxer’s real life opponent had lost his life in that fight. This choice powerfully showcases filmmaking’s capacity to reimagine history, and became an important symbolic gesture for peace. 

McGuigan’s experience as boxing consultant for the film, as he trained Daniel Day-Lewis for a year in Ireland, reaffirmed to him that every fight has an arc, a story that makes it ‘majestic’. In the face of violence, he had tried to use the sport to create happiness, and in doing so captured the paradox of how a brutal sport played a crucial role in breaking cycles of political violence. The depiction of the events on screen have only amplified the incredible story. 

REVIEW: HOUSE23 Presents Short Shorts: Comedy


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A fun collection of comedy shorts


New art community HOUSE23 put on a limited selection of comedy shorts from up-and-coming talent, with a Q&A with a BAFTA award winning director and a BAFTA award winning writer at Riverside Studios to discuss their work. 

The evening started off with a friendly and warm welcome from Molly, the founder of House23. A small group had already formed and were talking to each other, several of whom either knew or had worked with each other before. After brief introductions and a short chat with an actor-writer, we were given a goodie bag and ushered into one of the cinema screens. The screen itself was small, maybe a 40 seat capacity, but it was perfect for the screening and the seats were really comfy. Other short film screenings have not been in such venues and that alone made this event stand out. 

There were five films being screened, each of around 20 minutes. Each short was of high quality and what was produced on presumably a small budget was impressive. It is easy to produce very amateur productions on small budgets but none of them felt like that. Each was polished, engaging plots, well acted and good soundtracks or sound design and the filmmakers involved clearly were experienced. A standout short being “Egg Timer” which deals with the pressures of society expecting women to have children, which is very topical at the moment. All five shorts were equally funny and got a good reception from the audience. It was clear to see why several had been winning awards and festivals. There was one actor who appeared in a couple and it had been curated so that we saw the actor play a character avoiding noise and socialising to another character who was “hired” by a couple, making the audience feel like we were going on a personal development journey. Only in comedy short screenings would that level of attention to detail work and actually made the second screening even funnier, given how we had previously seen him. 

The Q&A was brief but a good insight into what it takes to develop a short film, highlighting many challenges that filmmakers face. What was being said clearly resonated with the audience as many were nodding in agreement. It was interesting to hear how the director went from shooting shorts to working with Saturday Night Live UK and how she approached the step up. Equally it was an interesting insight to hear how the writer was organising a rehearsal for the bbc on a silent film and the process of the filming. The night ended with more networking, discussing what was thought of the films and friends catching up. In an industry that relies on connections and your network, it was lovely and refreshing to see a group of people come together to support each other. 

After having a brief discussion with Molly about where she wants this art community to go, as someone who works in the industry and a fellow creative, it is reassuring to hear that there are people who are wanting to create a sense of community and support, especially when the arts is largely accessible for people who have the funds to do so. It’s exciting to know that there is a startup that is looking to address issues that filmmakers face and the realities of being a creative, even more so in uncertain times.

You can keep up to date on upcoming events via Instagram @HOUSE23_LTD or email hello@house23.co.uk for any enquires. 

FEATURE: Emma at Barbican Cinemas

Seen through the lens of the London Soundtrack Festival, Emma reveals itself as a film elevated by its music. Introduced by composer Rachel Portman in an onstage conversation, it plays like a case study in how score can become structure, not just accompaniment, but the very thing that gives a film its tone and emotional coherence.

Douglas McGrath’s version of Jane Austen’s novel has long been characterised as light, witty, even “Miramaxed”, a work that prioritises accessibility over textual fidelity. But what becomes newly apparent in this context is how deliberate that lightness is. The film moves quickly, compressing social intricacies into bright and legible gestures. 

From the opening bars, her music establishes a world of buoyancy and control: lilting strings, playful woodwinds, melodies that seem to drift rather than resolve. These are now recognisable Portman signatures, but in Emma they align us with Emma Woodhouse’s perspective, a consciousness that experiences social life as something manageable and orchestrable. The score subtly endorses her world.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s performance sits comfortably within this tonal design. Her Emma is bright, composed, faintly insulated: a young woman whose confidence is cushioned by the film’s aesthetic softness. Around her, Jeremy Northam’s grounded Mr. Knightley, Toni Collette’s pliant Harriet, and Ewan McGregor’s performative Frank Churchill all move with a kind of musical logic, their interactions shaped as much by rhythm as by dialogue. Even the comedy, often cited as the film’s greatest strength, lands with a precision that feels scored as much as written.

