REVIEW: HOUSE23 Presents Short Shorts: Comedy


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A fun collection of comedy shorts


New art community HOUSE23 put on a limited selection of comedy shorts from up-and-coming talent, with a Q&A with a BAFTA award winning director and a BAFTA award winning writer at Riverside Studios to discuss their work. 

The evening started off with a friendly and warm welcome from Molly, the founder of House23. A small group had already formed and were talking to each other, several of whom either knew or had worked with each other before. After brief introductions and a short chat with an actor-writer, we were given a goodie bag and ushered into one of the cinema screens. The screen itself was small, maybe a 40 seat capacity, but it was perfect for the screening and the seats were really comfy. Other short film screenings have not been in such venues and that alone made this event stand out. 

There were five films being screened, each of around 20 minutes. Each short was of high quality and what was produced on presumably a small budget was impressive. It is easy to produce very amateur productions on small budgets but none of them felt like that. Each was polished, engaging plots, well acted and good soundtracks or sound design and the filmmakers involved clearly were experienced. A standout short being “Egg Timer” which deals with the pressures of society expecting women to have children, which is very topical at the moment. All five shorts were equally funny and got a good reception from the audience. It was clear to see why several had been winning awards and festivals. There was one actor who appeared in a couple and it had been curated so that we saw the actor play a character avoiding noise and socialising to another character who was “hired” by a couple, making the audience feel like we were going on a personal development journey. Only in comedy short screenings would that level of attention to detail work and actually made the second screening even funnier, given how we had previously seen him. 

The Q&A was brief but a good insight into what it takes to develop a short film, highlighting many challenges that filmmakers face. What was being said clearly resonated with the audience as many were nodding in agreement. It was interesting to hear how the director went from shooting shorts to working with Saturday Night Live UK and how she approached the step up. Equally it was an interesting insight to hear how the writer was organising a rehearsal for the bbc on a silent film and the process of the filming. The night ended with more networking, discussing what was thought of the films and friends catching up. In an industry that relies on connections and your network, it was lovely and refreshing to see a group of people come together to support each other. 

After having a brief discussion with Molly about where she wants this art community to go, as someone who works in the industry and a fellow creative, it is reassuring to hear that there are people who are wanting to create a sense of community and support, especially when the arts is largely accessible for people who have the funds to do so. It’s exciting to know that there is a startup that is looking to address issues that filmmakers face and the realities of being a creative, even more so in uncertain times.

You can keep up to date on upcoming events via Instagram @HOUSE23_LTD or email hello@house23.co.uk for any enquires. 

FEATURE: Emma at Barbican Cinemas

Seen through the lens of the London Soundtrack Festival, Emma reveals itself as a film elevated by its music. Introduced by composer Rachel Portman in an onstage conversation, it plays like a case study in how score can become structure, not just accompaniment, but the very thing that gives a film its tone and emotional coherence.

Douglas McGrath’s version of Jane Austen’s novel has long been characterised as light, witty, even “Miramaxed”, a work that prioritises accessibility over textual fidelity. But what becomes newly apparent in this context is how deliberate that lightness is. The film moves quickly, compressing social intricacies into bright and legible gestures. 

From the opening bars, her music establishes a world of buoyancy and control: lilting strings, playful woodwinds, melodies that seem to drift rather than resolve. These are now recognisable Portman signatures, but in Emma they align us with Emma Woodhouse’s perspective, a consciousness that experiences social life as something manageable and orchestrable. The score subtly endorses her world.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s performance sits comfortably within this tonal design. Her Emma is bright, composed, faintly insulated: a young woman whose confidence is cushioned by the film’s aesthetic softness. Around her, Jeremy Northam’s grounded Mr. Knightley, Toni Collette’s pliant Harriet, and Ewan McGregor’s performative Frank Churchill all move with a kind of musical logic, their interactions shaped as much by rhythm as by dialogue. Even the comedy, often cited as the film’s greatest strength, lands with a precision that feels scored as much as written.

Portman’s reflections on her process complicate this apparent effortlessness. Working primarily at the piano, she describes melody as a way of externalising something internal, translating instinct into structure. Watching a film, she identifies key stretches, not isolated scenes but clusters of time, and begins there, allowing themes to carry across narrative space. In Emma, that approach results in a gently insistent score that guides the viewer through Emma’s emotional arc even when the film itself resists introspection.

