REVIEW: Macbeth


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

“A lively and imaginative Macbeth where tragedy meets humour in unexpected ways.”


Attending Macbeth by Shakespeare in the Squares at the Actors’ Church felt like stepping into a reimagined world where tragedy meets humour head-on. Known for their vibrant summer outdoor productions, this was my first experience of their winter season, and I was intrigued by the concept of a scaled-back, touring production of Macbeth. Director Sioned Jones’s vision promised an unconventional approach, and the result was certainly thought-provoking, if not always cohesive.

From the outset, it was clear that this Macbeth wasn’t going to be conventional. The tone leaned heavily into humour, which is a tricky balance in a tragedy. I found myself thinking of the Coen Brothers’ O Brother, Where Art Thou? (with their comic reimagining of Odysseus) as there were moments when I half-expected Macbeth to turn and say, “I’m a Dapper Dan man!” This playful tone gave the production a fresh energy, but it also made the transition to the darker, weightier parts feel abrupt and unbalanced.

The witches were a perfect example of this playful reinterpretation. Reimagined as flirtatious old spinsters, they felt more like gossiping neighbours than sinister figures of fate. Their fortune-telling, done through cards and tea leaves, added an earthy, mundane quality that was amusing but lacked menace. Molly Walker, one of the witches, brought a clever moment of humour when she transitioned into another role, quickly hiding her headscarf as if revealing the witches’ secret

Lady Macbeth, played by Cathy Walker, was another standout, though her approach was more frantic than commanding. She seemed almost like she was micromanaging the play at times, her energy frenzied as she pushed Macbeth forward. I did appreciate the early scenes between her and Macbeth, where their relationship felt genuine and touching, but as the play progressed, her descent into madness felt exaggerated and less impactful.

Gavin Molloy’s Macbeth had moments of charm, particularly in the earlier scenes. While he clearly worked to make Macbeth relatable, I missed the layers of complexity and inner turmoil that make the character so compelling. 

Mohab Kaddah brought a spirited energy to his roles, particularly shining in the comedic moments, though his more serious scenes lacked the gravitas needed to fully land their emotional weight.

For me, the evening’s highlights came from the multirole performances. Molly Walker was exceptional, jumping seamlessly between characters and injecting life into every role she took on. Her Porter scene was especially brilliant, with a mix of knock-knock jokes. Sam D’Leon also impressed, particularly as the First Murderer, where he relished the role’s bloodthirsty nature. Both actors showcased incredible versatility, and their energy kept the production moving. 

The use of the audience as part of the play added a unique touch. We were high-fived, spoken to directly, encouraged to clap, and even asked to repeat lines. It was entertaining but it felt more like a pantomime than Shakespeare.

The biggest challenge for me was the tonal shift between the comedy and the serious moments. The soliloquies, particularly, struggled to find their place in the production’s lighter tone. Macbeth’s final soliloquy, after Lady Macbeth’s death— “It is a tale told by an idiot”—stood out as an exception. Here, the word “idiot” resonated in the context of the play’s comedic elements, almost reframing Macbeth as a tragic fool in a way that felt oddly fitting.

Overall, Shakespeare in the Squares’ Macbeth was an ambitious project that delivered clever moments and lively performances, even if it didn’t fully balance its bold tonal choices. It’s a Macbeth that isn’t afraid to take risks, and while not every gamble paid off, it offered a fresh take on a classic tale. For those looking for something different, this production certainly delivers plenty to talk about.

REVIEW: A Midsummer Night’s Dream


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Opera North’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream subverted any preconceptions I had about opera in a captivating blend of seductive and sinister magic.


Opera North’s production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream presents Benjamin Britten’s 1960s compelling score with fantastic flair. Originally directed by Martin Duncan and revived by Matthew Eberhardt, the opera combines dark, alluring magic with whimsical comedy, offering an energetic, enchanting take on Shakespeare’s classic tale of fantasy and desire.