Portman’s reflections on her process complicate this apparent effortlessness. Working primarily at the piano, she describes melody as a way of externalising something internal, translating instinct into structure. Watching a film, she identifies key stretches, not isolated scenes but clusters of time, and begins there, allowing themes to carry across narrative space. In Emma, that approach results in a gently insistent score that guides the viewer through Emma’s emotional arc even when the film itself resists introspection.

Her comments on changing industry practices are equally revealing. Where directors once encountered a completed score in something like a first performance, an unveiling, contemporary filmmaking often dissolves that moment through constant iteration. Emma belongs to that earlier paradigm, and the confidence of the music reflects it. There is little sense of compromise or over-explanation; the score trusts its own tone and, in doing so, asks the film to meet it.

Critically, the music has often been described in soft-focus terms, “sweet,” “soothing,” “string-rich”, sometimes even criticised for its familiarity. Yet that familiarity is part of its function. The repetitions, the circling melodies, mirror Emma’s own limited perspective, her tendency to see patterns where there are none, to impose narrative where there is only contingency. The score comforts but it also contains.

Placed against later interpretations, particularly the more overtly textured work by Isobel Waller-Bridge and David Schweitzer for Emma, Portman’s approach can seem almost restrained. Where the 2020 adaptation expands outward, layering themes and vocal textures, Emma (1996) narrows inward, committing to a singular tonal identity. It is less interested in variety than in consistency, less in reinterpreting Austen than in smoothing her into something continuous and playable.

Three decades on, Emma endures not because it resolves the tensions between fidelity and accessibility, but because it sidesteps them. It becomes, instead, a film about tone, about the management of feeling, about the quiet authority of music to make even the most familiar story feel newly composed.

The London Soundtrack Festival concludes on Sunday April 12th 2026, with a variety of concerts, talks, Q&A’s and podcast recordings on offer.

FEATURE: Double bill- “Plan 9 From Outer Space” and “Ed Wood”


Two monochrome fever dreams that perfectly capture the B-Movie noir aesthetic of yesteryear


Being dubbed “The worst film of all time” is not usually an indicator of a great night out. However, Ed Wood is no usual director-writer-producer. His 1956 cult classic Plan 9 From Outer Space kicks off what the BFI states as the key title for their Trash! The Wildest Film You’ve Ever Seen season: an entertaining romp through retro B-movie madness, camp capers and the tell-tale sign of a wider societal parable being explored through schlocky sets and even worse acting. It is clear from the outset of the night’s double bill that Plan 9 is something special, though. Afforded an extended intro by not one but three guest speakers, we hear first from BFI curator William Fowler, followed by Head of Conservation, Kieron Webb and finally author Ken Hollings; each one discussing a unique element to their relationship with the fan favourite in an almost full house. A special 35mm edition of the film has been brought out for our viewing pleasure, as close as possible to the version original audiences would have experienced, including the splice in reel 1. It certainly feels as though we are about to witness cinematic history all over again.

For those less familiar with director Ed Wood’s masterpiece, Plan 9 is an eighty-minute wild ride about grave-robbing aliens who resurrect the recently dead to repopulate their alien race. Made on a budget of about £25, there is no doubt the script is atrocious and the acting as wooden as the cardboard props. Bela Lugosi (of vintage Dracula fame) is portrayed as the leading ghoul, his scenes shot aimlessly before there was a script. Iconic temptress Vampira portrays his recently deceased wife come back to kill. A mish-mash of hilariously inept police procedural, alien/zombie/vampire crossover and a genuine overarching message of anti-atomic bomb sentiment post WW2 and you get a vague sense of the piece. Beloved for a reason, there are a million quotable one-liners and unintentional visual gags (flimsy tombstones, a multipurpose cheap curtain and dinky plastic UFO saucers on wire). Plan 9 is an authentically chaotic but beloved B-movie classic that traverses the ratings parabola from good to bad and genuinely back to good again.

What better way to appreciate Ed Wood’s masterpiece than to follow it with a noir biopic about the man himself? In the BFI Screen 1, with its plush red velvet seating and golden velvet curtain, art deco proscenium arch and excellent technology, we are presented with Tim Burton’s 1994 love letter to one of his biggest influences. Filmed in beautifully lit greyscale- homage to Mr Wood’s own work- we are treated to a practically perfect depiction of his Sisyphean task to get his films made, distributed and celebrated. Johnny Depp portrays the Wood superbly, full of optimism, openness and vulnerability with his own lifestyle. We learn of his trials and tribulations to get Glen or Glenda made, right through to the infamous Plan 9. Burton achieves excellent panache in depicting accurately both Ed Wood’s methods as well as his own rather identifiable visual style. Dramatic, almost Renaissance lighting is complemented by Howard Shore’s mellifluously retro soundtrack with classical motifs. Martin Landau won an Oscar for his portrayal of Bela Lugosi in this film and rightly so. Ed Wood is as much about Wood’s journey with Lugosi in his tragic final year as it is about Wood himself. Ed Wood is Tim Burton at his creative finest before perhaps going the way of self-parody in later films.