Her comments on changing industry practices are equally revealing. Where directors once encountered a completed score in something like a first performance, an unveiling, contemporary filmmaking often dissolves that moment through constant iteration. Emma belongs to that earlier paradigm, and the confidence of the music reflects it. There is little sense of compromise or over-explanation; the score trusts its own tone and, in doing so, asks the film to meet it.

Critically, the music has often been described in soft-focus terms, “sweet,” “soothing,” “string-rich”, sometimes even criticised for its familiarity. Yet that familiarity is part of its function. The repetitions, the circling melodies, mirror Emma’s own limited perspective, her tendency to see patterns where there are none, to impose narrative where there is only contingency. The score comforts but it also contains.

Placed against later interpretations, particularly the more overtly textured work by Isobel Waller-Bridge and David Schweitzer for Emma, Portman’s approach can seem almost restrained. Where the 2020 adaptation expands outward, layering themes and vocal textures, Emma (1996) narrows inward, committing to a singular tonal identity. It is less interested in variety than in consistency, less in reinterpreting Austen than in smoothing her into something continuous and playable.

Three decades on, Emma endures not because it resolves the tensions between fidelity and accessibility, but because it sidesteps them. It becomes, instead, a film about tone, about the management of feeling, about the quiet authority of music to make even the most familiar story feel newly composed.

The London Soundtrack Festival concludes on Sunday April 12th 2026, with a variety of concerts, talks, Q&A’s and podcast recordings on offer.

REVIEW: Shooting From Below


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Reynolds constantly balances the gut-punch with the punchline, weaving serious critique through moments of effortless hilarity.


A blue hue washes over the Purcell Room at the Southbank Centre as the audience murmurs in anticipation. The crowd is eclectic, but united by the same electric buzz. A spotlight cuts through the noise. Suddenly, silence. Then BAM: Midgitte Bardot storms the stage to the roar of adoring fans, who greet her as if the Messiah herself had returned. And she looks incredible. In that instant, my expectations recalibrated. I knew exactly what I was in for: mayhem, filthy debauchery, and razor-sharp sexual wit, all delivered by an undeniable diva. I was completely on board.

Tamm Reynolds’ bold new show Shooting From Below, directed by Izzy Rabey, returns to the Southbank Centre for its second run– and it is as hilarious as it is bizarre. Equal parts riotous and tender, furious and joyful, the show confronts its audience with both Reynolds’ rage and their community’s lived experience… without ever sacrificing style. Over 60 minutes of glorious chaos, we follow Midgitte Bardot (Reynolds’ drag persona) as she is forced to apologise for a dreadful act she may or may not have committed (spoiler: it might involve those disembodied legs scattered across the stage). Through original songs, biting humour, and a tightly constructed narrative, Bardot shares her experience as a person with dwarfism (with fabulous wigs to match).

The writing is sharp, playful, and deceptively disarming. Reynolds lulls the audience into a false sense of comfort with jokes, audience interaction, and witty lyrics, before revealing the show’s true engine: rage. As they themselves note, the piece interrogates a world in which people wit dwarfism are too often reduced to spectacle– “entertainment, pets, toys, fetishes, dream sequences, musical numbers… most of the time.” It’s a brutal observation, but one delivered with such precision and humour that it lands without ever feeling sermonic or preachy– just undeniably true. Reynolds constantly balances the gut-punch with the punchline, weaving serious critique through moments of effortless hilarity.

As a performer, Tamm is effortless and easy to watch. They command the stage with ease, taking their time with complete confidence that the audience will stay with them– whether they’re adjusting a wig or slowly sipping water. And we do, because we’re hooked. A true multidisciplinary performer, they are a compelling actor, a strong singer, and a brilliantly instinctive comedian. That said, there are moments where pacing falters: extended pauses during costume changes occasionally disrupt the rhythm, particularly one sequence where the stage is left empty for too long. It begins as a gag but overstays its welcome. Still, Reynolds quickly regains momentum. And, as they declare in song, “They were jealous. I was charming.” They’re not wrong. The charm is undeniable.