The design and music in this production really worked to create a distinct, immersive tone that captured the surrealism of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.  The set was much more minimalistic than I was expecting with large, transparent plastic sheets and delicate bubble-like balloons suspended from the ceiling.  This creative choice differs from the whimsical excess seen in typical adaptations of the play, instead creating a hazy, psychedelic quality enhanced by the 1960s esque costume design for the lovers. The dynamic set pieces moved frequently, obscuring and revealing characters and often marking transitions between scenes, with lighting changes enhancing this fluid, dreamlike state the set worked to create. Clever technical effects like articles of clothing seemingly moving across the stage unaided really contributed to the magical and disorienting atmosphere. 

The orchestra, even beyond the vocal performances, played a significant role in creating atmosphere.  The opening notes of ‘psychedelic glissandi in the lower strings’ established a trippy, otherworldly ambiance that carried throughout the performance. The musicians’ skill was also showcased in the opera’s witty moments, especially during the staging of the amateur play in the final act, where the music lifted the humour without detracting or overshadowing it. 

Whilst there were a few minor pacing issues that meant some occasional lagging, the performance overall was strong, and the direction was unique.  The standout performances came from Daniel Abelson as Puck and Henry Waddington as Nick Bottom. Abelson brought an athletic, animalistic mischief to the role, cavorting around the stage and speaking his lines rather than singing them, which only added to his liveliness. Waddington also stood out for his incredible comedic timing and truly powerful voice.  The production made bold choices in bringing to the forefront the mature themes running through the story, such as a sensual eroticism between Oberon (James Laing) and Puck and costume decisions that left the lovers passionately arguing in minimal clothing. The fairies, played by children, dressed in identical blonde bobs and black wings, conveyed a sinister uniformity that contrasted with lighter traditional interpretations which worked really well alongside the barren staging. 

It is clear that Opera North and The Lowry have a keen commitment to accessibility, which is really important in encouraging a broader audience to attend opera. Two screens opposite the stage displayed the lyrics in real-time, allowing the viewers to follow the story closely and more easily, which was especially beneficial in quieter moments and for audience members needing text support. A pre-performance talk helpfully notified the audience of a summary section in the programme that detailed and decoded the three-act structure. While the accessibility efforts were commendable, I think they could have taken it further with program formats tailored for different processing needs and by making these programmes more visibly available to the audience, a strategy The Lowry has implemented successfully in other productions. 

Ultimately, I would recommend Opera North’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream to anyone, opera fan or not. Don’t let the long run time or its operatic form intimidate you, it is a highly entertaining and accessible production, and its artistic direction really lends itself to the fantastical world Shakespeare built in the original text. 

REVIEW: Cleopatra’s Antony


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A modern retelling that masterfully remade this classic tale


Cleopatra’s Antony, directed by the talented Mo Korede, reimagined Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra with a powerful, contemporary twist. This production went beyond simply retelling the classic story; it explored the layers of Cleopatra through three actors, each embodying a different facet of the Queen’s character.

The opening scene was so well choreographed, perfectly setting up the mood of the play right away. The set design itself deserves special mention, with a mesmerising design of patterns that still allowed the focus to be kept on the actors. The combination of smoke and orange-red lighting captured the intensity of both Cleopatra and Antony’s relationship, pairing beautifully with the shifting tones of the characters’ emotions, adding yet another layer to the overall experience.

One of the most inventive choices in this production was the decision to use durags as crowns. Worn by the coolest depictions of Antony and Caesar I’ve ever seen, these durags became a playful yet symbolic representation of power and authority. The decision to split Cleopatra into three roles, portrayed by three talented young actresses, was truly the standout for me. Each actress brought a unique flavour to Cleopatra, using different accents and subtle variations in personality to portray the complexity of a queen torn between love and power. Their voices, harmonising in beautiful and slightly haunting unison was wonderful to listen to.

The musical choices were another standout feature, particularly during the fight scenes, where the soundtrack made me want to dance but also to fight along with them. In quieter moments, the use of soft humming and singing filled the space with a continuous flow, bridging scenes seamlessly. This lack of abrupt silence between scenes kept me immersed in the world of the play, even during transitions.