Ultimately, this double bill is an exceptional chance to view films which, in isolation, have their own merits, but together are greater than the sum of their parts. Almost like an earlier version of Tommy Wiseu’s The Room (also dubbed the worst film ever made), and subsequently his own biopic, The Disaster Artist, we get a sense of storytelling nostalgia alongside an appreciation for a creative mind that no longer exists and never got to experience praise in his own lifetime. Ed Wood’s big film premiere finale for Plan 9 finally gives its subject the fantasy future it always deserved.

Trash! Season plays until 30th April 2026 at the BFI.

REVIEW: Some Films Are Trash, Some Have Trash-Ness Thrust Upon Them


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A fascinating introduction to the world of Trash cinema.


This April, the BFI is home to a brand new season ‘Trash! The Wildest Films You’ve Ever Seen’. Archivist William Fowler and BFI programmer Justin Johnson have curated a
wonderfully varied roster showcasing the campest, sexiest and trashiest of 20th century cinema. The season will begin with Paul Morrissey’s ‘Trash’ (1970) showing on Thursday 9th April and will close with two shorts ‘I Was A Teenage Serial Killer’ by Sarah Jacobson and ‘A Family Finds Entertainment’ by Ryan Trecartin showing on the 24th and 27th of April. On the 1st of April, the collection was kicked off with an introduction by its curators along with
three prevalent film scholars, critics and writers: Elena Gorfinkel, Helen de Witt and Dominic Johnson.

We began with the question ‘how do we define Trash cinema?’ The panel discussed genre, with films spanning horror, comedy, melodrama, pornography and queerness. The defining elements of Trash though, have much more to do with circumstance. The Trash-ness of a film is in its low budget, home-video style reality. These films are made by individuals, groups of friends, transgressives, punks in their own homes and cities, using what they have and revelling in its strangeness. They reclaim their ‘Trash’ label in their camp, bizarre
commitment to the filmmaking cause. A big takeaway of this discussion: ‘No one sets out to make a bad movie’. These filmmakers knew their budget and their resources, and they knew their films wouldn’t ever be consumed in the mainstream; therein lies the joy. They are
starkly aware of their ‘Trash’ and they love it. They are often a harshly real depiction of
marginalised identities, non-normative desires, unglamorised sex, drugs and vulgarity. As Fowler noted ‘The audience is confronted with more than just the maker’s intention’. We lose the layers of production, construction and merchandising and are left with what 1960’s ‘tastes’ would label ‘Trash’.


Justin Johnson showed a clip of John Waters’ ‘Pink Flamingos’ starring Edith Massey and Divine. Although known for its increasingly ‘revolting’ scenes and taglined ‘An exercise in poor taste’, we saw a charmingly strange scene between Edie and The Egg Man. Johnson noted the fascination in the everyday, taking it to surreal lengths through melodramatic script and peculiar performances. De Witt’s clip was from George Kuchar’s short ‘I, An Actress’ in which the filmmaker directs his student in a screen test, hijacking it and making for a hilariously hysterical short film. De Witt noted how the actor’s pleasure and excess in performance produces pleasure for the audience, another trademark of the ‘Trash’ genre. Gorfinkel chose a scene from better known ‘Trash’ by Paul Morrissey, starring Warhol
superstars Joe Delissandro and pioneering trans actress Holly Woodlawn, who George
Cukar suggested should have been nominated for an Oscar. It’s funny, eccentric and starkly confrontational of social conditions and the life of the ‘outcast’. Dominic Johnson showed ‘Super 8 1/2’ by Bruce LaBruce, a mockumentary style film about himself. LaBruce called the film a ‘Bruce-ploitation movie’, and through it blurred the lines between arthouse film and pornography. Johnson noted how LaBruce was often labeled ‘too arty for porn’ and yet ‘too pornographic’ to be widely successful in film. The clips were all captivating, and the panel’s analysis was thoroughly engaging and thought-provoking.

The evening was an eye-opening and intriguing introduction into the world of Trash cinema and I would strongly recommend a visit to the BFI during the season to take in some yourself. I certainly will be.