Visually, the show is a triumph. Maisie Frater’s set design is inventive and striking: a surreal landscape of legs and feet entwined with ivy creates a strange, luminous playground for Bardot to inhabit. It’s imaginative, cohesive, cleverly tied to the narrative and genuinely beautiful– one of the production’s standout elements. The costumes, by Lambdog 1066, are equally impressive. Midgitte Bardot looks stunning throughout– meticulously detailed, perfectly tailored, and gloriously, unapologetically drag.

Overall, Shooting From Below is a riveting, unruly, and fiercely intelligent piece of theatre. And I, for one, will be keeping a very close eye on wherever Midgitte Bardot appears next.

FEATURE: Double bill- “Plan 9 From Outer Space” and “Ed Wood”


Two monochrome fever dreams that perfectly capture the B-Movie noir aesthetic of yesteryear


Being dubbed “The worst film of all time” is not usually an indicator of a great night out. However, Ed Wood is no usual director-writer-producer. His 1956 cult classic Plan 9 From Outer Space kicks off what the BFI states as the key title for their Trash! The Wildest Film You’ve Ever Seen season: an entertaining romp through retro B-movie madness, camp capers and the tell-tale sign of a wider societal parable being explored through schlocky sets and even worse acting. It is clear from the outset of the night’s double bill that Plan 9 is something special, though. Afforded an extended intro by not one but three guest speakers, we hear first from BFI curator William Fowler, followed by Head of Conservation, Kieron Webb and finally author Ken Hollings; each one discussing a unique element to their relationship with the fan favourite in an almost full house. A special 35mm edition of the film has been brought out for our viewing pleasure, as close as possible to the version original audiences would have experienced, including the splice in reel 1. It certainly feels as though we are about to witness cinematic history all over again.

For those less familiar with director Ed Wood’s masterpiece, Plan 9 is an eighty-minute wild ride about grave-robbing aliens who resurrect the recently dead to repopulate their alien race. Made on a budget of about £25, there is no doubt the script is atrocious and the acting as wooden as the cardboard props. Bela Lugosi (of vintage Dracula fame) is portrayed as the leading ghoul, his scenes shot aimlessly before there was a script. Iconic temptress Vampira portrays his recently deceased wife come back to kill. A mish-mash of hilariously inept police procedural, alien/zombie/vampire crossover and a genuine overarching message of anti-atomic bomb sentiment post WW2 and you get a vague sense of the piece. Beloved for a reason, there are a million quotable one-liners and unintentional visual gags (flimsy tombstones, a multipurpose cheap curtain and dinky plastic UFO saucers on wire). Plan 9 is an authentically chaotic but beloved B-movie classic that traverses the ratings parabola from good to bad and genuinely back to good again.

What better way to appreciate Ed Wood’s masterpiece than to follow it with a noir biopic about the man himself? In the BFI Screen 1, with its plush red velvet seating and golden velvet curtain, art deco proscenium arch and excellent technology, we are presented with Tim Burton’s 1994 love letter to one of his biggest influences. Filmed in beautifully lit greyscale- homage to Mr Wood’s own work- we are treated to a practically perfect depiction of his Sisyphean task to get his films made, distributed and celebrated. Johnny Depp portrays the Wood superbly, full of optimism, openness and vulnerability with his own lifestyle. We learn of his trials and tribulations to get Glen or Glenda made, right through to the infamous Plan 9. Burton achieves excellent panache in depicting accurately both Ed Wood’s methods as well as his own rather identifiable visual style. Dramatic, almost Renaissance lighting is complemented by Howard Shore’s mellifluously retro soundtrack with classical motifs. Martin Landau won an Oscar for his portrayal of Bela Lugosi in this film and rightly so. Ed Wood is as much about Wood’s journey with Lugosi in his tragic final year as it is about Wood himself. Ed Wood is Tim Burton at his creative finest before perhaps going the way of self-parody in later films.

Ultimately, this double bill is an exceptional chance to view films which, in isolation, have their own merits, but together are greater than the sum of their parts. Almost like an earlier version of Tommy Wiseu’s The Room (also dubbed the worst film ever made), and subsequently his own biopic, The Disaster Artist, we get a sense of storytelling nostalgia alongside an appreciation for a creative mind that no longer exists and never got to experience praise in his own lifetime. Ed Wood’s big film premiere finale for Plan 9 finally gives its subject the fantasy future it always deserved.

Trash! Season plays until 30th April 2026 at the BFI.