Despite the complexities of Shakespeare’s language, the young cast delivered clear and compelling performances that made the story accessible, even for those unfamiliar with the original text. Their energy, confidence, and dedication were evident, and Mo Korede’s direction ensured that the story’s essence shone through in each scene. This was unlike any interpretation I’ve seen before, and it was both visually and musically pleasing to experience. 

REVIEW: The Weyard Sisters


Rating: 3 out of 5.

Beautifully written Shakespearean herstory could have been weirder.


The Weyard Sisters at Riverside Studios is framed by Dana Pinto’s effective set design of several evenly spaced ionic columns, marble exclamation marks punctuating a backdrop of grainy white cloth – though the columns could be doric, I can never quite remember which is which. Or should I say, witch is witch? (No, no I shouldn’t). Director and Playwright Helen Alexander weaves infinitely better wordplay throughout her darkly funny, female-centric sequel to Shakespeare’s Macbeth, verbally referred to as the Scottish play within the industry in keeping with time-honoured superstition. This ‘definitive sequel’ centres around the ‘weyard’, or weird, sisters in the original script, with an excellent bit of etymology spelled out in the programme:

‘Although most modern editions of Macbeth have generally regularised the “sisters” description of themselves to “weird” (meaning peculiar), in the First Folio this word is three times spelt “weyword”, three times “weyard” (meaning wayward). But weirder still, is the fact that the word “weird” appears to only have evolved in the English Language during the mid-17th century, and perhaps came into existence because of a play which never printed it!’

The production succeeds in flaunting a delicious command of Shakespeare’s tongue and a true talent for constructing the hidden herstories of the text. Agatha (Mother to England’s crown prince Edgar)’s daughter Margaret’s disdain for the volatile, camo-clad Malcolm who has seized the throne mirrors that of all the play’s women for the men whose wars and whims dictate their lives. ‘Weird and bearded’ sisters Erlynn, Marlin and Portia stand hairs on end as they swirl and creep around their captive in the opening scene, sporting roughly hewn, bone-hued masks with piercing noses and stretching woollen chin hair tickling their hapless captive. Portia provides some highly entertaining exposition in the context of her worldly role as Brewstress with the gift of the gab, revealing an unpaid debt racked up by Malcolm when they were children in Inverness, soon to take on an historical significance. ‘Woe betide a wise woman who chooses not to see’, a later confined Portia laughs knowingly to herself, fated to face the brutality of Macduff’s interrogation. The tragedy and cruel injustice of witch hunting practices in the UK makes for a potent brew, with the dialogue of Dr John Stearne, assistant to mid-17th century Witchfinder General Matthew Hopkins, based on his original explanation for witchcraft and its ‘remedies’.

The acting is exceptional from the entire cast, with stand-out performances from Jan Shephard (Portia), Claire Morrissey (Agatha, Pedrolino, Peg Speed) and Kiera Murray (Margaret, Beulah, Nancy Gance, Sister Joan, Il Capitano, Meg). Each displayed an impressive command of the audience, and a captivating presence on stage. However, the feel of the production is somehow dismayingly static, with exposition favoured over action, the script and intricate plot overly dense, to the point that myself and my companion often struggled to grasp in which directions the abstracted events were moving. There was much telling, and less showing, to the production’s detriment. Such beautiful language and exciting values in interpreting Shakespeare’s text needed some more room to breathe, and perhaps imbued with a higher degree of looseness and strangeness – the play claims to focus on the weird witchery of the sisters after all. I’m a fool for all things witchety and was hoping for more weirdness to boot, so I came away a little disappointed in these respects. 