Trash! The Wildest Films You’ve Ever Seen runs at BFI Southbank until 30th April. Tickets here.

REVIEW: Learning the Ropes


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A powerful and inspiring documentary about boxing as a sport and a metaphor for life.


Learning the Ropes is a documentary about Bethnal Green’s Repton Boxing Club, one of the most famous amateur boxing clubs in the world. It has produced countless champions, whose photos line the walls. The documentary is directed by Ryan Pickard, who began boxing age 7 at Repton and went on to be a highly successful amateur boxer. He describes the documentary as ‘a poem to the ones I loved,’ and this sense of pride and commitment to the club that shaped him permeates every aspect of the narrative.

The documentary focuses on the club’s legend, Tony Burns MBE, a coach who nurtured multiple young talents. At the point of filming, he had Alzheimer’s (he died in 2021.) Nonetheless, his spirit shines through in small moments, particularly in the reminiscences of students of the club.

The film starts and ends with a tracking shot, the camera gently meandering through the streets, parks and alleys of Bethnal Green. We are guided to the red brick front of the club and welcomed through the doors to meet Tony. Over the haunting sound of a solo viola, he walks through the building to the training ring, where so many greats have sparred. We meet the ‘old crowd’ first, men who are in their later years, who still share a strong sense of camaraderie. One of Pickard’s main concerns in the film is to show the way his beloved club created not just fellow boxers, but real, deep family. The documentary demonstrates the opportunity boxing provides to those overlooked by society, giving generations of young working-class men, and now women, the chance to create a life that takes them beyond the constraints of circumstances.

It probes at class, identity and community with a beautifully light touch, floating like a butterfly with humorous commentary before stinging like a bee with a moment of emotional impact. One moment that had the whole audience belly laughing was when one of the Nursery students says ‘Repton is old and traditional and smells of it!’ The documentary follows the whole range of generations at the club, from children aged seven up to the old timers. It conveys the strong bonds and community created by a shared passion, which are ever rarer in the modern world.

As a documentary focused on Repton but with Tony Burns as the lynchpin, a lack is felt in the gaps in Burns’ own background, which is slightly skated over, leaving questions as to how this formidable character emerged. However, the film conveys a deep love for boxing and its power as a metaphor for a life of courage and the strength to always get up, no matter how many times you are knocked down.

Learning the Ropes was the opening film for The Cinematic Life of Boxing season at BFI Southbank, ending 30th April. Tickets here.

REVIEW: Maricel


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“Cultural immersion, done beautifully”


Maricel is a beautifully crafted film, shining a light on a reality faced by millions of Filipino families. With the space it allows to explore the quiet moments, it raises important questions and invites questions on the cost of success.

Zar Donato is excellent in the role of Maricel. She completely captures the complex, conflicting emotions of the situation unfolding in front of her. From the meticulous standard of support she provides to the elderly Greek couple in her care to the earned bursts of frustration, her performance reflects Filipino culture authentically.

The simple, routine moments shine across both cultures. Food plays a continuous role in the film. The showcasing of lesser-known Greek cuisine, rooted in what is readily available, highlights the simplicity of Greek cooking. The preparation of honey and ginger tea to soothe ailments, and the presence of carefully stored, plastic-wrapped snacks, will feel familiar to many within Filipino households. The running joke around long-grain rice was subtle and well done.

The tenderness and honesty with which the sexual realities of OFWs are portrayed are moving and deeply affecting. The film presents, in a strikingly beautiful yet unflinching way, how difference and vulnerability can lead to exploitation. It powerfully captures the spectrum of experiences – from those who endure and adapt, making the best of difficult circumstances, to the harsher, more unsettling realities that many have had to confront and overcome.

As the daughter of an OFW who lived in Greece, this film feels deeply personal. Seeing the crossover of Tagalog, Greek and English brought to life feels almost sacred, a detail handled with great care. The emphasis on particular phrases – where “bastos” comes to mind – feels charmingly natural. The emotional turmoil of balancing the loss of family and the acceptance of another family met with a quiet, stoic resilience echoes the determination of OFWs to create a better life for their families, often at great personal cost.

After the screening, director Elias Demetiou took part in a Q&A. He spoke openly about his family’s personal experience with Filipino workers, affectionately referring to the woman who inspired Marciel as a sister. His brother also composed the moving score, a first for the brothers after many years of Elias’s requests. 


Marciel is a human story, told with care and details that resonates well beyond the screen. Showcasing 52 feature films, including nine UK premieres and eight world premieres, catch the Manchester Film Festival until 29th March. Tickets are available here.