REVIEW: Interstellar


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“The Royal Albert Hall Transforms Interstellar Into a Transcendental Symphony”


Watching a cinematic masterpiece like Interstellar on the big screen is always a treat, but experiencing it at the Royal Albert Hall elevates the film into an entirely different league of entertainment. The venue’s recent film-to-live-score event offered what can only be described as one of the most profound sensory experiences available to modern audiences. This presentation of Christopher Nolan’s 2014 sci-fi epic proved that when world-class musicianship meets high-concept filmmaking, the result is nothing short of transformative, turning a standard movie night into a monumental cultural event that resonates long after the final credits roll.

For those needing a refresher on the narrative, the story follows Joseph Cooper (Matthew McConaughey), a former NASA pilot who has traded the cockpit for a struggling family farm on a dying Earth. In a desperate bid to save humanity from a global blight, Cooper is recruited for a clandestine mission to lead an expedition beyond our galaxy through a newly discovered wormhole. The film’s immense emotional weight is anchored by a powerhouse ensemble including Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, and Sir Michael Caine, yet the true star of this particular evening was the live accompaniment.

The Royal Philharmonic Concert Orchestra, conducted with immense precision by Ben Palmer, performed Hans Zimmer’s legendary score in real-time. A standout element was the inclusion of acclaimed organist Roger Sayer, who commanded the hall’s iconic Grand Organ – the very instrument used in the original soundtrack recording. Seeing that massive instrument illuminated beneath the screen was an awe-inspiring sight that only deepened the immersion. The impact of the live music was sensational, capturing the cold, vast atmosphere of deep space while intensifying the high-stakes tension of the film’s most dramatic sequences. Perhaps most striking was the use of contrast; during scenes where the spacecraft floats in the silent void, the orchestra fell into a sharp, heavy stillness that made the vacuum of the cosmos feel terrifyingly real.

This production is part of the Royal Albert Hall’s prestigious “Films in Concert” series, a programme that has revolutionised how audiences interact with cinema since its inception. By stripping away the pre-recorded audio track and replacing it with a full symphony orchestra, the series highlights the technical brilliance of film scoring that often goes unnoticed in a traditional theatre. Over the years, the series has celebrated everything from the swashbuckling fanfares of Jurassic Park and Star Wars to the sweeping romanticism of Titanic, proving that the score is the true heartbeat of any great film. These events have become a staple of the Hall’s calendar, drawing in diverse crowds who might not otherwise visit a classical concert hall, thereby bridging the gap between pop culture and high art.

To appreciate the scale of this performance, one must consider the venue itself. Opened in 1871 by Queen Victoria, the Royal Albert Hall is one of the United Kingdom’s most treasured and distinctive buildings. Its world-famous stage has hosted everything from the BBC Proms to legendary rock concerts, and its unique acoustics – once a point of architectural contention – provide a literal “surround sound” experience that no modern cinema can replicate. The Grade I listed building provides a sense of occasion that makes every screening feel like a historic premiere, with its red velvet tiers and Italianate architecture providing a stark, beautiful contrast to the futuristic visuals of Nolan’s space odyssey.

The sheer scale of the sound vibrating through the historic auditorium is nothing short of breathtaking. The venue appeared to be a total full house, a fact made undeniable during the credits when the orchestra received a thunderous, well-deserved standing ovation. These performances offer a completely fresh perspective on the art of filmmaking, revealing layers of the score that are often compressed in a standard cinema setting. It is a rare treat to witness such world-class musicians in such an iconic setting.

While this specific run of Interstellar was a limited engagement held for only two nights, the Royal Albert Hall continues to host a variety of other spectacular “Films in Concert” throughout the year, including upcoming screenings of Harry Potter, Gladiator, and Avatar. Information on upcoming screenings and tickets can be found here.

REVIEW: Some Films Are Trash, Some Have Trash-Ness Thrust Upon Them


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A fascinating introduction to the world of Trash cinema.