The play takes off when it embraces its theatricality, particularly towards the end of the second act when the device of a medieval travelling troupe of players enters into the mix. A heady confusion and skewering of contemporary values, a topsy-turvy world glimpsed at and danced with is the exact dose of canny distortion the tale needs. Claire Morrissey is again jaw-droppingly good in her embodying of an ethereal mime, lingering a little longer in the ‘real-time’ world of the play after their scene is done with the effect of an unctuous, psychedelic blurring of worlds, a reluctance to cut the strings connecting them. Fun is had with a chronological leap to modern Scotland and a television crew hovering over an archaeological dig like the portentous crows above them. Perhaps a switching between these time periods throughout the production would have benefited from its lively effect of opening a spine-chilling window into history.

I’d recommend The Weyard Sisters for true Shakespeare fiends, and my head is still reeling with the beautiful twists and turns of its words – a strong claim is made for its being Macbeth’s definitive sequel. However, original productions aimed for appealing to the sensibilities of their contemporary audiences, with lively theatrical action and often slapstick-style movement entertaining the masses. In the context of a 21st century world well versed in interpretations of witchcraft and its scope for the exploration of female power and solidarity, the play so titled demanded a deeper leaning into the uncanny, the unknown, the dark and divine feminine, and a rallying call to get weirder, sisters.

REVIEW: Sh!t Faced Shakespeare


Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

An utterly anarchic, unique take on The Bard


A Midsummer Night’s Dream is one of Shakespeare’s most-loved comedies, following a group of fairies meddling in the preparations for a human wedding. Sh!tfaced Shakespeare adds an additional ‘Green Fairy’ to the mix – one of its six classically trained actors gets blind drunk just before the performance, leaving them to grapple with the play’s interconnected plots and quick-witted dialogue. This is a wonderfully anarchic spanner in the works, resulting in a blend of chaos and comedy which has the audience roaring with laughter.

The show opens with an itinerary of drinks consumed – three beers and half a bottle of vodka this evening – followed by a dance number challenging the audience to work out which cast member has done the drinking. Tonight, it quickly becomes clear that Hermia (Julia Bird) is indeed incredibly drunk: stumbling around the stage, slurring her lines, ad-libbing invariably sweary interactions with fellow actors, and being frankly uncontrollable for much of the show’s two hours.

The result has the feel of a very adult pantomime, replete with crude humour, a raucous crowd (many of whom are seeing the show again), and plenty of audience participation. Musical instruments are handed out which command another drink for poor Hermia, an audience member is in charge of the sick bucket, and another gets a starring role as Titania complete with costume. It’s exciting to be part of something that really feels quite naughty, and like it could all collapse at any minute.

It takes great skill to plan something so unplanned. The script has been carefully adapted to maintain key story beats and characters, whilst contriving enough scripted laughs to structure the drunken chaos. The cast are unafraid to go off-script and “yes-and” with their inebriated colleague: I don’t remember my English Literature lessons containing quite to many references to The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe – or paedophiles, for that matter – but I’m here for it!

An improvisational show lives and dies by the chemistry of its cast. Drunk Hermia and an increasingly frustrated stage manager (Beth-Louise Priestley) form an iconic duo, and Puck (Charlie Keable) expertly riffs off the audience and his fellow cast members: some of the biggest laughs of the night are his call-backs to drunken missteps from earlier scenes. Audience members leave keen to see the show again with a different sozzled actor, indicating that Sh!tfaced Shakespeare has tapped into something special.

This certainly isn’t a show for everyone – the humour is often crass and over-reliant on swearing; some momentum ebbs away in the second half; and whilst drunk Hermia remains on the right side of uncomfortable it’s best not to think too hard about what’s happening here. But if this description does appeal, then the show is probably a must-see. A thoroughly modern, polarising farce which is brilliant for the right person.
Sh!tfaced Shakespeare: A Midsummer Night’s Dream plays at the Leicester Square Theatre until 7th September, before embarking on a national tour. Tickets here.

REVIEW: Much Ado About Nothing


Rating: 4 out of 5.

The East London Shakespeare Festival’s “Much Ado About Nothing” at Crystal Palace offered a vibrant, community-centric experience with its modern, witty adaptation, immersive audience interaction, and charming performances set against a picturesque backdrop.