This April, the BFI is home to a brand new season ‘Trash! The Wildest Films You’ve Ever Seen’. Archivist William Fowler and BFI programmer Justin Johnson have curated a
wonderfully varied roster showcasing the campest, sexiest and trashiest of 20th century cinema. The season will begin with Paul Morrissey’s ‘Trash’ (1970) showing on Thursday 9th April and will close with two shorts ‘I Was A Teenage Serial Killer’ by Sarah Jacobson and ‘A Family Finds Entertainment’ by Ryan Trecartin showing on the 24th and 27th of April. On the 1st of April, the collection was kicked off with an introduction by its curators along with
three prevalent film scholars, critics and writers: Elena Gorfinkel, Helen de Witt and Dominic Johnson.

We began with the question ‘how do we define Trash cinema?’ The panel discussed genre, with films spanning horror, comedy, melodrama, pornography and queerness. The defining elements of Trash though, have much more to do with circumstance. The Trash-ness of a film is in its low budget, home-video style reality. These films are made by individuals, groups of friends, transgressives, punks in their own homes and cities, using what they have and revelling in its strangeness. They reclaim their ‘Trash’ label in their camp, bizarre
commitment to the filmmaking cause. A big takeaway of this discussion: ‘No one sets out to make a bad movie’. These filmmakers knew their budget and their resources, and they knew their films wouldn’t ever be consumed in the mainstream; therein lies the joy. They are
starkly aware of their ‘Trash’ and they love it. They are often a harshly real depiction of
marginalised identities, non-normative desires, unglamorised sex, drugs and vulgarity. As Fowler noted ‘The audience is confronted with more than just the maker’s intention’. We lose the layers of production, construction and merchandising and are left with what 1960’s ‘tastes’ would label ‘Trash’.


Justin Johnson showed a clip of John Waters’ ‘Pink Flamingos’ starring Edith Massey and Divine. Although known for its increasingly ‘revolting’ scenes and taglined ‘An exercise in poor taste’, we saw a charmingly strange scene between Edie and The Egg Man. Johnson noted the fascination in the everyday, taking it to surreal lengths through melodramatic script and peculiar performances. De Witt’s clip was from George Kuchar’s short ‘I, An Actress’ in which the filmmaker directs his student in a screen test, hijacking it and making for a hilariously hysterical short film. De Witt noted how the actor’s pleasure and excess in performance produces pleasure for the audience, another trademark of the ‘Trash’ genre. Gorfinkel chose a scene from better known ‘Trash’ by Paul Morrissey, starring Warhol
superstars Joe Delissandro and pioneering trans actress Holly Woodlawn, who George
Cukar suggested should have been nominated for an Oscar. It’s funny, eccentric and starkly confrontational of social conditions and the life of the ‘outcast’. Dominic Johnson showed ‘Super 8 1/2’ by Bruce LaBruce, a mockumentary style film about himself. LaBruce called the film a ‘Bruce-ploitation movie’, and through it blurred the lines between arthouse film and pornography. Johnson noted how LaBruce was often labeled ‘too arty for porn’ and yet ‘too pornographic’ to be widely successful in film. The clips were all captivating, and the panel’s analysis was thoroughly engaging and thought-provoking.

The evening was an eye-opening and intriguing introduction into the world of Trash cinema and I would strongly recommend a visit to the BFI during the season to take in some yourself. I certainly will be.

Trash! The Wildest Films You’ve Ever Seen runs at BFI Southbank until 30th April. Tickets here.

REVIEW: Learning the Ropes


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A powerful and inspiring documentary about boxing as a sport and a metaphor for life.


Learning the Ropes is a documentary about Bethnal Green’s Repton Boxing Club, one of the most famous amateur boxing clubs in the world. It has produced countless champions, whose photos line the walls. The documentary is directed by Ryan Pickard, who began boxing age 7 at Repton and went on to be a highly successful amateur boxer. He describes the documentary as ‘a poem to the ones I loved,’ and this sense of pride and commitment to the club that shaped him permeates every aspect of the narrative.

The documentary focuses on the club’s legend, Tony Burns MBE, a coach who nurtured multiple young talents. At the point of filming, he had Alzheimer’s (he died in 2021.) Nonetheless, his spirit shines through in small moments, particularly in the reminiscences of students of the club.

The film starts and ends with a tracking shot, the camera gently meandering through the streets, parks and alleys of Bethnal Green. We are guided to the red brick front of the club and welcomed through the doors to meet Tony. Over the haunting sound of a solo viola, he walks through the building to the training ring, where so many greats have sparred. We meet the ‘old crowd’ first, men who are in their later years, who still share a strong sense of camaraderie. One of Pickard’s main concerns in the film is to show the way his beloved club created not just fellow boxers, but real, deep family. The documentary demonstrates the opportunity boxing provides to those overlooked by society, giving generations of young working-class men, and now women, the chance to create a life that takes them beyond the constraints of circumstances.

It probes at class, identity and community with a beautifully light touch, floating like a butterfly with humorous commentary before stinging like a bee with a moment of emotional impact. One moment that had the whole audience belly laughing was when one of the Nursery students says ‘Repton is old and traditional and smells of it!’ The documentary follows the whole range of generations at the club, from children aged seven up to the old timers. It conveys the strong bonds and community created by a shared passion, which are ever rarer in the modern world.

As a documentary focused on Repton but with Tony Burns as the lynchpin, a lack is felt in the gaps in Burns’ own background, which is slightly skated over, leaving questions as to how this formidable character emerged. However, the film conveys a deep love for boxing and its power as a metaphor for a life of courage and the strength to always get up, no matter how many times you are knocked down.

Learning the Ropes was the opening film for The Cinematic Life of Boxing season at BFI Southbank, ending 30th April. Tickets here.

REVIEW: Maricel


Rating: 5 out of 5.

“Cultural immersion, done beautifully”


Maricel is a beautifully crafted film, shining a light on a reality faced by millions of Filipino families. With the space it allows to explore the quiet moments, it raises important questions and invites questions on the cost of success.

Zar Donato is excellent in the role of Maricel. She completely captures the complex, conflicting emotions of the situation unfolding in front of her. From the meticulous standard of support she provides to the elderly Greek couple in her care to the earned bursts of frustration, her performance reflects Filipino culture authentically.

The simple, routine moments shine across both cultures. Food plays a continuous role in the film. The showcasing of lesser-known Greek cuisine, rooted in what is readily available, highlights the simplicity of Greek cooking. The preparation of honey and ginger tea to soothe ailments, and the presence of carefully stored, plastic-wrapped snacks, will feel familiar to many within Filipino households. The running joke around long-grain rice was subtle and well done.

The tenderness and honesty with which the sexual realities of OFWs are portrayed are moving and deeply affecting. The film presents, in a strikingly beautiful yet unflinching way, how difference and vulnerability can lead to exploitation. It powerfully captures the spectrum of experiences – from those who endure and adapt, making the best of difficult circumstances, to the harsher, more unsettling realities that many have had to confront and overcome.

As the daughter of an OFW who lived in Greece, this film feels deeply personal. Seeing the crossover of Tagalog, Greek and English brought to life feels almost sacred, a detail handled with great care. The emphasis on particular phrases – where “bastos” comes to mind – feels charmingly natural. The emotional turmoil of balancing the loss of family and the acceptance of another family met with a quiet, stoic resilience echoes the determination of OFWs to create a better life for their families, often at great personal cost.

After the screening, director Elias Demetiou took part in a Q&A. He spoke openly about his family’s personal experience with Filipino workers, affectionately referring to the woman who inspired Marciel as a sister. His brother also composed the moving score, a first for the brothers after many years of Elias’s requests. 


Marciel is a human story, told with care and details that resonates well beyond the screen. Showcasing 52 feature films, including nine UK premieres and eight world premieres, catch the Manchester Film Festival until 29th March. Tickets are available here.

REVIEW: D is for Distance


Rating: 5 out of 5.

A profoundly moving and astonishing portrayal of a young man’s experience of Epilepsy.


D is for Distance is a strange, beautiful meditation on memory, truth and family, bound with tender fragility around the experiences of a young man with epilepsy, tracing his story from pre-condition to the current day.

The young man, Louis Petit, is the son of Chris Petit and Emma Matthews, both filmmakers and the directors of the film. It is a proliferation of different materials, from home videos of Louis taken by his mother as she tracks his seizures on the advice of doctors, to old cartoon clips, other old cinema clips and family travel footage. The glories of the artistic imagination seed out of the stark reality of the home video material, including some of Louis’ own artistic work. His paintings reflect the hallucinations that were a side effect of seizures during his adolescence, creating perplexing dreamscapes on his canvases.