The East London Shakespeare Festival (ELSF) has once again proven their dedication to bringing joy and culture to the community with their vibrant production of “Much Ado About Nothing.” Founded with the mission to make Shakespeare accessible and enjoyable for all, the ELSF has made a significant impact on the local community, infusing neighbourhoods with the timeless charm and wit of the Bard.

I had the pleasure of seeing their performance at Crystal Palace on an exceptional sunny day. The picturesque setting, with a little lake behind the stage made Shakespeare feel at home in the park rather than on the grand stages of London. This idyllic backdrop added a magical touch to the afternoon, creating a perfect blend of nature and theatre.

The ELSF’s modern take on “Much Ado About Nothing” was both refreshing and delightful. The production was full of witty and super funny moments that had the audience engaged from start to finish. The boundaries between stage and audience were almost non-existent, fostering a sense of inclusivity and participation that is rare in traditional theatre. Audience members were directly addressed by the cast and had their biscuits eaten.  A unique pre-show mask-making workshop had everyone donning their handmade masks during the performance, adding an extra layer of fun and engagement.

Directed by Rosie Ward, this modern take on “Much Ado About Nothing” begins with Beatrice catching a flight from Luton to Messina, fleeing a broken heart and downing a few brightly coloured cocktails. Messina is portrayed as a lively party town, setting the tone for a production heavier on merriment than melancholy. This modern twist was reminiscent of the 90s romantic comedies, filled with charm and clever humour. The production captured the playful spirit and light-hearted characteristics of rom coms.  The clever use of modern-day references and scenarios added an extra layer of enjoyment, appealing to both longtime Shakespeare enthusiasts and those new to his work.

The production brimmed with excellent acting and undeniable charm. The two couples in the play had palpable chemistry, making their romantic entanglements believable and captivating. Their performances were energetic and heartfelt, drawing the audience into their world. Ursula Early’s incredibly funny and energetic Beatrice and Kieran Garland’s warm-hearted Benedick reconnected in scenes teeming with suppressed passion and witty exchanges. Their playful interactions frequently extended into the audience, fostering connections that blurred the boundaries between performers and spectators. I was especially impressed with Londiwe Mthembu’s Hero and Isambard Rawbone’s Claudio, but also with their acting as a team of rap-loving valets ensuring justice is done with a little help from the audience once again. 

Andrew Hollingworth’s ingeniously designed set, featuring painted panels and boxes, maintained a brisk pace and created the perfect backdrop for this cheerfully imaginative and captivating production.  Patrick Rufey’s  playlist, which that had everyone ready to party,   included Busted, Dua Lipa, Irma Thomas, Jackie Wilson, and Sophia Loren, as well as his original music. 

In summary, the East London Shakespeare Festival’s “Much Ado About Nothing” was a joyous and unforgettable experience. The beautiful outdoor setting, modern interpretation, and interactive elements created a truly unique theatrical event. ELSF continues to unite the community through the magic of Shakespeare, and I eagerly anticipate their future performances. Meanwhile you can still catch them:

  • 18-21 July at Clissold Park, N16
  • 25-26 July at Valentines Park, IG1
  • 27-28 July at Springfield Park, E5
  • 31st July at Langthorne Park Amphitheatre, E11
  • 3rd August at Wanstead Park, E11

REVIEW: Troilus and Cressida & Romeo and Juliet


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

 BMH’s double bill production foregrounds love and interpersonal connection in a fluid and refreshing take on Shakespearean comedy and tragedy.


Bounding in from all angles, the characters seem to breathe life into the open air space, creating massive energy with bold costuming and a semi-acapella soundscape of shouts and cheers as Troilus and Cressida begins. 

The simplified staging makes great use of the Oxford Castle & Prison’s ancient stone architecture throughout the double bill in a unique and malleable space. 

This sparse stage allows performance to take precedence, the mischievous humour of the cast, first found in Angus Fraser’s portrayal of Pandarus, bubbles its way throughout the production, creating a joyful atmosphere.

There is great strength in the subtlety of interpersonal relationships; some of my favourite moments of the night being small improvisations – or extremely natural deliveries – of muttered discussions and connection between characters.

In Troilus and Cressida, Elizabeth Champion, as Odysseus, achieved this throughout. Her flowing delivery rendered the content clear and relatable to the modern audience, an achievement particularly vital in a play so little known compared to its companion piece, Romeo and Juliet.

Both plays are, at face-value, similar star-crossed love affairs. However, as director Jessica Keill states: “when they are laid out directly beside each other (…) the contrast between the two plays is highlighted”. Troilus and Cressida is, after all, one of Shakespeare’s problem plays, the primary romance of which is desecrated by the selling of Cressida as a war prize. This controversial and unripened relationship is well managed by Grace Boag-Matthews’ sensitive and understanding performance as Cressida.

In fact, the play is surprisingly funny and its flexibility allows for a refreshing departure from strictly traditional elements – the sub-romance of Achilles (Joshua Varty) and his lover Patroclus’ (James McDougall) – was explored unapologetically and naturally. This open, queer relationship felt a true and natural reflection of the tragi-comedic complication of the play, ranging from knowing inside jokes about their closeness to their final tragic moments.

As the evening progresses, the forever stifled love of Troilus and Cressida presents a conflicting backdrop in order to uplift Romeo and Juliet’s blossoming love. 

The romance of Romeo and Juliet is bursting with giddy young love; Jessica Sexton as Juliet providing a truly honest and effervescent portrayal of passion alongside the equally enamoured – yet less mature – Romeo (played by Joe O’Connor)

The warmth and passion of many interpersonal relationships bloomed in the dramatic modern Italian setting, elevated by Latin music and grounded in Dune-inspired costuming by Catherine Woolley. The jovial interplay and meaningful connection between Juliet and The Nurse (played by Nicola Jones) creates an endearing bond that corrodes as the tragedy progresses. These intense platonic bonds are concurrent and render the imposing devastation all the more potent. Similarly, the drunk, boyish banter of Romeo and his friends has a lovable cheek that is dashed with Mercutio’s catastrophic death, their original closeness corrupted through Mercutio’s (Alistair Nunn) devastating screams as Romeo attempts to physically comfort him again, and again.  Throughout the plays moments of physical connection yield great emotional intensity.

As the evening comes to a close, the sparkling romance of Romeo and Juliet begins to shatter and dim; the natural lighting, creeping further into dusk as lights from behind the audience create a crisp, chiaroscuro effect.

For an evening of laughs and love, painted in many complicated forms, this BMH production is well worth your time. 

Reviewed by Seren Rees Gardener on 28/06/24 

REVIEW: Macbeth (An Undoing)


Rating: 4 out of 5.

Engaging, haunting and tragic.


Audiences at The Royal Lyceum Theatre Edinburgh were treated to a spellbinding retelling of Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy with the return of Macbeth (an undoing). Directed and written by the acclaimed Zinnie Harris, this production offered a fresh perspective on tragedy placing Lady Macbeth squarely at the centre of the narrative. Set in the 1930s with a smattering of Shakespearean flair and allusions to the bard’s complete literature peppered throughout, this remix left the audience laughing and gasping in equal measure.

With a witty and brilliant opening performance by Liz Kettle the audience was invited into the so familiar narrative anew.  From the famous and haunting invocation by Lady Macbeth, “Come, you spirits, That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here”, the tone for the dark and visceral journey unfolded just as we knew it would. In this rendition, Lady Macbeth, portrayed with mesmerizing intensity by Nicole Cooper, drives the relentless pursuit of power that ultimately leads to their undoing blurring the lines between reality and perception.

Harris’s masterful direction and scriptwriting skillfully unravel the complexities of not only Lady Macbeth’s character individually but also relationally. Far from being a mere accessory to her husband’s ambitions, she emerges as a formidable force in her own right with all-encompassing desires for power and motherhood. As her descent into madness and despair unfolds, the audience is compelled to question the true nature of power and its cost.