When Louis has his first seizure as a young boy, the family embark on a journey into confusion and fear around his life-threatening condition, worsened by the ineptitude of the NHS doctors treating him with misprescribed medication. The film slips between materials with the same slipperiness as the condition, with its unnerving uncertainty, its terrifying unpredictability.

One result of Louis’ seizures is a loss of childhood memories, lending a pathos to the footage before his condition asserted itself, and there is a sense that this loss of memory is tied to a loss of innocence for the family as a whole, as his condition draws a stark line between before and after. The film is heartbreaking in its vulnerable probing into the secrets of the subconscious: what can be found, perhaps through art, and what is lost forever.

This loss of innocence is also portrayed in the parent’s dawning awareness of the ‘hubris and bureaucracy’ of a broken medical system. The NHS refuses to provide the medical cannabis medication that alleviates the symptoms, leading to the necessity of procuring it from Europe with the attendant financial anxiety.

As the film slips between materials, so does it meld Louis’ story with Petit’s own unfinished film project, centered around the American artist and writer William Burroughs and the former CIA chief James Angleton. Petit’s interest in the subconscious manifests here in the study of addiction and paranoia, and with minds that shared a fascination with secretive systems of control and surveillance. The film circles around the mystery surrounding Angleton’s suspect activities whilst working within the CIA, grasping at a mind muddied between truth and lies.

The film is narrated with calm lucidity by Jodhi May, whose third-person narration gives this story a calming throughline, amongst the beautiful disorder of material. Rich with imagery, music and seamless yet surprising material slippage, the film nonetheless imbues a sense of peace and hope within suffering, that lingers after both nightmare and dream have passed away.

D is for Distance will be released in UK and Irish cinemas on 3 April 2026 by BFI Distribution. A BFI Player release will follow on 11 May. See the new trailer here

REVIEW: Lady


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A chaotic and brilliant mockumentary into why giving the upper class a camera isn’t always a good idea.


Lady, directed by Sam Abrahams, is a mockumentary that blends satire, surrealism and character-driven storytelling into something that feels both unusual and refreshingly confident. Framed as a documentary following an aristocratic woman determined to reclaim the spotlight, the film quickly moves beyond its premise, leaning into unpredictability and imaginative storytelling.


At the centre of the film is Sian Clifford as Lady Isabella, a narcissistic yet oddly endearing aristocrat who hires a filmmaker to document her life. Clifford’s performance is the clear highlight, bringing energy, humour and surprising emotional depth to the role. What could easily have become an exaggerated caricature instead feels layered and engaging, with moments of vulnerability cutting through the character’s more theatrical tendencies. Her presence gives the film a strong anchor, ensuring that even its most surreal turns remain watchable and grounded.


The narrative follows a struggling filmmaker drawn into Isabella’s world under slightly questionable circumstances, setting up a dynamic that allows the film to explore control, perception and the blurred line between performance and reality. As Isabella’s desire for attention intensifies, the film becomes increasingly playful in its structure, moving between mockumentary realism and something far more surreal. This shift gives the film a distinctive identity, setting it apart from more conventional comedies.


Visually, Lady makes strong use of its stately home setting, using wide, open spaces to reflect both grandeur and isolation. The scale of the environment contrasts effectively with the personal nature of the story, reinforcing the sense that Isabella is performing not just for the camera, but for an audience that may not be there. This attention to visual detail adds to the film’s overall tone, helping to create a world that feels slightly detached from reality.


What makes Lady particularly enjoyable is its willingness to fully commit to its ideas. The humour is dry and often unexpected, while the more surreal elements are used to reflect the character’s internal struggles rather than simply for shock value. There is a sense that the film understands its own eccentricity and leans into it confidently, resulting in something that feels both distinctive and memorable.


Beneath the satire, there is also a surprising emotional core. Themes of loneliness, identity, and the desire to be recognised are woven throughout the film, giving it a level of sincerity that balances its more absurd moments. This combination of humour and emotional depth allows Lady to resonate beyond its initial premise, offering more than just surface-level entertainment.


Overall, Lady is a confident and imaginative debut that succeeds through its originality and strong central performance. Anchored by Sian Clifford’s magnetic portrayal, it delivers a film that is as strange as it is engaging, blending comedy and character study into a uniquely entertaining experience.

The Manchester Film Festival runs until the 29th of March. Tickets herehttps://manchesterfilmfestival.app/home