The production’s staging and design elements further enhance the immersive experience. With unsettling and eerie atmospheric lighting against the evocative set design coupled with the truly haunting sound design, the viewers were transported to a liminal and ungrounded world where madness and murder lurked; every detail contributed to the sense of foreboding and intrigue. In stark contrast, the costumes were vibrant and lovely in keeping with a 1930s silhouette, which presented the perfect backdrop for the shocking amounts of fake blood present throughout the narrative.

All the trappings of Shakespeare were present and accounted for with beautiful acting and diction chiefly among them. The piece as a whole was inaccessible to the uninitiated in the many iterations of the Scottish play. It was refreshing to see it anew, but amid trying to present avant garde theatre it did become demonstrative. As a piece it did not follow the rules in which it established its world building. The mechanics set in place for the actors to interact with the audience were inconsistently applied and— paired with the haphazard integration of other Shakespearean language as well as modern expletives—left the piece feeling slightly underdeveloped.

As a concept the show has much to recommend it. The flow of dialogue was witty and engaging which challenged the original language without forcing it to fit into a different cultural lens. The theatrical effects were highly entertaining and visually stimulating. Slowly, comedically acclimating the audience into the narrative was a brilliant choice that softened the blow of engaging with the tragedy in a different form. Overall, it was splendid and has the potential to be even better with another keen look at accessibility for newer audiences and a break away from the demonstrative.

As the curtain falls on this gripping production, audiences are left to ponder the timeless themes and moral dilemmas that continue to resonate with contemporary relevance. “Macbeth (an undoing)” is a must-see for seasoned theatergoers seeking thought-provoking drama and unforgettable performances. The show remains in residence from May 14 – 25 with tickets available below. 

https://lyceum.org.uk/events/macbeth-an-undoing-2024#dates-and-times

REVIEW: Twelfth Night


Rating: 4 out of 5.

A hilarious show full of miscommunication, meddling, and mischief, set in a stunning venue at Regent Park’s Open Air Theatre.


Very few theatre shows are born great, however some do achieve greatness, and I’m sure some do probably have greatness thrust upon them; Twelfth Night at Regent Park’s Open Air Theatre is a great show, set in a stunning venue. As the sun sets over this gorgeous outdoor theatre the audience enjoys a classic Shakespeare comedy. 

With excellent dinner options, ice cream for before the show whilst it is warm followed by hot chocolate and tea at the interval as it begins to get chilly, it is a fantastic setting, although cold once the sun has set. I’d recommend bringing a blanket. The lighting design creates an atmospheric scene throughout, particularly in the second act as it grows dark. The set is simple yet effective, with lots of varying entrances and exits providing interesting perspectives from different characters and subsequently adding to the confusion within this play.

Twelfth Night is an amusing production with the director implementing a great use of physical comedy to bring the text to life, particularly from Anita Reynolds as Maria, Michael Matus as Toby Belch, and Matthew Spencer as Andrew Aquecheek. Spencer is especially funny as the besotted, somewhat bumbling, Sir Andrew who remains out of the loop and unaware of the various subplots surrounding him, and Maria, alongside Toby, create an amusing duo causing chaos. Reynolds’ comedy was excellently supported by the actor-muso chorus quartet of Sally Cheng, Katherine Toy, Jon Trenchard, and Harry Waller. They brilliantly play the score, with Trenchard acting as Musical Director, and bring humour to scenes. 

Evelyn Miller playing Viola is particularly engaging, portraying the emotion, comedy, and conflict of the character brilliantly, whilst Anna Francolini as Olivia is also very amusing and uses silence and facial expressions brilliantly to create humour. Orsino, portrayed by Raphael Bushay, opens the show immediately drawing the audience in, and interacts brilliantly with Miller. Malvolio played by Richard Cant is superbly comedic and Michael Matus performing Toby as a drag queen is an exciting portrayal that brings lots of energy to the production. Antonio and Sebastian’s relationship, displayed by Nicholas Karimi and Andro Cowperthwaite, is openly portrayed as full of love and passion, as well as conflict and misunderstanding, which creates another perspective to the show and contributes to the confusion.

Regent Park’s Open Air Theatre’s production of Twelfth Night is not a musical but has an interesting use of song throughout, with Francolini as Olivia and Julie Legrand as Feste singing solos and some use of the actor-muso quartet, although I would enjoy further ensemble numbers. The end chorus when all characters come together and sing is quite beautiful. 

The costume design by Ryan Dawson Laight is excellent, particularly Feste’s gorgeous blue suit and corset, Viola’s understated but beautiful outfit, and Maria’s patterned, colourful ensemble.

This story is full of miscommunication, meddling, and mischief. Although the first act has moments of confusion as lots of scene setting and character introductions take place, it is hilariously brought together, or rather unraveled, in the second act as everyone reconvenes with mistaken identities, marriages, and reunions.

This is an exciting contemporary interpretation of a classic show that uses inspiration from queer culture and 80s fashion to bring Shakespeare’s themes of gender, identity, sexuality, love, and comedy to a modern audience. This is a great evening at an amazing venue, in the heart of Regent’s Park.

Creative Team:

Set Design: BASIA BIŃKOWSKA

Fight & Intimacy Direction: RACHEL BOWN-WILLIAMS & RUTH COOPER-BROWN FOR RC-ANNIE

Costume Design: RYAN DAWSON LAIGHT

Wigs, Hair & Makeup Design: CAROLE HANCOCK

Season Associate Sound Design: JAMES HASSETT

Movement Director: DANIEL HAY-GORDON

Casting Director: LOTTE HINES

Associate Director: CORY HIPPOLYTE

Director: OWEN HORSLEY

Composer and Musical Supervisor: SAM KENYON

Lighting Design: AIDEEN MALONE

Sound Designer: MAX PAPPENHEIM

In Conversation with Sally Cheng

We sat down with Sally Cheng who is in the cast of Twelfth Night at Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre.

TWELFTH NIGHT

3 May – 8 June 2024

Age Recommend: 12+

Tickets from: £15

https://openairtheatre.com/production/twelfth-night-or-what-you-will

  1. How did you get involved with Twelfth Night at Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre?

I was lucky enough to audition for the play back in January. I’ve never worked with any of the cast or creative team before so its a lovely experience being in a room with a new set of people with exciting new ideas and takes on the play. I feel very lucky!

2. What are the defining features of this particular production?

Owen Horsley, the director, has chosen to set the play in one place-a cafe by the ocean, and without scene changes. This really allows for the interconnectedess of character relationships and dynamic shifts in scenes to shine through. His concept and direction has focused very much on looking at this classic Shakespeare play through a queer lens. It’s a celebration of queerness and difference.

3. Who do you play? Do you identify with them personally?

In this production I am an actor musician and play a part called Querelle. I absolutely love being in the band with such brilliantly talented musicians supporting some fantastic singers and actors. We’re performing some beautiful original music composed by Sam Kenyon especially for this production. The band are very much a ‘house band’ for the cafe but also part of Orsino’s court so it’s been integral and really interesting in the process to understand what music means to each of the characters and it’s connection to the space.

4. How have you been preparing for the role?

Practicing lots of violin and learning the drums mostly. But I have also looked at queer films, TV shows and books to try to really engross myself in the world in which we are setting our production. We have been in rehearsal for five weeks-working every day on text and music. It’s been an enriching and exciting process.

5. If you had a piece of advice for your younger self, what would it be?

Be kind, work hard and be patient, it’s a tough career but when it’s worth it it’s totally worth it. You meet some of the kindest and most creative people.

6. Why should audiences come and see Twelfth Night?

It’s a production with loads of heart, that celebrates queerness and difference, whilst using Shakespeare’s beautiful, robust language to explore joy, grief and love.